Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/338065563
CITATION READS
1 27,269
4 authors, including:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Purna Prasad Arcot on 24 December 2019.
Published By:
Retrieval Number: B8004129219/2019©BEIESP
5063 Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
DOI: 10.35940/ijitee.B8004.129219
& Sciences Publication
Customer Satisfaction towards E – Banking
The final model, after modifying the initial model based on is more than 0.9, indicating further that the model very well
modification indices, is given above Figure. fits the data. The badness of fit index Root Mean Square
error approximation RMSEA should be lower than 0.05.
The conceptual model above was tested through the The table below indicates that the RMSEA value is 0.044,
goodness of fit tests. The global goodness of fit index showing that the model has a good fit.
Chi-square for the model is 4479.724 significant at 0.0,
indicating that Chi-square is not substantial and therefore,
the conceptual model has a good fit with the data. In
addition to the Chi-square goodness of fit index, there are
three sets of the goodness of fit indices and one set of the
badness of suitable index. All the goodness of fit indices
Published By:
Retrieval Number: B8004129219/2019©BEIESP Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
DOI: 10.35940/ijitee.B8004.129219 5064 & Sciences Publication
International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE)
ISSN: 2278-3075, Volume-9 Issue-2, December 2019
Table 1:
χ² df p-value χ²/df GFI RMSEA NFI CFI AGFI
Obtained values 3254.65 657 0 7.09815 0.854 0.044 0.8521 0.873 0.897
Source: Authors Compilation In addition to the Chi-square goodness of fit index, there are
three sets of goodness of fit indices and one set of the badness
The e-BankQUAL model was satisfied when the study was
of a suitable index. All the goodness of fit indices was more
done on four banks, i.e. two Indian banks and two foreign
than 0.8521, indicating further that the model very well fits the
banks and it was found that the conceptual model global
data. The badness of fit index Root Mean Square error
goodness of fit index Chi-square was 3254.65 significant at
approximation RMSEA was also lower than 0.05, which again
0.0. Indicating that Chi-square is not substantial and
proved the goodness of model.
therefore, the conceptual model has a good fit with the data.
Table 1.1: Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Levene Statistic Sig. F Sig. Welch Sig.
Name of Bank (A) Name of Bank (B) Mean difference (A-B) Standard Error Sig...
Published By:
Retrieval Number: B8004129219/2019©BEIESP
5065 Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
DOI: 10.35940/ijitee.B8004.129219
& Sciences Publication
Customer Satisfaction towards E – Banking
From the above table, it can be concluded that SBI clusters were observed based on E - Fulfillment: Public
customers have a significant association with ICICI and Bank (SBI), Private Bank (ICICI) & Foreign Bank (HSBC)
HSBC Banks customers on E - fulfilment factor. ICICI Respondents. The second cluster had a higher mean score
Bank customer has a strong association with SBI and HSBC (3.52) than the first & third clusters, which indicate that
Bank customer. There was no significant association found these people are highly satisfied than the first & third cluster
between HSBC & SBI & ICICI Banks. Hence three persons on E - Fulfillment.
Table 3.1: Customer Satisfaction level for Factor 2: Security
Standard
Name of Bank (A) Name of Bank (B) Mean difference (A-B) Sig.
Error
The mean score of these factors revealed that Customers of (ICICI) & Foreign Bank (HSBC) Respondents. The third
HSBC Bank are more satisfied (mean score 4.50) than those cluster had a higher mean score (4.95) than the first & second
SBI and ICICI Customer (mean score 3.56 and 3.94) in cost- cluster, which indicate that these people are highly satisfied
effectiveness factor. than the first & second cluster persons on Cost-Effectiveness
From the below table 2.2, it can be concluded that SBI and factor.
ICICI customers differ significantly from HSBC Banks
customer on Cost-Effectiveness factor. There was is
significant association were found between SBI & ICICI &
HSBC Banks. Hence three clusters were observed based on
Cost-Effectiveness: Public Bank (SBI), Private Bank
Published By:
Retrieval Number: B8004129219/2019©BEIESP Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
DOI: 10.35940/ijitee.B8004.129219 5066 & Sciences Publication
International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE)
ISSN: 2278-3075, Volume-9 Issue-2, December 2019
Table 2.2: Post Hoc Analysis Multiple Comparisons for Cost-Effectiveness factor
Standard
Name of Bank (A) Name of Bank (B) Mean difference (A-B) Sig.
