Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nux 054
Nux 054
In light of the coincident surge in overall gluten intake and the incidence of autoim-
mune diseases, the possible biological adverse effects of gluten were explored.
PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library databases were screened for reports
Gluten is the main protein in wheat, constituting ap- Wheat is an important food in human nutrition, and
proximately 80% of the total proteins in this grain. The wheat- or gluten-containing foods are common in
remaining 20%—albumins and globulins; multiple Western diets. Wheat grain is easy to stockpile and con-
enzymes such as b-amylases, uridine diphosphate venient to grind into flour, which improves its texture,
glucose pyrophosphorylases, peroxidases, and thiore- and palatability. According to the Food and Agriculture
doxins; amylase-trypsin inhibitors; puroindolines; heat- Organization of the United Nations, worldwide produc-
shock proteins; and proteins involved in response to tion of wheat increased from 711.4 million metric tons
stress— are outside the scope of this review. Wheat also in 2013 to 750.1 million metric tons in 2017 (as of
contains nonprotein components like fermentable, October 5, 2017).2 Gluten is a major food additive in
oligo-, di-, and monosaccharides and polyols the processed food industry, with a net increase in usage
(FODMAPs). Not surprisingly, gluten peptides are also of 1.8 6 0.4% per year reported over the last 30 years1
contained in other nonwheat cereals like barley, rye, Currently, both the prevalence and the incidence of
and oats.1 gluten-related disorders are surging in many countries
Affiliation: A. Lerner is with the B. Rappaport School of Medicine, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. Y. Shoenfeld is with
the Zabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center–Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel, and the Sackler Faculty of
Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel. A. Lerner and T. Matthias are with the AESKU.KIPP Institute, Wendelsheim, Germany
Correspondence: A. Lerner, AESKU.KIPP Institute, Mikroforum Ring 2, Wendelsheim 55234, Germany. Email: aaronlerner1948@gmail.com.
Key words: adverse effect, autoimmunity, biological effects, celiac disease, gluten-free diet.
C The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Life Sciences Institute.
V
All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nux054
1046 Nutrition ReviewsV Vol. 75(12):1046–1058
R
worldwide.3–7 The reasons most frequently suggested lines, and (3) effects of gluten-free diets on nonceliac
include the spread of the Western diet,1 the increased autoimmune diseases in humans.
consumption of gluten-containing diets,8 the gradual Research studies, reviews, and case–control series
shift toward increased production and consumption of were included, while case reports were excluded. The liter-
wheat, which is replacing the traditional food of rice in ature search was performed using the PubMed,
Asia and Africa,9 and the evolutionary development of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Database of
wheat with higher gluten content and cytotoxic proper- Systematic Reviews databases to identify the most relevant
ties.10,11 Even advanced food-processing technology, information.
which reduces dough fermentation time, can increase The following search algorithm was used (“gluten
gluten concentration in commercial bakery prod- side effect” or “gluten adverse effects” or “gluten
ucts.10,12 It is estimated that, in the 20th century, global treatment” or “gluten therapy” or “gluten application”)
wheat output increased 5-fold, with most of the increase AND (“human” or “animal” or “cell-line”) AND
the evidence from studies that explore the adverse small number of randomized clinical studies and animal
effects of gluten in vitro or of uptake in vivo can help studies, or because studies may have included patients
guide the decision to recommend restriction of dietary with high heterogeneity and varying medical pheno-
gluten to improve the well-being or clinical manage- types, disease activities, and morbidity. There is always
ment of patients with nonceliac chronic conditions. the possibility that some studies were not captured by
However, it should be stressed that the lack of studies in the keywords used in the literature search. Since the
normal human populations devoid of any inflammatory search screened for autoimmune diseases, and not non-
or autoimmune condition limits any recommendation celiac gluten sensitivity, some information could have
to attenuate or prevent gluten consumption worldwide. been missed. Furthermore, the gluten used in the stud-
Since wheat is the most important staple crop in ies might have been contaminated with other soluble
the West, and wheat consumption in countries un- proteins, such as amylase-trypsin inhibitors or yeasts
dergoing urbanization, industrialization, and used in commercial bakeries, which could have affected
Westernization is steadily increasing,3,4,15,63 further the results. Finally, evidence of the adverse effects of
investigations are needed to clarify the drawbacks and gluten was generated mainly in in vitro cell lines and
benefits of gluten ingestion. The enigma is further rein- animal models. There are not yet enough in vivo animal
forced by the gains attributed to gluten, being a major studies or human studies to support a recommendation
source for starch, energy, proteins, vitamins, fiber, and of gluten withdrawal in clinical practice.
phytochemicals. It should be clearly stated that the
above-described response to gluten-free diets in noncel- CONCLUSION
iac autoimmune diseases does not replace the corre-
sponding disease-specific therapies of these disease. The Wheat, along with its main storage protein, gluten, is a
mechanisms of gluten-free diets as nutritional therapy staple nutrient. Increasing evidence shows that gluten
are far from being elucidated, but this review sheds new may have multiple detrimental effects on human health.
light that might clarify some of the pathways underlying Figure 2 summarizes the possible detrimental effects of
the reduction in adverse effects sometimes observed gluten on the intestinal luminal compartment, on the
after gluten withdrawal. immunological pathways, and on cellular as well as
There are, however, some limitations to this review. systemic domains. A word of caution is needed before
The quality of evidence may be limited because of the conclusions are drawn and recommendations are