Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lesson 3 - Public Goods and Service-1
Lesson 3 - Public Goods and Service-1
The economic view is that the public sector provides goods and services that are
desirable but which, for one reason or another, a market economy cannot supply
effectively.
a) Public Expenditure
The Government at a national and local level and through the nationalisation
industries spends money.
Government expenditure has the following purpose:
To provide public goods and services such as health services, public education,
security, roads, public buildings etc. and to pay its administrative workforce.
To alleviate poverty
To provide payments to certain members of society such as pensioners etc.
On a small scale, perhaps, to provide finance to encourage investment by
private industry e.g. by means of grants.
GERTRUDE NYIRENDA 2
Finance IMF( IMF oversees the stability of the world’s
international monetary system. The IMF focuses on
monetary macroeconomic and financial stability .
fund/ world World bank goal is to reduce poverty by offering
Bank assistance to middle income and low income
countries. The world bank lend money to
governments of poor members to improve their
economies and to improve the standard of living
of their people.
There are two types of goods that the public sector provides; Public goods and merit
goods.
These types of goods cannot be divided into saleable units – and are therefore non
non-rival in consumption. For a given level of production of a public good one person’s
consumption does not reduce the quantity available for consumption by another
person. Example: the same light that Thandie uses to a bureau. Rodger can use the
same street light to establish whether he has found the street in which a distance
relative of his lives. Similarly, the protection provided by Malawi National Defence
force (MNDF) to the inhabitants of Lilongwe does not reduce the quantity of
protection available to inhabitants of Blantyre
i. The fact that one person’s consumption does not reduce the quantity available
to the other consumer implies the marginal cost (i.e. the cost of admitting an
additional user) is zero.
ii. Excluding anyone from consuming a non-rival good even if it was feasible to do
so, is pare to- inefficient. Allowing Ibrahim to use the above street light at zero
marginal cost will clear make him better off than before yet it will not detract
from the enjoyment that Thandie and Rodger derive from that same street light.
iii. Non – Excludable it is impossible to exclude particular individuals from
consuming such goods. Or it is not possible to assign property rights to public
goods or enforce them. The non-excludability characteristic of the public goods
and services creates incentives for free riding. The expectation that benefits
GERTRUDE NYIRENDA 3
may be enjoyed without having to pay for it. Those that cannot be excluded
from enjoying the benefits of free lights become free riders
i. Non- rival, excludable mixed goods and services. Consider Kamuza highway, the
exclusion principle can be applied by installing a toll gate. There will be no rivalry
in getting access to the highway as road user has no need to compete for scarce
space.
ii. Rival non excludable mixed goods and services. On weekdays main
thoroughfares in down town Lilongwe and Blantyre city are a good example of
the class of mixed goods characterised by rivalry in consumption and non-
excludability, Rivalry in the form of competition for the scarce road space is
fierce and the marginal cost of road usage increases as congestion increases.
Merit goods – these are politically regarded as meritorious are often provided via
national budget. Education and health, the reason for treating merit goods and service
in a special way is that individuals who buys or receives them often confers external
benefits on other people and hence on broader community.
There are two types of goods that the public sector provides; Public goods and merit
goods.
Public goods are commodities that are non- rivalrous and are non-excludable. Non-
rivalrous means that the consumption of the commodity does not reduce its
availability to others. And non- excludable means that no one can be effectively
excluded from enjoying the benefit of the commodity. If the market were to provide
such goods and services the providers would have problems of free riders, people
consuming without purchasing them. I.e. street lights, national defence can be used
free of charge they will not be supplies by private firm. Public goods are therefore
supplied by central and local government.
Only one person can consume several people can consume the
Therefore, a pure private good is rivalous and excludable while a pure public good in
non rivalous and non excludable.
A public good is an item which cannot be withheld from one consumer without
withholding the good from all consumers. Non tax payers cannot be excluded the
government provides these goods for free or mainly free of charge to increase their
supply and consumption i.e. health, education)
Merit Goods
Merit goods (and service) are commodities that are excludable but which, for reasons
of equity, government decides to provide them. Government provides the
commodities (services on basis of need rather than ability (or willingness) to pay.
A merit good is useful item, such as education, which some people are unwilling to
buy. Merit goods are supplied by public authorities either free or for a minimal charge
so as to enlarge consumption.
Merit goods which are desirable goods but which if left to be to be provided by private
firm they would be under supplied or under consumed.
(The government provides these goods free or meanly free of charge to increase their
supply and consumption).
