PROPOSED ERECTION OF A 2-STOREY SEMI-DETACHED DWELLING HOUSE WITH AN ATTIC ON LOT 97637K MK18 AT 18 BRAEMAR DRIVE (SERANGOON PLANNING AREA) STRUCTURAL DESIGN CALCULATIONS (Project Reference No.: A1650-30002-2007-ST01) PREPARED BY: | ER. DR. YONG DEUNG MING BLK 203 #03-61 Hougang st. 21 SINGAPORE 530203 TEL: 6287 2003 FAX: 6287 2236 45" May 2008Project Reference No.: A1650-00032-2007-STO1 PROPOSED ERE! IN A 2-STOREY SEMI-DET. [ED DWELLING HOUSE WITH AN ATTIC ON LOT 97637K MK18 AT 18 BRAEMAR DRIVE {SERANGOON PLANNING AREA) CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 PE CERTIFICATION 01-01 2.0 DESIGN INFORMATION 02-03 3.0 SUMMARY OF COLUMN LOADS 04-04 4.0 FOUNDATION DESIGN () CALCULATION OF BEARING CAPACITY 05 - 06 (ii) RAFT FOUNDATION DESIGN 07-29 (ii) PAD FOOTING DESIGN 30-30 5.0 REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB & BEAM DESIGN 31-52 6.0 STEEL DESIGN () ROOF PURLIN & BEAM DESIGN 53 - 63 (li) 28° STOREY & ATTIC BEAM DESIGN 64-110 (iii) STAIRCASE DESIGN 111-113 (iv) STUMPS & CONNECTION DESIGN 114-119 7.0 APPENDIX () SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT 120-145 8.0 PE CERTIFICATION 146- 146001 PE’S STANDARD CERTIFICATION STANDARD _CERTIFICATI STRUCTURAL PLAN‘ DESIGN CULATIONS BY THE iD PERSON FOR STRUt WORKS In accordance with Regulation 9 of the Building Control Regulations, I, Dr. Yong Deung Ming, the Qualified Person for Structural Works appointed under section 8(1)(a) or 110)(@@) of the Building Control Act, hereby submit the detailed structural plans and design calculations prepared by me and certify that they have been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the Building Control Regulations, the Building Control Act and any other written law pertaining to buildings and construction for the time being in force. 2. I further certify that these detailed structural plans and design calculations are in reference to Project Ref. No. A1650-30002-2007-STO1 3. Total number of structural plans submitted: 05_ Total number of pages of design calculations in this book: 46 (QUALIFIED PERSON FOR STRUCTURAL WORKS’ STAMP & SIGNATURE) Date: _15-05-20082 Project Reference No.: A1650-30002-2007-ST01 002 :D ERECTION OF A 2-STOREY SEMI-DETACHED DWELLING HOUSE WITH AN ATTIC ON LOT 97637K MK18 AT 18 BRAEMAR DRIVE (SERANGOON PLANNING AREA) GENERAL DESIGN AND INFORMATION SUMMARY 1.0 SUMMARY The proposed project is an erection of a 2-storey semi-detached dwelling house with an attic on Lot 97637K MK18 at 18 Braemar Drive (Serangoon Planning Area). The structural system adopted was the steel beams-columns systems for 2™4 storey, attic and roof. The floor slab for attic and 2™ storey is using 105mm thk Condek HP Composite Slab. The foundation of the structure is designed as raft foundation. 2.0 DE: DINGS 2.1 Dead Loads Concrete Seff weight Steel Self weight 22 Live Loads Roof Live load : Floor Live load (residential) 2.3 Soil Safe Bearing Capacity = 75 kN/m? 3.0 MATERIAL PROPERTIES 3.1. STRUCTURAL STEEL Design Strength Young's Modulus Density 3.2 CONCRETE GRADE Slabs, Raft foundation = 30 Nimm? 3.3. REINFORCED BARS High tensile steel bar, Fy = 460 N/mm? Mild Steel, Fyv = 250 Nimm?003 Project Reference No.: A1650-30002-2007-ST01 PROPOSED ERECTION OF A 2-STOREY SEMI-DETACHED DWELLING HOUSE WITH AN ATTIC ON LOT 97637K MK18 AT 18 BRAEMAR DRIVE (SERANGOON PLANNING AREA) 40 5.0 CODE OF PRACTICE BS 5950 - 2000 : Structural Use of Steelwork in Buildings SS CP65 - 1999 : Structural Use of Concrete in Buildings CP4 - 2003 : Foundations BS 6399 oading for building BS 648 ichedule of weight of building material Building Control Regulation 1990 — Fourth Schedule COMPUTER/ ENGINEERING SOFTWARE USED 1.0 2.0 Staddpro for Stee! Structural Analysis & Design Safe for Foundation DesignSUMMARY OF COLUMN LOADSPROJECT: REF 1B BRAEMAR DRIVE [Sheet No. = Date 004 Design by = Summary of column £0A0}Checked by: i= = i I Loa END i Weo1e 214 2 238-34 ahaa 3 att aes 4 BBB00 Bada 5] 276 a ab ds aT +I BOF | | ka 3.64] {14 a3 | i 2.65 keri 142. = = a taz im ae 210 |FOUNDATION DESIGN605 PRovect:1& BRAEMAR KORD [Sheet No. of Date fl a S _—_—_—_—_————___—Pesian by = rer: OFT Design Icheckes by: Stina ei bearing iain tue 2 tal O=eL| Pak pm Menge ye Rp Cau Be | 7 to f fs | a ae Cle EH + te = (2 3al, | D=lZhln | 4 22 chart Na 6-4 TH "I / of ineritzeat IE | ao sits = ce 4 + $513.5 /13| =) || ee Agar Teed: HEH SNA dh ele | 2 kan |_| dt Mafel