Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • H SESOC Sem 4203 1993

    Uploaded by

    Belzi Bub
    35 views50 pages
    loading standard seminar

    Original Title

    H_SESOC_Sem_4203_1993

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    loading standard seminar

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    35 views50 pages

    H SESOC Sem 4203 1993

    Uploaded by

    Belzi Bub
    loading standard seminar

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 50
    CAs NEW ZEALAND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SOCIETY buittetealcadiiehieaelietd LOADINGS STANDARD SEMINAR CONTENTS ‘The New Zealand Structural Engineering Society presents Page eee ee 1 Introduction 2 Loadings Standard Bee 2 Acknowledgements and Disclaimer 2 ‘An important Seminar wich 3 NZS 4203:1992 General Structural Design will enable you to and Structural Loadings. An Outline Paper By fete Andrew King and Rob Jury. 3 obtaining 2 rapid and thorough 4 Design Examples understanding of the new 7 Timber House Beam 6 Loadings Standard NZS 4203 : 1992 2 Steel House Beam 8 3 Composite Beam - Serviceability Limit State Only 2 4-2) Six Level Ductile Concrete Frame Structure +b) Six Level Ductile Shear Wall Structure 15 5 Five Level Steel Frame Structure 27 6 Timber Pole Retaining Wall a7 7 Relnforced Masonry Retaining Wall a 8 Steel Portal Frame 42 9 Timber Portal Frame 47 NEW ZEALAND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SOCIETY LOADINGS STANDARD SEMINAR INTRODUCTION ‘The Management Committee of The New Zealand Structural Engineering Society welcomes participants to this, the first of the "SESOC SEMINAR SERIES '93" presentations. ‘The purpose of the seminar series is to provide, Ina Practical way, Information which will enable the structural and civil engineering professions to maintain a standard of ‘excellence and skill in keeping with recent research and development In our respective fields. The Management Committee is choosing therefore to emphasise the direct and practical approach which will be found in the worked examples appended. ‘The seminar Is not intended to replace the “formal paper” approach, but rather to complement it by giving an interface between theory and practice. ‘The Management Committee would welcome feedback from participants on the value of this approach together with any Suggestions for improvements in future seminars. NeW ZEALAND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SOCIETY LOADINGS STANDARD SEMINAR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND DISCLAIMER ‘The SESOC Management Committee wishes to express Its thanks to the SESOC members who have assisted in Preparing the design examples for this seminar. In particular the Society wishes to thank (In alphabetical order) Bob Anderson of Beca, Carter Hollings & Ferner Ltd; Paul Brimer of Spencer Holmes Miller Partners Ltd; Des Bull of the Cement & Concrete Association; Martin Feeney of Holmes Consulting Group; Yogesh Kumar and Chris Thom of BCHF and Peter Smith of Spencer Holmes Miller Partners Ltd. ‘The seminar has been financially supported by the following three firms, to whom grateful thanks are accorded: - Mcintosh Timber Laminates Ltd, Phone (09) 573 0550. - Steltech Structural Ltd, Fax (09) 266 3080 - Firth Industries Ltd, Phone 0800 800 576 Whilst every care has been taken in attempting to interpret the requirements of NZS4203:1992 the Society, the authors of the examples and their presenters take no responsibility for any particular application of these interpretations. Examples do not necessarily represent full and realistic design cases. They are presented to illustrate the Standard ‘and in particular should not be taken as representing fully thought out designs giving maximum economy. Loadings NZS 4203 : 1992 General Swuctural Design end Stuctur ‘An Outline Paper By Andrew King & Reb Jury ? 