Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jessica Bugg
Abstract
This chapter focuses on clothing as performance and scenography and the
presence and role of clothing and costume design in performance. I explore
through my practice as a designer, the clothed body as a site for production of
meaning, narrative, performance and communication in an interdisciplinary setting.
The intention is to expose the role of costume and clothing design as a generator of
performance and meaning through design by drawing on embodied experience,
memory, sensory interaction, emotional and physical triggers in garment design as
a generator of embodied communication. The design within this research draws on
oral histories of dress and seeks to engage viewers and wearers on an emotional
and experiential level by connecting to cognitive understanding and memory.
This work builds upon aspects of my completed doctoral researchi which
identified that the intersections of subject disciplines are increasingly complex and
new interdisciplinary ways of working have emerged that focus on the body and
clothing, challenging preconceptions, traditional approaches and subject
definitions. I argue that as performance and experimental fashion practice both
increasingly move into new and site-specific contexts and as focus is extended
around the role of the performer, audience reception, conceptual and experimental
approaches, the divisions between clothing designed as conceptual fashion and
clothing designed as costume for performance have become less defined. I suggest
that it is the shared use of clothing and the performing body to communicate
meaning that has enabled a hybrid practice to emerge between fashion and
performance. I place emphasis on clothing the body as a visual and physical
communication strategy and in relation to research in the fields of performance,
costume design, fashion design and fashion communication.
I suggest that by focusing on the body as the site for production of meaning and
performance, clothing can be not only present in the production process of
performance, but also can become a generator of performance and communication
through design. By focusing on costume and clothing as a form of narrative and
scenography, I have been able to take into account how the emotional and physical
factors as well as the site of the body itself contributes to the making, intention and
reading of work in the context of hybrid fashion, clothing and performance practice
within a contemporary context.
*****
2 Emotion and Memory; Clothing the Body as Performance
__________________________________________________________________
‘a thinker who refuses the premise that fashion and the other
creative disciplines are separate entities. In fact much of his
output over the past ten years has brokered significant
connections between them. As Chalayan builds bridges between
the visual, the ideological, the invisible and the tangible, his
designs challenge preconceived notions of what clothing can
mean, contributing towards and even setting the parameters for a
whole new genre’13
New approaches, terminology and hybrid practices have emerged in both fashion
and performance. I have discussed the centrality of clothing as message, narrative
or performance and also the performance of fashion on the catwalk, however the
relationship between fashion and performance is far more complex than this. The
6 Emotion and Memory; Clothing the Body as Performance
__________________________________________________________________
design processes themselves also have shared elements in their methodology for
example high end and couture fashion design and costume design both realise one
off garments for a particular wearer or event, they utilise semiotic codes and
messages within clothing as a means of communicating to their audience and both
work with character in different ways to inform the design process. Character may
manifest in fashion as designing for a particular musician, muse, the styling for a
collection or may more directly become the design intention as in many of the
collections of Bernard Willhelm, Gareth Pugh, Henrik Vibskov, Alexander Mc
Queen and Walter Van Beirendonck. The exhibition Arrrgh! Monsters in Fashion
14
highlights this approach and points towards an extended exploration of the
relationship between fashion and performance methodology and practice. What is
interesting here is not only the visual and semiotic messages about character that
have been central to fashion for some time but the emerging exploration of
character behaviour, narrative and time based development through design that is
conveyed through a physical communication on the performing body.
