Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Apostolic Fathers
The Apostolic Fathers
A BRIEF INTRODUCTION,
SUMMARY, AND THEIR
CONTENTS
Prepared by Nick Campbell
This document can be used for any purpose. It is simply requested that the
document remains unaltered if used directly (leaving watermarks and website
URLs on the document) or credit is provided to Christ is the Cure.org if the
document's contents are reproduced or adapted in other formats.
The first text of the Apostolic Fathers provided below is public domain, from
Lightfoot's translation of the Apostolic Fathers. Unfortunately, the translation is a
bit dated, and I highly recommend Michael Holmes' edition of The Apostolic
Father. Note that Lightfoot's edition does not contain the Fragments of Papias.
It should be further noted that some of the information provided here is debated,
especially regarding the issue of church organization. I have tried to summarize
the information in a way that all could accept, but readers may find disagreement
with my summaries on points.
RESOURCES
[Free] Essentials of Church History – Lesson 1 with Gordan Isaac from Biblical training.org
[Free] Gerald Bray – The World of the First Christians from Biblical training.org
[Free] Gerald Bray – The Spread of the Church from Biblical training.org
[Free] Gavin Ortlund's Channel, Truth Unites, which discusses church history often from
a Protestant Perspective
Objective: Introduce students to the Apostolic Fathers and their historical and theological
significance.
o Who were the Apostolic Fathers, and why are they important in early
Christian history?
o What are some of the key themes or issues addressed by the Apostolic
Fathers in their writings?
Objective: Dive deeper into the writings of specific Apostolic Fathers and analyze their
teachings.
o What are some of the main teachings of the chosen Apostolic Fathers
in their writings?
Weeks 4 (for 5-week plan) or Weeks 4-7 (for 10-week plan): In-depth Study of Apostolic
Fathers
Objective: Further explore the writings of the chosen Apostolic Fathers and their
relevance for contemporary Christianity.
Week 5 (for 5-week plan) or Weeks 8-10 (for 10-week plan): Synthesis and Conclusion
Objective: Synthesize the learnings from the study of the Apostolic Fathers and conclude
the lesson plan.
- Summary and Reflection: Summarize the key teachings and insights gained
from the study of the Apostolic Fathers, and provide time for students to
reflect on how their understanding of early Christianity has been enriched
through this study.
Notes: The specific readings, discussion questions, and activities can be tailored to the
needs and interests of the audience. The above is just a suggestion or starting point for one
wanting to work through the Apostolic Fathers in a Church History class, small group, etc.
T
raditionally the term "The Apostolic Fathers" is used to designate the collection of
Christian writings outside of the New Testament, particularly from the period
between AD 70-150. The collection is important as it provides insight into
Christianity immediately after the apostles' lives. The collection deals with the church's
relationship to the state, Judaism, and exhortations for Christians in the post-Temple
context.
The historical context of the Apostolic Fathers, including the Didache, is marked by a
period of early Christian development and growth. The work presents teachings on
Christian virtues and ethics, reflecting the challenges the early Christian community faced
as it sought to establish its identity and navigate the complexities of the Roman world and
the contemporaries holding to Judaism.
All of the documents of the Apostolic Fathers are valuable in this way and are an excellent
way to familiarize oneself with the early church immediately following the Apostles.
A
fter the reign of Roman Emperor Nero in AD 68, Christianity rapidly spread
throughout the region, prompting questions about congregation organization and
leadership, which will be discussed below.
A significant event that requires attention is the destruction of the Jewish Temple and the
sack of Jerusalem in AD 70. The Jewish revolt against Rome from AD 66-74 was a pivotal
moment in the history of Judaism and the relationship between Christians and Jews. The
revolt, which lasted until AD 74, saw the temple destroyed by Titus, a Roman General, as
a means to end the rebellion and resolve what he saw as the Jewish problem.
In response to the destruction of the temple, Judaism underwent significant changes. The
focus of faith shifted from the temple to the synagogues, and Rabbis emerged as the new
key religious leaders, leading to the disappearance of most sects of early Judaism, except
for the Pharisees. This shift from priests to Rabbis also resulted in a greater emphasis on
the study of Torah rather than temple worship, intending to prevent the development of
sects within Judaism and draw a more apparent line between Jews and Gentiles (non-
Jews).