hearing lapaci q= 1H 1 CI] lkpiade fedetia | kr = Walk) jooee ‘| C 7 wl He COC E + (feaa| Pell Us\= \cwooo Ean? | — |Srp (BML 7 DB 4S. Skempton's vast tN, fr = 0 (Reproduced fom A, W. Skempton (951) Proceedings of the Building Research Congress, Division 1, p. 181, by 5 fermission of the Director of the Building Research Establishment) ‘review of bearing capacity theory, Skempton [8.27] concluded tha in ite “the case of saturated. clays under undrained conditions (4, = 0) the Ecemuad exe 8) “ihe factor N, being a fonction of the shape of the Tooling and the epth/breadth ratio. Skempton’s values of NN, are given in Fig, 8.5. The jor for a rectangular footing of dimensions. B x L (where B < L) is f¢ Value for a square footing multiplied by (0-84 + 0-16 B/L).SAFE Ctractural Modo |. Head (J ee in) ‘ eee at ateeet eee aceeeeeee raneeseeeee er + a +o . / * : : H+ +a Ff : + * I * +q ] Se O. y A 5 ‘SAFE v8.1.0 - File: RAFT-O1 ~ May 15,2008 16:25 - Scale: Fito Page ‘Structural Layer Plan View - KNemm UnitsSAFE 2D view 003 ‘SAFE v8.1.0 - File: RAFT-O1 ~ May 16,2008 16:25 - Scale: Fit to Page Point Loading (DL) - KN-mr UnitsSAFE Soil Precsure Diagram . 009 20, ‘SAFE v8.1.0 - File: RAFT-O1 - May 15,2008 16:26 ~ Scale: Soil Pressure Diagram -(DCON1) ~ KN-mm UnitsSAFE 627 a | _—— aii i Ht but tt aE eet nay. fho= 40 .Gam”, Ramiaz {lowr~ prinide 1 - (60 = &6amm™ (oy) SAFE v8.10 - Fle: RAFTO1 May 152008 17:07 — Sele Fo Page Bottom Y-Stip Reinforcement (Sq-mm) = KN-m UnitsSAFE BES Eee | ae ee a ee eee eee Hee ete 4: L>— J, — _ TZ at _————| I : + a 7 i A t+ I +4 ——4 is * + i 7 Ms eee oe fet re =a Le a ; <— = ik +. > + 3 Mak, Bo = 225-6 mm” rivicde 725-10 = 8&0 mmv a 623 ‘SAFE v8.1.0 - Bottom X-Stip File: RAFT-O1 - May 15,2008 17.07 - Scale: Fitto Page Reinforcement (Sqmm) ~ KN-m Unitsprosect:_If BRACMAR Deive Date | —_______________pesisn by : REF =: RAFT CHECEINY Checked by:Pad Footing Design FL (@ Area of footing Thickness = 300mm Net upward pres 678 kN/m2 Char. load 29 kN Area of footing = = 043. mm2 ‘SW of footing 72 kN/m2 — TrySQ.footing == 10m Safe bearing 75 kN/m2 Ata provided == 100 m2 OK. {b) Design moment Ultimate load 435 kN ‘Column size = 200 mm Earth pressure 435 kN/m2 feu = 30 N/mm2, Bending moment 3 kNm Effectivedepth = = 230.5 mm M/bd*2feu = 0002 lever arm = 0998 <095 = 0950 Provide No. of 6 13 Tdia, ‘Area required 40 mm2 Area provided = = 796 mm2 Min. ste! = 390 mm2 (0.13 %xbxh) Ok. OK (©) Check shear at critical section (2) Max shear at column face Col, perimeter 800 mm Vmax = 024 N/mm2 << O8SQRT(fou) «= 438 N/mm2 OK (@ Allowable shear stress 100As/bd 035 <3 OK 400/d 174 Min, 400/d=1 Alpha,material 125 Ve 054 From Table 39 Critical section at 1.0d from column face Force 7 kN Shear stress 003 N/mm2 —< Ve OK. @ Punching shear Critical perimeter 3566 mm ‘Area within perim. 079. mm2 ‘Area outside perim. 021 mmz ‘Punching shear str 0.01 N/mm2 S9p ENS IsOdOD ON 1 xuonos muemss 1YOyaH pe wnugoraat (39d 50 5ans95 ost) “arent eos [o0R 8] aauzeseputzes vo Buryddocd Aapsodweas mos 940 7pyesa eg 3° per pare pasodne Teo sam sr yap uoddns pray TeapemaAY ) Waa ST POT OTT vem 8 momar) seas = apie sokéns pHa f a wee eee t — 20 Fat 30 (ee x at aonpucg Jo day no z00nd ( em/bae6o um /ewnm Ise / COS) renga 40 YsIM (SOGA)BA [COTEPOOK-EP] adincud puyrba vawoste = *y Momauapuyres IStOnSWOlL myenim LET yuu palmbes rromacug)ioa wpeW w/emm Bob wawoe =") Soke wobGuaias awmausa' st : asnoH poyoujad pas :309[0414 STAID WaMuIIa}uied QUIS dH ,29BPMOD BOTH; MMSOT qwozdAL033 No: £2 Boast Place| GP ee Tel (65) exes 1550) Fax(@s) eget 4229) yf Bate 27 Mor 2008 ‘summary OF CONDECK. He FORM wor F condece Fre nase ictal trckoness o soomm condun ite slab depth ces Taerecnonsesign aid, %, 4 Cone weight tnoliding ponding ‘Maxcmiens uinpropped spans A + MaKinaan negative moment, M4) on : Negative moment capactiy, Ma” Mididnasene shear, Pr ‘Maxinaidra internal reaction, iM / §122kNK | Maxcusen Gnd rnction, Pe © ES 4.ez bese | Maxinaume positive moment M(t) * 1.7 Nm 2° Positive moment capacity, Mp af 64 62) Nin. "COMBINED EFFECT CHECK e nity ratio cheek MCE) / Mp Wap = LA Weng + LE Wigner = LAX BIF4 FLEXES = BR4S RN/ne Wie = Weg = 14 Wy = LX 0128 218 RN/m2 mh Wet = Wie = Wag = Wang = SH N/t2 Analytical Results of internal Actions: In the caleulation 2.4 andl 2.6 are the load factor for dead load and construction. load respectively. Based on the construction load arrangement the maxinune