Professional Documents
Culture Documents
T
he market for large design firms was strongest on the domestic side, rising its growth over the past three to four
right now may be the best that it has 8.9%, to $80.55 billion in 2018 from years—cheap and abundant energy, the
ever been. Many believe that the $73.97 billion in 2017. And revenue from move to renewable sources of energy and
market growth, which has continued into projects outside the U.S. rose as well, up pressure to spend on infrastructure.”
its tenth year, cannot last. But people in 3.4%, to $20.61 billion. For many design firms, demand is not
the industry have been saying that for the Virtually all market sectors measured so much a limiting factor in the market as
past three to four years, and the growth by the Top 500 survey saw gains in 2018. are broader industry issues. “The envi-
has continued unabated. On the domestic side, the gains were ro- ronment for engineering consultants is
The scope of the boom can be seen in bust other than for manufacturing, which very good right now,” says David LaVelle,
the data collected from the 2019 partici- was down 0.4%. CEO of BKF Engineers. “Having said
pants on ENR’s Top 500 Design Firms Leading the gainers was telecommu- that, we are beginning to fight two head-
list. Taken as a group, the firms had a re- nications, which rose 20.7%, followed by winds going forward: One is the scarcity
cord total design revenue of $101.16 bil- industrial process (20.6%), water (14.9%), of qualified staff, and the other is escalat-
lion in 2018, up an impressive 7.7% from transportation (10.6%) and petroleum ing construction costs. Both of these are
$93.90 billion in 2017. Market growth (10.2%). creating some drag on our business.” n
categories and rounding. NA=Not available. Power comprises thermal and hydroelectric power
How To Read the Tables General Building as a category includes commercial plants, waste-to-energy plants, transmission lines,
KEY TO TYPE OF FIRM buildings, offices, stores, educational facilities, government substations, cogeneration plants, etc.
A architect, E engineer, EC engineer-contractor, buildings, hospitals, medical facilities, hotels, apartments, Sewerage / Solid Waste includes sanitary and storm
AE architect-engineer, EA engineer-architect, ENV housing, etc. sewers, treatment plants, pumping plants, incinerators,
environmental, GE geotechnical engineer, L landscape Hazardous Waste includes chemical and nuclear waste industrial waste facilities, etc.
architect, P planner and O other. Other combinations are treatment, asbestos and lead abatement, etc. Telecommunications comprises transmission lines and
possible. Firms classified themselves.
Industrial Process comprises pulp and paper mills, steel cabling, towers and antennae, data centers, etc.
Companies are ranked according to revenue for mills, nonferrous metal refineries, pharmaceutical plants, Transportation includes airports, bridges, roads, canals,
PHOTO COURTESY OF EWINGCOLE
design services performed in 2018 in $ millions of chemical plants, food and other processing plants, etc. locks, dredging, marine facilities, piers, railroads,
dollars (*). Those with subsidiaries are indicated by (†).
Manufacturing includes auto plants, electronic tunnels, etc.
For information on subsidiaries and where each firm
worked outside of the U.S., see ENR.com. **Firms not assembly, textile plants, etc. Water Supply includes dams, reservoirs, transmission
ranked last year. Some markets may not add up to 100% Petroleum includes refineries, petrochemical plants, pipelines, distribution mains, irrigation canals, desalination
due to omission of “other” miscellaneous market offshore facilities, pipelines, etc. and potability treatment plants, pumping stations, etc.
TOP 500 SOURCEBOOK GENERAL BUILDING
HDR
Rush University Care Center
HDR designed the Rush University
Medical Center’s $450-million out-
patient care center. Named for Joan
and Paul Rubschlager, the 10-story,
480,000-sq-ft ambulatory care
complex for cancer and neurosci-
ence will consolidate outpatient
services at the Rush University
Medical Center west side campus in
Chicago. The design team is using
translational health planning to de-
sign spaces that tie together
RUMC’s clinical research, education
and care delivery within the new
facility. The building will feature 90
cancer infusion rooms, 82 cancer
exam rooms, 18 neurosurgery exam
rooms and 18 neurology infusion
rooms. It will connect to an adjacent
bed tower by a pedestrian sky-
ICONIC LINES The Royal Caribbean office will mimic the company’s cruise ships. bridge. The project also includes a
six-story parking garage with ca-
I
Cannon Design
n May, HOK revealed the design of a new headquarters for Royal Health Professions Hub
Caribbean Cruises in Miami. The $300-million, 10-story, 350,000-sq- Cannon Design was selected to de-
ft building will be located on Dodge Island, close to cruise ship termi- sign the Health Professions Hub for
nals in Biscayne Bay. The new headquarters consolidates current opera- D’Youville College in Buffalo, N.Y.
tions from two separate office buildings and temporary spaces. The 50,000-sq-ft facility will bring
together students from each of the
Referencing the look of the company’s iconic cruise ships, the exterior healthcare programs on campus to
edge of each floor extends out three to 12 feet from the building, provid- learn in a collaborative environ-
ing shade to the floors below each edge. At night, an LED scheme will ment. D’Youville College anticipates
illuminate the edges. Large terraces face downtown Miami. Upper terraces the facility will serve more than
will surround a three-story garden atrium open at the roof. Most of the 5,000 people each year in work-
force development and educational
workspaces will feature an open plan to facilitate collaboration. In antici- programs. It will also serve as a
pation of the potential impact of rising sea levels caused by climate change, community clinic for the under-
the lobby is more than 15 feet above sea level. Critical equipment is also served population of Buffalo’s West
elevated as part of the resilient design. Construction is scheduled to begin Side neighborhood. Construction
in June with completion estimated for late 2020. n on the $20-million facility is ex-
pected to begin in 2019 with com-
By Bruce Buckley pletion in 2020.
47.8
AECOM
USAF HUB FOR CYBER INNOVATION
AECOM is designing the U.S. Air Force Academy Cen-
ter for Cyber Innovation at the U.S. Air Force Academy
PHOTOS COURTESY HOK (TOP), AECOM (BOTTOM)
*BASED ON 2018 DESIGN REVENUE FROM GENERAL BUILDING AS REPORTED IN ENR’S SURVEY OF LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.
TOP 500 SOURCEBOOK GENERAL BUILDING
EDUCATION 13
14
IMEG CORP.
ZGF ARCHITECTS LLP
59.3
59.3
REVENUE
RANK FIRM ($ MIL.) 15 EYP 55.8
1 AECOM 205.1 16 ARCADIS NORTH AMERICA/CALLISONRTKL 54.0
2 PERKINS+WILL 121.6 17 WSP USA 51.5
3 DLR GROUP 117.6 18 HMC ARCHITECTS 50.7
4 STANTEC INC. 107.7 19 E4H ENVIRONMENTS FOR HEALTH ARCHITECTURE 44.0
5 PBK 88.6 20 BR+A CONSULTING ENGINEERS 40.0
6 GENSLER 87.0 21 LEO A DALY 40.0
7 HUCKABEE 82.5 22 FLAD ARCHITECTS 37.7
8 JACOBS 81.7 23 EWINGCOLE 35.9
9 CANNONDESIGN 80.0 24 SMITH SECKMAN REID INC. 35.1
10 STV GROUP INC. 77.8 25 BOULDER ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS 34.2
11 PERKINS EASTMAN 52.9
12 HMC ARCHITECTS 45.8
DISTRIBUTION AND WAREHOUSES
13 SMITHGROUP 44.6
REVENUE
14 TERRACON CONSULTANTS INC. 42.0 RANK FIRM ($ MIL.)
15 EYP 38.2 1 CHA CONSULTING INC. 52.1
16 AYERS SAINT GROSS 37.3 2 TERRACON CONSULTANTS INC. 42.0
17 HOK 33.9 3 KIMLEY-HORN 21.1
18 NAC ARCHITECTURE 32.3 4 STANTEC INC. 20.7
19 IMEG CORP. 32.1 5 AECOM 15.2
20 HKS 32.1
21 THE S/L/A/M COLLABORATIVE 30.1
22 INTERTEK-PSI 29.3
23 QUATTROCCHI KWOK ARCHITECTS 28.7
24 HDR 27.7
25 BR+A CONSULTING ENGINEERS 25.0
*BASED ON 2018 DESIGN REVENUE FROM GENERAL BUILDING AS REPORTED IN ENR’S SURVEY OF LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.
TOP 500 SOURCEBOOK GENERAL BUILDING
*BASED ON 2018 DESIGN REVENUE FROM GENERAL BUILDING AS REPORTED IN ENR’S SURVEY OF LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.
TOP 500 SOURCEBOOK TRANSPORTATION
$40.9B
New
“There is a desire by the industry to do more with
less. Our clients and the public don’t want to wait HDR and Mott MacDonald
Hampton Roads Bridge/
transportation ten years for a project to be completed. The whole Tunnel Expansion
investments
approved by
market is trying to keep up with economic growth. The Virginia Dept. of Transportation
has finalized funding agreements for
voters in 2018. With this in mind, clients continue to look for the largest project in the agency’s
—Source: Eno
Center for
creativity in delivering projects quickly.” history—the $3.8-billion expansion
Transportation —Kim Holland, RS&H vice president of the Hampton Roads Bridge-
Tunnel. HDR and Mott MacDonald
are lead designers for the Dragados
USA-led design-build team that will
add two bored two-lane tunnels ad-
jacent to existing 7,500-ft-long
tubes that opened in 1957 and 1976.