Unfortunately, these changes also led to the condemnation and separation of Jews from
Jewish Christians, resulting in bitterness and hostility that persisted for centuries.
T
he terms "bishop" and "presbyter" (or elder) were initially synonymous, as indicated
within the Letter of Clement. 1 Clement states that Christian communities were
ordered by a group of presbyters who served as presbyter-bishops and had multiple
roles, including offering the sacrifice (1 Clement, 44), which referred to administering the
Eucharist (or communion). Clement presents this presbyter-bishop and deacon model as
established by the apostles and as successors of the apostles in terms of authority over the
community (1 Clement 42-44), thus linking the authority of these offices through the
Apostles, Jesus, and God himself.
However, the idea of a single leader for each church, often referred to as the monarchial
episcopate, quickly emerged, leading to a distinction between the roles of bishop and
presbyter within the church. This threefold ministry of bishops, presbyters, and deacons
would be fully realized by AD 180. Still, its full formalization would occur in the 3rd
century (around AD 215 - 258), as seen in the writings of Ignatius of Antioch.
Ignatius of Antioch's letters reveal that the bishop was considered the single leader of a
congregation, with presbyters under their authority and assistance (Magnesians 2-3;
Ephesians 5, 3, etc). Ignatius viewed the bishop as one who maintained congregational
unity, filling the void left by the departed apostles. While the bishop held authority, the
bishop was not seen as a replacement of the apostles in status but rather in certain
functions. In Ignatius' Letter to Smyrna (8), the bishop is placed at the center of
congregational activities, with communion and baptism considered valid only when
administered by a bishop or someone appointed by a bishop. Ignatius stresses the
importance of congregational unity under a bishop, stating in Smyrna 8:2, "Wherever the
bishop appears, there let the congregation be; just as where Jesus Christ is, there is the
catholic church. It is not permissible either to baptize or to hold a love feast without the
bishop. But whatever he approves is also pleasing to God, in order that everything you do
may be trustworthy and valid."
While the concept of Apostolic Succession would further develop during the rise of
Gnosticism (with the first chronological list of Bishops found in Irenaeus of Lyons' Against
Heresies), Ignatius did not link the authority of the bishop to apostolic succession but
rather to the will of God, who desires the bishop to be the head of the community as a head
elder (Ephesians 6:1). Difficulties in tracing the development of this church structure arise
from the confusion of language (bishop, presbyter, and elder). However, the scholarly
consensus seems to indicate that the monarchical episcopate was an early development in
the church, likely following Jewish structures of a president elder among elders in the
synagogue.
D
uring this period, there is little to add to the discussion of church teachings that
cannot be ascertained from the scriptures, but there is evidence of the rise of errors
such as Docetism and Ebionism. Docetism taught that Jesus Christ was not
actually human but only appeared to be a man. According to this view, Jesus was a purely
heavenly being who could not interact with the material world. This view was part of the
larger worldview of Gnosticism, and Ignatius of Antioch, one of the Apostolic Fathers,
addressed Docetism and laid the groundwork for the defense against Gnostic teachings,
similar to the methods of Irenaeus. On the other hand, Ebionism taught that Jesus was not
God in the flesh but a supreme prophet who perfectly obeyed God. Ebionites were Jewish
Christians who continued to follow the laws of the Old Testament, viewing Jesus as the
Son of God through adoption at his baptism. According to this view, Jesus would return
to rule over the nation from Jerusalem, and Paul was considered a traitor to Judaism.
Ignatius also spoke against this Judaizing tendency, reminding Christians they are not
bound to the Old Covenant Law while defending the deity of Christ and his true
incarnation.
Regarding worship during the time of the Apostolic Fathers, the picture is complex to piece
together precisely. Our first detailed description comes from Justin Martyr, one of the
Christian Apologists who is not counted among the 'apostolic fathers.' However, the
Apostolic Fathers give us some insight into various issues, such as early Christian's view
on the Mosaic Law, The Lord's Day, the Lord's Supper, Baptism, and so on.
