You are on page 1of 3

Introduction

Neuroendocrinology 2017;105:193–195 Received: December 12, 2016


Accepted: January 24, 2017
DOI: 10.1159/000457957
Published online: February 11, 2017

ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the


Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine
Tumors
Marianne Pavel a Wouter W. de Herder b
a
Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité
– Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; b Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, ENETS
Centre of Excellence Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Keywords Introduction
Neuroendocrine tumors · Standards of care · Safety
In 2009, the first consensus guidelines for the stan-
dards of care in neuroendocrine tumors (NET) have been
Abstract published by the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Soci-
The landscape of treatment options in neuroendocrine tu- ety (ENETS) based on a consensus conference held in Pal-
mors (NET) has changed in the last 5 years. Novel targeted ma de Mallorca, Spain in November 2007, with leading
drugs have been introduced and approved for distinct types experts in the field [1]. Since then, the landscape of treat-
of NET. Furthermore, with the first randomized trial on 177Lu- ment options has changed. Novel targeted drugs, such as
DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in the mTOR inhibitor everolimus and the multiple tyrosine
midgut NET, not only is approval of this treatment awaited kinase inhibitor sunitinib, have been introduced in the
but also its more widespread use. Techniques and choices of treatment of NET and approved for distinct types of NET.
radionuclides have changed over time as well as imaging Furthermore, with the first randomized trial on 177Lu-
tools. Recognition of well-differentiated NET G3 within the DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy
group of neuroendocrine neoplasms G3 has widened the (PRRT) in midgut NET, not only is approval of this treat-
spectrum of chemotherapeutic drugs used in this field. Even ment awaited but also its more widespread use. Tech-
more so, it has become important to provide recommenda- niques and choices of radionuclides have changed over
tions for daily clinical practice on how to safely use novel time as well as imaging tools. In the same period, the rec-
drugs, chemotherapeutic agents, and PRRT. The updated ognition of well-differentiated NET G3 within the group
ENETS consensus guidelines for the standards of care in NET of neuroendocrine neoplasms G3 has widened the spec-
provide a tool to accurately assess the diagnosis of NET as trum of chemotherapeutic drugs used in this field. Even
well as practical recommendations for the use of surgery, more so, it has become important to provide recommen-
and the different systemic therapeutic options that are avail- dations for daily clinical practice on how to safely use
able for the management of NET. © 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel novel drugs, chemotherapeutic agents, and PRRT.

© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel Marianne Pavel


Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology
Charité – University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1
E-Mail karger@karger.com
DE–13353 Berlin (Germany)
www.karger.com/nen
E-Mail marianne.pavel @ charite.de
While recently updated and published consensus separately to discuss group-specific questions. The results
guidelines for the management of digestive NET [2] pro- of each working group were presented on the second day
vide guidance for appropriate therapy selection, stan- of the meeting to the general assembly where all partici-
dards of care needed to be addressed for recently intro- pants attended. Consensus statements were discussed
duced novel therapies and updated for established stan- and approved or rejected by all participants gathered in
dard therapies. The same group of experts who developed the general assembly. This procedure was followed for all
the recent ENETS consensus guidelines update for the 8 sessions.
management of patients with digestive NET convened at After the conference, the group leaders revised their
a consensus meeting held in Antibes on November 5–6 in manuscripts including all consensus statements and add-
2015 to update technical and practical details necessary ing additional information where requested before send-
for implementing consensus guidelines. ing the revised manuscripts to all participants of their
The consensus sessions covered the following topics: breakout sessions for review. The Organizing Committee
• pathology – diagnosis and prognostic stratification defined the rules to establish the design of each paper, the
• biochemical markers tasks for authors, and the general authorship policy. The
• radiological, nuclear medicine and hybrid imaging papers were designed to update and amend the previous-
• surgery for small intestinal and pancreatic NET ly published ENETS standards of care guidelines, incor-
• pre- and perioperative therapy porating all novel information and approved consensus
• systemic therapy: biotherapy, novel targeted agents, statements.
chemotherapy
• PRRT with radiolabeled somatostatin analogues
• follow-up and documentation in patients with NET Achievements and Final Remarks

The following 9 papers [3–11] are the result of an


Working Format Advisory Board Consensus Conference meeting. These
ENETS guidelines for the standards of care in NET pro-
Fifty-five experts active in the field of NET from 22 vide a tool to accurately assess the diagnosis of NET and
countries attended the Antibes consensus conference. provide practical recommendations for the use of sur-
Attendees were members of the ENETS advisory board gery, and the different systemic therapeutic options that
including adjunct members and recognized US physi- are available for the management of NET. A great effort
cians with high-level expertise in the field. The attend- was made by all participants devoting their time, experi-
ees represented all medical specialties involved in man- ence and enthusiasm to building the standards of care
aging patients with gastroenteropancreatic NET. They consensus guidelines. We expect that this practical infor-
were assigned to different working groups according to mation will provide useful and important information for
the topics outlined above. The complete list of partici- health care providers and will support the endeavor to
pants is provided at the end of each of the following pa- provide high-quality care for NET patients. We thank all
pers. participants for their efforts, contributions, and great
Eight working groups and their group leaders were de- dedication to construct these guidelines.
termined before the conference. The group leaders pre-
pared a first draft on standards of care in their field re-
viewing and integrating all relevant literature published Acknowledgement
beyond 2009. The draft manuscript was sent to all group
The consensus conference held in Antibes, France in 2015
members before the consensus conference and served as
was supported by the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society
a structure for the discussion. On the first day of the meet- (ENETS).
ing after a short introduction and presentation of the top-
ic in a plenary session, each working group gathered sep-
arately to discuss group-specific questions. The group
leaders presented the management to their breakout
group members and the management was discussed in
detail. On-site comments were collected continuously
throughout the conference. Each working group gathered

