Philippine Journal of Volcanoh
June and December 1985
Vol. 2 Nos. 1&2
Official bi-annual publication of the Philippine Institute of Volcanology ,
‘National Science and Technology Authority ISSN 0116-0109156
PROFILE MORPHOLOGY AND INTERNAL
STRUCTURE OF MAYON VOLCANO
Raymundo S. Punongbayan and Hernulfo B. Ruelo
ABSTRACT
Constructed profile diagrams across Mayon Volcano showed seven
distinct slope segments from summit to base. Mayon'ssingle-vent plumbing
system and the type and distribution of volcanic ejecta characterizing pre-
determined slope segments seem to have greatly influenced its shape. Piling
‘up of lava agglutinates at the summit causes the upward propagation of the
vent and wobbling of the crater lip which in tum, result in the random
distribution of flow ejecta around the edifice. Using the assumption that
‘past and present-day eruptions of Mayon Volcano are more or less similar,
and correlating the type of the volcanic ejecta with slope angle and distance
from the summit, its possible internal structure is viewed as a succesion of
limitedly overlapping deposits of pyroclastic flows, airfall, lava lows, and
debris flows, with a vertical ple of lava agglutinate cappings strung together
by a centeal vent
INTRODUCTION
Mayon Volcano is known for its highly symmetrical cone.
This shape was maintained even after the formation of a deep
gully at its southeastern upper slopes after the 1984 eruption,
Since 1616 and 44 recorded eruptions after, the edifice has con-
tinued to be described as 2 perfect cone. One ready explanation
is the maintenance of relatively moderate eruptions thru time
from a single vent. This, however, appears to be too convenient
for other factors may have influenced the sustenance of the
geometry of Mayon Volcano as it slowly builds up its edifice
upon the Bicol Plains. We shall present these other factors and
discuss the role they play in maintaining the highly symmetric
shape of Mayon Volcano thru time.
Mayon Voleano is an example of an active composite volcano,
To depict its internal structure, the cross-sectional views presented
only show alternating layers of lava flows and pyroclastic materials,
Based on evaluation of available data, we believe that such a
presentation is not only simplistic but also very misleading,
Newhall (1977) presents an improved version for describing the
internal structure of a composite volcano, particularly of Mayon
Volcano, but this version failed to incorporate two key ejecta
types. We shall attempt to give an alternative scheme for inferring
and representing the internal constitution of a volcano based on
the distribution of volcanic ejecta on the slopes and characteristics
of the slopes of Mayon Volcano.
187
PROFILE MORPHOLOGY
Four cross-sectional profile diagrams (Fig. 1) across Mayon.
Volcano were constructed along the E-W, N-S, NE-SW and NW-SE
directions for the purpose of determining slope angle variations
as a function of distance from the summit. For each opposing
slopes in the profile diagrams, seven slope segments can be esta-
blished based on changes in the values of slope angle. The seven
slope segments, which start from the summit and terminate at
the basal section of the edifice, are correspondingly labelled
as Segments A to G (Fig. 2) The obtained slope angles per slope
segment are listed in Table 1
Each slope segment does not shew much variation in slope
‘angle as measured from the eight opposing slopes of the profile
diagrams, For example, the measured slope angle for segment A
only varies from 35 to 40 degrees and yielded an average of 37
degrees for all the eight opposing slopes. Apparently, a five to
six degree difference between the obtained lowest and highest
values of slope angle within a given segment is not sufficient to
significantly upset the symmetrical building up of the Mayon
Volcano cone.
‘Mayon Volcano, when viewed from all directions, presents
convex-upward opposing slopes which approach a parabolic
curvilinear pattern from base to summit. There is also no distinet
elongation of the cone along any given direction. Consequently,
the geometrical form of Mayon Volcano can be derived by rota-
ting the lower half of a parabolic curve about a vertical axis
passing through the summit crater.
Based on clustering of the measured slope angles within
discrete ranges, the surface of Mayon Volcano can be qualitatively
‘categorized into upper, middle, lower and basal slopes. Hence,
Segments A, B, and C with slope angle ranging from 32 to 40
degrees were bunched together to represent the characteristics
of the upper slopes. The upper slopes, as defined in this manner,
start from the summit and extend down to elevation 150m.