1, Introduction: ‘The revision of the New Zealand loadings code, NZS 4203, has finaly been completed and is now avalable for use bythe profession in conjunction with the appropriate limit ‘fate material codes, Ths revision of NZS 4203 begsa inthe mid-1980s ts concusion ‘ngs the load reqitements for New Zealand more closely into line sith those used in ‘Ausinlis, Canada and the USA. The 1992 edidon marks a milestone in New Zealand ‘Rrvctural design as it brings the concepts of mt sate design formally ito practice. It Spaalies the load and forces to be impoted on a building when assesing is ability 0 SEER cach ofthe two. Lins states outlined inthe New Zealand Building Code. The code ‘ipulates sneans by which the detcbusin of loads and force within 3 building may be Cahalaed. 1 eequies to be used in conjunction with it state format cater standards ‘Tho Standard is published in two volumes, the Standard itself ia Volume 1, and the ‘Commentary in Volume 2. Both the Standard ard Commentary are separated into 6 pasts the contents of each being discussed below. “The commtenary provides background details and explanatory guidelines tothe provisions of the Standard. Coniments on racommended sound practice datas are iso made. The Commentary provisions are intended to be recommeodations only, and as such Geparture [Hom them should aot constitute non-compliance with the Standard 2. Umit state design Limit state design concepts are not new, but rather a more rational means of adres the tadonal sructural engineering reqeiements of adequate srength (ultimate lit (Sate) and adequate stiness (being the sericeablity limit sate) conditions. For a frocture to petform stisfzctodly, is ceguired to saisiy BOTH of thse limit tates. “The extra specitid for the serviceability limit state deal wth deformation and defection [ints which afer the appearance or function of buildings. Perfomance itera presenbe tie response of the structure fo given imposed loads. For the Gist time the loads “ppropriae for serviceability limit sate conditions are specied within NZS 4203. Such Tnads are expected to ovcur several time during the be ofthe buldng. | Examples of problems resulting fom faire to achieve the serviceabity Init state conditions inchude Enpaiment to drainage, damage to fishes and the cevurrence of excessive deleston oF vibration wich may ezuse alarm or dscomfor. 1. Structural Group Leader, Buiiing Technology Li 2. Associete, Been Carer Holiags & Femer Li. The criteria speciid forthe ulimete lit stat relate to the strength and sabi ofthe twulding and as pars This linit sae is ceached when che bulding fils to support the specified loads and forces, Falore may be due to the provision of insulicientstrenat, dedty or subity or any combination ofthese ‘The Standard prescribes the required sowiaal loads and load factors required for design ‘These are consistent with acceptable levels of csk determined fiom ris analysis studies both in Australia and tbe USA. “The nominal loads specified in the Standard have beea derived with considrston ofthe probabilities of exceecence ofeach applied load. For deat and lve lead combinations the Ultimate losd ae consistent with overseas practices, The dead an lve load combinations fave a5 percentile probability that tbe fctoed loads wil be exceeded within any yea for the serviceability ii state (ea retur period of approximately 20 years) and tin the ‘minal 50 year ie of the bulding forthe ultimate linie sate (le, a rtur period of approximately 950 year) “The ultimate limit sate wind speeds and peak earthquake acceleration response specra fiom which the design spectra have been derived, have a probability of exceedence of 10, {% over the bulding azumed lie of 30 years (ie 2 return period of approximately 475 yours), The loeds stipulated are gererly consistent with previously accepted practice, though some lod intensities have been modiied were recent experiences indicate that this is accesary, 3. Scope and erpratation ‘Wile the Standard was origrally prepared to comply sith the requirements of Chapter 8 of the Now Zesland Mods! Building By-laws (NZS 1900), delays encountered folowing cetensive industry consultation have sen a re-drection ofthe code o become a means of ‘ompliaace document with Clause Bl ofthe New Zealand Bulting Code. The provisions ofthe Standard are applicable