Up to 100,00 vehicles per day move
through the tunnels. Scheduled for
completion in 2025, the project will
also widen the Interstate 64 ap-
proaches to the crossing in Hampton
and Norfolk.
RS&H
First Coast Expressway
A two-project, 22-mile extension to
the First Coast Expressway toll road
in Clay County, Fla., will provide the
Jacksonville area with congestion
relief. RS&H designed the $507-
million design-build project between
state Route 21 and the St. John’s
River and serves as owner’s repre-
sentative for the Florida Dept. of
Transportation.
WSP USA
Seattle Light Rail
In Seattle, Sound Transit has se-
lected WSP USA to perform design-
BIG IMPROVEMENTS Dallas’ LBJ Freeway will receive $1.7 billion in upgrades to improve capacity and safety. build project management services
for the Downtown Redmond Link
T
he Interstate 635 LBJ Freeway in Dallas is set to undergo a $1.7- project will include both elevated
and at-grade sections as well as two
billion upgrade to improve capacity, safety and operational efficiency stations and a parking garage.
in a corridor that currently handles more than 200,000 vehicles per
day. AECOM Technical Services Inc., is the primary designer for the Stantec
design-build project, which is being led by a joint venture of Fluor and CTA Red and Purple Line
Balfour Beatty. The project team will widen and reconstruct 11.2 miles Stantec is leading phase 1 design
services for Chicago Transit Author-
of highway, increasing total width to 12 lanes. Elements include adding a ity’s $2.1-billion Red and Purple
general-purpose lane in each direction, making improvements to existing Modernization Program, the largest
tolled express lanes and rebuilding the freeway’s interchange with Inter- capital improvement project in the
state 30. The project also includes the addition of continuous frontage agency’s history. The design-build
PHOTO CREDIT: BUSINESSWIRE
roads along the segment and intersection to improve local traffic flow and project will reconstruct and mod-
ernize nearly two miles of elevated
freeway access. A bridge will also be incorporated into the Skillman Road/ tracks, including bridges and sup-
Audelia Street intersection adjacent to the freeway. n port structures along Chicago’s
By Jim Parsons busiest transit corridor.
The Top Design Firms in Transportation
TRANSPORTATION BRIDGES
REVENUE REVENUE
RANK FIRM ($ MIL.) RANK FIRM ($ MIL.)
1 AECOM 3,119.4 1 AECOM 421.9
2 JACOBS 2,566.8 2 JACOBS 201.0
3 HNTB COS. 1,238.8 3 HDR 193.8
4 WSP USA 1,163.5 4 HNTB COS. 185.9
5 HDR 1,051.8 5 MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL 145.7
6 PARSONS CORP. 1,047.6 6 WSP USA 115.0
7 STANTEC INC. 510.0 7 GREENMAN-PEDERSEN INC. 107.4
8 SNC-LAVALIN INC. 456.4 8 HARDESTY & HANOVER LLC 97.5
9 STV GROUP INC. 440.7 9 STV GROUP INC. 97.0
10 KIMLEY-HORN 379.4 10 TRANSYSTEMS 87.0
11 T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL 342.5 11 T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL 79.7
12 GANNETT FLEMING 295.4 12 PARSONS CORP. 77.1
13 MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL 291.8 13 KCI TECHNOLOGIES INC. 72.0
14 JOHNSON, MIRMIRAN & THOMPSON INC. 266.2 14 STANTEC INC. 64.5
15 KBR INC. 260.0 15 RK&K 51.1
16 RS&H INC. 251.4 16 VHB 45.1
17 WOOD 240.9 17 TRC 41.0
18 MOTT MACDONALD 240.3 18 ALFRED BENESCH & CO. 39.7
19 ARUP 213.4 19 MENDEL & CO. CONSTRUCTION INC. 35.1
20 RK&K 208.9 20 GANNETT FLEMING 33.0
21 GREENMAN-PEDERSEN INC. 192.7 21 DEWBERRY 32.8
22 TRANSYSTEMS 191.6 22 TETRA TECH INC. 30.0
23 CDM SMITH 186.5 23 JOHNSON, MIRMIRAN & THOMPSON INC. 27.9
24 TRANSCORE 182.9 24 VOLKERT INC. 25.7
25 TETRA TECH INC. 167.0 25 FLUOR CORP. 25.1
26 MOFFATT & NICHOL 164.0
27 TRC 155.7 MASS TRANSIT AND RAIL
28 DEWBERRY 155.6 REVENUE
29 GOLDER ASSOCIATES CORP. 150.6 RANK FIRM ($ MIL.)
*BASED ON 2018 DESIGN REVENUE FROM TRANSPORTATION AS REPORTED IN ENR’S SURVEY OF LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.
TOP 500 SOURCEBOOK TRANSPORTATION
AIRPORTS
REVENUE
RANK FIRM ($ MIL.)
1 JACOBS 350.0
2 AECOM 330.5
3 HNTB COS. 140.2
4 BURNS & MCDONNELL 97.0
5 KIMLEY-HORN 91.0
6 HDR 80.4
7 GENSLER 71.1
8 WOOD 70.7
9 PARSONS CORP. 70.1
10 RS&H INC. 64.0
11 WSP USA 61.0
12 MEAD & HUNT INC. 57.2
13 SNC-LAVALIN INC. 54.3
14 CORGAN 54.1
15 HOK 51.9
16 LANDRUM & BROWN INC. 48.4
17 MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL 33.1
18 STANTEC INC. 33.0
19 GARVER 32.5
20 T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL 31.3
21 KBR INC. 31.0
22 GHAFARI ASSOCIATES LLC 30.2
23 TERRACON CONSULTANTS INC. 27.1
24 PGAL 25.5
25 KOHN PEDERSEN FOX ASSOCIATES PC 25.4
*BASED ON 2018 DESIGN REVENUE FROM TRANSPORTATION AS REPORTED IN ENR’S SURVEY OF LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.
TOP 500 SOURCEBOOK PETROLEUM
Bechtel
Sabine Pass LNG
In June, Cheniere Energy gave
Bechtel full notice to proceed on
the construction of Cheniere’s
Train 6 expansion of the Sabine
Pass Liquefaction (SPL) project in
Cameron Parish, La. Work on the
SPL expansion includes construc-
tion of a new LNG train and tie-in
to existing facilities. The expansion
will add 4.5 million tonnes of LNG
per year to the plant’s current ca-
pacity of 22.5 million tonnes.
Bechtel has provided numerous
services to Cheniere on the SPL
complex since 2006. Additionally,
NextDecade awarded Bechtel an
EPC contract in May for the first
phase of the Rio Grande LNG proj-
ect in Brownsville, Texas.
Phillips 66
Liberty and Red Oak Lines
On June 10, Phillips 66 announced
one joint venture to build a pipeline
to move oil from the Rockies and
Bakken oil fields to Cushing, Okla.,
and a second joint venture to build ONGOING Chevron awarded Wood Group a new one-year contract for its Gorgon LNG facility.
a pipeline system to take oil from
I
start as early as the first quarter
of 2021, Phillips says. Phillips will
n May, Wood Group entered a new one-year contract with Chevron
partner with Plains All American to Australia to provide subsea integration and flow assurance front-end
build the Red Oak Pipeline system. engineering design (FEED) services for the Jansz-lo compression proj-
The system will move crude from ect offshore of Western Australia. This project will maintain gas supply
Cushing to coastal Texas. The to the existing Gorgon LNG facility. Wood will serve as system integrator
$2.5-billion project could also
come online by 2021. A Phillips
of the technology, providing independent flow assurance, subsea design
spokesman said that routes have and construction engineering support during the FEED process. This
not been made public and that the will be the first Australian project to use subsea compression technology.
contracts for engineering services In 2017, Wood signed a global master services agreement with Chevron
are also confidential. that enables the company to deliver conceptual engineering, pre-FEED,
Fluor FEED detailed design and procurement services in multiple locations
Valvoline Plant across the operator’s global onshore and offshore asset portfolio. n
In February, Fluor was awarded the By Louise Poirier
EPC management contract for Val-
voline’s new blending and packag-
*BASED ON 2018 DESIGN REVENUE FROM PETROLEUM AS REPORTED IN ENR’S SURVEY OF LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.
TOP 500 SOURCEBOOK PETROLEUM
*BASED ON 2018 DESIGN REVENUE FROM PETROLEUM AS REPORTED IN ENR’S SURVEY OF LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.
TOP 500 SOURCEBOOK POWER
T
MW clean energy storage project
he country’s first large-scale wind farms are under design off the coast in Utah. Known as Advanced Clean
of Maryland and Massachusetts, while two other large projects in those Energy Storage, the project will
states are in the early stages of development. Massachusetts utilities in include renewable hydrogen, com-
late May issued a request for proposal for 200 MW to 800 MW of offshore pressed air, large-scale flow bat-
wind. That's in addition to the $2-billion, 800-MW project now under teries and solid oxide fuel cells.
