Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER 1
Financial Accounting and Accounting Standards
Topics Questions
2. Environment of accounting. 2, 3, 4
5. Authoritative pronouncements 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19,
and standards-setting bodies. 20, 21, 22, 23
8. Ethical issues. 31
1. Financial accounting measures, classifies, and summarizes in report form those activities and that
information which relate to the enterprise as a whole for use by parties both internal and external to a
business enterprise. Managerial accounting also measures, classifies, and summarizes in report
form enterprise activities, but the communication is for the use of internal, managerial parties, and
relates more to subsystems of the entity. Managerial accounting is management decision oriented
and directed more toward product line, division, and profit center reporting.
2. Financial statements generally refer to the four basic financial statements: balance sheet, income
statement, statement of cash flows, and statement of changes in owners’ or stockholders’ equity.
Financial reporting is a broader concept; it includes the basic financial statements and any other
means of communicating financial and economic data to interested external parties. Examples of
financial reporting other than financial reports are annual reports, prospectuses, reports filed with the
government, news releases, management forecasts or plans, and descriptions of an enterprise’s
social or environmental impact.
3. If a company’s financial performance is measured accurately, fairly, and on a timely basis, the right
managers and companies are able to attract investment capital. To provide unreliable and irrelevant
information leads to poor capital allocation which adversely affects the securities market.
4. Some major challenges facing the accounting profession relate to the following items:
Non-financial measurement—how to report significant key performance measurements such as
customer satisfaction indexes, backlog information and reject rates on goods purchased.
Forward-looking information—how to report more future oriented information.
Soft assets—how to report on intangible assets, such as market know-how, market dominance,
and well-trained employees.
Timeliness—how to report more real-time information.
5. In general, the objectives of financial reporting are to provide (1) information that is useful in
investment and credit decisions, (2) information that is useful in assessing cash flow prospects,
and (3) information about enterprise resources, claims to those resources, and changes in them.
More specifically these objectives state that financial reporting should provide information:
a. that is useful to present and potential investors and creditors and other users in making
rational investment, credit, and similar decisions. The information should be comprehensible to
those who have a reasonable understanding of business and economic activities and are
willing to study the information with reasonable diligence.
b. to help present and potential investors and creditors and other users in assessing the amounts,
timing, and uncertainty of prospective cash receipts from dividends or interest and the proceeds
from the sale, redemption, or maturity of securities or loans. Since investors and creditors’ cash
flows are related to enterprise cash flows, financial reporting should provide information to help
investors, creditors, and other users assess the amounts, timing, and uncertainty of prospective
net cash inflows to the related enterprise.
c. about the economic resources of an enterprise, the claims to those resources (obligations of the
enterprise to transfer resources to other entities), owners’ equity, and the effects of transactions,
events, and circumstances that change its resources and claims to those resources.
6. A common set of standards applied by all businesses and entities provides financial statements
which are reasonably comparable. Without a common set of standards, each enterprise could, and
would, develop its own theory structure and set of practices, resulting in noncomparability among
enterprises.
7. General-purpose financial statements are not likely to satisfy the specific needs of all interested
parties. Since the needs of interested parties such as creditors, managers, owners, governmental
agencies, and financial analysts vary considerably, it is unlikely that one set of financial statements
is equally appropriate for these varied uses.
8. The SEC has the power to prescribe, in whatever detail it desires, the accounting practices and
principles to be employed by the companies that fall within its jurisdiction. Because the SEC receives
audited financial statements from nearly all companies that issue securities to the public or are listed
on the stock exchanges, it is greatly interested in the content, accuracy, and credibility of the
statements. For many years the SEC relied on the AICPA to regulate the profession and develop
and enforce accounting principles. Lately, the SEC has assumed a more active role in the develop-
ment of accounting standards, especially in the area of disclosure requirements. In December 1973,
in ASR No. 150 (affirmed following passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002) the SEC said the
FASB’s statements would be presumed to carry substantial authoritative support and anything
contrary to them to lack such support. It thereby supports the development of accounting principles
in the private sector.