Error
which indicates that these people are highly satisfied than the
VII. FINDINGS,SUGGESTIONS& CONCLUSION second & third cluster persons on Security factor.
In the case of Cost-Effectiveness, SBI and ICICI customers
Findings differ significantly from HSBC Banks customer on Cost-
1. The present study indicates that there is a Effectiveness factor. There was is significant association
significant association in Satisfaction level regarding were found between SBI & ICICI & HSBC Banks. Hence
various factors of E-banking services provided by Public, three clusters were observed based on Cost-Effectiveness:
Private & Foreign Bank. Public Bank (SBI), Private Bank (ICICI) & Foreign Bank
2. Average E-fulfillment in E-banking service was (HSBC) Respondents. The third cluster had a higher mean
approximately the same in three banks. score (4.95) than the first & second cluster, which indicate
3. Average Efficiency in E-banking services was that these people are highly satisfied than the first & second
higher in HSBC banks in comparison to its other banks. cluster persons on Cost-Effectiveness factor.
Customers of SBI& ICICI are Dissatisfied on cost This study also revealed that Customers of ICICI are more
Efficiency parameter. satisfied (mean score 3.52) than SBI and HSBC (mean rating
4. Average Accuracy in E-banking services was 2.82 and 2.86). Even SBI customers are not happy with E –
higher in SBI bank than other banks. Even ICICI & HSBC Fulfillment.
bank Customers are dissatisfied on security parameter. This study also revealed that Customers of SBI Bank are
more satisfied (mean score 3.95) than those ICICI and HSBC
Suggestions Customer (mean score 321 and 3.30).
The policymakers have to take precise measurements for This study also revealed that Customers of HSBC Bank are
improving the delivering services in E-Banking as follows. more satisfied (mean score 4.50) than those SBI and ICICI
1. Core Banking services Customer (mean score 3.56 and 3.94) in cost-effectiveness
2. Services through Automatic Teller Machines factor.
3.EFT services
4. MICR Services REFERENCES
5. Debit & Credit card services 1. Kumbhar V.M. “Alternative Banking: An Modern Practice in India,
6. Internet banking & Mobile Banking services Professional Banker”. The ICFAI University Press, Volume:9, Issue:9,
pp:65-73. 2009
Conclusion 2. Kumbhar, V.M. Factors affecting Customer Satisfaction in E-banking:
Some Evidence from Indian Banks”. Management Research and
In the case of E- Fulfillment: SBI customers have a Practice, Volume:3, Issue:4, pp:01-14. 2011.
significant association with ICICI and HSBC Banks 3. Kumbhar, V.M. “Service Quality perception and customer‟s
satisfaction in Internet Banking service: A case study of public and
customers on E - fulfilment factor. ICICI Bank customer has private sector banks”. Cyber Literature,Volume:4, Issue:2, pp:21-29.
a strong association with SBI and HSBC Bank customer. 2013.
There was no significant association found between 4. Kumbhar V.M. “Structure Equation Modeling of eBankQual Scale: A
Study of E-Banking in India”, International Journal of Business,
HSBC & SBI & ICICI Banks. Hence three clusters were
Economics and Management Research, Volume:2, Issue:5, pp:08-32.
observed based on E - Fulfillment: Public Bank (SBI), 2011
Private Bank (ICICI) & Foreign Bank (HSBC) Respondents. 5. Kumbhar V.M. “Alternative Banking Channels and Customers
The second cluster had a higher mean score (3.52) than the Satisfaction: An Empirical Study of Public and Private Sector Banks”.
International Journal of Business and Management Tomorrow,
first & third clusters, which indicate that these people are Volume:1, Issue:1,2011.
highly satisfied than the first & third cluster persons on E - 6. Sakai, S.F., Afshari, A.J. &Esmaili, E, “The Impact of Service Quality
Fulfillment. on Customer Satisfaction in Internet Banking”. Journal of Mathematics
and Computer Science, Volume:9, Issue:8, pp:33-40. 2013.
In the case of Security, There was no significant 7. Nupur, J.M. “E-banking and Customer„s Satisfaction in Bangladesh:
association was found between SBI & ICICI and HSBC An Analysis”. International
Banks, respectively. Hence three clusters were observed based Review of Business Research
on Security: Public Bank (SBI), Private Bank (ICICI) &
Foreign Bank (HSBC) Respondents. The first clustered had a
higher mean score (3.95) than the second & third clusters,
Published By:
Retrieval Number: B8004129219/2019©BEIESP
5067 Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
DOI: 10.35940/ijitee.B8004.129219
& Sciences Publication
Customer Satisfaction towards E – Banking
AUTHORS PROFILE:
Published By:
Retrieval Number: B8004129219/2019©BEIESP Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
DOI: 10.35940/ijitee.B8004.129219 5068 & Sciences Publication
View publication stats