T
he Greco-Roman world's paganism and moral values, which were heavily centered
on territorial deities, often conflicted early Christianity with its neighbors. This was
especially true because the idea of separating state and religion, or having private
religion, was unheard of during that time. The pagan religion was deeply ingrained in the
Roman Empire's institutions, and the belief in supernatural causes and effects was
prevalent in the people's minds. For example, earthquakes or floods were sometimes
attributed to the judgments of deities like Neptune or Poseidon against the growing
Christian community. The inner turmoil of Rome was sometimes seen as a result of a lack
of proper honor to the imperial cult. As a result, Christians were often excluded from many
social practices, celebrations, entertainment, military duty, and other activities.
Ethically, Christians found themselves at odds with their neighbors as well. While Romans
practiced abortion, infanticide, gladiatorial violence, divorce, and other behaviors,
Christians rejected these practices, which made them unpopular among their
contemporaries. Additionally, Christians were sometimes accused of engaging in
detestable practices such as cannibalism, incest, and black magic, although these charges
were based on misunderstandings of Christian beliefs and practices. For example, the
notion of cannibalism arose from how Christians spoke of the Eucharist and partaking in
Christ's body and blood. The idea of incest came from Christians calling each other brother
and sister due to their relationship in Christ and their participation in "love feasts" that
included communion. The lack of clarity about Christian beliefs was exacerbated by the
fact that Christians often met quietly due to the fear of persecution.
The Roman Empire also had periods of persecution against Christians, carried out by
emperors such as Nero (AD 54-68), although some emperors like Commodus (AD 180-92)
were more tolerant. During the period, we find the first official government
pronouncement on how Christians should be dealt with, which came from Emperor Trajan
(AD 98-117). Trajan received an inquiry from the governor of Bithynia, Pliny, asking for
guidance on dealing with Christians. Trajan's reply stated that Christians should not be
actively sought out, but if anyone was accused of being a Christian, they would have the
chance to prove otherwise by worshiping a pagan deity. They must be put to death if found
guilty of being a Christian.
This policy of Trajan's was carried out for the next 200 years. During this period, martyrs
gained high respect among Christians for following in the footsteps of Christ in their
sufferings. For example, Polycarp of Smyrna was martyred in AD 160, and his bones were
considered precious, with the "birthdate of his martyrdom" celebrated. This eventually led
to the observation of different days for the heroes of the faith. This practice continues in
various traditions today, although Protestants abandoned it during the Reformation due
to unverifiable legends and superstitions surrounding alleged sacred relics that developed
later on.
T
he origin of Gnosticism is not a simple discussion and scholarship continues to dig
into original sources to better pin where exactly “Gnosticism” began.
The term “Gnosticism” was first used by Irenaeus, followed by church fathers, and
even Neo-Platonic pagan opponents of Gnostics. Prior to this, it is believed that John the
Apostle encountered early forms of Gnosticism given his emphasis on the incarnation of
Jesus. Many, however, have determined that Gnosticism comes from a form of Hellenized
Jewish Mysticism that sought to explain difficulties with Israel’s experience post-AD 70.
Because of the numerous views within Gnosticism, and no central authority or canon,
“Christianized Gnosticism” is best placed in the 2nd Century when we see “Christian”
Gnostic teachers being addressed by Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria,
Tertullian, Hippolytus, Origen, and Ephiphanius. As it pertains to the Apostolic Fathers
there have been debates over whether or not figures such as Ignatius were pushing back
against early forms of Gnosticism.
With recent scholarship and the analysis of the Gnostic texts of Nag Hammadi, it is best to
bear in mind that Christianized Gnosticism was not existent by itself nor is the Gnosticism
we find polemics of in church writings representative of all forms of Gnosticism.
Gnosticism is a debated term typically and loosely used to describe a religious
phenomenon with many articulations and faces. A central idea of this worldview was the
acquisition of “true knowledge” regarding divine and human spiritual realities.
Gnosticism is heavily debated in many ways, but we will summarize what is traditionally
understood concerning “Christianized Gnosticism.” Gnosticism is linked to platonic
dualism, a division of matter and spirit, which is articulated as depicting the physical or
material world as inherently evil. In contrast the spirit world was potentially good.