to normal buldings and their parts. Unusual buildings are ‘il required 1 be subjected to speiel study. An expanded list of definitions of tems wed throughout the Standard is iachadad in ths Part, while the notation of symbols used femnaing with their expecive pars 4. Ganeral requirements “The essoce of the Standard is contained within Par 2 This links the loads derived from the other Parts through the loxd combinaons, ‘The classication of buldings and pars of buildings are defined within thie Par. Accepcable methods of analysis and design procedures forthe various load conditions are also prescribed here. The ond combinations fave been assessed 22 providing an appropriate level of safety for New Zesland Conditions. Thoy are consent wth thot ueed inthe 1980 version of American National ‘Standard ASS. (Subsequently revised and redesignated ANSVASCE 7-1988). Load e ‘combinations are specied for oth the serviceability and ulm imi states. Live load (aration factors are specified forthe servicesbty mit state which enables the sominal live loads to be adjusted for both short ard long tr iv loud considerations. A ive load combination factor i specified for theultimate iit sae ad is used when the live load is Considered in conjunction with other time dependent evens as a means of eating that ‘consistency ix maintained bezween individual lad cases and load cominations. The lve load dursbon factors and the lve load combination fictecs been derived from work undertaken in Australi and follow the approach wed in the Australian Loading Cede (AS 1170:1985), Dead and tive loads “The nominative loads are presented ins sniae maar to tat used in NZS 4203:1984. ‘Where justied, some values have been adjusted, generally bringing them into lie withthe provisions of AS 1170.1:1989, “The dead load provisions have been extended to include 'near-permanent’ imposed toads such as permanent equipment. Likewise partion weights, which are likly to be relocated ddring te fe ofthe strucrre are allowed at UDL's istibuted over the Boor area “The basic lve loads for diferent occupancies are speed in Table 3.4. as both istibuted loads and also as concenrated loads (where often a minimum values is speifeg). Live load reduction fezors are pemied In stuaoas where area eects may ‘Mls the imensity ofthe lve loads. Some excisions remain where ve load reduction Is rot permitted (eg assembly areas) 6. Selsmic provisions “The design cocFlcints and design spectra published in the code are based on a ‘damped usifoam hazard specra (UHS) which are modied 10 give values which are appropiate for design. The unifona hazard spectra adopted ae based on thse derived by the SANZ Seisie Risk Subcommittee using modified Katayama attenuation relationships For intermediate subsoil sss (ubsol category b) the basic seam hazard accsleration ‘ocficients for elastic response Cy(T,1) ae the 3% dammpod aormalised hazard spectal ‘values derived. by the above conuatce The basic seismic hazard acesleration coeficiets or elastic response on rock sites (category a) or exible subsol ses (category @) were derived by sealing the values for incrmesiat subsoil sites. The seale fctors applied were derived fom the Katayama atenustion relationships ampli to take the sparsity of New “Zealand earthquake records and the diferences is subsoil clesieatons ino account ‘The basic inelastic sctmic hasardaocslermvon coofceats use forthe equivalent static method were derived from ther respective dase raxponse caves for deren: seusural (aclty factors (a) using the principles of equal Gsplacement (w the long pesiod (0.7 ° sec) range), equal energy principles (in the short period ( My evs (OGHEQ *VHBOHS cle 6 <1 Dein Balding caegry *W D Mato : fai ote os Ch 21K D-AB = O1OSENin Sr sepcedte| cently | ae EHD oritcal Vez 1 IS FOXISXI-O = 28/5 = hExag? END > qn -eadts -codh wn le-Ben eae "EBiog - Lonel: Chora, aq 2 yoh= ek El geod oe a be progidal to ES Soe Saas ree a sweetie te g sone teneme ren is BR Aer Sesoe Gls stent PRR A/S eB Us sedscico. bean. Mop WBacheonUoBBUl = SS leNro oc, Bhs sso Stew Kor bo. > Deeeo = aXQ14B1 = 6.Smm_ aC carl 109 by Cheer oe 