internat forces can. be found by elastic analysis. The final overall maxtnwene bateraat forces ave determined and the results are suncnarised as follows: Maximum positive (sagging) moment My (+) = (moment caused by decking weight (on alt spans) + moment caused by weight of wet concrete and construction load (end spar) } (0.07%028 + 0.096X6.663) X (8230/2000}2 17 RNM In cerseninivengh 3842 £154 270% Pathe senereflng beige POF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www_pdffactory.comProject: Sent Detached House : 18,Braemar Seranggon. Bate 2% Mar 2008 Maximum negative (hogging) moment My (-) = (moment caused by decking weight (on all spans) + moncent caused ty weight of wet concrete and 1/3 construction load (two span) + moment caused by 2/3 construction (end span) } (oaasxoie + -0425%X5068 + -0.063%2.6) X (2220/2000)2 A.D RNB. Maximum end reaction Ft = C end reaction caused by decking weight (on alt spans) + end reaction caused by weight of wet concrete and construction load (end span) (0275%048 + 0.428X6.663) X (2220/2000) 4.82 RN/n Maxtrhurs internal reactton #,/ = ( internal reaction caused by decking weight (on all spans) + internal renction caused by weight of wet concrete and 1/3 construction load (two spans) + internal renction caused by 2/2 construction load (end span) } G.25%018 + 1.25%5.063 + 0.625%2.6) X (3230/2000) = 122kN/n Maxinaum shear force at the internal support Fy = fend reaction caused by decking weight (on all spans) + end reaction caused by welght of wet concrete (trio spans) + end reaction caused by construction load (end and tnternal spans loaded with 1/3 construction load plus 2/3 for tnd span) } (0.625%0.18 + 0.625XS.243 + 0563X) X (3220/2000) = G75keN/m Here the Moment coefficient, reaction and shear cofficient are based on end spar length which are obtained from elastic analysis with load combination as described above for Double span. Resistance of Condeck" HP to Bending, Shear and crushing : els oss wer bending, shear and crushing, LCP Condeck” HP needs to be considered to sustain each action aud the combination of all tree, Moment Capacity Checking: Ma (H) = 19 RN 6.62 RNn//me My (—) = LIF Nii < FF Nd /m ok OF User miata Winn g\a 2122834. 070R: Pa Lepore fling ecigne PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.comProject: Semb Detached House : 18,Braemar Seranggon bite: arma? 4.82 RN/at = 12kN/m Web Shear capacity Fy = 675 RN SPL = 100 N/m Concbined Bending and web Crushing FNL Pat My (Mg, = 122078 + LIRA FE o4aF S125 Combined Bending and Shear (Fy / PIPE (Ody (“)/ My)? = (eRS0ON + (Lap rA re) OOF S10 Deflection of condeck” HP G2 /185 Wreag bp” / (Clap) 4/495 x 3174/1000 X ((s250/2)2)2 / (210x569000) smn S Mindrum (Ly / £20 01 sone) = Mininuune (24.8 or some ) ‘The deflection coefficient 1 / 185 is adopted for Double span. (Note: # code provides a martmune deflection for two or more span. using a factor of 1/185 with unifronly distributed load and 2/384 (or 145/85) whth pattern loading. ‘formeworke stage servicenblitty design, pattern loading is mot applicable). Note: The above calculations are based on Condeck” HP slab per metre wiatin, Summary : The above design. shows that for a 105 mm thiske concrete slab with 1.00 mmm thick |Adopt One row (EMT) Condecle" HP decking material and a span of 525 mus, propping bs |of Propping required. The maxtraune uetpropped Single span length (s 2897 van. + Deviations from standards due to projets requbrements cermin a 32 £199.07 Path =\\Lepcerene fling Designer PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com033 my Bere! Pace| ep: iinenerr ed ae Tel (65) e805 1500 Faxleo) ener #218| one CONDECK. re COMPOSITE MODE “ho Bs 5960) s vgs a Saget ee . | sland eo oa E pareber of spa 3 Cnr cet on e Cbitinious spins S25 nem Tage Ee Poceonerete ‘ | chiiactericte serangth Ue ret ne | Nominal cover to negative reinforeenent | Seooimpecea centicad | gah UP cen “Slab weal weight Inetuding ponding © % hy i basirive Moment capacity € Positive moneent sapaeiey 13 f Positive eat feelers due a leads: eos ~ LNEegaTive anion) caPsciry Negative moment COs eee ee i ‘ vernéae sHear citeck F Shear stress capacity at support : | Beslgn ultimate shear stress SALE RNS SS ARN | Shear bond capacity SY asin ultimate shat force TOTAL DEFLECTION. Effective | value ©! Deflection lint " Reflection under 13.3 mim Senin je SHRINKAGE AND TEMPERATURE MESH ‘Unity ratio 095 * Nombvoal lateral (eeneperatiare) mesh tet mnie So L PROVIDE [2-100 2-200] BE(E5D3) mesh or equivalent : ae Transverse reinforcencent area 2 284 mma | Longttuilinal reinforcement area - 03 mnt serarsiniongrossiz2 1131 of op 2NPath=NLepseuene fling Desgnen, PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com039 Na iz Banal Pace GP cen eo Condeck” HP Composite Slab Design Tal (65) 68051550 Fax(65) 6964 4218) Project: Semt Detached Mouse : 12, Braemar Seranggon Date : 27 Mar 2008 Checke composite design. of a 1050.0 thick Condeck HP* composite slab with 1.0omsn (BMT) thick steel decking. The slab is designed as a Continuous span. stab. (Mild exposure conditions) Centre to centre span, length (s 3325 rant. The supporting Steel bean widths are 250mm. This design considers end span as governing design check. in the design, extra concrete weight due to ponding is considered. Standards : # BS5950: Part 4: 1994, Code of Practoe for Design of Composite Slab with Prefled Sie! Sheeting 2 BSELLO: Part 1: 1997, Structural use of Concrete - Cod of Practice for Design and Construction 5 BSHLLD: Part 2: 1985, Structura use of Concrete ~ Code of Practice for Splat Chreumstances other Major References: + Gurocode 4: ENV 19934-1-1:994, Désign of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures, Part 1.1 General ules for Bulldings 7 + European Convention for Constructional Steelworke(ECCS) - Teahnieal Committee ¥, No. GF, Design Manual for Composite Slabs, 1st edition, 1395 Baslo Data: BS 6599: 1996 tmposed live load ead Load: inposed dead load Steel decking self weight 2.228 kg/m Ponding load from construction 0.522 N/m? Conslder tm width of stab 1000 mm Matertals : Normal Concrete Density, p (ary) = 2350 kg/m Allowance for reinforcencent, 50 kg/m Characteristic cube strength, = s0MPa ‘Steel elastic modulus, 200 kN/ran? Cross-sectional area of profited sheeting, 1620 mmns/ne “Sheet steel specified yield strength, 550 MPa Characteristic strength of reinforcement, 460 MPa (steel reinforcement in negative stction) Norutnal cover = 34 num Sheet steel design strength, Py = StL.5 MPA Where Pip = 0.98 X Rema conservatively, adopt effictive span, Lg = ss25mnm where, Lg = 3225- (1504150)/2 + 105 = 3220un or aobual spar) Mserasin Wlongho 31122035 07 op ANPOO=\\LepcoriAe ling Designer, PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com040 Project: Semt Detached House : 18,Bratmar Seranggon Bite 12 mar 2008 pesign Loads : Slab self weight, Wey = 9.81 X (2350+50)/1000 X 0.105 = 2472 RN/m? Slab total weight, Wag = War t Wa Wy = 3.122 RNP Slab total dead land, Wg = Weng + 1.8 = 4.9.22 RN/ne? ‘Slab total service load, Wap = We + We = 6.422 RN/at2 Load factor for dead load anc live lead are t+ and 1.2 respectively. Material factors, Yq » for steel andl concrete are 1.05 § 1.5 respectively, Maximune negative (hogging) moment: Negative Reivforcenent at Support asign Conposite slabs as Continuous span My(-) = Cmonent caused by self weight load (cv all spans) + moment caused by wmepased Live Lond and dead load (Pattern lending) } = (0107X[4.4X3.122] + -0.116X[L.6X4.544.4 X4.8)) X 3.325? “11.42 RN Negative Reinforcement required, A, =Mx(—) 7 (F4/%m Z) 498 mn? where d” = 105-34 - 9/2 = 6x mom and = My (=) / (Bel TP fon) = 0.085 ZA” = 0.5 + V(0.25-4,K/34) = 0.998 wd O95 SZ/d" S OFFS Cracking of Concrete Dus to Shrinkage and Temperature 6ffeot The minimus area of reinforcement should be 0.23% of gross concrete area. Minimum Rebnforcement area = 1.3 X 105 = 137 mma The mininure longitudinal reinforcement required is at the support is 438 mm> and transverse reinforcement required is 37mm? for slab designed as Continuous span. To aveld crack widths checking provide 237m anti-oracke reinforcement at maxinum spacing of 20tnK, The above arrangement automatically covers requirement for nelninuent longitudinal reinforcement area of 0.1% gross cross sectional area and transverse rebvforcement area of 0.49 of concrete area above the steetrlis at support. PROVIDE [f#-100,9-200] BE(B50S) mesh or equivalent Longitudinal reinforcement aren, A, = 903 ran? Transverse reinforcenent area = 251 vuna eeraeaiinngh 09029 488 27OF NPR Lop cere fling Pacino PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com041 Project: Seml Detached House : 18, Braemar Stranggon Bitte :2¥ Mar 2008 esign positive Moment Capacity Assuming fidi shear connection, Conpostte slab monent capacity My = AP