Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The human RH locus is responsible for the expression of the Rh blood group an-
tigens. It consists of two closely linked genes, RHD and RHCE, that exhibit 92%
similarity between coding regions. These observations suggest that they are de-
rived from a relatively recent duplication event. Previously a study of nonhuman
primate RH-like genes demonstrated that ancestral RH gene duplication occurred
in the common ancestor of man, chimpanzees and gorillas. By amplification of
intron 3 and intron 4 of gorilla RH-like genes, we have now shown that, like man,
gorillas possess two types of RH intron 3 (RHCE intron 3 being 289 bp longer than
the RHD intron 3) and two types of intron 4 (RHCE intron 4 being 654 bp longer
than the RHD intron 4). Here we report the characterization of a cDNA encoded by
a gorilla RH-like gene which possesses introns 3 and 4 of the RHCE type. A com-
parison of this gorilla RHCE-like coding sequence with previously characterized
human and ape cDNA sequences suggests that RH genes experienced complex
recombination events after duplication in the common ancestor of humans, chim-
panzees and gorillas.
The human Rh system encompasses five tibodies was abandoned and the definition
main antigens—D, C, c, E, and e—that are of the Rh antigen was based on the use of
present on red blood cells ( Issitt and An- human anti-Rh antibodies. Another prob-
stee 1998). The term ‘‘Rhesus antigen’’ was lem was that it was impossible to demon-
introduced by Landsteiner and Wiener, strate the presence of the Rh antigen on
who found that rabbits (and later, guinea macaque red cells by tests with human
pigs) immunized with red blood cells anti-Rh reagents. Twenty years after Land-
(RBCs) from a rhesus monkey produced steiner and Wiener’s experiments, Levine
antibodies which agglutinated 85% of Cau- et al. (1961) characterized in the serum of
casian blood samples ( Landsteiner and a guinea pig immunized with human RBCs
Wiener 1940, 1941). The antibodies were a fraction of antibodies (called anti-LW in
called anti-Rhesus (anti-Rh), and the two honor of Landsteiner and Wiener), which
human groups were defined as Rh positive identified an antigen present on human
From the Laboratoire d’Immunogénétique Moléculaire, and Rh negative. Before the discovery of Rh-positive and Rh-negative and rhesus
Université Paul Sabatier, Pavillon Charles Lefebyre, the rhesus factor it was suspected that monkey red cells ( Levine et al. 1961,
Hôpital Purpan, Toulouse, France. This work was sup-
ported by funds from MESR (contrat Jeune équipe
some cases of grave hemolytic anemia in 1963). The antigen LW was clearly distinct
1966) and from Agence Française du Sang (contract newborn babies resulted from an unspec- from the Rh antigen, and later it was dem-
65001731231). We wish to thank Dr. Francis Roubinet ified immunologic incompatibility be- onstrated that the LW gene lies on human
for critically reviewing this manuscript and for helpful
discussions and advice. We are indebted to Stéphanie tween the mother and the fetus ( Levine chromosome 19 (Sistonen 1984), while the
Despiau for her very efficient laboratory assistance. All and Stetson 1939). Several observations RH gene is localized on the short arm of
experiments described in this article were performed made following the discovery of the Rh human chromosome 1 (Chérif-Zahar et al.
in accordance with French laws and regulations cur-
rently in force. We thank Alejandro Rooney and Masa- factor firmly established that the Rh factor 1991; Marsh et al. 1974). Although the two
toshi Nei for helpful discussion and critical review. The was at the root of unexplained reactions genes are distinct, the Rh and LW proteins
gorilla RHCE-like coding sequence was submitted to
GenBank/EMBL. We are waiting for the accession num-
that occurred during transfusion of blood are part of a molecular complex called the
ber. Address correspondence to Antoine Blancher, La- that was of the same ABO, MNS and P Rh complex at the surface of red cells
boratoire d’Immunologie, CHU (Centre Hospitalier et types as the recipient, and that it was the (Cartron et al. 1998). In conclusion, if the
Universitaire) de Toulouse, Hôpital Purpan, 31059 Tou-
louse CEDEX, France, or e-mail: blancher@mail. cause of hemolytic disease in newborns term ‘‘Rh’’ was coined by Landsteiner and
easynet.fr. This paper was delivered at a symposium ( Levine et al. 1941; Wiener and Peters Wiener because of the source of antigens
entitled ‘‘Genetic Diversity and Evolution’’ sponsored 1940). Because the animal anti-Rh antibod- (the rhesus monkey) they used to obtain
by the American Genetic Association at the Pennsyl-
vania State University, University Park, PA, USA, June ies required extensive absorption before anti-Rh in rabbits, it is highly probable
12–13, 1999. being able to produce faint Rh-specific ag- that, in fact, they produced anti-LW anti-
2000 The American Genetic Association 91:205–210 glutination, the use of animal anti-Rh an- bodies. Despite that, the term Rh has con-
205
Table 1. Primer sequences
Analyzed
region RhcE RhD Gor.IC Gor.ID Nb
Rh-like antigens of gorilla. The single go- depended mainly on the sixth external
rilla Rh-like antigen that can be studied is loop of the Rh polypeptide, and more pre-
called Dgor and is detected on red blood cisely on a motif of three amino acids
cells by means of certain human anti-D (Asp350-Gly353-Ala354; Apoil et al. 1997). This
monoclonal antibodies (Roubinet et al. was confirmed by tests with erythroleu-
1993). The reactivity of one of these hu- kemia cells transfected with human RHCE
man monoclonal anti-D antibodies, LOR- cDNA mutagenized at codons 350, 353, Figure 3. Neighbor-joining tree of RH and RH-like
15C9, was extensively studied with large and 354 ( His350- → Asp, Trp353- → Gly, coding sequences. Evolutionary distances were calcu-
panels of human RhD antigenic variants Asn354- → Ala) ( Liu et al. 1999). Rh poly- lated by Kimura’s two-parameter method on the basis
of the nucleotide alignment ( Figure 2). Bootstrap val-
(Apoil et al. 1997). It was deduced from peptides that are recognized by the LOR- ues are based on 500 replications. The percentages of
the results that the reactivity of LOR-15C9 15C9 antibody are expressed on the mem- occurrence of each branching are reported on the tree.