MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Proficient Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: Nina Dyan G. Saban Name of Rater: Vergelio A. Legarde Jr.
Position: Teacher I Position: Master Teacher II
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Puerto Princesa City Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Review Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 2022- 7% Classroom Observation
Education Knowledge knowledge 2023 Tool (COT) rating sheet/s
Services and of content or inter-observer
Pedagogy within and agreement form/s done
across through onsite / face-to-face
curriculum / in-person classroom
teaching areas. observation.
(PPST 1.1.2)
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
person classes are not

implemented,
• through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching
in other modalities; or
• through observation of
a demonstration
teaching* via LAC
session.
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Review Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 2. Used a range 2022- 7% Classroom Observation
Education of teaching 2023 Tool (COT) rating sheet/s
Services strategies that or inter-observer
enhance agreement form/s done
learner through onsite / face-to-face
achievement in / in-person classroom
literacy and observation.
numeracy
skills. If onsite / face-to-face / in-
(PPST 1.4.2) person classes are not

implemented,
• through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching
in other modalities; or
• through observation of
a demonstration
teaching* via LAC
session.
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Review Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 3. Applied a 2022- 7% Classroom Observation
Education range of 2023 Tool
Services teaching (COT) rating sheet/s or
strategies to inter-
develop critical observer agreement form/s
and creative done through onsite / face-
thinking, as well to-
as other higher- face / in-person classroom
order observation.
thinking skills.
(PPST 1.5.2) If onsite / face-to-face / in-
person classes are not

implemented,
• through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.

Basic KRA 2: 4. Managed 2022- 7% Classroom Observation

Education Learning Classroom 2023 Tool (COT) rating sheet/s or
Services Environme structure to inter-observer agreement
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Review Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
nt & engage form/s done through onsite /
Diversity of learners, face-to-face / in-person
Learners individually or in classroom observation.
groups, in
meaningful If onsite / face-to-face / in-
exploration, person classes are not
discovery and implemented,
hands-on • through observation of
activities within synchronous /
a range of asynchronous
physical teaching in other
learning modalities; or
environments. • through observation of
(PPST 2.3.2) a demonstration
teaching* via LAC
session.

Basic 5. Managed 2022- 7% Classroom Observation

Education learner behavior 2023 Ñ Tool
Services constructively (COT) rating sheet/s or
by applying inter-
positive and observer agreement form/s
non-violent done through onsite / face-
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Review Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
discipline to to-
ensure learning- face / in-person classroom
focused bservation.
environments.
(PPST 2.6.2) If onsite / face-to-face / in-
person classes are not
implemented,
• through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
Basic 6. Used 2022- 7% Classroom Observation
Education differentiated, 2023 Tool Outstanding 1 No MOV
Services developmentally (COT) rating sheet/s or presented
appropriate inter-
learning observer agreement form/s
experiences to done through onsite / face-
address to-
learners’ face / in-person classroom
gender, observation.
needs,
strengths, If onsite / face-to-face / in-
interests and person classes are not
experiences. implemented,
(PPST 3.1.2)
• through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Review Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic KRA 3: 7. Planned, 2022- 7% Classroom Observation
Education Curriculum managed and 2023 Tool
Services and implemented (COT) rating sheet/s or
Planning developmentally inter-
sequenced observer agreement form/s
teaching and done through onsite / face-
learning to-
processes to face / in-person classroom
meet curriculum observation.
requirements
and varied If onsite / face-to-face / in-
teaching person classes are not
contexts. implemented
(PPST 4.1.2)
• through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.