The project will use gas turbine
development by Vineyard Wind 15 miles south of Martha’s Vineyard. Mary- technology developed by Mitsubi-
land legislation enacted in late May supports the construction of up to 1,200 shi that allows a mixture of re-
MW of wind in addition to the 368 MW now under development at a cost newable hydrogen and natural gas
of $2.1 billion. Ørsted is developing a 120-MW project for which it will use to produce power. The developers
in-house design professionals. WSP and Wood Thilsted are designing the will engineer, finance, build and
operate the Millard County, Utah,
foundations for Vineyard Wind’s Massachusetts project. WSP is the overall project.
project manager. Wood Thilsted’s foundation design has lowered the cost
of offshore energy, co-founder Alastair Wood says. The Vineyard Wind Florida Power & Light
project is one of the largest detailed design contracts ever let for offshore 30 x 30
wind, WSP says. Another 600 MW has approval from Connecticut and Florida Power and Light expects to
have the first 750 MW of its “30 by
Rhode Island for the Revolution Wind Farm developed by Orsted and 30” solar installation plan in place
Eversource. Rhode Island approved 400 MW of the project on May 31; on by next year at sites in 10 Florida
June 7, Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont (D) signed legislation authorizing counties. The utility said earlier this
the construction of 2,000 MW of offshore wind by 2030. n year it would engineer and install
By Mary B. Powers more than 30 million solar panels
by 2030 at 100 sites. The new sites
will raise the state’s total solar ca-
pacity to 2,000 MW. FPL also plans
PHOTO COURTESY OF GENERAL ELECTRIC
The Solar Energy Industries Association has designated the next to deploy solar powered battery
20%
decade as “Solar +,” setting a target to have solar energy account storage throughout Florida by
for 20% of U.S. power generation by the end of the decade. “If we 2030. A 409-MW storage center
hit 20% solar by 2030, we will prove that solving the
will be built at the Manatee County
climate challenge won’t hurt the economy, but instead will be
one of the greatest economic growth opportunities in decades,” solar plant. The battery will cover
says Abigail Hooper, SEIA’s president and CEO. 40 acres and be able to deliver 900
MWh of power.
The Top Design Firms in Power
NUCLEAR PLANTS POWER
REVENUE REVENUE
RANK FIRM ($ MIL.) RANK FIRM ($ MIL.)
1 SARGENT & LUNDY 181.8 1 BURNS & MCDONNELL 857.7
2 ENERCON SERVICES INC. 168.4 2 BLACK & VEATCH 692.4
3 JACOBS 40.7 3 AECOM 433.2
4 TETRA TECH INC. 27.0 4 POWER ENGINEERS INC. 431.9
5 ZACHRY GROUP 24.6 5 SARGENT & LUNDY 427.0
6 BURNS & MCDONNELL 20.0 6 KIEWIT CORP. 414.5
7 WOOD 18.0 7 TRC 307.7
8 BLACK & VEATCH 15.6 8 TETRA TECH INC. 221.0
9 BECHTEL 13.3 9 WSP USA 219.1
10 GOLDER ASSOCIATES CORP. 9.9 10 LEIDOS 215.4
11 SNC-LAVALIN INC. 9.1 11 HDR 204.6
12 AECOM 8.7 12 WOOD 203.5
13 GREENMAN-PEDERSEN INC. 8.5 13 INTERTEK-PSI 185.5
14 FLUOR CORP. 5.6 14 ENERCON SERVICES INC. 177.7
15 TRC 4.6 15 BECHTEL 156.0
16 STANTEC INC. 148.7
17 ZACHRY GROUP 146.7
TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION 18 WORLEYPARSONS GROUP INC. 137.4
REVENUE 19 JACOBS 131.4
RANK FIRM ($ MIL.)
20 NV5 GLOBAL INC. 120.4
1 BURNS & MCDONNELL 457.9
21 KBR INC. 114.0
2 POWER ENGINEERS INC. 378.7
22 GOLDER ASSOCIATES CORP. 97.4
3 TRC 272.9
23 MESA ASSOCIATES INC. 86.0
4 AECOM 223.6
24 ELECTRICAL CONSULTANTS INC. 83.8
5 BLACK & VEATCH 219.4
25 WILLDAN 83.0
6 WSP USA 202.8
26 TERRACON CONSULTANTS INC. 77.0
7 LEIDOS 180.0
27 STANLEY CONSULTANTS INC. 68.2
8 SARGENT & LUNDY 123.2
28 RCM TECHNOLOGIES INC. 59.5
9 HDR 96.5
29 ULTEIG ENGINEERS INC. 57.5
10 TETRA TECH INC. 59.0
11 WOOD 30 WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 53.1
53.9
12 ELECTRICAL CONSULTANTS INC. 48.9 31 EN ENGINEERING LLC 48.8
*BASED ON 2018 DESIGN REVENUE FROM POWER AS REPORTED IN ENR’S SURVEY OF LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.
TOP 500 SOURCEBOOK POWER
*BASED ON 2018 DESIGN REVENUE FROM POWER AS REPORTED IN ENR’S SURVEY OF LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.
TOP 500FIRMS
DESIGN SOURCEBOOK
SOURCEBOOK
ENVIRONMENT
ENVIRONMENT
Battelle
Navy PFAS Cleanup
As part of its continuing environ-
mental remediation work for the
U.S. Navy at the former Naval Air
Warfare Center in Warminster, Pa.,
Battelle is now under contract to
clean up PFAS found at drinking
wa te r syste m s n e a r t h e s i te.
PFAS, the term for per- and poly-
fluoroalkyl substances, are a group
of man-made chemicals often used
in firefighting foam at airports.
Typically, ion exchange or granu-
lated activated carbon filtration
systems are used to reduce PFAS
levels to below detectable levels in
drinking-water plants. However,
Amy Dindal, PFAS program man-
ager at Battelle, says that unless
the original sources of contamina-
tion are remediated, “It’s like put-
ting a Band-Aid on [the problem] … WATER TREATMENT The SWIFT pilot facility will inform large-scale implementation of the program.
because [the chemicals] continue
H
fied more than 400 sites contami-
nated with PFAS.
azen and Sawyer is working with AECOM to provide program management services for
the full-scale $1-billion implementation of the Sustainable Water Initiative for Tomor-
Brown and Caldwell row (SWIFT) for Hampton Roads Sanitation District (HRSD) in southeastern Virginia.
South Platte Water Study Five SWIFT advanced treatment facilities will be built at existing HRSD water reclamation
Brown & Caldwell has been se- facilities. The facilities will use an eight-step, carbon-based advanced treatment process to
l e c te d to l e a d a S o u th P l a t te
R e g i o n a l Wa te r D eve l o p m e n t
further treat up to 100 million gallons per day of highly treated wastewater to meet drinking
study to help municipal officials water quality standards. That water will be pumped back into the Potomac Aquifer to help
from the South Platte River Basin replenish shrinking groundwater supplies. Under the new $80-million contract, awarded to
in Colora do mana g e the basin AECOM in September, Hazen will provide technical design for bridging documents as part
m o r e e f f e c t i v e l y. T h e S o u t h of HRSD’s consideration of delivering the facilities through an alternative delivery procurement
Platte River Basin is facing the
largest projected water supply
process. The first documents—for a SWIFT treatment facility at HRSD’s James River Treat-
gap of any of Colorado’s river ba- ment Plant—are expected to be complete by spring of 2020. Dwayne Amos, an associate vice
sins. Brown and Caldwell will pro- president at Hazen, says the 1-mgd, Hazen-designed SWIFT Research Center, which went
vide project oversight, coordinate online May 2018, is helping to demonstrate at a meaningful scale that carbon-based advanced
a stakeholder task force, evaluate treatment can produce water that meets primary drinking-water standards. n
agricultural requirements and
lead modeling. Stantec will inte-
By Pam Hunter McFarland
grate the results of the South
Platte Storage Study, a 2017 re-
port detailing multipurpose water
storage possibilities in the Lower REBUILDING OYSTER BEDS
South Platte River basin. Initial HDR RESTORES TEXAS REEFS
PHOTOS COURTESY SWIFT (TOP) AND HDR (BOTTOM)
concepts being studied include HDR assisted the Nature Conservancy, which partnered
with the Texas Natural Resource Damage Assessment
multiple linked storage facilities Trustees, to design, permit, construct and monitor ap-
c a p a b l e of s to r i n g m o re th a n proximately 60 acres of a three-dimensional oyster reef
150,000 acre-ft of water, and ad- complex adjacent to Lap Reef in Copano Bay. The $4.5-mil-
d i ti o n a l co nveya n ce c a p a ci t y lion project will mitigate losses to oyster reef fisheries that
strategically positioned through- have been in steady decline for the past several decades.
HDR is placing rock at a higher elevation, which creates
out the basin. The work began in more space above the bay floor for the reef structure to
March and the study is expected remain above siltation.
next year.
The Top Design Firms in Environment
WATER SUPPLY SEWER AND WASTE
REVENUE REVENUE
RANK FIRM ($ MIL.) RANK FIRM ($ MIL.)