9. The Committee on Accounting Procedure was a special committee of the American Institute of CPAs
that, between the years of 1939 and 1959, issued 51 Accounting Research Bulletins dealing with
a wide variety of timely accounting problems. These bulletins provided solutions to immediate
problems and narrowed the range of alternative practices. But, the Committee’s problem-by-problem
approach failed to provide a well-defined and well-structured body of accounting theory that was so
badly needed. The Committee on Accounting Procedure was replaced in 1959 by the Accounting
Principles Board.
10. The creation of the Accounting Principles Board was intended to advance the written expression
of accounting principles, to determine appropriate practices, and to narrow the differences and
inconsistencies in practice. To achieve its basic objectives, its mission was to develop an overall
conceptual framework to assist in the resolution of problems as they became evident and to do
substantive research on individual issues before pronouncements were issued.
11. Accounting Research Bulletins were pronouncements on accounting practice issued by the
Committee on Accounting Procedure between 1939 and 1959; since 1964 they have been
recognized as accepted accounting practice unless superseded in part or in whole by an opinion of
the APB or an FASB standard. APB Opinions were issued by the Accounting Principles Board
during the years 1959 through 1973 and, unless superseded by FASB Statements, are recognized
as accepted practice and constitute the requirements to be followed by all business enterprises.
FASB Statements are pronouncements of the Financial Accounting Standards Board and
currently represent the accounting profession’s authoritative pronouncements on financial accounting
and reporting practices.
12. The explanation should note that generally accepted accounting principles or standards have
“substantial authoritative support.” They consist of accounting practices, procedures, theories,
concepts, and methods which are recognized by a large majority of practicing accountants as well
as other members of the business and financial community. Bulletins issued by the Committee on
Accounting Procedure, opinions rendered by the Accounting Principles Board, and statements
issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board constitute “substantial authoritative support.”
13. It was believed that FASB Statements would carry greater weight than APB Opinions because of
significant differences between the FASB and the APB, namely: (1) The FASB has a smaller
membership of full-time compensated members; (2) the FASB has greater autonomy and increased
independence; and (3) the FASB has broader representation than the APB.
D G
The Belgian Expedition was well supported by patriotic subscribers.
Captain de Gerlache was chosen to command it, and in February, 1896,
there were sufficient funds to enable him to buy a suitable ship in
Norway—the Patria of 241 tons, built at Svelvig near Drammen in 1884.
She was very thoroughly refitted and strengthened at Sandefjord, and on
June 19th I spent the day there and was very favourably impressed by the
efficiency and ability of the Belgian Commander and above all by his
modesty. Lieutenant Lecointe was his second in command, Arçtowski
went as geologist, Racovitza as naturalist, Danco as magnetic observer,
and Dr Cook, who had been with Peary in Whale Sound, as surgeon.
Roald Amundsen was 2nd Lieutenant. The Patria was renamed the
Belgica.
The expedition of de Gerlache approached the South Shetlands at
the western end of the group by Smith and Low Islands to the Gulf of
Hughes, which is an expansion of the Orleans Channel discovered by
Dumont d’Urville. The Belgica then proceeded down a channel with the
north-west coast of Graham Land on one side, and four large islands on
the other which de Gerlache named Liège, Brabant, Gand, and Anvers.
The channel, which was named after de Gerlache, led into the Pacific
Ocean. The scenery on both sides was magnificent.
Captain de Gerlache gave as many opportunities of landing as
possible, and M. Arçtowski, the geologist, was specially eager to
examine the rocks and the glaciation. At his first landing he found
eruptive rocks of great density, of a deep green colour. He next landed on
Trinity or Palmer Island. The rocks were erratic, from a moraine, and
consisted of granite, and also of numerous ancient eruptive rocks. The
latitude was 63° 57′ S. The landings of Arçtowski and his messmates
were, in fact, very numerous as the Belgica steamed down Gerlache
Channel, with interesting glacial and geological results; the officers
meanwhile making surveys of the coast. Arçtowski thought that the
channel and the islands were once covered with a vast glacier. He found
some evidence that the glaciers were now receding.
