Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Strategy
What it is
As firms diversify, it can be challenging to maintain a balanced portfolio and set
priorities for future investment. The BCG Growth-Share Matrix provides a simple
tool to get a high-level overview of a corporate portfolio, acting as an input into
strategic investment decision making.
Background
In the 1970s, marketing managers began to recognise that companies' shift
towards more diversified product offerings required new planning models to
provide a means for analysing investment opportunities.
When to use it
The BCG Growth-Share Matrix can be used to:
How to use it
Two key assumptions form the core of the BCG Matrix:
1. Market growth harms cash flow due to the requirement for investment in
manufacturing facilities, equipment and marketing.
The model requires each business line to be placed in one of four quadrants,
depending on the rate of market growth and current relative market share.
Stars - high rate of market growth and high relative market share
Business lines within this quadrant are likely to be highly profitable but will likely
need investment to maintain growth and challenge new and existing competitors.
Cash Cows - low rate of market growth and high market share
Cash Cows are the market leaders within a stable market. As such, they are likely
highly profitable and require little investment. The barrier to entry into a stable
market is likely high enough to deter most potential competition.
Question Marks - high rate of market growth but low market share
These products tend to be a drain on cash flow due to the high rate of market
growth but are unlikely to be highly profitable due to the low market share.
Managers will need to decide whether to invest more cash into the business to try
to gain more market share and turn it into a Star, raise the price and lower
marketing spend to try to make the most of the current position or divest the
business entirely.
When using the BCG Matrix, care should be taken to recognise possible
interdependencies between market offerings that the model does not make
obvious.
Related models
Further reading
Reeves, M., Moose, S. and Venema, T. (2014) The Growth Share Matrix. Boston,
MA: The Boston Consulting Group. Available from https://image-
src.bcg.com/Images/BCG_Classics_Revisited_The_Growth_Share_Matrix_Jun
_2014_tcm9-84453.pdf [accessed 26 August 2021].
Kotler, P., Keller, K. L., Brady, M., Goodman, M. and Hansen, T. (2019)
Marketing Management, 4th European edition. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
Some of the links to products provided in this article are affiliate links. This means that the supplier may pay the owner of this
website a small amount of money for purchases made via the link. This will have absolutely no impact on the amount you pay.
Subscribe