1 TETRA TECH INC. 1,213.0 1 JACOBS 676.0
2 AECOM 822.0 2 TETRA TECH INC. 326.0
3 JACOBS 664.0 3 AECOM 294.4
4 CDM SMITH 238.6 4 STANTEC INC. 237.0
5 BLACK & VEATCH 224.1 5 BROWN AND CALDWELL 232.2
6 HDR 203.6 6 BLACK & VEATCH 219.7
7 ARCADIS NORTH AMERICA/CALLISONRTKL 189.0 7 CDM SMITH 217.8
8 STANTEC INC. 178.0 8 HDR 213.7
9 CAROLLO ENGINEERS INC. 111.8 9 CAROLLO ENGINEERS INC. 188.7
10 MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL 101.9 10 HAZEN AND SAWYER 188.5
11 KBR INC. 98.0 11 KBR INC. 136.0
12 BROWN AND CALDWELL 92.0 12 SCS ENGINEERS 130.0
13 WOOD 91.2 13 WOODARD & CURRAN 99.1
14 WSP USA 84.3 14 GHD INC. 85.0
15 HAZEN AND SAWYER 81.6 15 GOLDER ASSOCIATES CORP. 75.9
16 GHD INC. 74.8 16 ARCADIS NORTH AMERICA/CALLISONRTKL 71.0
17 DEWBERRY 74.6 17 BURNS & MCDONNELL 68.7
18 BURNS & MCDONNELL 69.5 18 WOOD 67.4
19 GANNETT FLEMING 65.1 19 GREELEY AND HANSEN 63.3
20 GOLDER ASSOCIATES CORP. 62.7 20 GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS 62.0
21 KIMLEY-HORN 62.0 21 MOTT MACDONALD 59.8
22 FREESE AND NICHOLS INC. 51.2 22 FREESE AND NICHOLS INC. 49.6
23 PARSONS CORP. 49.4 23 AEGION CORP. 49.0
24 WOODARD & CURRAN 46.1 24 WADE TRIM 44.0
25 SNC-LAVALIN INC. 45.2 25 DEWBERRY 43.3
26 GEI CONSULTANTS INC. 43.8 26 KLEINFELDER 42.4
27 MOTT MACDONALD 40.1 27 KIMLEY-HORN 41.3
28 SCHNABEL ENGINEERING 28.0 28 WESTON & SAMPSON 40.5
29 LEO A DALY 26.8 29 GANNETT FLEMING 39.7
30 KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS INC. 25.3 30 OBG PART OF RAMBOLL 34.1
31 KLEINFELDER 24.0 31 STRAND ASSOCIATES INC. 33.1
32 WESTON & SAMPSON 20.3 32 RJN GROUP INC. 32.4
33 STANLEY CONSULTANTS INC. 19.1 33 CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC. 31.7
34 GREELEY AND HANSEN 19.1 34 D&B ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS PC 30.5
35 PSOMAS 19.0 35 CP&Y INC. 30.2
36 GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS 17.4 36 KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS INC. 29.8
37 EXP 17.0 37 WRIGHT-PIERCE 27.6
38 ARUP 16.3 38 LJA ENGINEERING 26.5
39 TERRACON CONSULTANTS INC. 16.0 39 EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY INC. PBC 24.0
40 TIGHE & BOND INC. 15.9 40 EXP 22.6
41 DANNENBAUM ENGINEERING CORP. 15.9 41 BURGESS & NIPLE INC. 22.0
42 HNTB COS. 14.8 42 LEO A DALY 22.0
43 WOOD RODGERS INC. 14.6 43 GRESHAM SMITH 21.8
44 LJA ENGINEERING 14.2 44 DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES INC. 21.7
45 BARTLETT & WEST INC. 14.2 45 DLZ CORP. 21.6
46 GARVER 14.1 46 ECS 20.5
47 WHITMAN, REQUARDT AND ASSOCIATES LLP 13.9 47 RK&K 20.3
48 OLSSON INC. 13.5 48 TIGHE & BOND INC. 20.1
49 NV5 GLOBAL INC. 13.4 49 MASER CONSULTING PA 19.0
50 BAXTER & WOODMAN INC. 13.2 50 TERRACON CONSULTANTS INC. 17.9
*BASED ON 2018 DESIGN REVENUE FROM ENVIRONMENT AS REPORTED IN ENR’S SURVEY OF LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.
DESIGN FIRMS SOURCEBOOK ENVIRONMENT
*BASED ON 2018 DESIGN REVENUE FROM ENVIRONMENT AS REPORTED IN ENR’S SURVEY OF LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.
DESIGN FIRMS SOURCEBOOK ENVIRONMENT
*BASED ON 2018 DESIGN REVENUE FROM ENVIRONMENT AS REPORTED IN ENR’S SURVEY OF LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.
DESIGN FIRMS SOURCEBOOK ENVIRONMENT
NUCLEAR WASTE 12
13
BURNS & MCDONNELL
WSP USA
31.6
26.7
REVENUE
RANK FIRM ($ MIL.) 14 GEI CONSULTANTS INC. 26.1
1 FLUOR CORP. 381.1 15 KBR INC. 26.0
2 JACOBS 320.7
3 LEIDOS 210.4
4 BECHTEL 186.7
5 SNC-LAVALIN INC. 156.1
*BASED ON 2018 DESIGN REVENUE FROM ENVIRONMENT AS REPORTED IN ENR’S SURVEY OF LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.
TOP 500 SOURCEBOOK MANUFACTURING
Pepper Construction
Rolls-Royce, Indianapolis
Rolls-Royce is nearing completion
Automotive Investments Up
of the $600-million modernization Fiat Chrysler adds $1.6B assembly plant in Detroit
of its Indianapolis operations,
F
where many of the facilities date to iat Chrysler has begun construction on a $1.6-billion assembly plant on the site of its
before World War II. The four-year existing Mack Avenue Engine Plant in Detroit. The plant will produce the Jeep Grand
revamp of the 397,000-acre cam-
Cherokee, a new Jeep SUV and hybrid automobiles. Contractor Walbridge Aldinger
pus includes a new 150,000-sq-ft
rotatives factory, a turbines fac- Co. referred all questions about the project to Fiat Chrysler, citing a nondisclosure agree-
tory, an assembly and test facility, ment. Construction is anticipated to be completed by late 2020, and Fiat Chrysler said it
a materials research laboratory, expects to begin producing vehicles there for the 2021 model year. This investment gives
two new cells used to test helicop- Jeep the opportunity to enter two underserved segments that will offer significant margins,
ter engines, and the Rolls-Royce
“and will enable new electrified Jeep products, including at least four plug-in hybrid vehicles
Development Center. The company
announced in February that it will and the flexibility to produce fully battery-electric vehicles,” says Mike Manley, chief execu-
compete for a $1-billion Air Force tive officer of Fiat Chrysler. Fiat Chrysler’s nearby Jefferson North Assembly Plant will receive
B-52 engine contract that will be a $900-million modernization and retooling to build the Dodge Durango and another line
awarded in 2020 based on up- for Jeep Grand Cherokees. Fiat Chrysler’s Warren, Mich., truck facility is getting a $1.5-mil-
grades made to its campus by con-
lion investment to produce the Jeep Grand Wagoneer. n
tractor Pepper Construction.
By Jeff Yoders
Ghafari
Ford Motor Co., Allen Park
Construction has begun on Ghafari’s
design of a $200-million Vehicle
Performance and Electrification
Center in Allen Park, Mich. The
210,000-sq-ft complex will have a
rolling road wind tunnel, vehicle
electrification laboratories, a cli-
matic wind tunnel, labs and offices.
Ghafari provided programming/
planning, architecture, interior de-
sign, civil, structural, and process
engineering services.
3,000
RENDERING COURTESY FIAT CHRYSLER AUTOMOBILES
The number of
manufacturing jobs created
in May 2019, according to
the Bureau of Labor
Statistics DETROIT Fiat Chrysler expects to create nearly 6,500 new jobs for its Detroit area projects.
The Top Design Firms in Manufacturing, Telecom
INDUSTRIAL PROCESS MANUFACTURING
REVENUE REVENUE
RANK FIRM ($ MIL.) RANK FIRM ($ MIL.)