At the same time as new developments have been taking place in fashion
performance has also developed its practice and parameters. Terminology, process,
new media, new audience relationships and contexts for communication are all
being challenged and responded to. The role of costume itself is being reassessed
in the hierarchy of design and performance production, researchers and
practitioners are beginning to discuss the developed role of costume as
performative conduit or maker of meaning. A generation of designers are now
graduating and entering the creative industries working with costume in new
spaces, with new methods and trained in different backgrounds. Design education
has also developed and approaches to costume are diverse a good example of this
shift is the MA Costume Design for Performance course at London College of
Fashion which specifically seeks to develop ‘experimental practitioners who will
push the boundaries of the subject of costume beyond its established traditional
role’15
As fashion has moved into the performative space performance has also
extended into the traditional fashion space. For example Seven Sisters group in
their performance Double Take (2000) used the interior of Selfridges department
store as a site specific performance platform. They continued this exploration of
the fashion site and performed Boxed in the window of John Lewis on Oxford
Street (2006) inhabiting the commercial fashion environment and speaking directly
to fashion audiences. Punch Drunk have also collaborated with high end fashion
designer Louis Vuitton where they created a site specific immersive performance
in an old post office for the opening of the new flagship store on Bond Street
(2010), interestingly breaking with performance tradition this performance did not
specifically tell a story or follow a narrative but was inspired by the Vuitton
archive and museum 16, an approach often taken in fashion as part of the design
intention. In a post modern context the idea of what performance is, its duration,
purpose, audience, visual languages and premise to communicate narratives is
Jessica Bugg 7
__________________________________________________________________
being pushed into new territories and performance like fashion is exploring the
potential of methodologies and practice from other disciplines.
New media and communication platforms have also informed and
extended approaches in both disciplines and contribute to this cross-disciplinary
dialogue. The possibilities of film, projection, digital editing soft wear, animation
packages, mobile technologies, live feed and the relationship between the real and
the virtual have all altered the way both disciplines communicate, the way
audiences engage in the meaning making of any communication and in turn have
extended the practice of designers in performance contexts. Liora Malka Yellin
discusses in this volume innovative use of technology and the relationship between
the visual and the virtual in relation to contemporary dance and illustrates the
influence of technology on changing perspectives in performance. She talks
specifically of the ‘interchangeability between the real and the virtual’17 in relation
to Merce Cunningham’s Biped and Parjad Sharifi takes this a step further where he
discusses ‘Bioscenography’ and the construction of character through assemblage
of scenographic elements to ‘deterritorialise the discourse of theatrical agency from
human actors and humanoid puppets to anthropomorphic non-representational non-
representational characters’18 The rules of scenography and performance making
are clearly being reassessed and developed. These perspectives embrace methods
of abstraction, deconstruction and questioning of methods of performance
production and receivership that reflect the way I challenge and question
methodology’s in my own clothing based research and practice. Practitioners
across disciplines are also now able to communicate using a wide range of
scenographic and visual meaning making tools. The illusion of a communication
can now be manipulated, re contextualised and reviewed and this in turn enables a
reassessment of the ephemeral nature of both fashion and performance. Narratives,
characters, time and space can be fragmented, abstracted and multi layered
enabling agency and traditional hierarchical structures of production to be
reconsidered and re ordered.
Within fashion exploration of time-based narratives through animation,
virtual presentation platforms and layering of the real and virtual particularly in
presentational formats has become more commonplace. The catwalk is being
challenged as an expensive and exclusive undertaking that does not reach the
widest audiences and as a result fashion film has grown exponentially over recent
years. Fashion Film employs clothing and its related intentions and connected
narratives as central to its methodology and is a hybrid genre between fashion and
performance and has enabled designers and communicators to work with narrative,
sometimes with performers as opposed to models and to embrace new platforms
and audiences emerging from the potential of time based and digital platforms.
ShowStudio.com has played a central role in the development of the genre, giving
a platform for the exploration of experimental communication of garments through
time based and digital media. This practice has also been adopted in the
8 Emotion and Memory; Clothing the Body as Performance
__________________________________________________________________
commercial realm by high-end brands as an advertising platform and in some cases
the films function both as commercial conduit and as films in their own right. The
use of the medium has been employed with different degrees of integrity and can
often appear lacking in performative purpose or intention. There are notable
exceptions such as the short film MUTA by Lucrecia Martel commissioned by
Muccia Prada for the Miu Miu collection (Fall Winter 2011/2012)19 that functions
somewhere between dark emotive narrative and fashion promotion.