GERTRUDE NYIRENDA 5
Regional Public Goods
These are goods that display characteristics of being both non-rival and non-
excludable with respect to the benefits they offer. Non-excludability means that when
a pure public good is created or supplied, it is not possible to exclude additional users
(consumers) from the benefits/ services it generates. Non-rivalry means that the
additional user or beneficiary of the service does not reduce the benefit enjoyed by
existing users. This classical definition applies to ‘pure public goods’ such as clean air,
world peace or international financial stability. other examples of pure public goods
include limiting the spread of contagious diseases and publicising basic research
findings.
from a policy perspective, there are several reasons why RPgs should be a focal point
of national and regional development plans . firstly, by pooling resources to supply a
shared good, individual countries can access public goods at a reduced cost due to
economies of scale. secondly, providing RPgs creates the foundation for future
cooperation among countries by creating trust and establishing formal and informal
ties among different national agencies. Thirdly, individual countries may more easily
achieve national objectives by contributing to the supply of a RPg rather than trying to
do it alone. fostering national peace and security through regional peacekeeping
efforts is a good example of the latter as seen in the eastern Congo region bordering
Rwanda and Burundi. National public goods have regional spill-over effects that might
justify a bilateral or regional strategy for provision of that good.
in reality, there are many impure public goods where the benefits generated are
available to two or more countries, but where the good displays either partial non-
rivalry or partial-excludability, or both. Club goods are an example of RPgs whose
benefits are fully excludable and partially rival. examples of these goods include
transnational parks, power grids and regional transportation infrastructure. The great
GERTRUDE NYIRENDA 6
Limpopo Trans frontier Park is an example of such a good, encompassing south Africa,
Mozambique and Zimbabwe.
infrastructure networks are generally associated with club goods. for these club goods,
it is possible to exclude potential users without incurring excessive costs. usage can
also be tracked quite easily, allowing the suppliers of the good to charge a toll per unit
of utilisation (Rufin 2004). A cross-country toll road is a good example of a club RPg.
users not prepared to pay the toll fee will automatically exclude themselves. The
Maputo development corridor provides insights into the successful development of
club goods.
another class of impure public goods is ‘joint products’ . in this class, a single activity
gives rise to two or more outputs with differing spill-over reach. Examples of this class
include preserving a rainforest, preventing natural disasters, supplying internet
connectivity and providing peacekeeping forces. in each case, two or more goods are
produced. as an illustration, preventing a natural disaster creates a regional public
good by fostering regional stability; while limiting country-specific damage in those
countries that are directly affected.
The preceding discussion allows us to identify four classes of regional public goods –
pure public goods, club goods, joint products, and other impure public goods. These
classes can be further distinguished by identifying the manner in which the good is
supplied by various countries.
international financial institutions such as the world bank and IMf have long been
involved in the provision of international public goods and RPgs . some of their income
is derived from their operations but most is due to member country contributions.
international organisations such as the various un agencies are also involved in
providing multiple RPgs . The un is funded through membership fees and donated trust
funds. although the international institutions have a global mandate in relation to their
particular agency role, they often play an important role at country and regional level.
for example, the UNHCR is a specialised agency dealing with refugee migration. This
agency has on numerous occasions played a crucial role across Africa resolving post-
conflict situations and ensuring that displaced persons are well cared for and
ultimately repatriated to their home countries. other un agencies that play important
GERTRUDE NYIRENDA 7
regional roles include UNEP (environment protection), WHO (public health) and FAO
(food security).
National public sources national funding plays a role where a national public good
produces benefits that extend beyond its borders. as long as there is a high proportion
of country-specific benefits, it will be in the interest of the host country to expend
some of its national budget on the provision of the good; whether or not neighbouring
countries contribute.
However, the subsidiarity principle suggests that neighbouring countries are likely to
contribute additional funds to ensure that the level of supply is sufficient to cover
them as well. The Lesotho Highlands water Project is a good example of a major
infrastructure project in Lesotho that benefits both Lesotho and south Africa. To
ensure a sufficient level of supply of this RPg, the south African government has
contributed both financially and technically to the project.
Private sector resources and partnerships The private sector has become a major
source of financing for RPgs in Africa, particularly in the development of infrastructure.
for example, the explosion of mobile telecommunication services across the continent
has been primarily driven by the private sector. Transnational infrastructure has also
brought development through PPPs where the private sector brings skills and finance
in exchange for commercial rights to collect toll revenues over a period of time. The
Mpumalanga toll road connecting south Africa and Mozambique is a good example of
how two countries were able to jointly develop a transport corridor by leveraging both
public funds and private finance.
Common property goods are resources that are not owned by any one individual (i.e.
a lake and its fish within it). Unrestricted access or non-excludability will lead to
excessive fishing and reduce voluntary restraint and investment in the resource by any
individual. This leads to free rider problems (if we don’t exploit others will do) leading
to market failure.
Other Definitions
Common Property – Property without well‐defined owner
Tragedy of the Commons – The elimination of social gains due to overuse of
common property. The museum is an example of this. Free riding – Reaping
benefits from the actions of others and consequently refusing to bear the full
costs of those actions.
GERTRUDE NYIRENDA 9