Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module 9 11 RIZAL
Module 9 11 RIZAL
Course Code: GE 09
Course Title: The Life and Works of Rizal
Course Type: GEC
Course Credits: 3 units
Duration: Second Semester 2020-2021
Instructor: ROCHELLE M. BACONG, LPT
Contact Information: rochellebacong22@gmail.com/ 0935-474-0232
Module 9-11
The Search for Filipino Origins
I. Learning Outcomes
II. Introduction
This module presents a different perspective of Philippine history prior to the arrival of the Spanish
colonizers. The pre-colonial past became one of Rizal’s motivations in writing the sequel to Noli Me Tangere.
Section 1, Pacto de Sangre: Why We Were Conquered presents a view of the blood compact between early
Spanish conquistadors led by Miguel Lopez de Legazpi and community rulers led by Sikatuna and its significance
to the development of Filipino nationalism. Section 2, Pre-Colonial Philippines: Rizal’s Annotations of Morga
discusses insights from Rizal’s research and Annotations of Antonio de Morga’s Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas.
a. Blood Compact
b. La Solidaridad
c. Colonization
What is Sucesos?
-EVENTS, HAPPENINGS, OCCURRENCE
-The Sucesos is the work of an honest observer, a versatile bureaucrat, who knew the workings of the administration
from the inside.
-His extensive annotations of Morga's work number "no less than 639 items or almost two annotations for every page."
Rizal also annotated Morga's typographical errors. He commented on every statement that could be nuanced in Filipino
cultural practices. For example, on page 248 Morga describes the culinary art of the ancient Filipinos by recording: "... they
prefer to eat salt fish which begin to decompose and smell." Rizal's footnotes: "This is another preoccupation of the
Spaniards who, like any other nation in that matter of food, loathe that to which they are not accustomed or is unknown to
them... The fish that Morga mentions does not taste better when it is beginning to rot; all on the contrary" it is bagoong and
all those who have eaten it and tasted it know it is not or ought not to be rotten“.
1. Rizal commits the error of many historians in appraising the events of the past in the light of present standards.
2. Rizal's attacks on the church were unfair and unjustified because the abuses of the friars should not be construed to
mean the Catholicism is bad.
RIZAL'S ANNOTATION
- In his historical essay, which includes the narration of Philippine colonial history, punctuated as it was with incidences of
agony, tensions, tragedies and prolonged periods of suffering that many of people had been subjected to. He correctly
observed that as a colony of Spain, "The Philippines was depopulated, impoverished and retarded, astounded by metaphor
sis, with no confidence in her past, still without faith in her present and without faltering hope in the future."
-He went to say: "... little by little, they (Filipinos) lost their old traditions, the mementoes of their past; they gave up their
writing, their songs, their poems, their laws, in order to learn other doctrines which they did not understand, another
-To the Filipinos: "In my "NOLI ME TANGERE" I commenced to sketch the present conditions obtaining in our country. The
effect produced by my efforts gave me to understand - before proceeding to develop before your eyes other successive
scenes - that is necessary to first lay bare the past, in order the better to judge the present and to survey the road trodden
during three centuries.
2. Content Analysis
a. Thesis Statement and Main Ideas
b. Supporting Details
3. Synthesis:
a. What do you think was the reason why
Bonifacio wrote “Ang Dapat Mabatid ng
mga Tagalog”?
b. What have you realized after reading the
text?
c. Write a response to Bonifacio in the form
of a letter using your pen name.
Google Slides/ PowerPoint Presentation Collective Memory Struggle: Redrawing the
- Make a PowerPoint presentation of Philippines
Section 2: Pre- the table below: From past lessons, recall any knowledge
VI. Assessment
Activity 1: What are the possible reasons why the Philippines was colonized by Spain?
Activity 2: Instructions: Compare and Contrast Rizal and Morga’s differing views of the Filipinos and Philippine Culture
Activity 3:
Instructions: Give 5-10 importance of Rizal’s Annotations to the present generation?
VII. References
Aguilar, F. (2010). The Pacto se Sangre in the late nineteenth-century nationalist employment of Philippine history.
Philippine Studies, 58 (1-2), 79-109. Retrieved from
http://www.philippinestudies.net/files/journals/1/articles/3017/submission/original/3017-3409-1-SM
Bonifacio, A. (1896). Ang dapat mabatid ng mga Tagalog. Retrieved from http://www.kasaysayan-kkk.info/kalayaan-
the-katipunan-newspaper/andres-bonifacio-ang-dapat-mabatid-ng-mga-tagalog-c-march-1896
De Torres, N. (2014). Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=y76p2clvhBE
Ocampo, A. (1998). Rizal’s Morga and views of Philippine history. Philippine Studies, 46 (2), 184-214
Pigafetta, A. (1969). First voyage around the world (pp. 23-32). Manila, Philippines: Filipiniana Book Guild
Rizal, J. (1962). Historical events of the Philippine Islands: published in Mexico in 1609 by Antonio de Morga;
recently brought to light and annotated by Jose Rizal; preceded by a prologue by Ferdinand Blumentritt. Manila,
Philippines: Jose Rizal National Centennial Commission