Additionally, Gnosticism has an understanding of “a scale of being.”
Despite the gap between the supreme being and the material world, human beings are
made up of the same spiritual substance of the supreme being, and are noted to be trapped
within their physical bodies. It is our being trapped in our physical bodies that we need
salvation from so that we can be reabsorbed into the supreme being. The supreme being
thus sends a redeemer and a messenger who is to awaken people of their true identity, and
home, via knowledge of the truth. Jesus within Gnosticism mixed into Christianity, then,
is this redeemer. As Stephen Wellum in “God the Son Incarnate” notes,
“All forms of Gnosticism denied that “Christ” - This heavenly, spiritual redeemer - became
incarnate, given their antithesis between spirit and matter. So, they argued that ‘Christ’
Gnosticism mixed with Christianity ultimately took various forms, but fundamentally
denied the humanity of Christ. Docetism is the most familiar heresy inspired by Gnostic
influence. Additionally, many early false writings of the New Testament can be traced to
Gnosticism such as the Gospel of Mary, Thomas (right image), Judas, and so on.
SUMMARY OF CLEMENT
Clement of Rome was a bishop (or overseer) of the church in Rome who is considered a
disciple of Paul with association [to
some extent] with Peter. It is generally
accepted that Clement is the author of
the letter 1 Clement, written around AD
96. Furthermore, it is held by some,
including Origen of Alexandria, that
Clement of Rome is the same Clement
mentioned in Philippians 4.3.
According to Eusebius, Clement was a
part of the Roman church's leadership
for nine years.
§ Good Works and Practical faith (1 Clement 31-38): Clement stresses the
importance of living out one's faith through acts of charity, hospitality, and good
works.
§ Repentance and forgiveness (1 Clement 24-30): Clement emphasizes the need for
repentance, forgiveness, and spiritual renewal as essential aspects of the Christian
life.
SUMMARY OF 2 CLEMENT
The work "2 Clement" is often called the Second Letter of Clement, but it is neither a letter
nor is it written by Clement. Instead, it is a sermon by an elder/presbyter who is
anonymous (17.3). The sermon relies heavily on Isaiah 54 and calls for its audience to come
to repentance, purity, and perseverance.
Some have suggested that 2 Clement is
also a work that reacts against gnostic
ideas because of its stress on the deity of
Christ, the resurrection, and the
judgment to come.
• The New Covenant in Christ: The work compares and contrasts the Old Covenant
of the Jewish law with the New Covenant established in Jesus Christ. The author
highlights the superiority of the New Covenant, which is fulfilled in Christ and
brings salvation to all humanity. This theme underscores the central role of Jesus
Christ as the mediator of the New Covenant and the source of salvation for
believers. (2 Clement 11:1-3)
• Faith and Works: 2 Clement emphasizes the inseparable relationship between faith
and good works in the Christian life. The author stresses that righteous deeds
accompany genuine faith and that a mere profession of faith without
corresponding works is insufficient. This theme underscores the importance of
both belief and action in the life of a faithful Christian. (2 Clement 14:1-2)
SUMMARY OF
IGNATIUS
Within the letters of Ignatius, we find a particular emphasis on the importance of unity
within the local church, wherein he argued for the importance of the bishop's [or overseer]
role as a pillar of unity and proper authority. Ignatius speaks about his concerns against
false teachers within the church, the unity of the church, and his coming death. Ignatius
feared that false teachers within the church would be more deadly than the pagan society
outside of the church as such, could split the church, which is reflected in nearly all of his
letters.
In speaking to false teachings, Ignatius defended the deity of Christ and the real
incarnation of Christ via Christ's true suffering and bodily resurrection. In the letter to the
Philadelphians, Ignatius speaks of a schism that occurred as some had moved from their
bishop while teaching that it was necessary to observe the law. Ignatius speaks heavily
against those who would follow the schismatics noting that they will not inherit the
kingdom of God if they hold to alien views (3:3).
