1.

What makes a protagonist a good person can vary depending on the story, the author's
intentions, and the reader's perspective.

the protagonist may be considered a good person because they display qualities such as courage,
kindness, empathy, or selflessness. They may help others, stand up for what they believe in, or sacrifice
their own well-being for the greater good.

In other stories, the protagonist may be flawed or even morally ambiguous, but their actions and
motivations may still be understandable or relatable to the reader. They may go through a
transformation or learn important lessons throughout the story, which can make them a more
sympathetic or admirable character.

In conclusion, what makes a protagonist a good person is subjective and depends on various factors,
including the story's themes, the protagonist's actions and motivations, and the reader's own values and
beliefs.

What makes an antagonist a bad person can vary depending on the story, the author's intentions, and
the reader's perspective.

the antagonist may be considered a bad person because they display qualities such as cruelty,
selfishness, greed, or a lack of empathy. They may harm others without remorse or take actions that are
harmful to society or the world at large.

In some stories, the antagonist may have a more nuanced or sympathetic backstory, but their actions in
the present may still be harmful or unjustifiable. They may be motivated by a desire for power, revenge,
or a misguided belief in their own superiority.

The same conclusion of what “protagonist as perspective”, what makes an antagonist a bad person is
subjective and depends on various factors, including the story's themes, the antagonist's actions and
motivations, and the reader's own values and beliefs.
 2. From my perspective the ideal way to improve one's character is through voluntary action and
self-reflection. I believed that good habits and virtues are developed through practice, and that
individuals must choose to cultivate these habits in order to become better people. Aristotle
argued that a person's character is shaped by their choices, and that the choices they make are
influenced by their values, beliefs, and habits.

However, it is also possible for an individual's character to be improved by being forced into a situation
that requires them to change their habits or behavior. For example, if someone is addicted to drugs and
is sent to rehab against their will, the experience may still lead to positive changes in their character if
they are willing to engage in the process and make the most of the opportunity. Similarly, if someone is
forced to confront the consequences of their actions and take responsibility for them, this can also lead
to positive character development.

In general, it is better for individuals to choose to change their habits voluntarily, as this demonstrates a
commitment to self-improvement and personal growth. However, circumstances such as external
pressures or crises can also lead to positive character development, provided that the individual is
willing to engage in the process and take responsibility for their actions.

It is worth noting that the impact of forced change on an individual's character can vary depending on
the person and the circumstances. Some individuals may resent being forced to change, while others
may embrace the opportunity and make the most of it. Ultimately, the individual's willingness to engage
in the process and their ability to reflect on their actions and motivations are key factors in determining
the impact of forced change on their character.

3. In Aristotle's philosophy, techne, phronesis, and eudaimonia are three important concepts that
are interrelated in the pursuit of a good life.

Techne refers to technical knowledge or skills, such as those required in crafts or trades. It involves a
mastery of specific techniques, methods, and procedures that allow individuals to produce or achieve
certain outcomes. While techne is necessary for achieving practical goals, it is not sufficient for leading a
good life.

Phronesis, on the other hand, refers to practical wisdom or practical reasoning. It involves the ability to
make good judgments in practical matters, taking into account the particular circumstances of each
situation. Phronesis requires a deep understanding of human nature, social norms, and ethical
principles, as well as the ability to apply this knowledge to specific situations.

Finally, eudaimonia refers to human flourishing or the good life. It is the ultimate goal of human
existence and involves the cultivation of virtues and the development of a virtuous character.
Eudaimonia is not simply a matter of pleasure or happiness, but rather a holistic state of well-being that
encompasses all aspects of human life, including intellectual, social, and ethical dimensions.
The relationship between techne, phronesis, and eudaimonia can be understood as follows: techne is
necessary but not sufficient for achieving eudaimonia, as it only provides the technical skills required to
achieve practical goals. Phronesis is essential for achieving eudaimonia, as it involves the ability to make
good judgments that are guided by ethical principles and the pursuit of the common good. In turn,
eudaimonia is the ultimate goal of human existence, and it can only be achieved through the cultivation
of virtues and the development of a virtuous character.

Overall, the relationship between techne, phronesis, and eudaimonia highlights the importance of
practical wisdom and ethical considerations in the pursuit of a good life. While technical skills are
necessary for achieving practical goals, they must be guided by practical wisdom and a commitment to
ethical principles in order to lead to human flourishing.