Basic 8. Participated 2022- 7% 1. Proof/s of attendance in

Education in collegial 2023 LAC sessions / FGDs /
Services discussions meetings / other collegial
that use discussions
teacher and 2. Minutes of LAC sessions
learner / FGDs / meetings / other
feedback to collegial discussions on use
enrich teaching of teacher and learner
practice. feedback to enrich teaching
(PPST 4.4.2) practice
3. Reflection notes of
teachers on their
demonstration of teaching
practices following
participation from LAC
sessions / FGDs /
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Review Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
meetings / other collegial
discussions that use
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich teaching
practice, with proof/s of
attendance
4. Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective
Basic KRA 3: 9. Selected, 2022- 7% Classroom Observation
Education Curriculum developed, 2023 Tool
Services and organized and (COT) rating sheet/s or
Planning used inter-
appropriate observer agreement form/s
teaching and done through onsite / face-
learning to-
resources, face / in-person classroom
including ICT, to observation.
address
learning If onsite / face-to-face / in-
goals. person classes are not
(PPST 4.5.2) implemented
• through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
Basic KRA 4: 10.Designed, 2022- 7% 10. Classroom Observation
Education Assessmen selected, 2023 Tool (COT) rating sheet/s or
Services t and organized and inter-observer agreement
Reporting used diagnostic, form/s done through onsite /
formative and face-to-face / in-person
summative classroom
assessment observation.
strategies
consistent with If onsite / face-to-face / in-
curriculum person classes are not
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Review Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
requirements. implemented
(PPST 5.1.2) • through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching via
LAC session. *

Basic 11. Monitored 2022- 7% Any one (1) of the following:

Education and evaluated 2023 ● Individual Learning
Services learner progress Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
and ● Peer assessment data
achievement ● Sample of learners’ output
using learner with reflection / self-
attainment assessment
data. ● Progress charts/anecdotal
(PPST 5.2.2) records
● Class/e-class
record/grading sheets
● Lesson plans showing
index of mastery
● Frequency of errors with
identified least/most
mastered skills
● Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective
(e.g., Individual Learning
Agreement (ILA), ALS
Assessment Form 2)
● Others (Please specify
and
provide annotations)

Basic 12. 2022- 7% Any one (1) of the

Education Communicated 2023 following:
Services promptly and ● A sample of corrected
clearly the test paper of a learner
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Review Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
learners’ in a learning area with
needs, progress parent’s or guardian’s
and signature and date of
achievement to receipt
key ● Minutes of meetings
stakeholders, with key stakeholders
including (e.g., PTA, SGC, SPT,
parents/ CPC) with proof of
guardians. attendance
(PPST 5.4.2) ● Report card with
parent’s or guardian’s
signature in all quarters
supported by minutes of
meeting
● Communication with
key stakeholders (e.g.,
parents/guardians, co-
teachers, LGU) using
various modalities
● Anecdotal record
showing entries per
quarter
● Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective
● Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Basic KRA 5: 13. Applied a 2022- 7% A reflection/journal entry
Education Personal personal 2023 that highlights the
Services Growth and philosophy of application of a learner-
Professional teaching that is centered teaching
Developmen learner- philosophy in the lesson
t centered. plan or community work
(PPST 7.1.2)

Basic 14. Set 2022- 7% 1. Certification from the ICT

 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Review Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Education professional 2023 Coordinator / School Head /
Services development Focal Person in charge of
goals based on e-
the Philippine SAT
Professional 2. IPCRF-DP
Standards for 3. Mid-year Review Form
Teachers. (MRF)
(PPST 7.5.2) 4. Updated IPCRF-DP from
Phase II
Basic Plus Factor 15. 15. 2022- 2% Any one (1) proof of:
Education Performed 2023 ● committee involvement;
Services various related ● involvement as
works / module/learning material
activities that writer/validator;
contribute to ● involvement as a resource
the teaching- person/speaker/learning
learning facilitator in in the
process. RO/SDO/school-initiated
TV/radio-based instruction;
● book or journal
authorship/
co-authorship/
contributorship;
advisorship/coordinatorship/
Pchairpersonship;
● participation in
demonstration
teaching;
● participation as research
presenter in a
forum/conference;
● mentoring of
pre-service/in-
service teachers;
● conducted research within
the rating period;
● others (please specify)
with annotation on how it
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Review Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
contributed to the teaching-
learning process.

VERGELIO A. LEGARDE JR. NIÑA DYAN G. SABAN REX K. IGNACIO

Rater Ratee Approving Authority