py Z = syst enn where A is the maxinun area to satisfy condition Z > 0495, or Ap (bneplying a linttation. of the neutral axts to depth of d./2) A= Minbnune (1056.2, 1620) = 1056.2 nme tnd dy =D -Vag = 105 - 1544 = 29.59 mm Zid, = 1 - OFAP gy / (Be de O6F feu/Yu) = 1-0.5%1056,2XS11.5/ (100% 29.59 XO. FX30/1.5) = OFFS ultimate positive (sagging) moment = Mx (4) = (moment caused by self weight load (on alt spans) + moment caused |; 0 2.4.2 § 6.1 ‘by posed Live Load and dead tond (Pattern loading) } (0.07 ex|1.4X3.422] + 04x [L.6X2541.4 X18) X (9525/1000) 9.28 Fee S My = 8751 kee ok ‘The two coefficlents 0.078 and 0.t in the above calculation are based on elastic analysis results for Continuous spare Design Shearbond capaolty : Ves Bede Ime (mp Ap/Be by + Ky Why, ) = 38:26RN Where re, k, are erepirical pararneters. Based on test results, be, and K, = 2zN mm? and O.C2N/nene respectively Ly ks the shear span of composite stab and ts taken. as distance between potnt of contra flexure /4. For unbformaly distributed load Ly = Ls /+ for end span and Yq = 125 ultimate shear bond force : VE OSX (t4We + 16X Wa) X(LXR) 0.5 ( [1.4X4.922] + [.eXt5]) X (2225/1000 X 1) = 1545 @N SV, =3046kN ok Where ke is the adjusting coefficient to equivalent simple span between point of contrafiexure. Forme elastic analysts e=0.93 and 0.63 for end and internal span restectively, Taking K=2 for endl span as required * gives a conservative result, sermeninivengiosrs2.1181.0707.2\Path=\\Lep-cerieneiling Designee PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com042 Project: Sent Detached House : 18,Bratmar Seranggon Bite :2% Mar 2008 esign verttoal Shear Capacity : WH Bed, Ve = FRERRN where Vo ts the design concrete shear stress Vo = OFV Yn (400A, / 18, a1)? (400/d,)* (fy 725)? = 061 MPa and A, may be taken as minimum (Ay Ag”) = 503 name ultimate shear force at the internal support : V= (shear caused oy setf weight load (on alt spans) + shear caused by meposed Live Load and dead Lond (Pattern. loading) } (0.607 [1.4X3.122] + 0.616X[L6X1.541.4XL8]) X (3325/1000) 129 RN SVy =54.622N oe The two eeffetents 0.607 and 0.616 in the above calculation are based on elastic analysis results for Continuous span Deflection of The Composite Stab: The serviceability leads are unfactored, excluding construction loads. Two mtthods car. be used to checke slab deflection. The first is to check the limiting span to find the allowable span. The second method is to chéole actual deflection ith the limiting values, Both netthods are presented. Span to depth ratio For Continuous span, the maxinum allowable tnd span / effective depth ratio is 26, with 2-4 tension § compression reinforcement modlfleation. factor. Maxtnasnn allowable span = 624X895) = Seinen. oe Caloutation of Actual Deflection The deflection of the consposite stab can also be checkeed using the second moment of area of the composite slab about its centrotdal axls, tax which is the average value of erackeed section, Iq, andl gross section, Ig. lan = ler + 1g)/2 a) Deflection de to the imposed Load ‘The second moment of area composite slab for cracked stction can be found using : leg = By dyl /3Q + Ay (de- dy)? + Iy = 5860 X10" mn" ranting) 124281 o7ORNPaH=\Lepcevene fling Delonas PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com043 Project: Semi Detached House : 28,Bracmar Seranggon bite :2¢ Mar 2008 where dy is the sectional neutral axis measured from top surface dy = Ct + +4B,d,/ 204.) J /(B,/0A,) = 46.20 mm and 1 is the stoond moment of area of Condeck HP per nucter width. tg = 647000 mm* ot is the vatio of elastic modulus of steel to concrete or nodular ratio. a= a, +p. (a-a,) = 6 4 4.920/(4.92244.5)X 9-6) = 15.2 Here the modular ratio is conservatively teleen as 15:2 instead of short term |>Cls3.3g 0172 loading modular ratio, Ot. = & or sea / Exmerte = 200/ (20 + 02X30) =F The seoond moment of aren composite slab for gross seetion can be found using Ig = BLD" 120 + Apdedy)? + Ix + As dg -05D)* = 9900 x 10" mm" where d ts the neutral axis depth for gross section. dy = (AD/2 +A, dd) / Ay FA,) = 59.54 mm and A, =B,D/ a = 6909 mame Second moment of area of the cormpastte slab about its centr oidal axis, en = War #19) /2 7220 x10" non" Deflection, Linait for imposed load is the mininuwn of Le / 350%9.5 0r 20mm The end span deflection, due to imposed Load car. be estinaated by using: é 100 X Wals* /Elex = 1/100 x 1.5/1000000 X 33.25% / (2007230) 13mm SIF b) Deflection. due to the Total Lond Stoond monent of area of the composite slab about les centrotdal axts, tea = (ley +1g) / 2 = (S78849412)/2 = port X10" mm* Where ty = Bed? 30 4 Aye Ay)? + be = 5s X10 mut 52/120 + Ayds-dy)? + ly + A, yg -0.50)? = 2412 x 10" mm* cermin ong\e 2418 27552 PaRn\\Lepceneneiing\bezignen PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.comG4 Project: Semi Detached House : 28,Braemar Seranggon Bate 2 Mar 2008 @, + p.