Other collaborations with film makers are extending the potential of this
medium beyond the commercial realm notably Gareth Pugh’s presentation 20 (A/W
2009) by Ruth Hogben which demonstrates a sensitive and developed use of the
medium as a means of communicating the kinetic potential of the garment’s and
the theme of the collection through embodied experience of the wearer. Menswear
designer Aitor Throup’s work with Jez Touzer goes a step further and uses film to
convey a physical and emotional narrative of transformation where the clothing
morphs from the body to become the cases of musical instruments. This work
responds to the devastation of Hurricane Katrina in 2005, drawing on the idea of a
traditional New Orleans funeral marching band, telling ‘the story of five musicians
and their fight for survival in the wake of the devastation – a struggle in which they
must protect both themselves and their instruments’. 21 In this case the film enabled
the designer to communicate the narrative through both the design itself and
subsequent performance. This work from my perspective functions in a space
between fashion and performance and can be interpreted from either perspective or
indeed read and understood in its own right outside of discipline parameters
through the particular lenses of the viewer and is socio cultural context. I argue that
the examples of fashion design and communication discussed here all have some
form of message or visual narrative that drives the rationale for a performative
communication and the process and message is the primary focus as opposed to the
consumption of the garment as product.
There are shared areas of process and methodology that go beyond current
discussion of character, narrative, spectacle and performance in fashion
communication which are manifest in a variety of ways. What is most interesting
however at this interface is the transferability of areas of the design process itself
and the role of clothing in the overall communication. Both disciplines work with
cloth, the body, embodied meaning, semiotic codes, exploration of time with
reference to the past and present and both speak to an audience of some kind in the
present. I am not arguing that all performative applications within fashion are
performance or that contemporary aesthetics, themes and use of fashion spaces in
performance are fashion but rather that there is a particular and growing area of
practice in both disciplines that seems to function close to or at the intersection. In
a climate of reassessment of discipline parameters, interdisciplinary and
collaborative thinking it seems natural that a cross fertilisation of processes and
ideas has emerged. I further suggest that it is the shared understanding of clothing
Jessica Bugg 9
__________________________________________________________________
and the body and the similarity in methodology that enables practitioners to work
in a developing hybrid space with refocused methodologies.
‘By the time Merce Cunningham and his modern dance company
took a standing ovation at the Paris Opera on Tuesday, those
weird goiter-like protuberances had become part of the
performance, as the costumes created forceful, sculptured shapes
against the surgical white set’ 34
In this example the costumes are not only a tool for developing the choreography,
but they enable conceptual, emotional and physical development of the
performance between the choreographer and dancers. A more direct example of
this approach is the work of Ulrik Martin Larsen who having trained in fashion
started to work in costume. His ‘Choreographed garments’ are inspired by ideas of
dressing the body and he utilises this exploration in the development of both the
garments form and as the performance itself seeking to ‘actively define movement
and influence choreography’ through clothing 35 This work demonstrates the power
of the performative nature of clothing, dressing and wearing and potentially of the
design process itself. My own research and practice over the past fifteen years has
exposed the potential for costume and clothing to be central not only in the final
‘performance’ but in the process of developing performance, physical response and
communication with wearers and viewers.
Artists and performance artists from the late 1960s to the present day have
used the medium of clothing and the performing body to convey their ideas in an
interdisciplinary context36 There are however currently a community of
contemporary practitioners like Larsen who seem to work specifically in the hybrid
space between performance and fashion. They come from diverse backgrounds
such as fashion, textiles, architecture and visual art, some have trained or worked
in more than one discipline and all have a preoccupation with clothing the visual
and performing body to one degree or another. They work with different
methodologies and employ performance and performance art approaches using
narrative, character, physical action through time and space as well as employing
fashion led processes or communicating contemporary ideas, narratives, themes
and aesthetics.
Fashion trained Di Mainstone works directly with the body designing
dance and performance pieces through clothing. In her process she employs
performance design processes writing stories that are translated into wearable
forms. Through physical improvisation in collaboration with a performer she
choreographs short garment lead performance narratives. Others work outside of a
specific narrative and their work indicates the possibilities of communicating
shared clothing and body related concepts in performance. The sculptor Nick Cave
comes from a background of fibre textiles and then modern dance and produces
fabricated body sculptures that convey, semiotic and performative messages when
worn. The design duo Lucy and Bart work in a similar way creating fabricated
12 Emotion and Memory; Clothing the Body as Performance
__________________________________________________________________
body forms that explore character, narrative and meaning through clothing the
performing body. Their work has been described on their blog as an ‘instinctual
stalking of fashion, architecture, performance and the body’ 37 The artist Margret
Wibmer also works between disciplines and often across media creating
performances, photographic narratives and installations that use clothing that she
designs as both fashion and communication conduits, her conceptually led works
function firmly at the interface of performance art and fashion. The Finish artist
Riitta Ikonen works from a more conceptual position using costume as a
communication tool in her work, she explores concepts related to the body,
emotion and socio political issues to create short performative photographic
narrative responses38. The Japanese artist Pyuupiru uses clothing, makeup and
prosthetics as a means of exploring character and identity producing costume,
images and short performance films that deal with contemporary issues.