1 JACOBS 944.3 1 JACOBS 288.7
2 INTERTEK-PSI 554.0 2 WOOD 195.5
3 FLUOR CORP. 456.6 3 KBR INC. 84.0
4 WOOD 243.3 4 GHAFARI ASSOCIATES LLC 82.9
5 HARGROVE ENGINEERS + CONSTRUCTORS 207.1 5 SSOE GROUP 78.1
6 BECHTEL 186.0 6 GOLDER ASSOCIATES CORP. 67.9
7 KBR INC. 168.0 7 CHA CONSULTING INC. 62.6
8 FOTH COS. 142.3 8 JENSEN HUGHES 53.0
9 CRB 141.5 9 INTERTEK-PSI 49.3
10 GOLDER ASSOCIATES CORP. 138.8 10 TETRA TECH INC. 40.0
11 IPS-INTEGRATED PROJECT SERVICES LLC 135.1 11 GP STRATEGIES 37.8
12 S&B ENGINEERS AND CONSTRUCTORS LTD. AND AFFILIATES 115.0 12 AECOM 35.9
13 AECOM 103.3 13 FLUOR CORP. 34.9
14 DENNIS GROUP 75.3 14 BARGE DESIGN SOLUTIONS INC. 34.3
15 WORLEYPARSONS GROUP INC. 62.6 15 SNC-LAVALIN INC. 33.6
16 BURNS & MCDONNELL 54.1 16 WUNDERLICH-MALEC ENGINEERING 31.0
17 MATRIX TECHNOLOGIES INC. 49.0 17 BURNS & MCDONNELL 30.8
18 STELLAR 48.3 18 IBI GROUP INC. 30.0
19 ZACHRY GROUP 48.1 19 LEIDOS 28.0
20 SSOE GROUP 38.7 20 BRPH ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS INC. 26.5
21 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 37.9 21 SALAS O'BRIEN 23.9
22 STANTEC INC. 36.9 22 RCM TECHNOLOGIES INC. 21.7
23 POWER ENGINEERS INC. 34.1 23 OBG PART OF RAMBOLL 21.6
24 OBG PART OF RAMBOLL 28.8 24 RS&H INC. 19.3
25 HASKELL 27.5 25 ECS 17.9
26 THE YATES COS. INC. 26.3 26 TERRACON CONSULTANTS INC. 16.0
27 ON-BOARD ENGINEERING CORP. 25.7 27 ISG 15.5
28 EWINGCOLE 24.3 28 DESIGN SYSTEMS INC. 15.3
29 TERRACON CONSULTANTS INC. 24.0 29 STANTEC INC. 13.0
30 MIDDOUGH INC. 23.0 30 THERMALTECH ENGINEERING INC. 12.5
31 PLUS GROUP 22.3 31 GRESHAM SMITH 12.0
32 WUNDERLICH-MALEC ENGINEERING 21.0 32 TKDA 11.1
33 TETRA TECH INC. 20.0 33 S&ME INC. 9.8
34 SNC-LAVALIN INC. 17.9 34 MCKIM & CREED INC. 9.3
35 KIEWIT CORP. 17.5 35 THE MANNIK & SMITH GROUP INC. 9.0
36 DAY & ZIMMERMANN 17.4 36 SHIVE-HATTERY 7.5
37 HIXSON ARCHITECTURE & ENGINEERING 17.0 37 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS PA 7.4
38 COFFMAN ENGINEERS INC. 16.6 38 ALBERT KAHN ASSOCIATES 7.2
39 WOODARD & CURRAN 16.6 39 PAGE SOUTHERLAND PAGE INC. (PAGE) 7.0
40 NV5 GLOBAL INC. 15.7 40 SME 6.0
41 GANNETT FLEMING 14.7 41 ON-BOARD ENGINEERING CORP. 5.9
42 MEAD & HUNT INC. 13.8 42 C&S COS. 5.0
43 KLEINFELDER 12.2 43 AMERICAN STRUCTUREPOINT 4.8
44 WSP USA 11.9 44 POWERS BROWN ARCHITECTURE 4.8
45 EXP 11.3 45 JORDAN & SKALA ENGINEERS 4.8
46 BRAUN INTERTEC 11.2 46 GRAEF 4.5
47 PCI SKANSKA INC. 10.2 47 MARTIN/MARTIN INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 4.4
48 DLZ CORP. 10.0 48 ENSAFE INC. 4.3
49 ORBITAL ENGINEERING INC. 9.5 49 LJB INC. 4.3
50 BILFINGER NORTH AMERICA INC. 9.0 50 CORE STATES GROUP 4.2
*BASED ON 2018 DESIGN REVENUE FROM MANUFACTURING, INDUSTRIAL AND TELECOM AS REPORTED IN ENR’S SURVEY OF LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.
TOP 500 SOURCEBOOK MANUFACTURING
*BASED ON 2018 DESIGN REVENUE FROM MANUFACTURING, INDUSTRIAL AND TELECOM AS REPORTED IN ENR’S SURVEY OF LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.
TOP 500 SOURCEBOOK MANUFACTURING
*BASED ON 2018 DESIGN REVENUE FROM MANUFACTURING, INDUSTRIAL AND TELECOM AS REPORTED IN ENR’S SURVEY OF LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.
THE TOP 500 DESIGN FIRMS The Top 500 List
TE
G
LEU
ILDIN
WA S
G
ATIO
TE
RIN
TRO
LY
WA S
UPP
L BU
CTU
OUS
O RT
/ PE
M
ER S
ER /
UFA
ARD
ERA
NSP
ECO
ER
US.
RANK FIRM FIRM 2018 REVENUE $ MIL.
MAN
POW
SEW
WAT
GEN
HAZ
TRA
TEL
IND
2019 2018 TYPE TOTAL INT’L
TE
G
LEU
ILDIN
WA S
G
ATIO
TE
RIN
TRO
LY
WA S
UPP
L BU
CTU
OUS
O RT
/ PE
M
ER S
ER /
UFA
ARD
ERA
NSP
ECO
ER
US.
RANK FIRM 2018 REVENUE $ MIL.
MAN
POW
SEW
WAT
GEN
HAZ
TRA
TEL
IND
2019 2018 FIRM TYPE TOTAL INT’L
TE
G
LEU
ILDIN
WA S
G
ATIO
TE
RIN
TRO
LY
WA S
UPP
L BU
CTU
OUS
O RT
/ PE
M
ER S
ER /
UFA
ARD
ERA
NSP
ECO
ER
US.
RANK FIRM 2018 REVENUE $ MIL.
MAN
POW
SEW
WAT
GEN
HAZ
TRA
TEL
IND
2019 2018 FIRM TYPE TOTAL INT’L
101 115 CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC., Pittsburgh, Pa. E 158.7 0.0 22 0 4 1 20 36 3 10 0
102 116 GAI CONSULTANTS INC., Homestead, Pa. † E 157.1 0.1 13 0 26 1 3 33 23 1 0
103 109 WISS, JANNEY, ELSTNER ASSOCIATES, Northbrook, Ill. EA 156.0 2.0 63 1 1 1 1 2 8 0 0
104 111 IMEG CORP., Rock Island, Ill. E 155.3 0.1 92 2 0 0 0 1 4 0 1
105 104 BARR ENGINEERING CO., Minneapolis, Minn. † E 155.0 11.0 0 0 23 7 4 47 2 17 0
106 93 HGA, Minneapolis, Minn. AE 154.1 0.9 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
107 119 POND, Peachtree Corners, Ga. AEP 152.7 20.5 28 0 0 0 0 53 20 0 0
108 112 OBG, PART OF RAMBOLL, Syracuse, N.Y. EC 151.1 0.5 0 14 0 5 23 19 0 39 0
109 121 FREESE AND NICHOLS INC., Fort Worth, Texas EA/ENV 150.7 0.0 4 0 0 34 33 2 23 0 0
110 101 CRB, Kansas City, Mo. EC 145.4 10.4 2 1 0 0 0 97 0 0 0
111 107 WHITMAN, REQUARDT AND ASSOCIATES LLP, Baltimore, Md. EA 145.1 0.0 22 0 0 10 9 0 58 0 0
112 133 PAGE SOUTHERLAND PAGE INC. (PAGE), Washington, D.C. † AE 143.6 56.0 81 5 0 0 0 4 2 0 8
113 132 MASER CONSULTING PA, Red Bank, N.J. E 142.8 0.0 36 0 0 7 13 7 25 1 6
114 127 GZA, Norwood, Mass. † EC 142.5 0.1 11 0 7 9 2 0 20 51 0
115 113 SIMPSON GUMPERTZ & HEGER, Waltham, Mass. E 142.4 8.2 70 0 10 4 0 5 11 0 0
116 105 SSOE GROUP, Toledo, Ohio † EA 142.1 17.4 11 55 3 0 0 29 0 0 2
117 120 BRAUN INTERTEC, Bloomington, Minn. GE 142.0 0.0 42 0 5 1 1 30 19 0 0
118 126 AFFILIATED ENGINEERS INC., Madison, Wis. E 137.5 0.8 75 2 14 0 0 6 0 0 3
119 139 MEAD & HUNT INC., Middleton, Wis. EA 136.7 0.0 9 0 1 4 6 10 66 0 2
120 117 MORRISON HERSHFIELD, Atlanta, Ga. † EA 136.2 107.9 31 0 1 2 4 0 44 0 17
121 128 HALFF ASSOCIATES INC., Richardson, Texas † EA 135.2 0.0 21 0 1 9 10 10 35 0 0
122 124 IPS-INTEGRATED PROJECT SERVICES LLC, Blue Bell, Pa. † EA 135.1 31.5 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0
123 108 GHAFARI ASSOCIATES LLC, Dearborn, Mich. EA 132.7 25.1 15 62 0 0 0 0 23 0 0
124 136 BGE INC., Houston, Texas E 131.0 0.0 0 0 0 5 3 0 27 0 0
125 135 H.W. LOCHNER INC., Chicago, Ill. E 129.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0
126 114 EYP, Albany, N.Y. † AE 128.6 0.3 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
127 125 DLZ CORP., Columbus, Ohio † EA 127.9 9.2 16 0 11 8 17 9 36 3 0
128 137 PAPE-DAWSON ENGINEERS INC., San Antonio, Texas E 127.5 0.0 71 0 0 10 1 0 17 0 0
129 ** ATWELL LLC, Southfield, Mich. † E 127.0 0.0 36 1 34 1 0 28 0 0 0
130 123 NORR, Chicago, Ill. † AE 125.1 73.2 94 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0
131 130 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON (SEH), St. Paul, Minn. † E 124.0 0.0 13 1 2 8 10 2 59 1 1
132 129 ALFRED BENESCH & CO., Chicago, Ill. E 122.5 0.0 10 0 0 4 4 0 81 1 0
133 122 MERRICK & CO., Greenwood Village, Colo. EA 118.4 7.5 39 3 3 1 4 4 6 21 0
134 ** CONSOR ENGINEERS LLC, Houston, Texas E 118.0 1.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0
135 161 VANDERWEIL ENGINEERS, Boston, Mass. E 117.3 2.3 37 0 17 0 0 0 2 0 44
136 147 SWCA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, Phoenix, Ariz. ENV 116.6 0.0 8 0 39 5 1 32 4 0 0
137 138 EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY INC. PBC, Hunt Valley, Md. ENV 115.0 0.0 1 0 14 9 21 12 7 37 0
138 146 GARVER, North Little Rock, Ark. E 113.6 0.0 10 0 1 12 10 0 65 0 0
139 148 GPD GROUP, Akron, Ohio EA 113.0 0.0 40 0 12 0 6 4 18 0 21
140 142 HENDERSON ENGINEERS INC., Lenexa, Kan. † E 112.3 0.3 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
141 143 PSOMAS, Los Angeles, Calif. E 112.0 0.0 32 0 0 17 12 3 35 2 0
142 152 WESTON & SAMPSON, Reading, Mass. † E 110.9 0.0 0 0 2 18 37 0 13 8 0
143 154 BKF ENGINEERS, Redwood City, Calif. E 110.7 0.0 71 0 0 3 2 0 24 0 0
144 140 WALTER P MOORE, Houston, Texas E 109.0 2.3 76 0 0 6 1 0 16 0 0
145 186 LABELLA ASSOCIATES DPC, Rochester, N.Y. † EA 108.0 2.0 40 2 30 6 3 2 6 11 0
146 153 LPA INC., Irvine, Calif. AE 107.6 0.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
147 62 CDI ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, Philadelphia, Pa. † A 107.5 0.0 5 0 1 0 1 75 17 0 0
148 165 MESA ASSOCIATES INC., Madison, Ala. E 106.0 0.0 0 0 81 0 0 12 0 0 7
149 166 PARTNER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE INC., Torrance, Calif. † ENV 104.6 0.3 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0
150 159 WARE MALCOMB, Irvine, Calif. AE 103.8 6.6 96 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
STANTEC sold its construction
TE
G
LEU
ILDIN
WA S
G
ATIO
TE
RIN
TRO
LY
WA S
UPP
L BU
CTU
OUS
O RT
/ PE
M
ER S
ER /
UFA
ARD
ERA
NSP
ECO
ER
US.