2, fitch, beon RON Hee OF eet ES, we celng). Checle \O_pos* OS —s 3 HOLMES Rtn GROUP CALCULATIONS a enesee cates SY AGE pare le B Design tangle: Menber 2 lpn Gee) Wy * jen) » dese b> Sf iy > ¢S lfm pives)- dos she Uhmake Linit- Soto Dein fehans fr 126 ¢ 168 design beadsig mamert- M® = 12 (12.8061) ¢ 66 (48423) >» 1% bile desgn shear fore |" > (Le Fle hx 27F ; i = 5c bs 2 = HEL CLES consUUTING Grove I Hous consuurive Grou i CALCULATIONS CALCULATIONS soa NAME pacela som name page te tesgy caves evar ose ioe nls sy case WE vitee93 Rant load @ mid span: Cousider foo desi ge enauples teak ond fe a Ese een () Steet beam sep flange laberolly restrained by flow foits = da ad tg» bhi. © asitind no hp flange reshrah provided by floor sitsts : ree een ae [1:0 Hesaa Author tetkasied by Lon | 2g a Spe laberilly Alife k = 28 bile, | Be Ma Ubinak, ini shat, Weese aching are combed He load Gombrations gun o Caine 2633 Fer fhe. Servos, » Coleulat diftechine for Gpprpritte Combrabins of caad toed and. rervicabilety five heed to goo by Cause 2062-2 (000 alin Conse 2621) ad for assessing macinm deflections, ote 64% Q ofr aensurg creep deflechone se 64,0 rf astctring deftccms combed vil nnd or aathquake ue G8 yd C241 A Gumertay & NS $203 :(702) (ite also Table TS Pie = OTs PBB Dea dik ~ er tlle, MP = (36 < BM, = BT ok 12 heck. macsber. mantel” capacity fren the relatively clase pocng af Wtermadia’ (aterol restate, the nonnal member epacity wilthe decked asgumeg full laleral restrant (law: $3) Thes absumplan. Will b2 verified Beam is Consiterd. fo have full lateral peshaink if it salisfies Clause S323 10 a HOLMES CONSULTING, a B ied ee GROUP CALCULATIONS son messy aed Teles caves ay aue CALCULATIONS recede eare bees Dee SS ences site $21 Gach end of bean tz cmrechd will a single web sie plate (SP) cannechon > ends are parhily resbraiud (fee Clouse C5.¢-22) % Cause £32.36) sabsfied 22 Need te check fat bnghh of cach Sub segment, satisfies. oe S32 <9) fie Be f= tos Ede Sogo ropesre — fe tachi fA 23) shih. [93 Get pastel acts af cheat i) flonge and & ah effective lateral restramd- + Clause $-3:2.3 sahihed Thirefore bean ts offactiely fully Taterally respoined Hence My = Mg > Mi < om, Ss Betas ~ cere 13 usb aa. a lt: for anforn shear shess déSfrbuhon Clause S-/.2 (3) d, ~ 2 (ebiloted) < _$2_ a [Be aes mee Us = CL Ay = 0:6 Qn tte « Bote CF) mn? © S20kul > 289 ka > 3100BES Oe fora | ys ce < gy 2.0 Coaster beam a: befor but assume np labecal restraint pevched by fla jaists (Form mast sshily Unuse $6) Chick sechor nement Ca Ty Maub7s 2 Mig % RE effechie kergih ecard. ate Claws 6:3 —Aehaak Langhe L> 6420 rum, ach ced. connate wc Shgle USP Gornechion. nal and resfraunt “pee aks Load. haght peiition af hp flange. - of load spite. deelf. & Valera Pestrasied, ther hy -asiume load. 4shem i rab. (ahralty ried = 5s she see Table 5.63 (2) Ante fosume bp nto Table $6363) Sfeehoe heagh Le = bh kp b = MOF Choo + 9570 man 22-2 Cvaluale moment piccifizaton factor ,, for uth, seigle supports fq ~O > malls i clawee 568 see Able S.6./ Choose ms hE aro fr corkal pomd load DS Ku (35 Ba oumes consort seour CALCULATIONS Jos waue races 40s Mossy caves ayMie Dateb.2-93 223. Calculate slenderness reduchon facbr, ,? Gn 56-612) calculate HB, ining gn S868) for lee Vm BM 19 Me Note that ese tables assine on + [0 (Comerrecbiie) we fT Km IRE > SMG 2 125 OT = BF bin 372 Tables DESIGN MOMENT CAPACITIES FOR MEMBERS WITHOUT FULL LATERAL RESTRAINT SUBJECT TO BENDING about x-axis UNIVERSAL BEAMS — GRADE 250 AISC : DESIGN CAPACITY TABLES FOR STAUCTURAL STEEL 1 12 ME tes conc & BB OHOLMEs chaste CALCULATIONS CALCULATIONS Jou wane Destin es rao on wave a soa nesig 7 “estes svar Datelo¥e Joe weS/3 caves erm tages 2 le: bess composts members ‘Hin, /3_, WES Boo : (922 This example (Luistrates the coletatin. of hefteckons of @ composite flcor beam, to sabi ify the si erniea bilby ‘le lini spate. Consider a. siixply Supported secmdacy flor beam aabjecl fe gaily lads. only Beam. span > ~ B70. ten, cinprepped. dlankg Construction bedi spaccig = 2568 ham beam sapparts (20mm Kick eonerefe jlab on. Aeoripar. 