The work of these practitioners embodies some form of suggested
narrative, characterisation or message as dictated by the material choices and
forms, although this goes beyond the traditional parameters of fashion or costume
design for performance by drawing ideas and inspiration from both methodologies.
In all of these instances the performance relies upon the costume and the
performers response to it as integral to the visual narrative and the development of
the performance or communication itself. I suggest that from these examples
clothing can be understood not as scenography alone but as a form of body located
scenography that metamorphoses the divisions between costume and set, body and
costume, wearer and audience by communicating a narrative of some kind or
through the relationship between the materiality of the garment and the embodied
response of the wearer in an intimate and experiential exchange 39 There are many
definitions of the term scenography as with the understanding of the term fashion
and its many and increasingly diverse practices. Arnold Aronson’s description of
scenography40 seems to embrace a perspective that is more tangible in this context,
he understands scenography as:
This description may seem to take the focus away from costume but if the clothing
is designed to communicating meaning or visual and physical narratives or
messages through its interaction with the body, and if we understand the body itself
as site or stage then I argue that this interdisciplinary practice can be understood as
a type of site specific scenographic practice in its own right.
Aoife Monks discusses the significance of these ideas to performance and costume
design specifically, identifying the role of costume in the production of meaning
between costume, performer and audience 45 She also looks to fashion theory to
14 Emotion and Memory; Clothing the Body as Performance
__________________________________________________________________
locate this argument saying ‘if we take the work of fashion theorists seriously, who
point to the ways in which clothing anchors and produces the social body, and
embeds that body with a web of social and economic relations, we might need to
acknowledge theatre costumes crucial role in the production of the body on stage’46
The viewer essentially imbues the costumed body on stage with meaning through
not only a visual reading but from experiential knowledge of dress, as Monks
affirms ‘Spectators do not simply see costume representing clothes on stage; they
also see it being used. Actors visibly wear their costume, and this costume is made
of the same stuff of the dress worn by the audience’47 Therefore clothing’s physical
relationship to the body extends its meaning making potential through a sensory
understanding of clothing. The feel, weight, shape and physical attributes, as well
as embedded emotional and semiotic messages afford potential to connect and
communicate on a more experiential level.
If we focus then on the ‘performing’ and communicating body in both
fashion and performance being not only received by viewers but also being
experienced and viewed by wearers then clearly there is an experiential dialogue
that emerges between the designer, wearer and viewer. This dialogue connects the
viewer and performer through an embodied and emotional response, whether that
be in the moment or through connection to memory and previous experience of
clothing. Effectively the wearer and viewer draw on what is remembered
physically about wearing clothing, its materials, forms and associated memory and
interpreted meaning as well as its visual symbolism. Of central importance here is
also the role of the designer, who creates work through his or her own embodied
knowledge of clothing. Cohen talks of this ‘intimacy’ between body and materials
in her practice and research highlighting the importance of ‘material thinking’ that
‘acknowledges unconscious and emotional connections’ she talks of this
relationship as a process of ‘thinking through the body as material and materials
triggering the body in processes’48 this approach enables focus on emotional,
sensory and physical response and reaction to the clothed body which is central to
my current practice and research into contemporary clothing based communication.
I argue that it is the concept highlighted by Entwistle of ‘situated bodily practice’49
that resonates and connects with this way of thinking, providing not only a means
of understanding hybrid practice between fashion and performance but uncovers
the complexities and potential of the body in its holistic sense as a site for clothing
design and communication. Within these frameworks costume and the clothed,
communicating body can itself be seen as a body located scenographic practice,
this is particularly so where clothing becomes the generator of performance
through design.