Within his letters against false teachings and unity of the church by means of a bishop's
authority, Ignatius spends time reflecting on his martyrdom. Ignatius presents a zealous
eagerness to imitate the suffering of Jesus and thus becoming a true disciple of Christ via
his suffering. In part, he does express some worry that he will fail his test, yet his desire in
the letters is to suffer as Christ suffered, "Let me be the meal of the beasts!" (To the
Romans).
• Divinity of Jesus Christ: Ignatius strongly affirms the divinity of Jesus Christ,
asserting his belief in the incarnation of Christ as the Son of God. He emphasizes
that Jesus Christ is both fully human and fully divine and the source of salvation
for all humanity. (Ignatius to the Ephesians, 18:2; Ignatius to the Romans, 1:3)
• Christian Unity: Ignatius stresses the importance of unity and harmony within
the church. He emphasizes the need for love, humility, and mutual submission
among believers and warns against division, schism, and false doctrines. (Ignatius
to the Ephesians, 4:1-2; Ignatius to the Magnesians, 6:1)
• Martyrdom: Ignatius expresses his desire for martyrdom and views it as a means
of imitating Christ and attaining closer union with God. He encourages the
recipients of his letters to support and pray for his martyrdom, and to be willing
to endure suffering and persecution for the sake of the faith. (Ignatius to the
Romans, 2:1; Ignatius to the Ephesians, 9:1)
• Counter to Legalism: Ignatius argues against those who advocate for placing
Christians under the Jewish law, asserting that the observance of the Mosaic law
no longer binds Christians. He emphasizes that the Old Covenant has been
fulfilled in Jesus Christ, and that Christians are now under the New Covenant of
faith in Christ, which surpasses the limitations of the Old Covenant. (Ignatius to
the Magnesians, 8:1; Ignatius to the Philadelphians, 6:1)
• Church Worship: Ignatius briefly mentions the practice of the Eucharist (or
communion) as a means of unity. He emphasizes the importance of celebrating
communion in a manner consistent with the apostles' teachings. (Ignatius to the
Ephesians, 20:2; Ignatius to the Smyrnaeans, 8:1)
SUMMARY OF POLYCARP
Polycarp was a leader and bishop in the church of Smyrna, in Asia Minor. He would be
most famous for his martyrdom that occurred sometime around 155-167 and he has been
considered one of the most noble individuals of the post-apostolic period. Polycarp has
traditionally been considered a disciple of the Apostle John, although a handful of scholars
questions this. What can be confirmed is that Polycarp had been friends with Ignatius of
Antioch who would write a letter to Polycarp.
By all accounts, Polycarp had a significant role to play in the church amidst the growing
movement of Gnosticis. According to Eusebius, Polycarp had gone into hiding outside of
Smyrna when persecution broke out. He was betrayed, arrested, and burned at the stake
according to "The Martyrdom of Polycarp." The only surviving document from Polycarp
himself is his letter to the Philippians, which is a letter written in reply to their inquiry.
• Love and Humility: Polycarp emphasizes the importance of love and humility as
essential virtues in the Christian life. He encourages the Philippians to imitate
God's love and to walk in humility towards one another. (Polycarp to the
Philippians, 2:1)
• Obedience to Church Leaders: Polycarp emphasizes the need for the Philippians
to be obedient to their church leaders, as they hold authority in the community of
faith. He urges them to submit to their leaders and to avoid rebellion and division.
(Polycarp to the Philippians, 5:1-2)
"The Didache" literally means the teaching and has sometimes been called the teaching of
the Lord to the Gentiles by the Twelve Apostles or the Teaching of the Twelve Apostles.
The Didache is a mystery regarding who wrote it, where they wrote it, and most obviously
when it was written. Many commentators on the Didache have stated that it is likely a
compilation from various sources rather than the work of a singular author, making its
dating more of a range rather than a single period. What is clear is that the Didache is a
manual dealing with teachings of the two ways (life and death) and church practices. The
ending of the document presents a brief apocalyptic section, but for the majority, the
document is concerned with instruction. The general presentation of the work is teaching
on Christian life (chapters 1-6), discussions on baptism, fasting, prayer and the Lord's
Supper (chapters 7-10), and discussions on disciplinary actions and leadership (chapters
11-13) and the conclusions (chapters 14-16).