(a-@,) 6 F (4,9224+1/3X2.5)/ (4.922415) % (18-6) = 16.13 (p_ bs the proportion of the total loading that is long tenn, 1/8 of imposed load is taken as long term. for Normal usage) dy HOt + [t+ 4Bd,/ 24,1" 37 (B,/0A,) = 4722 0m ALTE, D/O = 6509 me dg = A.D/2 +A, de) / Az tAy) eter en eae The end span defection due to slab self weight (imeludting removal of props) can. be conservatively and convenientiy estinuated ty using: 1.218185 K Wag ba" / Clon 1.213 /185 X 3.122/1000000 X (325°) / (200X F071) = 19mm The end spav deflection due to other uniform permanent dead loads consists off long term load such as permanent partition, Poor fintsh, ceiling and cther superimposed dead londs fo) all spans. Big = 100 X (We ~ Wray) ba’ / Elen 1283 /185 X 1,8/4000000 X (25253) / (200K YOy1) = Lemm The end span deflection dlue to truposed load can. be approxinantely expressed as: Ba= t/00X Wels" Elen 2.213 /185 X 1.5/1000000 X (25252)? / (200X 7074) 13mm S be / 350 or 20mm or Deflection. lint for total load is the minimum of Lg / 250=13.2 Deflection due to total Load, 5 = 5a, + baa + Se eti6e+is eo mn Summary Area of minimum. longitudinal reinforcement required at the support is +2Q.002 and the aven of transverse reinforcement required s 137nun> for slab designed as Continuous span + Deviations from standlards due to projects requirements sermabnongho St12. 1881 070R2\PUN=N\ Cap srvONe fling BaTgners PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.comNo Bena Slnompore 629 95% Tel (65) exes 1550 Fax(5) e861 4212 Sine ore CONBECK HP FIRE MORE (to BSS 5950) , . Be Co Nunaber of span = hy, ae Centre to centre span Cossrete setagen S | Supedneposed dead lead ¥ slab total weight troluding oon | Stat fre aecion Load | NEGATIVE moment capacity UE | abi fireoilent strength reductten faster 1 Lever Arm a cuppore gle Moxinane elnforecnient alontea Negative mopaant capacites oF EN a POSITIVE RIMFORCEMENT REQUIREMENTS (FER) Grd Span Manindn positive moment h Sasi 9 Sar kNm fre * flection pobnt nucacired from internal suppor 0.701 1 1} Abohorage length measured frone suppare Pefbotiveapth i ak ae E Reinforcement strength redluction factor FER Contribution forni Condeck" HP | Adalttonat Area of Fire rechforcencent ailiak erimain Sey ser eatnivong\ot12.2188 070R NEWNAN Lap see fling’ Déslgntrs PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com046 No. 2 Benot Piace] ep Singapore 629 981 Tel (@5) ones 1550) Fax(65) eet +218 Date #27 Mar 2008 Condeck® HP Composite Slab Fire Design Project: Semt petached Mouse : 48,Bratmar Seranggon Check fire design. of @ 105 mn thick Condeck HP" conposite slab with t.comn (BMT) thiol steel decking. The slab is designed as @ Continuous span slab, Centre to centre span length is 3325 mum. The fire resistance required is 30 minutes. This design. considers end span. as governing design. check. Standards : * BS595D: Park &: 1990, code of Practise for Fire Resistant Design 2 BSELL0: Part 1: 1997, structural use of Concrete ~ Code of Practice for Design and Construction, + BSH1I0: Part 2: 1925; Structural use of Concrete ~ Cede of Practee for Spectal Cireunctnacte ther major references: + Construction industry Research and information. Association. (CIRIA), Fire résistance of consposite Slabs with steel decking, CIRIA special pubileation 42, London, 2986 + Newnaitn, GM. Fire resistance of composite laors with steel decking, Steel Construction Institute, No 056, 1989, pp.24 + Design and detailing of concrete structures for fire resistance Joint Conumittee ofthe Institution of Stiuctwrnl Engineers and Concrete Society, April, 4972 + Fire resistance of conareta structures, joint Conmuittee of the Institution of Structural Cugineers and Concrete Soclety, August: 2975 + Lawson, RM, Fire resistance of ribbed concrete floors, Part 2. Composite desk slabs, C1RIA publication 10%, S985, pp. 45° Baste Data: Fire resistance period, Slab thicleness, consider 1m wideh