830 melel decking Ded load 6 BERR romueal dite load Q = 35 bP Sfeol beam sechen rs 300846 cetgned for partial composite actor foiabify Ha Uikmate linet state See Cause (2-2-6 Hs 340421992 for Ke hocks requir for serniccabilly lunch gle leads |. Caleutale daflechon of bare sheet banes due te tonshucheis Head lead, Gostuchon cleact oak» F-8ljle (eacledes seperenprced dua bad) pudlipan diflechns. of beam bition. peg: $ BFon! 3 + clive. waite ane slab hea 0.25 -Sie0 - 7 TEI na Clee Cheata I3 $2: SE Fenced Ofackie wid = bao a 262 nem : fecha ileb thickeass € > FE psa Ge Clause (3:1-2-5) ~ Sechen, “Area (un!) aba Ag Age = eet Cowcreke, M8860 xe fey Bt sheet. S58fe. me 4934 loo tet WIS 23700 4B oy > G - Fnn pom tp of slab Ty = Yi8 + bot - B750495* - 3820 [0% tga Dislance befrseen pasital aact and centrid of sffechive slab flarkness 9S - Be = Sf &* GK * a a a Hii i? GROUP a HOLMES, 3 CONSULTING GROUP. 7 CIUEC ENGINEERS civat ensiveens CALCULATIONS CALCULATIONS joe mesa eaves evr eae toe wes caves ermge withae 0c. Conmenboy Cie Chiko e «defect due fe short form hire load Pe eile Se = 3 fins . 4G ibe tes - tee bg Bex BSR 5 (eit c Bot onens)¢ B10 mn x SPs” @ Be Deo GPs 382x108 Aiflickom dis — Perm dat fond ae Bible

    ty, » PSR 23bux0-F 36h HOLS CONSULTING ROR CALCULATIONS paces caves Bur pate so.2-95 Fucremental deflectans (positese viten daflachan.& belt Y ey | 4 Bley] ORalese by eB EB y orstrakin) dead lead. lage lead Compare wit recommenced bint from jj28 #203: (RZ Table C24) | E poe God HERA Design Guides Vet 2 ae a [@ | elle: aes ae Saue. f i BE OLB GE | Ylaw= Bond Spgs 52 |e +P lind vepble lee key +83 | br Seth yb noged are aed gindes toffee Ba Othe Ue pcan Sey he Yorn? 22 |S: Se Saher oye | + to auypid exxgssie. 50 of slab foe | BE pnptalttteg Yon Se iG nee | eens ta ~8 rð, in pg agp Vow = 18 ey ‘é clare Prargenal # his limit right be satisfied af fushos are yplid offer Some Srsbge oftectis. has Le fac Ung keokecos) 1 , eee: Beca \_.,ter Hollings & Ferner ih: || CALCULATION SHEET Beca Carter Hollin, _. Ferner ‘fy i. CALCULATIC. SHEET eo win NES AZOR: 1992 BECA ate BECA oe Sunt 6 storey ConeceTe BUILONG DeRGN ExAMAznce “ Tor sneer rate 10 AA. we ome. 307.5 - 93, me owe, seca Caner Hotings Ferner [BE chain eter Rea Carer ing 8 Famer cwamnnen ser see nas. 420% $1392 so mae: chen @. SOREN CONCRETE BUILDING. DESK BAMPLE mae 10. Zor ane nacre Bo oe on 7 eae T peble 3-4-1 rleat Area) \| rable Bde Ripal {loor san Jom ce 1 wats 1 S00 wide ep 17 ih A r hs Bec arter Hollings & Ferner ak [7 carcuuanow steer Beca Carter Holl”. Ferner i epee rena ae eae pata tae Be all aha oy ee) re ; D749 kN + O-s04 (668): 18 Boca Carter Hollings & Ferner Eas LCCICULATION SHEET Beca Carter Holings 8 Ferner iM: CALCULATION SHEET 6-207 e) * Tible 4-62) AbD c 19 shy: 7 |: 1 Beca Carter Hollis & Ferner Lid exoaL WORKSHEET Beca\_ ter Hollings & Ferner ih; BECA Jeane NZSe208 1852 vesve: 000 aor falnon 6 STOREY OUCTLE FRAME CESIGN perma veer be YOGESHIGMAR ome 2808 - oo ‘SEISMIC FORGE DISTRIBUTION FOR EQUIVALENT STATIC FORGE ANALYSIS Nootines 8 ‘eisnie coareont 098 Haight erpenect 1.00 Progeton af haa top 08 Base Shear 10276 Bae Momert 13590 Tae Wage | Seay | Far] Way | Faree | — ieee ane fen | Nog | Hoare | “orm” | om | ow | eam oie Sis abeo] — raeir [— seao] — 88 T | sue] 320] i000] soma] az] cosa] 1900 2 | Stee] 30] ts20| sows | tana] ease | ana 3 | seme] Seo] tio] soos] tas] eee] 5720 2 | Saz| 320] ‘Yoo] sims] 903] esas | t0007 S| Sel 320] so] zoe] gs | seas | sae seer [Czas nco|—aaeest [aioe | ta [tae Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner Ltd [BXCaL WORKSHEET obras NZSse05 1052 eave: 1100000 Sinsor DUCTILE SHEAR WALL STRUCTURE DESIGN acne. ae YOGESHIGMAR See a8 ihe 4-61 6) “SESUIG FORGE DISTRIBUTION FOR EQUIVALENT STATIC FORGE ANALYSIS Noctis 5 Selsie Coocont noes Fiore experene 1.00 Properton of hoa top 08 BaseSoeer 156508 Base Moment 25168 oT Laval | Wag | Say | Tea] WR Ra | Face] Siar] ane all sete Se Siig — tae) “aor | “Se or ss Twas] 05 7 si Closan nals Obl ht s | eos] a80| toco] sissos} ase] exes | a — eee 2 | ees] 220] 1320] sasor]} zen] © viase | soe HxO-67 x Lx ©: 3 exes | 380] 11.40 exe} ais2} 13809 9405, 2 | ges] aco] "7o0] sass] tase] tans | e500 + | oes | seo} eo] cover | rer] tangs | aoe wee [-Bea9| 000] —wewoes | iso [tear } —asree 20 seca carer Hong: Femer HE ceca sist Beca Carter Hotingsefemer HEE cascuon se oe Wee. L race wy LO.08 suauecr. aoe wo: I) on sy: 1 lye . Beca__ ster Hollings & Femer hi | | cateutanion suger‘ Beca Carter Holl, Ferner FoF catcutas:') SHEET a ta ee anains tree Be ulin Daign Spe z =e OO EIABS.