• The Two Ways: The Didache introduces the concept of the "way of life" and the
"way of death" at the very beginning of the text, providing ethical instructions for
Christian living (Didache 1:1-6). This framework presents a stark contrast between
right and wrong, good and evil, and sets the tone for the moral teachings in the
rest of the document.
• Virtuous Teaching: The Didache strongly emphasizes virtuous teaching and the
importance of true teachers. It advises believers to accept genuine teachers who
lead them towards righteousness and to reject false teachers who promote
immorality and deceit (Didache 11:3-12:5). This highlights the Didache's concern
• Ethics: The Didache addresses various ethical issues, such as abortion, and sexual
immortality (Didache 2:2). It also emphasizes the importance of treating others
justly, sharing with those in need, and not being greedy or covetous (Didache 4-
6). Chapter three speaks on a proper disposition of humility.
The Epistle of Barnabas is written by an anonymous teacher who seeks to explain the Old
Testament scriptures to his Christian community in light of who Christ is. While the epistle
is traditionally called the epistle of "Barnabas," most scholarship rejects that Barnabas
wrote the letter. Instead, the letter is thought to have been written in Alexandria because
of its particular approach in hermeneutics and its earliest witness, Clement of Alexandria.
Most date the epistle between AD 70 and AD 132. The epistle focuses on how Christians
should interpret the Jewish texts and explaining the relationship between Judaism and
Christianity. Its angle is one that seeks to persuade and convince that is often considered
highly polemical.
One of the emphasis is similar to that found in the Didache, that is, the discussion on the
two ways. However, while the Didache frames it as the way of life and the way of death,
Barnabas frames the discussion as the way of life and the way of darkness. This has led
some scholars to conclude that these texts and traditions are dependent on one another.
The epistle focuses on eschatology in discussing the struggle of the present age and the
eradication of the present evil age with the coming of the age to come. Here the author
speaks of the Christian ethic before discussing Israel's role in God's plan. Finally, Barnabas
argues that Israel forfeited God's covenant because of their idolatry and disobedience and
that Christians have become the true and intended heirs of the covenant.
• New Covenant and Fulfillment of the Law: The Epistle of Barnabas emphasizes
the idea of the new covenant in Christ, interpreting Jesus as the fulfillment of the
Jewish law and prophecies. It highlights how the Old Testament's
commandments, rituals, and sacrifices were types and shadows of the realities
found in the Christian faith.
• Ethical Teaching: The Epistle of Barnabas provides practical ethical instruction for
Christian living, emphasizing the importance of virtues such as love, faith,
humility, and righteousness. It encourages believers to avoid sin, strive for
holiness, and live a separate life from the immorality of the world.
• Typology and Symbolism: The Epistle of Barnabas uses typology and symbolism
extensively to interpret the Old Testament as prefiguring Christian realities. It sees
the events, characters, and rituals of the Old Testament as pointing to the person
and work of Jesus Christ, and the establishment of the Christian community.
• On False Teaching: The Epistle of Barnabas addresses the issue of false teachings
and heresies within the Christian community. It warns against the influence of
false prophets and teachers, urging believers to discern the truth and to hold fast
to the orthodox Christian faith.
• Moral Dualism: The Epistle of Barnabas presents a moral dualism, contrasting the
ways of light and darkness, righteousness and sin, and urging believers to choose
the path of virtue and holiness. It highlights the ongoing struggle between good
and evil, and the need for believers to resist temptation and live in accordance with
God's will.
The Shepherd of Hermas (or called Hermas) is a work that would be particularly popular
in the second and third centuries among Christians. Hermas puts forward a Jewish-
Christian perspective through various types of imagery and analogy. The author of the
work attempts to answer various questions as to how Christians should live especially
those who live in Rome. The work narrates various visions with subsequent explanations
of said visions which are given to Hermas (the main figure of the work) by an 'angel of
repentance' who appears as a Shepherd. The work's emphasis is centered on self control
and observing the commandments given by Christ.
There is little Christological reflection in the work, but instead focus is placed upon the
Holy Spirit, yet the term spirit is used in several ways making a theological analysis
difficult. Hermas' use and understanding of the Spirit as a hypostasis (or person) of the
Godhead is debated.