‘Segmerit D comprises the cone’s middle slopes which begin at
elevation 1500m and terminates at elevation S00m and have
slope angles of 15 to 21 degrees. The lower slopes are represented
by Segments E and F. The lower slopes extend from the 500m
elevation down to the 200m level and have slope angle values
of 4 to 8.5 degrees. The basal section is represented by Segment
G which starts from elevation 200m and goes down to sea level.
‘The slope angle characterizing the basal section varies from 2 to
3 degrees.
ee159
158
‘ye popes 07 ono st 9838
ywozu0y Soyp9 ayy Jo 29epMS ayp J2K0 5 OF Y syNoUIRDS ado.
Jo suonssod auodso1 Zummoys ouRDpoA WOKEN Jo susp yO] ZL
‘yen jogs94 0} yenbo 296 HUOZUORL
‘suoqsomp senor ouypou pu aMYDMOE BENNO “HOH
3st "ymossyvow oxy SHOE ONE, Hose HONE sures oNjong "RE
ON
=< Ne = 3
a0160
‘Table 1, Slope angle variation from summit to base of Mayon Volcano
along selected compns directions
cuore. [eevation [MEASURED SLOPE ANGLE
SEGMENT| (meterss.1.) NTs |e | w [sw|NE|SE| NW
2462 |
A |39 [38 35 | 3s |38 |3s | 40) 35
| 2300 | |
B as |as |36 | a6 ]37 |34 | 37 |34
2000 | | |
c | sa faa [aa | a2 |22 |2a | 23 [22
1,500 | |
: fede ler etlietieallts
soo- | |
Ez 6 | 75/85! $| 6s] 55] 5 | 65)
300 | |
F alata] ale ]-] 6] -
| 200
6 afafa|-|a]-|afe
| L |
INFLUENCE OF ERUPTION PRODUCTS ON
PROFILE MORPHOLOGY
‘The recorded eruptions of Mayon Volcano since 1616 belong
to the Vulcanian and Strombolian types. There was, however, one
large Plinian eruption which occurred in 1814 and Newhall (1979)
suspects that such eruption intervenes every now and then —
perhaps every 100 years — whenever there is an influx of fresh
basaltic lava in the magma reservoir. Thus, it can be safely assumed
that the volcano edifice is primarily made up of pyroclastic flow
and lava flow deposits with associated airfall layers and lava
agglutinates, These materials are generally found at the lower
to upper slopes of the volcano. The basal sections are dominated
hy debris flow and lahar deposits derived mainly from the pyro-
clastic flow fans and precariously perched materials at the middle
and upper slopes,
161
‘Table 2. Maximum distance reached by Mayon Voleano lva flow
‘units (linear distance from summit crater in kin)
Linear distance from summit
of lava flow per quadrant
NW NE sw SE
43 a at 45
38. 30 4s 42
45 33 38 8s
40 43 35 so |
37 | oo 56
4 82
43 58
J ss | sa
46
| 4s
AVERAGE| 41 37 42 52
Strombolian eruptions mainly contribute lava flow units in
the construction of the Mayon Voleano edifice. However, the
volume of lava extruded during each eruption episode is relatively
small (15 to 30 millon cubic meters). The largest historical flow
was emplaced during the 1928 eruption and attained a volume
of 60 milion cubic meters (Faustino, 1929). The lava flow units
are highly elongated, tapered towards the summit and somewhat
widened and even bifurcated at their distal portion, The farthest
linear distance from the vent reached by a lava flow unit is only
5.9 km and this was by the 1928 lava flow. On the average, Mayon
lava flow fronts are found at about four kilometers from the
vent (Table 2)
Mayon lavas have moderately high viscosity, high degree of
crystallinity and high yield strength. These attributes tend to
retard the spreading out of the flow far from the vent, At the same
time, the attained viscosity has not been high enough to produce
pasty lavas which could cause formation of domes and bulges
‘on the surface of the volcano
ermal162.