RANK FIRM 2018 REVENUE $ MIL.
MAN
POW
SEW
WAT
GEN
HAZ
TRA
TEL
IND
2019 2018 FIRM TYPE TOTAL INT’L
TE
G
LEU
ILDIN
WA S
G
ATIO
TE
RIN
TRO
LY
WA S
UPP
L BU
CTU
OUS
O RT
/ PE
M
ER S
ER /
UFA
ARD
ERA
NSP
ECO
ER
US.
RANK FIRM 2018 REVENUE $ MIL.
MAN
POW
SEW
WAT
GEN
HAZ
TRA
TEL
IND
2019 2018 FIRM TYPE TOTAL INT’L
201 191 AKRF INC., New York, N.Y. ENV/E 79.1 0.0 30 0 3 11 3 0 33 21 0
202 205 SOLOMON CORDWELL BUENZ, Chicago, Ill. A 79.0 0.2 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
203 195 HORD COPLAN MACHT INC., Baltimore, Md. A 78.6 0.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
204 247 COBB, FENDLEY & ASSOCIATES INC., Houston, Texas E 78.4 0.0 3 0 1 1 5 3 64 0 13
205 228 WADE TRIM, Detroit, Mich. † E 77.6 0.0 0 0 1 11 57 6 17 0 0
206 193 ANVIL CORP., Bellingham, Wash. † E 77.4 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0
207 200 FARNSWORTH GROUP INC., Bloomington, Ill. EA 77.2 0.0 45 2 5 5 11 22 10 0 0
208 145 CUNINGHAM GROUP ARCHITECTURE INC., Minneapolis, Minn. † A 76.3 6.4 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
209 207 HR GREEN INC., Cedar Rapids, Iowa E 75.4 0.0 8 0 0 5 22 2 51 1 1
210 248 DENNIS GROUP, Springfield, Mass. † EC 75.3 2.8 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0
211 225 ULTEIG ENGINEERS INC., Fargo, N.D. E 75.2 0.0 0 0 76 1 1 0 18 0 0
212 163 KENNEDY/JENKS CONSULTANTS INC., San Francisco, Calif. E 74.5 0.0 1 4 0 34 40 5 7 9 0
213 211 WSB, Minneapolis, Minn. E 73.2 0.0 6 0 0 14 5 8 67 0 0
214 204 A. MORTON THOMAS AND ASSOCIATES INC., Rockville, Md. E 73.0 0.0 15 0 0 11 4 0 70 0 0
215 231 ESD, Chicago, Ill. E 72.0 0.8 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54
216 196 HUMPHREYS & PARTNERS ARCHITECTS, Dallas, Texas † A 71.8 1.9 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
217 226 GEOENGINEERS INC., Redmond, Wash. GE/ENV 71.6 0.2 31 0 2 11 2 16 8 19 0
218 213 GOODWYN, MILLS AND CAWOOD INC., Montgomery, Ala. AE 71.3 0.0 51 2 0 15 8 0 12 0 0
219 230 BRPH ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS INC., Melbourne, Fla. † EA 70.6 2.6 40 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
220 263 INTEGRAL GROUP, Oakland, Calif. E 70.5 34.6 91 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 1
221 238 PRIME AE GROUP INC., Baltimore, Md. † AE 70.5 0.0 17 0 0 11 5 0 67 0 0
222 241 TIGHE & BOND INC., Westfield, Mass. E 70.5 0.0 16 0 9 23 29 0 7 17 0
223 215 SMITH SECKMAN REID INC., Nashville, Tenn. E 70.1 0.6 78 0 1 5 3 5 8 0 0
224 250 WGI, West Palm Beach, Fla. EA 70.0 0.0 34 0 0 1 1 0 64 0 0
225 245 MOSELEY ARCHITECTS, Richmond, Va. AE 69.9 0.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
226 244 RETTEW ASSOCIATES INC., Lancaster, Pa. † E 69.7 0.0 8 6 4 0 3 63 10 0 1
227 219 CP&Y INC., Dallas, Texas † EA 69.4 0.0 0 0 0 0 43 0 48 0 0
228 239 SHANNON & WILSON INC., Seattle, Wash. GE 69.2 0.8 2 0 0 14 7 2 50 6 0
229 255 SCHNABEL ENGINEERING, Glen Allen, Va. † GE 69.0 0.0 27 0 4 41 2 0 18 2 0
230 287 TVSDESIGN, Atlanta, Ga. A 69.0 4.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
231 199 ROBERT A.M. STERN ARCHITECTS, New York, N.Y. A 68.2 12.9 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
232 232 CTA ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS, Billings, Mont. AE 67.1 0.5 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
233 157 DAY & ZIMMERMANN, Philadelphia, Pa. † EC 67.0 21.1 74 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0
234 216 JAROS, BAUM & BOLLES, New York, N.Y. E 66.2 4.0 90 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 7
235 236 HBK ENGINEERING LLC, Chicago, Ill. † E 66.0 0.0 2 0 41 1 1 10 5 0 34
236 218 AKF GROUP, New York, N.Y. E 66.0 3.6 98 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
237 260 MOODY NOLAN INC., Columbus, Ohio A 66.0 0.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
238 227 TLC ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS INC., Orlando, Fla. E 66.0 0.4 95 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0
239 243 WALKER CONSULTANTS, Tampa, Fla. † AE 65.9 2.9 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
240 269 DRMP INC., Orlando, Fla. E 65.6 0.0 4 0 0 0 0 0 96 0 0
241 262 CENTURY ENGINEERING INC., Hunt Valley, Md. E 65.6 0.0 10 6 0 0 0 0 70 0 0
242 217 FISHBECK, THOMPSON, CARR & HUBER, Grand Rapids, Mich. EA 65.6 0.0 29 4 0 4 15 2 41 6 0
243 201 BR+A CONSULTING ENGINEERS, Boston, Mass. E 65.0 1.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
244 198 NEEL-SCHAFFER INC., Jackson, Miss. † E 64.5 0.0 8 0 0 2 9 0 60 3 2
245 208 H2M ARCHITECTS + ENGINEERS, Melville, N.Y. † AE 64.4 0.0 57 0 0 20 6 0 1 16 0
246 ** HASKELL, Jacksonville, Fla. † AEC 64.2 1.9 34 1 0 0 0 51 14 0 0
247 259 MATRIX TECHNOLOGIES INC., Maumee, Ohio EA 63.6 0.0 0 3 0 0 0 96 0 0 0
248 178 LITTLE DIVERSIFIED ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTING, Charlotte, N.C. † AE 62.9 0.6 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
249 268 OTAK INC., Portland, Ore. † EA 62.5 3.9 30 0 0 9 2 0 39 0 0
250 235 BEYER BLINDER BELLE, ARCHITECTS AND PLANNERS LLP, New York, N.Y. A 62.2 7.5 86 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0
PARSONS CORP. moved its
TE
G
LEU
ILDIN
WA S
G
ATIO
TE
RIN
TRO
LY
WA S
UPP
L BU
CTU
OUS
O RT
/ PE
M
ER S
ER /
UFA
ARD
ERA
NSP
ECO
ER
US.
RANK FIRM 2018 REVENUE $ MIL.
MAN
POW
SEW
WAT
GEN
HAZ
TRA
TEL
IND
2019 2018 FIRM TYPE TOTAL INT’L
TE
G
LEU
ILDIN
WA S
G
ATIO
TE
RIN
TRO
LY
WA S
UPP
L BU
CTU
OUS
O RT
/ PE
M
ER S
ER /
UFA
ARD
ERA
NSP
ECO
ER
US.
RANK FIRM 2018 REVENUE $ MIL.