— The deeign — W065. applied. —tareugh. “pre es Q 2 ze Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner CA‘CULATION SHEET Fe i seca Carter Hotings @Femer EA fee ce net oe ‘naseor, APPENDIX een Sa ace fate. shea Wat Sirachae 1 46-32 Bec, ‘ter Hollings & Ferner Beca Carter Hollir,, Ferner Pet [Devel t| 23 24 geca Cart’ Hollings & Ferner coe ae CULATION. SHEET ra no A Rew neck Ve Real — regalans Ey Tin _actorcdane. wih, pe —Sitenenar of avenge: diplacemew’ at thes Jo__application Af — equivalent Bal iy Beca Carter Hollings & Fe voor: NZS4200 1662 XOEL WRKSHEET wom ax Heer, FRAWEY.ORECTON Xi be YOGESH KUMAR ‘shies ‘SEIsMIO FORCE DISTRIBUTION FOR EQUIVALENT STATIC FORGE ANALYSIS No.ctiows 8 Seismic Coateant ass Heigrtexponent 1.00, Proportion a shear atop 008 Besashear 110276 Tae Weg] Seay | Ta] Wa ae | as Saar Gn) | Hagm | volar | ox | ony eae] Oe] iso] ais es | 8 | sice| o00| isao| zee] zene | saa S| si2| 000] tio] Goo | rns] sore 3 | se] 900] ‘en0) eran | teat | et 2 | gee] 00/30] zetos| sore | sos i | Sis | Seo] 210 iss | soo | ze. wise | tea] ooo] pss | eae |e. Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner Ltd EXCEL WORKSHEET ana: 258200 1952 ison. FRAMEX- DIRECTION een. 1100000 mr YooesHianan tee aa “6G FORGE OFS TRIBUTION FOR EGUNALENT STATIC FORCE ANALYSIS Nasties 6 ‘Sani Coeicerk cae feo Prponinctsheereicp 08 | Noera Toa eG Say | Ta] Wat Haiw [Fase] Siar fo | ssge | wesgre| “ose | gag) |p aa eo Seo eas 0 F | Sez] ono| vzvo| sor] ans] sane 2] Ese] 800) tao) ser] ane] ams 3 | sae| too] “tm0] Sor] eo] ons 3 | Ese] coo] S00] arvco | tone | soma i_| Sel coo] 200 fons |_"ane |__ssmza Sateen tie re. ites ae deflections Cm) Henne mn ETDS of shears analysis from equivaleet equivalent static force stodic leads analysis Therefore the vertical regulavity requirements of ce 4a 2 are eats fied Bei” ‘arter Hollings & Ferner Lid (7) exce.wonesvesr Beca Carter Holi’ “¢.Femer WE ae 25 oar: E929 1992 © eam ieee seek AT |) SHEET walor waus vomeeTON LouD mane AB me oo Yocesianan See ‘aa maser nacre Ae GElSWI FORGE OS TRIBUTION FOR EGUWALENT STATIC FORGE ANALYSIS one Nectioae 6 ‘Sean Contr om Height exponent 1.00 Proportion of sheer at top 0.08 — Siawimaty: petted ry aa Taal | Wage | Say | THR] WR Rag [Fares] Sra ~fegulasity 5s | eas] | i 5 cas | 0.0] 8.00 somo | “568 53 The vesulbaut store {| Sas] Geo See] aoe] ee | one 2] Sel aS) am] fee] mre] tener $] SS) GS] em) tee] ier] eos 2 | fe eeol feo] “rooo| "ose | teams Ee i Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner Ltd EXCEL WORKONET eave: NZSA203 192 Sunect, WALLXOIRECTION LOAD eano: 1100600 ues of deflectonsCnr nom ETAGE analysts be equivalent etatc loads Br YOOSSHKUMAR See 25ran8 ‘SuISWIG FORCE DISTRIBUTION FOR EQUIVALENT STATIC FORCE ANALYSIS Neots 6 tei Cooter ous Heigreexponent 1.00 Proporion shes atop aoe Base Sheae 136609 Tat | WERT] Samy | Tea | Wee | Foes] Saar Toad. | Haig | weg |“ onim = | omy | ans a ates pees] eroy seme ees Se 3 | sces| ano) sso) suara| | cone | 9119 2 | ecos| aco) suf weght of floor system 3 2403, Flor areca ~ HOm™ | Baustng Plane 28 Hones SONSUETING GROUF iS B HOuMES SY NG 6 SRO CALCULATIONS CALCULATIONS son name pacezy soo wane pace ZZ doa ne caves evmur pare soa ne caves aymur Dareeede Consider Koo analysss and design of a. perineter f ae lee @ an and _(d) (E006 fener cil bo Hasens) manaseineh Hoo % lak S 30 —— ——| M5202. aol tt | ii . : a L Shae eat 3 a =e z fea, = lesk2 ae au x level | | aaa | ¥ gennd a ir geosily bonding, he trbotary undth of floor = logge = 5300 mm Evaluate beam (oad: | Dead lead | al (ads on beams of penmeter frame are ig > BF tos)bR we F3u + Blain = 2sluh (@ 405) Clacng plassef eight for fies flow Bg BF ENS) AR eS Iun + 42 bef + 2th cod level Heglet area reduchin foctr tor beans Udesgpers choice, bub fib aree & small, Y,=lo asp) base he load 0, +25 bie for office fears - PO~ p> 25% for serniceabilaty lint ste OQ, (620 Clue 2.421) short fem. bie ad = g Q #0 BS = NISHE hp flee = aod Dita D. 2 Feb Poof Hp for pov ref. agen at lad = SEGRE IB FR ad 00%20. 