Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sts Lesson 8
Sts Lesson 8
ELICIT
Social Networks
-Facebook
- Dribble
- Snapchat
- Behance
- Flickr
-youtube
Cloud Storage
- Dropbox
Communication
- Messenger
- telegram
- what's up
- line
- hangouts
- slack
- Viber
- messages
- Skype
- kakatalk
- hipchat
- kakaotalk
App store
- Google store
- Apple store
EXPLANATION:
These icons are sorted and identified based on their uses, features, and functions on the Internet.
For example, messenger, telegrams, what’s up, Viber, etc., are internet applications used for basic
and advanced communication. Sorting these application icons helps us identify and recognize
their uses and features on the internet.
ENGAGE
Activity 8.1 TEDTalk Reaction Report
WikiLeaks is an international non-profit organization that publishes news leaks and classified media
provided by anonymous sources. Its website stated in 2015 that it had released online 10 million
documents since beginning in 2006 in Iceland. Julian Assange, an Australian Internet activist, is generally
described as its founder and director and is currently fighting extradition to the United States over his
work with WikiLeaks. Since September 2018, Kristinn Hrafnsson has served as its editor-in-chief.
Assange considers WikiLeaks a protection intermediary. Rather than leaking directly to the press, and
fearing exposure and retribution, whistleblowers can leak to WikiLeaks, which then leaks to the press for
them. The goal of the organization is "to bring important news and information to the public. One of our
most important activities is to publish original source material alongside our news stories so readers and
historians alike can see evidence of the truth. The group has released a number of prominent document
caches that exposed serious violations of human rights and civil liberties to the US and international
public, including the Collateral Murder footage from the 12 July 2007 Baghdad airstrike in which Iraqi
Reuters journalists were among several civilians killed. WikiLeaks is known for publishing leaks such as
diplomatic cables from the United States and Saudi Arabia, emails from the governments of Syria and
Turkey, corruption in Kenya, and at Samherji, a multinational fishing company based in Iceland.
WikiLeaks has also published documents exposing surveillance by the Central Intelligence Agency,
National Security Agency, and private corporations. During the 2016 U.S. presidential election campaign,
WikiLeaks released emails from the Democratic National Committee and from Hillary Clinton's campaign
manager, showing that the party's national committee favored Clinton over her rival Bernie Sanders in the
primaries. These releases resulted in the resignation of Debbie Wasserman Schultz as chairwoman of the
Democratic National Committee (DNC) and caused significant harm to the Clinton campaign. They have
been cited as a possible contributing factor in Clinton’s loss to Donald Trump in the presidential election.
During the campaign, WikiLeaks promoted conspiracy theories about Hillary Clinton, the Democratic
Party, and the murder of Seth Rich. Good information, it is believed, improves decision-making, enhances
efficiency, and provides a competitive edge to the organization which knows more than the opposition.
EXPLORE
Activity 8.2 Social Media Synopsis (Fake News)
News is one of the greatest means of communication between people and the world. In addition, they are
also a great medium of knowledge. We get our daily dose of news from newspapers early in the morning.
It is quite a reliable source that gives us information only after thoroughly investigating the information.
Though it may be interesting or even entertaining, the foremost value of news is as a utility to empower
the informed. The purpose of journalism is thus to provide citizens with the information they need to make
the best possible decisions about their lives, their communities, their societies, and their governments. On
the other hand, Fake news is false or misleading information presented as news. Fake news often has the
aim of damaging the reputation of a person or entity or making money through advertising revenue. Fake
news can make a person turn away from reality, therefore making them do the wrong things. hearing a
false fact can make someone believe in it and can cause unnecessary panic or false hope depending on
the type of news. Dealing with fake news is a balancing act. On the one hand, fake news can be a serious
problem as seen currently amid the COVID-19 pandemic where harmful misinformation about the virus
has been spreading like wildfire. The accidental spread of inaccurate information makes it harder for
people to find accurate information online. It can also cause fear, panic, and hate, making difficult
situations even more challenging. The COVID-19 pandemic created an “infodemic”, an overwhelming
increase of misinformation that has made public health measures more difficult. Unreliable and false
information is spreading around the world to such an extent, that some commentators are now referring to
the new avalanche of misinformation that’s accompanied the COVID-19 pandemic as a ‘disinfodemic’.
