Which of the three typologies of project delivery methods would you prefer?

Justify your answer.

Evaluating the three types of project delivery methods, I prefer Construction

Management (CM) project delivery method the most. Construction Management
(CM) excels in managing the complexity of the project and in today's complex
construction landscape, where projects involve intricate designs, evolving
regulations, and advanced technologies, construction managers bring expertise to
navigate these challenges. They coordinate various project aspects, ensuring that
design intent is faithfully executed while addressing unforeseen issues promptly.
Construction Management (CM) as well shines in terms of schedule management.
Time is of the essence in architecture, and construction managers employ their
skills to streamline processes, optimize sequencing, and efficiently allocate
resources. This results in reduced construction durations, enabling clients to
occupy their buildings sooner and generate revenue faster.

Moreover, Construction Management (CM) exhibits an unparalleled

commitment to budget objectives. Architects often find themselves in precarious
positions when it comes to controlling costs. Construction managers, on the other
hand, proactively manage budgets, employing value engineering, cost control, and
negotiation skills to keep projects within the agreed-upon financial parameters.

In conclusion, Construction Management (CM) is a superior project delivery

method for architects because it offers a holistic approach to project success. It
leverages expertise to manage complexity, ensures meticulous schedule
adherence, and demonstrates unwavering commitment to budget constraints. By
embracing construction management services, architects can enhance their value
proposition, deliver better projects, and foster stronger client relationships in
today's demanding architectural landscape.