30 For ultinate binit shbe QO or Qu fr Combrnalions of only fruity beak Q> Qe. fe » 256K ty flor ead @ = 204K roof fr enbnahone inching wind, snows, cartiquake or fra Quer Uf @ sons + eh fe he fs ard Q, | Values ob ve, are from Table 2-4.) y | Values of yy are frm Table 242 [ ard ney, HOLMES CONSULTING GROUE CALCULATIONS paseZ3 soe ne caves BY AYE pare Oy 264 $3 2 13 haf for bp oflcr flows jn Pol 5S = ku for roof (Pr Srvceabilly nit Slate, tse Jide om Say 20 Gymprictt > Tlf. (fer) or 5 3huhe (Gifize) and 2¢bb fn (mf) or 0 tee ilkeabe Lait: slab = Yor 126 E168 eB ee Evaluate Cobsme. loads \Grsder Gory ads om typical comer Column eg. 2 Gad fypicak infer clam eg. AB seal tribubary area = he gs = Men™ per bvel |Frsitte Colma * tate Gheulete Coluan achins Jor fhe follrung wlmate liitt state bod (oubinations L2G EI6Q , RELA el; Geeky Thevefore caleslate column Moads dae te 6, & gud Ox Tae above Gomer Chane - 4 fob ¢ 52-28 m* per evel Wb toade om beans of perimeter frime are ie fies = 53h GAs) a 29 HOLMES CONSULTING GROUP SEROCIURAL an9 C1vIC ENGIMEE CALCULATIONS es “ida Witm o (ke teak ‘ed so Ja aist, o, 33 a 8 Goili) af bilim of colon Le Le a = FORM of both of ae Ws feeb 742 + HSI kal cb bil of cob HOLMES CONSUL. 16 & GROUP CALCULATIONS CALCULATIONS son wane i paces paced lon we exces evmue 0078/9392 eases evmue oar e 3-93 Secale foties 8 888 g Cuabucte Satiur forces te frame 1. accordance wit a AF & g ——__f "rn ts Bar Nes $203 3 fag eee = 7 B Raa Fle momnend (esheg frame ill be cengnsd 04 a eschle thuchire sits tate! v ofr Fre wtteinate Aunt slabs RB eee i + Spa oct Cue 4241) ae fir ternciabitly binit ool furl ~g7$ i & fir ulbwale. shee, nse par ~ see N25 340%. pend B oe wm eapecily deogn & “vepeared (Clute Bas) gPt fs. = s Sein snag actanad op cack. toad 2 eucirclanes” Rate Peg : with Clause H2 -- resuits fabulated ox page $2 [eter + hes pmprced b use fhe epurialect sabe malted of aealyesr. Check tha limitabons 3 Clause $32 are cangled with, Head te check seksfichm of bavtotel « vote rpolarty Peguiements \Leck homoskel cgeecly Clawe #1) Pisssnuig vniforn dastivutien Uf Seine mace, bod eptual stofiaces of ; rromend resistiig frames on Lies @ and ®) > Aihrce fom hoe @ A ceshe of man (220 a) +e wi +60 and itlance fom bi @ fo Hear ceafre ~ bm Bas Palle sce Hive os Use Level ; 31 | Ree oe creer HOLES CONSULING CALCULATIONS paces soa wane raced joa we caves nme oar ey7393 CALCULATIONS gon xe caves aye Atay 895 Whinate Linck Stale 4 2 fo Gable 46-3) | pene oe, pb %G, (09,6) ~ 00% (abe. #61) | fe ieinic fooae Ke narthfimatte diseckin,, fhe reostacd Bit ete gee Se ive ea UL a | conan os rot Mkaly & aagripianty ofect lelerat force clesisbalton i aaciee | 2 Prrivontal regularity requitamanls £463 fred it | Lpecivalecd Stabe forces, | AY wapiclin, Merhéal vepatarty requirenarls ale sabssfied . Frees evaluated for Ke tgeuivalont sabe mefhad wm accordance | 03 max plan demonsein = 09282 = Fim f ee a | psa wf deka Ui Chaos #8 = see EP peg | Spptelent abs forsat aim ppd thesughe pools cocales b Fi policy Baal He pet vibration. 25 Kea for pao =a ofa a) E OM Hee Se Lic hin, oT; = 0%. sete Gort Line lila ee eae nt) Wecidinlel teenth, = £0: Seu = 32m ee ce Be Ailes fos goid © ty pois af application of equiolot bldg « located on an’ intermediate sal. site” ~ sabsoit cabegary Shab forces are (FEE 3B2m = Dm at Manukay oy Buckland, and Eas Building calgary Gee Fike 231) Worzt caae for frome 2% baie (6) at sat cccentraly at 2o-Bmelras fom ® > foi frame resih appre Ine . est “of Holal Lexan hr B= 06 Ha, oe & f fee frre: A Nok South dhinetin 2 slasyomeg orion ts ressfed = Clejoy T > sho Cite 46-2) Liberal fore tweffivrdks darived wseg Close 4.527 4 enbiely by fase Pe permator faxes) Sericsabrhly lumi fale: ken ol? — (Tabla 463) Base seesmie shear wy Perce f 0955, perl > Cy, (09,19) = 053 (fabs +e) Sew, Lin slate Ve» 0-035, sok + S¢8h/ => + O53 «06% « ho x O6 al = 0-035 UE bum sfabe U, = 0036. Kasokl + Glo hil Se ts / 461) Fr ut lim Site > OD = Serb #Q0tV = 49 | Segmi Latiral fore ore 5 CONSULTING RR HOLES CONS, G GROUP CALCULATIONS hoe we caves ey ME CALCULATIONS once 3.6 yee ne caves eva eared gas oa = Gerla & Fork he We Wik 5 ho Ho bum SSS) aes 4.49 «28 & It 340 Sik OF (52 5 Ie 3m ey 0% IIS 2 FE Bo Sita OB ced 33 3¥m ate, 00%. 