MAN
POW
SEW
WAT
GEN
HAZ
TRA
TEL
IND
2019 2018 FIRM TYPE TOTAL INT’L
301 246 D&B ENGINEERS AND ARCHITECTS PC, Woodbury, N.Y. EA 50.1 0.0 0 0 0 9 61 0 4 26 0
302 328 D’AMATO CONVERSANO INC. DBA DCI ENGINEERS, Seattle, Wash. † E 49.2 0.4 93 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 0
303 ** CBT, Boston, Mass. A 49.2 5.5 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
304 354 ATCS PLC, Herndon, Va. E 49.0 0.0 0 0 0 2 2 0 62 0 0
305 344 THE S/L/A/M COLLABORATIVE, Glastonbury, Conn. † A 48.7 0.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
306 305 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS PA, Wichita, Kan. E 48.6 0.0 36 15 7 8 7 7 18 0 0
307 298 DESIMONE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, New York, N.Y. E 48.4 3.9 98 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
308 271 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC., Plymouth, Minn. E 48.2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0
309 350 DRAPER ADEN ASSOCIATES INC., Richmond, Va. AE 48.1 0.0 43 5 23 2 3 8 1 0 0
310 307 SME, Plymouth, Mich. E 48.1 0.0 37 12 10 2 2 4 23 8 0
311 302 HART HOWERTON, New York, N.Y. † A 48.0 7.2 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
312 326 KISINGER CAMPO & ASSOCIATES CORP., Tampa, Fla. E 47.7 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0
313 338 HLW INTERNATIONAL LLP, New York, N.Y. A 47.6 5.6 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
314 313 KENDALL/HEATON ASSOCIATES INC., Houston, Texas A 47.5 0.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
315 329 TOLUNAY-WONG ENGINEERS INC., Houston, Texas GE 47.3 0.0 25 0 0 0 0 60 0 15 0
316 339 GP STRATEGIES, Columbia, Md. † E 47.3 23.0 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
317 277 SHEPLEY BULFINCH, Boston, Mass. A 47.0 0.5 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
318 355 NOVA ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL LLC, Kennesaw, Ga. E 46.8 0.0 53 5 3 0 0 0 24 7 0
319 314 THE MANNIK & SMITH GROUP INC., Maumee, Ohio E 46.8 0.0 18 19 4 10 16 7 17 5 3
320 306 BALLINGER, Philadelphia, Pa. AE 46.7 0.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
321 315 WD PARTNERS, Dublin, Ohio † AE 46.6 4.4 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
322 321 AYRES ASSOCIATES INC., Eau Claire, Wis. EA 46.5 0.0 9 0 1 9 7 0 40 0 4
323 345 THE BECK GROUP, Dallas, Texas A 46.5 5.4 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
324 414 VLK ARCHITECTS, Fort Worth, Texas A 46.2 0.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
325 346 LARSON DESIGN GROUP INC., Williamsport, Pa. EA 46.0 0.0 23 0 0 1 5 16 39 0 0
326 340 AYERS SAINT GROSS, Baltimore, Md. A 45.9 0.8 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
327 297 LMN ARCHITECTS, Seattle, Wash. A 45.9 0.0 91 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0
328 348 BAXTER & WOODMAN INC., Crystal Lake, Ill. † E 45.9 0.0 0 0 0 29 33 0 31 0 0
329 331 TREANORHL, Lawrence, Kan. A 45.8 0.7 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
330 309 FUSS & O’NEILL INC., Manchester, Conn. † E 45.6 0.0 31 5 2 6 2 10 11 7 1
331 343 MORRISON-MAIERLE INC., Helena, Mont. E 45.5 0.0 25 1 0 2 18 0 38 0 0
332 360 DGA PLANNING | ARCHITECTURE | INTERIORS, Mountain View, Calif. A 45.4 0.0 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
333 322 MITHUN, Seattle, Wash. A 45.0 0.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
334 318 PS&S, Warren, N.J. EA 44.8 0.0 48 1 21 1 9 20 0 0 0
335 295 NAC ARCHITECTURE, Spokane, Wash. A 44.8 1.2 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
336 359 FENTRESS ARCHITECTS, Denver, Colo. A 44.7 0.0 40 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0
337 310 MSA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INC., Baraboo, Wis. EA 44.7 0.0 9 0 0 20 31 0 32 6 0
338 358 BARTON & LOGUIDICE DPC, Liverpool, N.Y. E 44.6 0.0 3 2 2 15 34 1 29 4 0
339 301 DANNENBAUM ENGINEERING CORP., Houston, Texas E 44.6 0.0 0 0 0 36 11 0 36 0 0
340 361 KIRKSEY ARCHITECTURE, Houston, Texas A 44.4 0.2 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
341 ** E4H ENVIRONMENTS FOR HEALTH ARCHITECTURE, Boston, Mass. A 44.0 0.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
342 317 WALDEMAR S. NELSON AND CO. INC., New Orleans, La. EA 43.5 10.3 2 0 4 0 4 66 1 1 0
343 341 ON-BOARD ENGINEERING CORP., East Windsor, N.J. E 43.0 6.8 7 14 4 0 0 73 3 0 0
344 380 BHDP ARCHITECTURE, Cincinnati, Ohio A 43.0 0.7 85 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0
345 316 COLLINS ENGINEERS INC., Chicago, Ill. E 42.9 1.2 8 0 0 1 1 5 85 0 0
346 390 WILEY|WILSON, Lynchburg, Va. AE 42.6 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
347 356 I.C. THOMASSON ASSOCIATES INC., Nashville, Tenn. E 42.0 0.0 67 2 7 0 7 7 7 0 2
348 337 DAVIS PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS, Denver, Colo. A 41.9 0.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
349 407 ROBERT DERECTOR ASSOCIATES, New York, N.Y. E 41.7 0.0 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23
350 332 BWBR, St. Paul, Minn. A 41.6 0.0 94 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
GANNETT FLEMING acquired
TE
G
LEU
ILDIN
WA S
G
ATIO
TE
RIN
TRO
LY
WA S
UPP
L BU
CTU
OUS
O RT
/ PE
M
ER S
ER /
UFA
ARD
ERA
NSP
ECO
ER
US.
RANK FIRM 2018 REVENUE $ MIL.
MAN
POW
SEW
WAT
GEN
HAZ
TRA
TEL
IND
2019 2018 FIRM TYPE TOTAL INT’L
351 335 HILLIS-CARNES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES INC., Annapolis Junction, Md. E 41.4 0.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
352 ** SYSTRA USA, New York, N.Y. † E 41.1 8.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0
353 386 HUBBELL, ROTH & CLARK INC., Bloomfield Hills, Mich. EA 41.0 0.0 8 2 2 12 27 1 42 0 0
354 374 LEIGHTON GROUP INC., Irvine, Calif. † GE 41.0 0.0 56 0 5 7 0 2 24 5 0
355 364 LIONAKIS, Sacramento, Calif. † AE 41.0 0.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
356 293 WILSON ASSOCIATES, Dallas, Texas A 41.0 26.7 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
357 357 JORDAN & SKALA ENGINEERS, Atlanta, Ga. E 40.5 0.0 88 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
358 347 MCLAREN ENGINEERING GROUP, Woodcliff Lake, N.J. E 40.4 1.0 50 0 6 0 0 0 44 0 0
359 388 C&I ENGINEERING, Louisville, Ky. E 40.2 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0
360 452 BINKLEY & BARFIELD INC., Houston, Texas † E 40.2 0.0 0 0 18 11 6 2 31 0 4
361 349 GEOCON, San Diego, Calif. GE 40.0 0.0 72 3 0 3 1 5 16 0 1
362 372 MARTIN/MARTIN INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS, Lakewood, Colo. † E 39.8 1.1 74 11 1 3 3 0 7 0 1
363 422 MBH ARCHITECTS, Alameda, Calif. A 39.7 2.9 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
364 ** FROEHLING & ROBERTSON INC., Richmond, Va. E 39.7 0.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
365 409 JCJ ARCHITECTURE, Hartford, Conn. A 39.7 0.4 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
366 366 CPH INC., Sanford, Fla. EA 39.6 2.1 31 0 0 19 22 0 10 0 0
367 471 MODJESKI AND MASTERS INC., Mechanicsburg, Pa. E 39.5 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0
368 383 WIGHT & CO., Darien, Ill. AE 39.4 2.3 83 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0
369 404 SEPI ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION INC., Raleigh, N.C. E 39.3 0.0 3 0 0 6 4 0 88 0 0
370 370 P2S INC., Long Beach, Calif. E 39.2 0.0 73 8 8 0 0 0 7 0 3
371 382 RATIO ARCHITECTS INC., Indianapolis, Ind. A 39.2 2.4 96 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
372 405 GRAEF, Milwaukee, Wis. EA 39.0 0.0 44 11 2 7 10 2 23 0 0