The genre of the book is similar to that which is classified as "apocalypse" in that it focuses
on a revelational vision via a mediator with subsequent interpretations, though, its focus
is not one of end times but on practical concerns. As for the author, some have suggested
it was Paul or Hermas, yet both seem unlikely. The author ultimately remains unknown.
The dating of the work is also generally unknown but the range of proposed views go from
AD 70s – 175.
• Moral and Ethical Instruction: The Shepherd of Hermas provides practical moral
and ethical instruction, emphasizing the importance of living a virtuous and
righteous life. It highlights the virtues of faith, love, patience, humility, and self-
control, and encourages believers to cultivate them daily.
• Community Life and Unity: The Shepherd of Hermas addresses the issue of
community life and unity among believers. It emphasizes the importance of living
in harmony and mutual love, and warns against divisions and conflicts within the
Christian community. It encourages believers to be compassionate, forgiving, and
supportive of one another. It further presents the idea of God's forgiveness and the
The Epistle of Diognetus is an anonymous early Christian writing, and the authorship
remains uncertain. Some scholars have proposed that it could have been written by a
disciple of the apostles, while others speculate that a Christian apologist or teacher may
have penned it. Just as well, the exact date of the Epistle is uncertain, and scholars have
proposed various timeframes for its composition. Some suggest it could have been written
in the late 1st century, while others propose a date in the early 2nd century. However, no
consensus has been reached regarding its dating.
As for its purpose, the Epistle of Diognetus was likely written to respond to the prevailing
pagan culture and to instruct and encourage early Christians in their faith. Furthermore, it
was likely composed during a time when Christians faced persecution and
misunderstanding from the broader society, and the author sought to provide a reasoned
defense of the Christian faith.
The author expresses a deep appreciation for the mystery of God's plan of salvation and
contrasts the wisdom and truth of Christianity with the emptiness and futility of pagan
beliefs and practices. The author emphasizes the unique revelation of God in the person of
Jesus Christ, the Son of God, and the profound transformation that occurs in the lives of
believers through faith in Him. The author also highlights Christians' distinctive ethical
and moral character, calling them to live lives of holiness, love, and righteousness as a
testimony to the truth of their faith.
• Defense of the Christian faith: The Epistle serves as an apologetic work, defending
the Christian faith against pagan beliefs and misconceptions. It presents
Papias (AD 60-130) was a bishop in Asia Minor who would significantly influence Irenaeus
of Lyons, Hippolytus of Rome, and Victorinus of Petovium. According to Eusebius (3, 39),
Papias was a follower of one of the seven disciples of John. At the same time, according to
Irenaeus, Papias had close ties to the apostles, was a follower of John, and a contemporary
of Polycarp (Against Heresies, 5.33.4).
He is best known for his five-volume work, Expositions of the Sayings of the Lord, which
was highly respected and heavily quoted. This work was an attempt to preserve the
sayings of Christ that were not recorded in the gospels. He collected these sayings from
various sources who claimed to have received them from the apostles, yet many of them
were strange, leading many in the church not to consider them authentic.
The fragments of Papias are, as one can guess, fragments of this five-volume work. The
collection of fragments has been diverse in their size, numbering, sequence, and selection
in various publications. This makes the publications of Papias more complex than we
would hope. Still, nonetheless, Papias has led scholars to deeper reflection on the text of
the New Testament and the reality that there were oral traditions regarding Jesus
circulation beyond the gospels within the post-apostolic period.
• Papias emphasized receiving teachings directly from the apostles and their
disciples. He valued firsthand accounts and oral traditions that were passed down
from the apostles, seeking to preserve and transmit their teachings.
• Papias was concerned with preserving the authenticity and accuracy of the Gospel
accounts. Therefore, he sought to confirm the reliability of the Gospel narratives
by gathering information from those who had direct contact with the apostles and
eyewitnesses of Jesus' ministry.
• Papias expressed a keen interest in the teachings of Jesus regarding the end times.
He referred to the "sayings of the Lord" and sought to understand the details of
Jesus' teachings on the coming kingdom of God and the resurrection of the dead.