Cohen’s discusses the ‘creative site’ as ‘a combination of multiple inputs
and connections-conscious and unconscious’ and that it is ‘also a site where
practitioners may have opportunities to experiment with various levels of cognitive
process and development of shared experience’50 In the context of my work it is
the combined conscious and unconscious reading and response as well as the focus
Jessica Bugg 15
__________________________________________________________________
on shared experience of the lived, performing, wearing and viewing body that
combines to make a ‘creative site’ through which costume is designed, experienced
and communicated between designer, wearer and viewer in performance. I argue
that essentially it is the focus on the body both physical and emotional as well as
the experience, memory and embodied understanding of clothing as part of a
complex performative dynamic that contributes to the making, intention and
reading of work within contemporary performance contexts.
Notes
1
Jessica Bugg, University of The Arts London, 2006.
2
Sophia Pantouvaki, Presence and Absence in Performance, Costume in the
Absence of the Body. (Place: Pub, date p.7)
3
Nancy. J. Troy, Couture Cultures: A Study of Modern Art and Fashion, (USA:
Massachusetts, MIT Press, 2003).
4
N.J. Troy, nd. 2003, 81.
5
Walter Van Beirendonck, designed for Robert Lepage and Russell Maliphant’s
Not Strictly Rubens, Royal Ballet of Flanders, Sadlers Wells (2003). Alexander Mc
Queens designed for Eonnagata, Sadlers Wells (2009). John Paul Gaulthier
designed for Regine Chopinot’s, Le Defile, Astoria (1985) and Zandra Rhodes for
Aida, English National Opera Coliseum (2008)
6
Uma Thurman was the face of Louis Vuitton (Handbag campaign (2005) and
Halle Berry for the Versace campaign (2006). Bjork and Lady GGa have both
endorsed and promoted Alexander McQueens designs which have been worn in
live performances, interviews and to high profile events.
7
Fashion Theory: The Journal of Dress Body and Culture (Vol 5 Issue 3, Berg,
2001).
8
C. Evans, The Enchanted Spectacle, n.d. 301.
9
C. Evans, Fashion at the Edge, (USA: Yale University Press, 2003).
10
Bugg, n.d. 2006.
11
S. Pantouvaki, Costume in the Absence of the Body, (Place: Pub, date. p.8)
12
S. Pantouvaki, n.d. Costume in the Absence of the Body, (Place: Pub, date. p.3)
13
B.Quinn, Hussein Chalayan, (Rotterdam Nai publishers 2005) p.46
14
Arrrgh! Monsters in Fashion, Benaki Museum, Athens Greece, May-July 2011
22 Emotion and Memory; Clothing the Body as Performance
__________________________________________________________________
15
www.fashion.arts.ac.uk/courses/graduate-school/ma-costume-design-for-
performance. 7.6.12
16
S.Garrett, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/theatre/7843548/Punchdrunk
17
Liora Malka Yellin, Louie Fuller and her Legacy: The Visual and the Virtual,
Presence and Absence in Performance. (Place: Pub, date. p.12)
18
(Parjad Sharifi, Bioscenography; Towards the Scenography of Non-
Representation. (Place: Pub, date. p.1)
19
www.miumiu.com/en/wtales/2/film
20
http://showstudio.com/collection/gareth_pugh_paris_womenswear_a_w_09
21
http://showstudio.project.neworleans
22
A. Monks, The Actor in Costume. (London: Palgrave, 2010, p.10).
23
Pamela Howard, What is Scenography (Routledge, 2009, p.224)
24
P.Howard. n.d, (Routledge, 2009). As discussed in the Introduction to the book.
25
Scenography and connected terminology is discussed from different
perspectives in this volume by, p. Sharifi, H.Cohen, M. Malka Yellin and S.