of slab, Characteristic Nonuat cube strength, Area of negative reinforcement, Characteristic strength of reinforcement, Steel decking self weight, Ponding load from construction, Slab self weight, Slab total weight Wing = Wa HW, toy cposed Live Load, Dead Load: mapased dead load = srmreniongho3132.1194.07071\PatnN\Lepcenere filing Decigner 30 minutes 105 mnt 1000 mine SOMPA 503 mm? = 460MPa 2olsar4 0.128 kg/ma 0.522 RN/mu2 = 2472 kN/m? = 3122 kN/m2 LS RN/ME 1.8 N/m? POF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com647 Diate : 2 Mar 2008 Conservatively, Adopt effective span, Lg = 3325 Where, Ls = 3825 (t50+150)/2 + 105 = 3220nen« or actual span) FIRE LIMIT STATE DESIGN pesign Loads : Slab total dead load. Wa = Weng + Dead Lom — Wa = 4,922 RN/ma2 under fire limit state, load factors, ¥¢ . for dead load and live load ave 1 § 08 Matera factors, Yq.» for tel ana concrete are 2 § 43° respectively, Fire design Lond, (04.922 + 0.84.5) Wy = 6422 N/m tmsulation : For 30 minutes fire resistance period, mininaune slab thickness = 90 ras Design of Moment Capacity using Fle Engineering Method Design of the conposite floors is based on a plastic fatlure mechanisne and the redistrinution of moment is assumed to take place under fire conditions This analysis, method uses measurements of the temperature rise in various eross- sections, together with the known behaviour of steel and concrete at elevated temperatures, to calculate the reduced moment capacity of the stetion, The temperature profile usta in. this analyses were based on a series of pilot Condeck HP slab fire tests and adopting strength reduction factor given in BSeLA0: Pare 21985: Slab Negative Moment Capaoity in Fire Limiting neutral axis to half effective depth, the lever arm value and the maximum allowable negative rébnforcenent area were calculated using strip utthod. These values have been provided ine Condlecke HP Technécal Deslan Manual, Maximum allowable negative reinforcement, Ag) = 700 mm /m Lever arm, Zp = 40,7 num oo AS As > 508 vas /ny, 503 msn Jat bs used in the negative moment capacity caleutation. Negative moment capacity,M,. =Ae Ra fy Ze Yu 508 X 1X $60 X48, F/4 44.97 Nm /ne serstepininengna sii c135.o7oR Pan Lepsonede ing Decne PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com048 Project: Sems Detached House : 18,Braemar Seranggor. ote: 2% Mar 2008 Slab Positive Moment tn Fire = #13 RNie Jet ee End Span conditions The postive moment can be obtained as: My” = (Mo = Mg)? HaWyt 7) - (My tM 2 + Wy se (718-0) (2X6122X3.32F) - (74340//2 + (6.122%3.32598) = 527 Nm sm The location. of maxinuwn monent is Xn = Oe + OMA Mg Wish s) 3328/2 + (F.13-0)/(6.122X3.225) = 201m The location. of the polnt of contraflexure (measured fiom internal support) can be found using: X_ =(2M,"-2Ma" +Wylg")/2W lg = Sart Dam," ~2Ma" #Wyl.g*)/2Wyl el” — 2M ws ) (2x 7.28-2X0+6.222X3.3259)/(2X6122X3.325) - sqrt LQXx7.13-2X0+6.422%3.2252)/(2X6122X3.325)]2 = O70 m Negative reinforcement should be extencted at least to the following value: Xe = Maximum (O8L;, Xe+D, Xq+ 429) = Maxinune (0.3X3.325, 0FOL+0.4105, 0,704 +42%8) 2g9em Note: * For 3 or more spar. composite slab, M," and M." is conservatively taker. as the lesser of My" and internal span negative moment capacity for X. = spans, following above prececture, to account for reineforcencent euertailnent > under ancbient temperature, Correspondingly, taking, Mz" = Ma" = 713 RNM /nt internal span, X_ = 4408 nm internal span positive moment = 235 RNn Ju neva .3440.1454 0707. s\PathaN\Lep-eiene fling Deign oh PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www-pdffactory.com049 Project: Semt betached House : 18, Braemar Seranggon ite :2% Mar 2008 Design of Positive Fire einforcenent For the given design ultimate positive moment in the end span, the positive fire enaergency reinforcement (FER) can be found as follows: Positive Retnforcenent required, As* =My* / (Ka f4/%m Z) = 249 mm2/m where d* = 105-55-9-8/2 = 38 mm and = My’ 7 (8, a*? fa) = 0222 2d = 05 + V025-¥y4K/A34) = 0.862 oR and O95 S Z/d” S OFFS andka” = 1. (reinforcement strength reduction factor a 33°C elevated tmeperaturt) Correspondingly, internal Span FER Required = 80 mune /u. summary According to the above calculations, the required end span positive reinforcement {for fire purposes ic 249 mene /me. The negative reinforcement hould be extended to the slab at least 4.408 mm For 30 