Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: Riad A. Ajami & Homa A. Karimi (2023) Artificial Intelligence:
Opportunities and Challenges, Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 24:2, 73-75, DOI:
10.1080/10599231.2023.2210239
EDITORIAL
This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes does not impact on the academic content of
the article.
© 2023 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
74 EDITORIAL
and the reduction of down time. It could also improve customization to meet
the needs of consumers and address demand variability.
AI is likely to improve quality controls and help with generating design
algorithms for optimization. It will certainly help access data, improve innova
tion, and enhance technological growth and development in various econo
mies from highly industrial countries to emerging economies. Moreover, AI
could improve cyber security and improve responses to customers’ needs by
helping to build faster software. It could also monitor various corporate
transactions to customize personalized advice, and could make related trans
actions more efficient, and free members in the value-added chain to move
toward skill enhancement and learning. Furthermore, AI could also help
monitor changes in supply chain and logistics to ensure availability of certain
products and allow for efficient replenishment of missing supplies. Finally, AI
usage in virtual voice assistant programs could be used in various sectors from
retailing to banking, and could increase employee productivity and enhance
teamwork.
While AI could perform tasks better than humans, it should be stated that
AI has the potential for misinformation and risks in the social, economic and
political spheres. Moreover, AI tools could not protect individuals from what
has been referred to in social discourse as “hallucinations.” AI tools produce
“hallucinations” and misinformation that could be used by others as facts and
not be considered as opinions, though opinions are not always facts. Thus, AI
tools could create incorrect falsehoods.
AI technology is now in its early stages and growing fast and we should
move to minimize its risks. Technological firms should not resist the demand
from governments and other stakeholders to work together to mitigate and
reduce the negative impact of AI tools. Rather, they should want the feedback
and the input of all stakeholders and members of society in the early formative
years of AI usage.
Some countries are now introducing both regulations and legislation to deal
with AI’s potential risks and have moved to ban ChapGPT. Across OECD
countries and elsewhere across the globe, there are social and cultural concerns
about AI and the protection of individual privacy. In this regard governments,
the corporate sector, and other societal stakeholders should come together to
create guidelines and promote the safe usage and application of AI. Italy and the
U.S. among other countries and governments are proposing policies to regulate
AI to mitigate the possibility of misinformation and bias. The coordination
between the private sectors and governments could help provide for sound and
functional rules to capture the benefits of AI and reduce its risks. From such
initial attempts informed policies can come about. Global discourse and coop
eration of the various stakeholders at the local and higher level of governments
could guide the process to reduce the risks of AI prior to its emerging and
certainly growing worldwide usage. Bringing together transnational firms,
JOURNAL OF ASIA-PACIFIC BUSINESS 75
governmental bodies, and societal stakeholders from across the globe at this
early stage is in the best interest of all. The disruptive tools of AI could be
immense and could lead us away from possible global cooperation and sustain
ability as a functioning global society. The time for global cooperation and
coordination to regulate AI is now. For our future just arrived yesterday.
The Journal of Asia–Pacific Business has a seemingly very specific scope,
but the region includes such a wonderful variety and our articles for this issue
reflect that as well. Our articles for this issue are as follows: our first article,
“Consumer Purpose: A Holistic Rethinking of Psychological Bonds,” by
Dianne Welsh and Bonnie Canziani of The University of North Carolina at
Greensboro, and their colleague Yuchin Hsieh of Saunders College of Business
Rochester Institute of Technology. The second article, “Social Media Used for
Academic Purposes in Vietnam and China: An Overview of Implementation
and Futures,” by Daniel S. Helman of Ton Duc Thang University, Vietnam.
The third article is by Asra Jabbar of Lahore Garrison University and Rizwan
Qaiser Danish of the University of Punjab entitled: “The Art of Juggling:
Effects of Employee’s Polychronic Orientation on Service Recovery
Performance and Extra-role Customer Service.” Our fourth article,
“Exploring the Impact of Servitization on Chinese Manufacturing Firm
Performance,” is a collaborative effort of Muhammad Ajmal of the
University of Gujrat, Pakistan, Zeenat Islam, and Azmat Islam of the
National College of Business Administration and Economics, Lahore. It is
our hope that one or more of these articles will inspire and augment your
research interest about the Asia–Pacific economies. We are as always, extre
mely grateful for our reviewers and referees without whom all of the scholars
in our fields would be left adrift. Finally, we value our readers for their
continued support of our efforts.
Riad A. Ajami
Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, Wright State University,
Dayton, OH, USA
Riad.ajami@wright.edu
Homa A. Karimi
Managing Editor, Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, Dayton, OH, USA