And fears are growing that this phenomenon is putting lives at risk, prompting some with symptoms to try
unproven remedies in the hope of ‘curing’ themselves.
Why do fake news wildfires spread so quickly across the media landscape? One key factor fanning the
flames is, of course, political agendas. Fake news affects far more than politics, but it has recently
characterized that sphere of public life to a frightening degree. There have always been lying politicians
desperate to promote themselves, and propaganda is a vital tool for any totalitarian state. Yet it does feel
that there is something very different about the current political landscape. Fake news affects far more
than politics, but it has recently characterized that sphere of public life to a frightening degree. Fake news
is also driven by greed. However, fake news is not always created with an obvious agenda. Often on
social media, especially following an atrocity or disaster, it is merely careless, unverified reporting which
quickly spreads. We all have a strong psychological tendency to latch on to information that confirms
ideas we already have. In other words, our response to much of what we see within social media is
primal, not rational.
In the Philippines, knocking out fake news is like pushing back a tsunami that a Senate inquiry was called
for to help curb the proliferation of malicious and misleading information that wears the shoes that belong
to the truth. It’s hard to believe that Filipinos know fake news exists, so alarming and ubiquitous on the
world wide web. The media in the country have to constantly contend with online trolls as their articles
that do not support or agree to the powers-that-be are always tagged as “fake news”, whereas fly-by-night
and anonymously hosted websites have a great foothold on many, if not the majority, of Filipino netizens.
You ask why? Because the lure of fake news is stronger than the truth, even when certain information is
already close to the borderline of illusion and bigotry. In this case, the role of the mass media, referred to
as the fourth branch of the state as it can expose abuse of power and corruption in the Philippine
government is undermined. Authorities have arrested 32 people across the country for allegedly
spreading fake news about the coronavirus disease on social media. The Philippine National Police said
that by posting false information on COVID-19, the suspects have caused panic among people. The
accused are now facing charges of violating "Unlawful Use of Means of Publication and Unlawful
Utterances” under Article 154 of the Revised Penal Code, the PNP said. The penalties of "arrest mayor"
or imprisonment of one month and a day to six months, and a fine ranging from ₱40,000 to ₱200,000,
shall be imposed upon "any person who by means of printing, lithography, or any other means of
publication shall publish or cause to be published as news any false news which may endanger the public
order, or cause damage to the interest or credit of the State,” according to Article 154. Instead, we must
resist our confirmation bias, questioning the assertions that come streaming our way. We must not
assume that ‘social proof’ proves anything. We must commit to discovering the truth, which includes doing
our best to be sure of the sources of the information which comes our way.
EXPLAIN
The 6th Edition: Ethics for the Information Age written by Michael J. Quinn, is a book that talks about how
technologies have brought us different benefits and raise many ethical concerns. What I like about this
book is that it opened up another view of understanding the fast growth of modern innovations and
technology which are part of the information age. Computers and high-speed communication networks
are transforming our world. These technologies have brought us many benefits, but they have also raised
many social and ethical concerns. My view is that we ought to approach every new technology in a
thoughtful manner, considering not just its short-term benefits, but also how its long-term use will affect
our lives. There is good reason to say we are living in the Information Age. Never before have so many
people had such easy access to the information. Low-cost computers and high-speed communication
networks make possible the products of the Information Age, such as the Samsung Galaxy S4. It
functions as a phone, email client, Web browser, camera, video recorder, digital compass, and more. Our
culture today is highly modernized, automated, data-driven, and technologically advanced, as
demonstrated by how easily knowledge can be transferred or exchanged. Different aspects of culture,
such as communication, economics, business, health, and the environment, have been profoundly
affected. Despite the benefits we have gained as a result of the rapid advancement of information
technology, the rapid upgrading of information often has drawbacks.
The content of the book is good, and it has opened my thoughts about the ethics of the information age.
The author’s view in Ethics for the Information Age is that we ought to approach every new technology in
a thoughtful manner, considering not just its short-term benefits, but also how its long-term use will affect
our lives.