During major Vuleanian eruptions, pyroclastic flows are
produced either by backfall of pyroclastic materials from a tall
of 2 dense slag of incandescent pyroclastic ejecta. As observed
during the 1984 eruption of Mayon Volcano, the resulting pyro-
clastic flows tended to follow preexisting ravines and gullies
while moving downwards at the upper slopes. It was further
observed that significant deposition of pyroclastic flow materials
commonly occurred at breaks-inslope at elevations 500 to 600m
(Table 3). However, there are some known occurrences of pyro-
clastic flows going beyond the break-in-slope and being depo-
sited at the basal sections of the volcano. For example, during
the 1897 eruption, a pyroclastic flow surged all the way to the
coastal area of Sto. Domingo.
Toble 3. Emplacement parameters of major 1984 pyroclastic fans
Linear distance | Slope angle of | Breakin.
Pyroclaste fan (PF) from crater (in km) | depositional | slope
surface
ICAMALIG PF 4205S @ 19°
[Must PF 320039 10° 19°
IMISERICORDIAPF| 38:0 46 2° 20°
BONGA PF 40106.0 ° 20°
Commonly associated with the Vulcanian eruptions of
Mayon Voleano are airfall materials mostly in the form of ballis-
tically ejected blocks, bombs and lapilli fragments. These materials
are formed by explosive sub-aerial fragmentation of solidified and
partly solidified pieces of forcibly erupted lava. They tend to be
deposited at the upper slopes of the volcano. The deposits are
loosely consolidated and have high permeability-high porosity
characteristics, The associated finer fractions — fine lapilli and
ash fragments — easily become airborne and are deposited at
the middle and lower slopes and even beyond the edifice especially
the ash component.
‘The summit and near-summit sections of the Mayon Voleano
cone are characterized by deposits of agglutinated and annealed
lava. The materials for these deposits are derived from minor and
‘major activities during the eruption episodes of the volcano and
163
such activities can be in the form of lava fountaining and spatter-
ing, boiling over of incandescent ejecta during formation of pyro-
clastic flows and short-term overflowing of lava from the crater.
Associated with these deposits are some detached proximal
ends of lava flow units. It is the presence of these relatively
solid deposits which makes it possible for Mayon Volcano to
attain a slope angle of 35 to 40 degrees at its summit area.
‘The earlier deposited pyroclastic flow materials can be
remobilized during periods of high precipitation rate to be rede-
posited later as lahars at the basal sections of the volcano, The
amount of time required by the pyroclastic flow-to-lahar trans-
formation varies from zero hour to several years to infinite. The
resulting lahar deposits, together with debris flow deposits due
to mass movement of loosely held materials at the middle and
upper slopes, contribute to the lengthening and flattening of
basal sections of the edifice.
DISTRIBUTION OF VOLCANIC EJECTA
A generalized map, based on primary field data and those
of Newhall (1977), delineating the distribution of the various
ejecta of Mayon Voleano is shown in Fig. 3. Specifically, the
map shows only the dominant type of ejecta occupying the
different slope categories of the present surface of the voleano.
Thus, the dominant ejecta at the middie and upper slopes are
lava flows and airfall materials and those at the lower slopes are
pyroclastic flows. Lava agglutinates are confined to the volcano
summit while lahar or mudflow deposits are concentrated on
the basal slopes.
The inferred transition from one dominant ejecta type to
another from the summit to the base is shown in Fig. 4, As pre-
sented in this pictograph, the distribution of the various ejecta of
Mayon Volcano is generally slope dependent and partly governed
by distance of the depositional surface from the summit crater,
Expectedly. airfall deposits exhibit gradual tapering towards the
base but the rest of the ejecta types shows either nearly abrupt
appearance or disappearance at clearly defined slope sectors.