On leaving the channel the Belgica ran south along the western coast
of Graham Land, passing many flat-topped icebergs. The Circle was
crossed and the Antarctic regions entered on the 14th February, 1898. De
Gerlache tried to approach the Alexander Island of Bellingshausen, but
was stopped by the pack. It was, however, sighted. The coast beyond
seemed to turn to the east. The Alexander Island glaciers were found not
to reach the sea, coalescing in a gigantic ice-foot or terrace.
De Gerlache then left the coast of Graham Land and the Belgica was
steered westward into the Pacific on February 24th, being in 69° 30′ S.
Working through the closely-packed ice the ship had reached a latitude
of 71° 31′ S. on the 20th March, in longitude 85° 16′ W. The young ice
was forming fast, and it became evident that they would have to winter
in the pack. During that dreary winter the ship drifted from 85° to 90°
W., the Peter Island of Bellingshausen being in 92°. As summer
approached it was necessary to cut a canal to the open water, but at
length the Belgica was clear of the ice on March 14th, 1899.
Over the area that the vessel drifted during the winter the depth
averaged about 270 fathoms. This was a continental shelf, showing that
the land was at no great distance to the south. At the edge of the shelf to
the north there was an abrupt descent to 800 fathoms.
This discovery of the edge of the continental shelf in the Pacific
Ocean is important, combined with the discoveries of Bellingshausen.
But all the work done by this expedition was well done and has increased
our knowledge of the geology and glaciation of Graham Land. Captain
de Gerlache conducted the expedition with ability and success. He has
since done very useful Arctic work in the same ship, with the Duc
d’Orléans. M. Arçtowski’s excellent paper on the exploration of
Antarctic lands during the voyage of the Belgica was included in the
199
Royal Geographical Society’s Antarctic Manual .
The expedition under Mr Bruce was for a very short time south of
the Antarctic circle, most of its two years and a half duration being
devoted to scientific investigations in two islands of the South Orkneys.
Mr Bruce was a natural history student. In that capacity, in 1893, he
made a voyage to the south in one of the whalers, the Balaena, Captain
Robertson. From 1894–96 he was at the meteorological station on the
summit of Ben Nevis, and in 1896–97 he served under Jackson during
his last winter in Franz Josef Land. Having received a promise of support
from Mr James and Major Andrew Coats, wealthy manufacturers at
Paisley, he went to Norway and bought an old vessel of 400 tons called
the Hecla, which required much repair. Captain Robertson was master of
the ship, which was renamed the Scotia, and there was a scientific staff.
The main object appears to have been deep sea sounding. The Scotia
sailed on the 2nd November 1902, and in the first year she crossed the
Antarctic Circle, went south as far as 70° 25′, and then returned to winter
at the South Orkneys.
The two islands of the South Orkneys, called Laurie and Coronation,
were discovered by a sealing captain named Powell in the Dove in 1821.
They had been visited by Weddell, who named them, by Dumont
d’Urville in 1838, and by Larsen in 1893. Bruce and his staff took
meteorological, magnetic, and tidal observations, and made biological
and geological researches and collections. Silurian fossils were found,
and some evidence was obtained to show that the Patagonian coast once
extended to these islands and beyond them.
In the second season the Scotia crossed the Antarctic Circle in 32°
W. on February 27th, 1904, finding a depth of 2630 fathoms. The ship
was now in King George’s Sea of Weddell. Icebergs of immense size
were met with, far too large to have come off the mountain slopes. They
pointed to a vast glacial formation analogous to Ross’s ice barrier. On the
3rd March, when in 72° 18′ S. and 17° 59′ W. with a depth of 1131
fathoms, a line of ice cliffs 100 to 180 feet high was sighted, but could
not be approached nearer than two miles. These cliffs were probably
resting on land which is a continuation of the coast of Antarctica from
Enderby Land. The line of cliffs was traced for 150 miles, and a
sounding on the continental shelf gave 159 fathoms. Mr Bruce named the
ice cliffs Coats Land. On the 9th March, the Scotia was in 74° 1′ S. and
22° W. and on the 14th she was headed north. The soundings obtained
were from 2000 to 2600 fathoms. On the 27th the Antarctic Circle was
again crossed, the Scotia having been 28 days south of it. After a second
winter at the South Orkneys the expedition returned.