minsctes fire resistance, reduction in required posttive reinforcement (FER) With Condecke HP 1.00 nu is S451? /m Therefore 4 ment? /ne Grd Spare FER is requirtd. NO internal Span FER is required. Temperature § shrinkeage Reinforcement also serves as FER [9-100] 503 mnr/m, * Deviations from standards due to projects requbrements cerntsin ong asa teas opp a\Dath=\\Lepserinefing Designer, PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.comPROJECT:__1@ BRAEMAI DR IST STORET BEAMresults. ‘ATSStructe: Rel 20.84 ATS Softwarecentre Pte Ltd ‘Singapore Project: Designed by: & May 2008 Job Ref: Checked by: ‘Continuous Seam 7 Sub-frame Analysis and Design: bata File name: 181 Span No. = 1, Length= 4.500m, B= 200mm, D= 450mm toad Factors= = 1.40 1,60 DLA GRN, m) LL Ck, upL Ym = 2a 0.50 Left cantilever: Length= 0.500m, 8= 200mm, b= 45am IL CKN, m) LL CKN, alpha beta vol Ym = Bg tag aha _ Point Load = 15.72 3.67 0.000 ENVELOPE values of Shears & Moments - considering ALL LOAD CASES S (shear) & M moment) shown are @ 10th points of RESPECTIVE spans SPAN 1 12 10 8 He 5 3 2 1 SF 2 aa 5 7 -14 -11 8 5 3 2 -1 M fe 4 6 6 6 5 3 REACTION ‘For Info only if Contbeam] SUPPORT DL. u, bree col mts of scubrrane 1 23.5 565 2.6 -2.6 2 3.1 0.7 2.6 2.6 Design shear & moment envelope values, considering a1 Toad cases: *# Ss: CP 65 (1999) bata File: Design Details: Feu = 30N/mm2 Fy = 460N/nm2 Fyv = 250N/mm2 Clear cover = 25mm REQUIRED DETAILS REBAR DETAILS SPAN 1 Left “widdle Rigne Left Middle Ri er 14.4 L= 4500; B= 200; De 450 Cini os 68352 d= 400; Reqd. = 112 ‘TOP STEEL 16060616 2710 2710 2710 Layers @ @ @ BOT STEEL ne 416) (116 2710 2710 2710 Page 1results. @ i 6.6 6.4 1R10-300 1R10-300 1R10-300 052 0.083 0.080 0.357 0.357 € 1500) ¢€ 1500) ¢ 1500) 0.368 0.368 0.53 0.53 0.53 L=_ 500; B= 200; D= 450 d= 400; Reqd: = 71 ‘TOP STEEL 116 2710 2T10 2T10 ayers @ BOT STEEL 116 2710 2710 2710 Layers @ shearckn) 29.8 4n10-300 1R10-300 1R10-300 ve Nm? 0.369 160) ¢ 180) ¢ 160) ve ; Ksv/ev (01368 033 ‘953 ‘0.53 Page 2STEEL STRUCTURE DESIGNPROJECT:_/8 PRacmar LOADINGS sikb|+tm] = 14-6 3 7H ES) Pe nica pol tp 3/al | slab + Hfin| =| 4b Karr: |» (abyas+r[26>/2 sla + iftn| =| 415 1¢ A ~|c.325)2 9 lab +tin| = 4-6 CP ce «lca:PROJECT:__1% BRaemAe oO REF 6: Lonoas Tr} | Fe 1A slab|+ fil =|-445 |e LE ¢Orpe+ ais:PROJECT:_16 BRAEMAR DR. Design by + LOBDINGS |Checked by: Apel [fe leet: Tew | =[ ale kate 2 slab tt ffia| =| 412 Calaes|>067 |PROJECT: 1B BRAEMAR PR [Sheet No. = of. Date J _—______________]esign by R REF: = LOADING IChecked by: al Wonoials lox duc at 5 Cea ple kal = lenJ «(ot =| alae Tesh T Ut =| F7r6B| tel =) uye-gs feb =| 24-p2| kA pl =| 193-43] enw | =) tal ec e | “ I tak pe SIEPROJECT:_18 BRAEMAR PR LoADINGS111 |PROJECT:. 18 BRAEMAR DR [Sheet No. « of. Date Design by REF 6: STAIRCASE STRINGER BEAM |checked by: | f I I Lente) i { I BL IE r27e1= Oa tal t 12/2 |= 01 4b ialhn | OTE boul 1 q | i it plea [REpER |e |SIRER bapret 1 | f t | t t I [ I | | t I | = ole ito Zolad dnlen 0136 Nino 7D rrn| + fells ladeqluate112 PROJECT:_!B BRAEMAR PR [Sheet No. [Date [Design by REF STHRCASE CONNECTION Checked by: ELDED| To STRANGER GEA I a=! f-4 coz 3+ |- 4 c0-3B 9% xt-273) _| =| o> | 1 lei len = Theak | | | eld el na = | Of |icalfromx 28] =| dee ea [op Val= ool boi 2) | HaNGie| consechon To |Flooe BAAD T | aa yantical shear | vd =| 8-216 let | { 1 t |: Fre RE eld len =| Zero? 4 fede fb d6 [es = [30am pyr J Bho} ef =Telalx Bao =| Aa en = ie AM 12, ptt d I ott | [= ! t [2 | Holts) Tensthn kabedrty | =| f Iv te = ~ ene BHoINE OX Nel _|=|e Diz 74 +4 d- I113. PROJECT:_1 BRAEMAR PR Date [Design by 2 STAIRCASE CONNECTCON [Checked by. | I ie | Va | = |e:115. PROJECT:_IB BRAEMAR DIR iSheet No. of Date Design by REF =: BASE PLATE DESIGN IChecked by: ult. laxtal {toad |= | 384-2)6 (ccpmPeEst/0F D| ait [shear eb | Tae RNPROJECT:__/@ S@AEmAe_ OR ISheet No. +117 PROJECT:__1@ BRAEMAR PR |Sheet No, Date Design bys REF: TYPICAL CONNECTION DESIGN _ |Checked by: al \7o| elaey hEP t | batt] N61Ed x] C ‘2cab2 lt He: 0118- IPROJECT:__1@ BRAEMAR PR ISheet No. Date Design by : REF 0: TYPICAL CONNECTION peeIGN [Checked mi et |Te cole! 2 CI53-p-. 2{C0l-6 +5. =(|672-d m Plastie| meldul us| o Gaba mids 4> pelos BDCISIENa ys Et kunh+ werdthl> earl Fee) 1218 = 1t6l x io 4 Cb 52)119. PROJECT:__12 BRAEMAR DR TYPICAL CONMECTION DESIGN I | cal Tine | absent [me th be of unit wi | (l4-}4-]0-B) (42- 2+] ARPS H134 x10) obo ssf