For example, pyroclastic flow deposits may be encountered
beginning at elevation 2000m but these are mostly gully-confined
and negligibly small, Almost abruptly, beginning at clevation
500m down to the 200m level, pyroclastic flow fans become the
dominant deposit. Lava flow units, on the other hand, dominate
over the deposits of the other ejecta types starting from the
2000m elevation but extending only down to the 500m level.164
~ bominatly
a
Map showing distribution of voleanie ejecta and debris flow deposits
‘on the slopes of Mayon Volea
Fig.3
middle
slope
165
elevation
2,462 m
2,300 m
Lava agglutinates
FEE} Airfall deposits
Lava flow deposits
Pyroclastic flow
deposits
a4
EZY Debris flow deposits
Fig. 4 Pictograph showing relative abundance of Mayon Volcano ejecta
deposits from summit to base of the edifice.16
INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF MAYON VOLCANO EDIFICE
Based on the foregoing discussion, the usual presentation
of the internal structure of Mayon Volcano or of any composite
‘volcano as alternating layers of lava flows and pyroclastic materials,
appears to be not in agreement with the observed distribution of
recently emplaced volcanic ejecta. With the exception of the
airfall materials, none of the other ejecta types has the capacity
to completely enshroud the edifice from the summit down to
its base. As mentioned earlier, the deposits of pyroclastic and
lava flows are slope sector specific. Consequently, as the voleano
continues to erupt, separate successive girdles of limitedly over-
lapping deposits of pyroclastic and lava flows are formed around
the edifice. Thus, these major ejecta types of Mayon Volcano
have limited upslope and downslope distributions.
Obviously, the above generalizations have no applications
uring cone construction of Proto-Mayon Voleano. Assuming that
the eruption style of Mayon Volcano has not materially changed
over time, it is to be expected during this stage that the various
ejecta had been emplaced at random, their distribution more
widespread relative to the dimensions of the incipient cone and
their overlapping relationships more pronounced. From this
stage onwards, there must be a critical height atttained by the
voleano edifice where the present distributional pattern being
followed by the voleanic ejecta had commenced to operate.
Based on the inferred configurations of the edifice as it grew into
its present dimensions and the volume as well as downslope extent,
of lava flows extruded during each eruption episode, the said
critical height was inferred to be at about 1500m.
The lava agglutinates, due to their restricted affinity to the
summit area of the volcanic cone, can be assumed to be entirely
independent of the successive heights reached by the edifice. Thus,
from Proto-Mayon Volcano to the present, a vertical succession of
lava agglutinates shaped like mushroom caps and strung together
by the upwardly propagating volcanic vent can be imagined to
occupy the central axis of the cone.
Combining all of the above observations, inferences and
generalizations, an alternative scheme for depicting the internal
structure of Mayon Volcano can be devised and is illustrated in
Fig. 5
CGEM tere ctotiones copes
ao
Debris flow deposits
PASI! wees Gis in
showing in
fice, Thickness
the
Fig.5 Generalized cross-sectional diagram of Mayon Volean
{erred distribution of volcanic materia
of the various deposits not to scale.
167168
MAYON VOLCANO AS A PERFECT CONE
‘The highly symmetrical form of Mayon Volcano owes its
origin to the sustained interplay of several factors. The commonly
siven ones are eruptions thru a single vent, lack of wide variations
in the physico-chemical characteristics of the erupted lava to
preclude internal and external lava doming, relatively mild erup-
tions, absence of large-scale sectoral collapse anywhere on the
volcano slopes, and randomized syn-eruption and post-eruption
distributions of voleanic ejecta. All these, taken together, can
indeed be used for explaining the highly symmetrical shape of
Mayon Volcano and why this shape still remains despite many
repeated eruptions. However, there is one key factor which
heretofore is being ignored and that is the role played by the
Java agglutinate cappings in the shaping of Mayon Voleano edifice
and in preserving its near-perfect symmetrical cone,
Lava agglutinate ceppings (Fig. 6) are emplaced at the summit
and near-summit slopes particularly during the major eruptions
of Mayon Volcano. Because these cappings, as described earlier
are composed predominantly of coherent units of volcanic ejecta,
they tend to preserve the post-eruption dimensions of the near
surface extension as well as the incremental elongation of the
vent, This ultimately results in the formation of a vertical pile
of lava agglutinate cappings and the upward propagation of a
vertical vent (Fig. 5). Thus, the lava agelutinate cappings somehow
serve to guarantee that the eruptions of Mayon Volcano shall take
place thru a single vent and that the vent shall retain its vertival
orientation thru time.