Pantaouvaki
26
S. Pantouvaki, n.d. Costume in the Absence of the Body, (Place: Pub, date p.2)
27
S. Pantouvaki, n.d . Costume in the Absence of the Body, (Place: Pub, date p.9)
28
In an Interview with Dazed Digital Sonia Biache discusses her inspiration and
process. http://www.dazeddigital.com/fashion/article/4391/1/from-the-triadische-
ballet-to-the-giudecca)
29
Lamentation was first performed in 1930
30
L. Malka Yellin, n.d. Louie Fuller and her Legacy: The Visual and the Virtual
(Place: Pub, date p.1)
31
L. Malka Yellin, n.d. Louie Fuller and her Legacy: The Visual and the Virtual
(Place: Pub, date p.7)
32
Issey Miyake collaboration with William Forsythe, Loss of Small Detail,
Frankfurt Ballet, (1993)
33
Rei Kawakubo's costume for Merce Cunningham’s Scenario, The Barbican,
London (1998)
34
Menkes, S. Ode to the Abstract: When Designer Met Dance (1998)
http://www.nytimes.com/1998/01/08/style/08iht-dance
35
info@ulrikmartinlarsen.com
36
Artists and Performance Artists such as Rebecca Horn, Caroline Broadhead,
Leigh Bowery, Lucy Orta, Azra Aksamija, and Yayoi Kasama as well as many
others have all in different ways used clothing and performance as central to their
work and communication.
37
lucyandbart.blogspot.com/
38
http://www.riittaikonen.com
Jessica Bugg 23
__________________________________________________________________
39
See also L. Malka Yellin, Presence and Absence, Loie Fuller and her Legacy,
(Place: Pub, date), p.2. Yellin discusses the costume and dance of Fuller as
integrated and non-separable.
40
A. Aronson, Looking into the Abyss: Essays on Scenography, (Michigan:
University of Michigan Press, 2008).
41
Aronson, 2008, p.7
42
H. Cohen, n.d. Presence and Absence, You can Take the Art out of The Body, But
you can’t Take the Body out of Art, (Place: Pub, date),, (Place: Pub, date, p.2)
43
J. Entwistle, The Fashioned Body, (Cambridge: Polity, 2000).
44
A. Warwick and D. Cavallaro, Fashioning the Frame: Boundaries, Dress and
the Body, (Oxford: Berg, 1998), 24.
45
Monks, n.d.8.
46
Monks, n.d. p.l0
47
Monks, n.d. p.39
48
H. Cohen, Presence and Absence, You can Take the Art out of The Body, But you
can’t Take the Body out of Art, (Place: Pub, date), p.9
49
Entwistle, n.d. 2000
50
H. Cohen, Presence and Absence, You can Take the Art out of The Body, But you
can’t Take the Body out of Art, (Place: Pub, date), p.4
51
H. Cohen, Presence and Absence, You can Take the Art out of The Body, But you
can’t Take the Body out of Art, (Place: Pub, date), p.6
52
H. Cohen, Presence and Absence, You can Take the Art out of The Body, But you
can’t Take the Body out of Art, (Place: Pub, date),p.5
53
H. Cohen, Presence and Absence, You can Take the Art out of The Body, But you
can’t Take the Body out of Art, (Place: Pub, date),p.5
Bibliography:
Aronson, Arnold. Looking into the Abyss: Essays on Scenography. Michigan:
University of Michigan Press, 2008.
Atopos CVC, Not a Toy: fashioning radical characters, Berlin: Pictoplasma, 2011.
Bugg, Jessica. Interface: Concept and Context as Strategies for Innovative Fashion
Design and Communication: An Analysis from the Perspective of the Conceptual
Fashion Design Practitioner. Phd Thesis, University of The Arts London, 2006
Counsell, Colin. and Mock, Roberta. ed., Performance, Embodiment and Cultural
Memory. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2009.
24 Emotion and Memory; Clothing the Body as Performance
__________________________________________________________________
Entwistle, Joanne. & Wilson, Elizabeth. ed. Body Dressing. Oxford: Berg, 2001.
Evans, Caroline. Fashion at the Edge. USA: Yale University Press, 2003.
Fashion Theory The Journal of Dress Body and Culture, Fashion and
Performance, Journal Vol 5, Issue 3, Oxford: Berg, 2001.
Menkes, Suzy. Ode to the Abstract: When Designer Met Dance, 1998
http://www.nytimes.com/1998/01/08/style/08iht-dance
Troy, Nancy. J. Couture Cultures: A Study of Modern Art and Fashion. USA:
Massachusetts, MIT Press, 2003.