194 Neuroendocrinology 2017;105:193–195 Pavel/de Herder


DOI: 10.1159/000457957
References
1 Plöckinger U, Wiedenmann B, de Herder W: Consensus Conference participants: ENETS guidelines for the standards of care in neuro-
ENETS consensus guidelines for the standard consensus guidelines for the standards of care endocrine neoplasms: systemic therapy – bio-
of care in neuroendocrine tumors. Neuroen- in neuroendocrine tumors: biochemical therapy and novel targeted agents. Neuroen-
docrinology 2009;90:159–161. markers. Neuroendocrinology 2017;105:201– docrinology 2017;105:266–280.
2 O’Toole D, Kianmanesh R, Caplin M: ENETS 211. 9 Garcia-Carbonero R, Rinke A, Valle JW, Fazio
2016 consensus guidelines for the manage- 6 Partelli S, Bartsch DK, Capdevila J, Chen J, N, Caplin M, Gorbounova V, O’Connor J, Er-
ment of patients with digestive neuroendo- Knigge U, Niederle B, Nieveen van Dijkum iksson B, Sorbye H, Kulke M, Chen J, Falkerby
crine tumors: an update. Neuroendocrinolo- EJM, Pape U-F, Pascher A, Ramage J, Reed N, J, Costa F, de Herder W, Lombard-Bohas C,
gy 2016;103:117–118. Ruszniewski P, Scoazec J-Y, Toumpanakis C, Pavel M, all other Antibes Consensus Confer-
3 Perren A, Couvelard A, Scoazec J-Y, Costa F, Kianmanesh R, Falconi M, all other Antibes ence participants: ENETS consensus guide-
Borbath I, Delle Fave G, Gorbounova V, Gross Consensus Conference participants: ENETS lines for the standards of care in neuroendo-
D, Grossman A, Jensen RT, Kulke M, Oberg consensus guidelines for the standards of care crine neoplasms: systemic therapy – chemo-
K, Rindi G, Sorbye H, Welin S, all other An- in neuroendocrine tumors: surgery for small therapy. Neuroendocrinology 2017;105:281–
tibes Consensus Conference participants: intestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tu- 294.
ENETS consensus guidelines for the standards mours. Neuroendocrinology 2017;105:255– 10 Hicks RJ, Kwekkeboom DJ, Krenning E, Bo-
of care in neuroendocrine tumors: pathology 265. dei L, Grozinsky-Glasberg S, Arnold R, Bor-
– diagnosis and prognostic stratification. Neu- 7 Kaltsas G, Caplin M, Davies P, Ferone D, Gar- bath I, Cwikla J, Toumpanakis C, Kaltsas G,
roendocrinology 2017;105:196–200. cia-Carbonero R, Grozinsky-Glasberg S, Davies P, Hörsch D, Tiensuu Janson E, Ram-
4 Sundin A, Arnold R, Baudin E, Cwikla JB, Er- Hörsch D, Tiensuu Janson E, Kianmanesh R, age J, all other Antibes Consensus Conference
iksson B, Fanti S, Fazio N, Giammarile F, Kos-Kudla B, Pavel M, Rinke A, Falconi M, de participants: ENETS consensus guidelines for
Hicks RJ, Kjaer A, Krenning E, Kwekkeboom Herder WW, all other Antibes Consensus the standards of care in neuroendocrine neo-
D, Lombard-Bohas C, O’Connor JM, O’Toole Conference participants: ENETS consensus plasia: peptide receptor radionuclide therapy
D, Rockall A, Wiedenmann B, Valle JW, Vul- guidelines for the standards of care in neuro- with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues.
lierme M-P, all other Antibes Consensus endocrine tumors: pre- and perioperative Neuroendocrinology 2017;105:295–309.
Conference participants: ENETS consensus therapy in patients with neuroendocrine tu- 11 Knigge U, Capdevila J, Bartsch DK, Baudin E,
guidelines for the standards of care in neuro- mors. Neuroendocrinology 2017;105:245– Falkerby J, Kianmanesh R, Kos-Kudla B, Nie-
endocrine tumors: radiological, nuclear med- 254. derle B, Nieveen van Dijkum E, O’Toole D,
icine and hybrid imaging. Neuroendocrinol- 8 Pavel M, Valle JW, Eriksson B, Rinke A, Cap- Pascher A, Reed N, Sundin A, Vullierme M-P,
ogy 2017;105:212–244. lin M, Chen J, Costa F, Falkerby J, Fazio N, all other Antibes Consensus Conference par-
5 Oberg K, Couvelard A, Delle Fave G, Gross D, Gorbounova V, de Herder W, Kulke M, Lom- ticipants: ENETS consensus recommenda-
Grossman A, Jensen RT, Pape U-F, Perren A, bard-Bohas C, O’Connor J, Sorbye H, Garcia- tions for the standards of care in neuroendo-
Rindi G, Ruszniewski P, Scoazec J-Y, Welin S, Carbonero R, all other Antibes Consensus crine neoplasms: follow-up and documenta-
Wiedenmann B, Ferone D, all other Antibes Conference Participants: ENETS consensus tion. Neuroendocrinology 2017;105:310–319.

Standards of Care in NET Neuroendocrinology 2017;105:193–195 195


DOI: 10.1159/000457957

You might also like