The observed random outpouring of lava flows and ejection
of pyroclastic flows from the central crater over the slopes of
Mayon Voleano could be attributed to the combined effects of
the cone having small crater diameter (150m) and very steep
slopes from the summit down to elevation 230m, This may be
theoretically possible if one invokes that the ejecta can be pro-
pelled towards any direction from a small point source and highly
tapered conical surface, We suspect, however, that the lava aggluti=
nate cappings also played a key role in determining which sectors
of the voleano slopes shall be the sites of deposition of lava and
pyroclastic flows,
During the 1984 eruption of Mayon Volcano, one lava flow
unit was emplaced at .the southwest slope and five pyroclastic
flow fans were distributed on the east, southeast, south, southwest
and northwest slopes. Generally speaking, during the first phase
i.
Fig. 6 Acrial view of summit crater showing lobes of newly deposited lava
agglutinates capping, (Photo taken on 23 October 1984 by J. V.
Fig.7- Mayon Voleano summit and upper slopes as viewed from the south-
west. Note pronounced tilt of the crater rim to the southeast. (Photo-
‘paph tenon 23 October 1984 by LB. Ruelo)
cE El170
of the 1984 eruption (9 to 18 September), volcanic ejecta were
dumped on the northwest to southwest sectors of the volcano;
during the resurgence on 23-25 September, the ejecta affected
the south, southeast and east sectors. Thus, during Phase 1, lava
and pyroclastic flows were directed towards the middle’ and
Jower slopes within the northwest and southwest quadrants;
during Phase 2, pyroclastic flows were deposited only on the
lower slopes within the southeast quadrant,
It was noted during the transition period between Phase 1
and Phase 2 that the outline of the volcano summit exhibited a
Pronounced tilt towards the southeast. Although ground defor.
mation studies revealed that Mayon Volcano experienced infla.
tion prior to eruption resurgence, the determined inflation mag.
nitude was not sufficient to account for the noticeable tilt of the
Volcano summit towards the southeast. The more probable
explanation is that the observed tilt was due to a preferential
buildup of lava agghutinates on the northwest and southwest
Segments of the crater lip during Phase 1 of the 1984 eruption,
Such buildup inhibited unloading of flow ejecta towards the
Rorthwest and caused this to be directed towards the southeast
luring the eruption resurgence on 23 September. Based on analy.
ts of recently generated topographic map of Mayon Voleane,
Umbal (1985) deduced that prior to Phase 1 eruption, the voleane
Summit was characterized by notches on the northwest and souti
Wwest sectors. These notches thus predetermined towards what
Girections the flow ejecta of Phase 1 shall be dumped and on what
part of the crater lip there shall be preferential buildup of lava ag-
alutinates,
It is likely that selective piling up of lava agglutinates around
the crater lip is a common occurrence during the major eruptions
of Mayon Volcano, The net result of this is a wobbling effect on
the crater lip, Thus, the random distribution of flow ejecta around
the Mayon edifice is a consequence of a wobbling crater lip as itr
Guced by the nonuniform development of the lava agghitinate
cappings over the volcano simmit,
At present, the crater lip remains tilted to the southeast
(Fig. 7) and connects with the recently entrenched Bonga Gully at
the southeast middle and upper slopes. During the next eruption
of Mayon Volcano, flow ejecta can be predicted to be directed by
the Bonga Gully. If the eruption shall be of the Strombolian type,
then the Bonga Gully may be partly or completely healed and the
crater lip may start wobbling towards another direction, If it shall
1
be Vaeanian, then the Bonga Gully may be further deepened and
widened and the crater lip may maintain its present fit to the
southeast because of the highly erosive nature of pyroclastic flows
while moving at the upper and middle slopes.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
do Arboleda and Luts
We remain grateful to Mess. Rona
Might forte asian toned tos we prea ti
cot. We ao aprecite with thanks the hel comments and
Sutgestions of Mes, Emmanuel Ramos, Rolly Rimando a
Jesse Umbal.
REFERENCES
Faustino, Leopoldo A. 1929. Mayon Volcano and its eruptions. Philippine
Journal of Science. 40: 1-43.
7. Gzloy and pelo of Mayon Yon,
ert, Crops, 1977. ano ade oe
“Souths Lizen, Pallphes M's. Tass, Unventy a al
(Davis), 292 pp. (unpublished),
sof Mayo Veen, aly
ees oa \
Fane ete eens oe Geotea Rea neh
Umbal, Jese V. 1985, Personal Communication,