37 Kyat Ve 562 Moke Hab fo: He teritaaby dail tale, He Leigh FE of Re ebore forces for the wbmale nit toh. Thorefere, se the sane dforeas fo verify compleines wx te deflection inte approprate dor tha Seema: senceabilly henit 52 chiens prpertes for deflection. calculations are Geen Appedin M, Nes Beat, Pat} > aatunng composite acon ab midepon Omit shot. caludationg uttmate. leit sfale calatations, wae T+ 13 Ty for Sernieabe d Te h2ty Wtiate Lesnil sfobe a oo DSO ESTE Lonsitor the petineter moment resishig Manes be Linifed ductile Gahegary 2 sivucheres - tee MES swe) fe ultimate damit state sean dasigh, Changes to fx proceeding cotealatione Ore as Plus: fr Ha altvinale hirul stole, chose fe*B - see W234 Apolo = 2 capacity design may be required - See. NBS 30% Sectine 2. simu Aa v a 3) = a8 (aera). SCs O18 u06F< for 0Ge/o = D072 : ta bate Shear, and egustalont stabi loteral force a S08 = 2x forces oor sax 2 deflechone fhm anche are mult liid by ecabig thchr = 3 + Lenit for nterstorey drift given by Guuaton #9] os ruck fess severe wil +3 (see. laler pages frre fer the serviceability linit ste ore oppresiaatly W5 of tose for wlhmale. limit stale tog pu>8 33 HUMES CONSULTING ROU BE 044s counts croup CALCULATIONS CALCULATIONS son name race bt Jos wae pacehz toa ne eases avpuF oar y9 3.98 lee me ences or MF oateeaee Wed foreea — oe + Sike 2lerabon os less than 500 mefres Evakuali witd floret an Hes framed decardance wtih Ms (th, Me, Mae)pan 2 12 Chetan $-46/ Bet S$, Nes 4203. ~ fr i derechons ee : Boz wnid Ere WE ‘ak This bitdig ts rok wand: sensibie Gee Clute $223) Dircchan ley Gay Gea © Ayrots hyn 03 Pee eee a a A. + 3. 093 fo be 3t 38 Sitewide. Ee eee 30 O93 he fe. iy EJ a 3) a7. aSeneae Be. 3F. yy 3 8s po ener bchedy asta = [Sw > aaa 09s = nia Frit ia faecal “Fie legory HT Ditlteg stich sk maliplar My »b0 2 = + Busting Hegel hy = Fir 7 slope oc < Ge? ute reference eight > hy «Im. 1 «Be wind spood from makdiiectons itis assimed Hab fhe gerund bal While Unit toe | reughecss o Partaud. Cotegry 3. (Hote. that fhe transition Bone Be dap. dz > Tom fiom Clase 54) Fal + Shrslding ofecks will be grored fr ehh darechors except $4. aT > frm Clause S45. Me =o fypically ond My *0°Tsey fo Send | OT Semniechibly (it sole + Ske & rok on tadubating grumd >My sto Clause S462 wy + Gite ts rol urilhex, alee tone > Ms /-0 lame FEF s heepacte pees Sonate aiieee we Me #10 Clause S96 + Site ts rof nlx a vatley or gorge. 34 HOt res FONSUTING | GRU, & BE OES cost, 4 ROU CALCULATIONS pacees ors. 13 caves ev aue | fer prietohei, t building privcpal ork mal anes WS, 6,0 > dang unnd spesde Wy, are deberneied 4 accordance WH Clause $.3-4 — a Vac lat stale af | | oe | CD) Sen Lint as) Spaces beelantasuicl asaas deigh iard spoed = (34, Bay 3 Me po ilde ive aed. (23.30 mae = 3) mls. for sel, bam clade > Gq > 08% Ha (ult bm stole) and O°SP kh Gor lis fale) Mud, forces on complete buildons, Fam Clause 56:12, forces on the conplote. building are taken a2 the summation of forced on enteral Serfces, Clack = Ke. ard % 03 bk sy 2. do rok need. te tonsider frctinal diag effects. [for wind om Worth /Saulh durechon , Conssiter pressure cooftiionls len unndusard and foewterd watts, frm Cauca 5-63 Wirdiward wall -see 5-6. < Sm 4a" Ih Table calculated at heigl 2>). Gh hes) (i ani pre God wot vars brat area of balig- feck by sad fori am a aly CALCULATIONS saoe he caves ayaur - Ger OF Lenard wall sae Table 5-62(b) Pog Hope X < l0° ds ke. O75 ¢ ° ® Ge = OS. Hence, for purposes of tualuabeig overall urvel. foresa on ten Boulding CL nat rot “Ms pn tdnard o Leetvard ofall) eesfiaent— G Jefe

    You might also like