373 444 CO ARCHITECTS, Los Angeles, Calif. A 38.9 0.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
374 378 WRIGHT-PIERCE, Topsham, Maine E 38.8 0.1 0 0 0 26 71 0 2 0 0
375 336 STEINBERG HART, San Jose, Calif. † A 38.8 1.5 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
376 389 T. BAKER SMITH LLC, Houma, La. E 38.6 2.7 5 3 13 6 3 48 17 0 5
377 365 INTEGRUS ARCHITECTURE PS, Spokane, Wash. AE 38.5 0.1 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
378 363 MANHARD CONSULTING LTD., Lincolnshire, Ill. E 38.2 0.0 91 0 1 3 1 1 3 0 0
379 411 SUNRISE ENGINEERING INC., Fillmore, Utah † E 38.1 0.0 36 0 0 19 4 18 6 0 0
380 435 ENGLAND-THIMS & MILLER INC., Jacksonville, Fla. † E/LA/P 38.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 0
381 ** NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATES, Atlanta, Ga. A 37.7 0.0 98 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
382 392 ADRIAN SMITH + GORDON GILL ARCHITECTURE, Chicago, Ill. A 37.7 33.7 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
383 333 SPEC SERVICES INC., Fountain Valley, Calif. † E 37.5 0.0 0 0 0 1 1 93 5 0 0
384 403 PBS ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL INC., Portland, Ore. E 37.3 0.0 48 6 3 2 8 2 13 15 0
385 351 FXCOLLABORATIVE, New York, N.Y. A 37.3 0.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
386 375 AI ENGINEERS INC., Middletown, Conn. E 37.2 0.0 19 0 7 7 6 0 61 0 0
387 431 HEAPY ENGINEERING, Dayton, Ohio † E 37.2 0.0 93 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
388 490 BALA CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC., King of Prussia, Pa. E 37.1 0.0 93 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0
389 319 COMMONWEALTH ASSOCIATES INC., Jackson, Mich. E 37.0 0.0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0
390 ** C.H. FENSTERMAKER & ASSOCIATES LLC, Lafayette, La. ENV 36.7 0.0 0 0 0 0 4 79 17 0 0
391 420 KAPUR & ASSOCIATES, Milwaukee, Wis. E 36.7 0.0 5 0 14 1 2 0 67 1 10
392 369 WALLACE MONTGOMERY & ASSOCIATES LLP, Hunt Valley, Md. E 36.2 0.0 0 0 0 8 2 0 89 0 0
393 417 ADVANTAGE ENGINEERS LLC, Columbia, Md. E 36.0 0.0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92
394 432 DEGENKOLB ENGINEERS, San Francisco, Calif. E 36.0 0.0 94 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
395 410 STEELMAN PARTNERS, Las Vegas, Nev. † A 35.6 8.4 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
396 447 WK DICKSON & CO. INC., Charlotte, N.C. E 35.3 0.0 4 0 0 17 29 5 28 0 0
397 367 MUESER RUTLEDGE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, New York, N.Y. E 35.3 1.4 30 7 11 7 7 8 27 0 4
398 342 MAZZETTI, San Francisco, Calif. E 35.2 0.1 18 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1
399 425 RDG PLANNING & DESIGN, Des Moines, Iowa † A 35.2 0.0 91 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
400 423 GBA, Lenexa, Kan. † EA 35.2 0.0 5 0 0 0 19 21 40 5 5
THE TOP 500 DESIGN FIRMS
TE
G
LEU
ILDIN
WA S
G
ATIO
TE
RIN
TRO
LY
WA S
UPP
L BU
CTU
OUS
O RT
/ PE
M
ER S
ER /
UFA
ARD
ERA
NSP
ECO
ER
US.
RANK FIRM 2018 REVENUE $ MIL.
MAN
POW
SEW
WAT
GEN
HAZ
TRA
TEL
IND
2019 2018 FIRM TYPE TOTAL INT’L
TE
G
LEU
ILDIN
WA S
G
ATIO
TE
RIN
TRO
LY
WA S
UPP
L BU
CTU
OUS
O RT
/ PE
M
ER S
ER /
UFA
ARD
ERA
NSP
ECO
ER
US.
RANK FIRM 2018 REVENUE $ MIL.
MAN
POW
SEW
WAT
GEN
HAZ
TRA
TEL
IND
2019 2018 FIRM TYPE TOTAL INT’L
A Carollo Engineers Inc. 50 Eppstein Uhen Architects Inc. 299 Hart Howerton 311
CBT303 Erdman Anthony 420 Haskell246
Advantage Engineers LLC 393 CDG Engineers & Associates Inc. 492 ESD215 Hastings Architecture LLC 498
AECOM2 CDI Engineering Solutions 147 ESG Architecture & Design 415 Hazen and Sawyer 59
Aegion Corp. 55 CDM Smith 23 ESP Associates Inc. 256 HBG Design 463
Affiliated Engineers Inc. 118 HBK Engineering LLC 235
Century Engineering Inc. 241 David Evans Enterprises Inc. 100
AI Engineers Inc. 386 HDR7
CESO Inc. 458 EwingCole171
AKF Group 236 Heapy Engineering 387
CHA Consulting Inc. 56 EXP28
AKRF Inc. 201 Henderson Engineers Inc. 140
Civil & Environmental Consultants Inc. 101 EYP126
Alpha Testing Inc. 295 Herbert, Rowland & Grubic Inc. 435
Clark Nexsen 180
American Structurepoint
Anvil Corp.
169
206
CO Architects 373 F HGA106
Highland Associates Ltd. 489
Cobb, Fendley & Associates Inc. 204
Arcadis North America/CallisonRTKL 13 Farnsworth Group Inc. 207 Hillis-Carnes Engineering Associates Inc. 351
Coffman Engineers Inc. 177
Architects Orange 199 Fehr & Peers 270 HKS42
Collins Engineers Inc. 345
Architectural Nexus Inc. 481 C.H. Fenstermaker & Associates LLC 390 HLW International LLP 313
Ardurra Group Inc. 272 Commonwealth Associates Inc. 389
Fentress Architects 336 HMC Architects 152
Arora Engineers Inc. 482 Consor Engineers LLC 134
FFKR Architects 466 HNTB Cos. 16
Arquitectonica275 Cooper Carry 173
Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huber 242 HOK37
Array Architects 427 Core States Group 279
Flad Architects 158 Hord Coplan Macht Inc. 203
Arup39 Corgan83
Fluor Corp. 3 Horrocks Engineers 194
ATCS PLC 304 COWI North America 255
Foth Cos. 77 Houston Engineering Inc. 432
Atwell LLC 129 CP&Y Inc. 227
Freese and Nichols Inc. 109 Hubbell, Roth & Clark Inc. 353
Ayers Saint Gross 326 CPH Inc. 366
Froehling & Robertson Inc. 364 Huckabee192
Ayres Associates Inc. 322 CPL269
Fugro46 Huitt-Zollars Inc. 157
Crafton Tull 461
Hull & Associates Inc. 464
B Crawford, Murphy & Tilly Inc.
CRB110
280 Fullerton440
Fuss & O’Neill Inc. 330 Humphreys & Partners Architects 216
Hunt, Guillot & Associates LLC 266
Bala Consulting Engineers Inc. 388 CTA Architects Engineers 232 FXCollaborative385
HVJ Associates 496
Ballinger320 CTL Engineering Inc. 404
Barge Design Solutions Inc. 165 CTL|Thompson Inc. 442 G I
Barr Engineering Co. 105 CUBE 3 494
Bartlett & West Inc. 287 G70407
Cuhaci & Peterson Architects, Engineers and Planners Inc. 421 IBI Group Inc. 45
Barton & Loguidice DPC 338 GAI Consultants Inc. 102
Cuningham Group Architecture Inc. 208 IMEG Corp. 104
Baxter & Woodman Inc. 328 Gannett Fleming 35
Infrastructure Consulting & Engineering PLLC 286
BCC Engineering Inc.
Beam Longest and Neff
267
418
D Garver138
The Gateway Engineers Inc. 438 Integral Group 220
GBA400 Integrus Architecture PS 377
Bechtel17 D&B Engineers and Architects PC 301
GBBN434 Interface Engineering Inc. 281
The Beck Group 323 Dahlin Group Architecture Planning 462
GEI Consultants Inc. 95 Intertek-PSI15
Alfred Benesch & Co. 132 Leo A Daly 78
Gensler14 IPS-Integrated Project Services LLC 122
Bergmann262 D’Amato Conversano Inc. dba DCI Engineers 302
Geocon361 ISG292
Bermello Ajamil & Partners Inc. 409 Dannenbaum Engineering Corp. 339
GeoEngineers Inc. 217
BETA Group Inc. 467
Beyer Blinder Belle, Architects and Planners LLP 250
Davis Brody Bond
Davis Partnership Architects
414
348
Geo-Logic Associates Inc. 276 J
BGE Inc. 124 Geosyntec Consultants 47
Day & Zimmermann 233 Jacobs1
BHDP Architecture 344 Geotechnology Inc. 450
Degenkolb Engineers 394 Jaros, Baum & Bolles 234
Binkley & Barfield Inc. 360 GFF468
Dekker/Perich/Sabatini Ltd. 430 JCJ Architecture 365
BKF Engineers 143 Ghafari Associates LLC 123
Dennis Group 210 Jensen Hughes 73
BL Cos. Inc. 288 GHD Inc. 25
Robert Derector Associates 349 JLG Architects 411
Black & Veatch 12 Goettsch Partners 428
DES Architects + Engineers 431 Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson Inc. 54
Bohannan Huston Inc. 422 Golder Associates Corp. 19
DeSimone Consulting Engineers 307 Goodwyn, Mills and Cawood Inc. 218 Jones Edmunds & Associates Inc. 477
Bolton & Menk Inc. 161
Dewberry38 GP Strategies 316 Jones|Carter167
Borton-Lawson488
DGA planning | architecture | interiors 332 GPD Group 139 Jordan & Skala Engineers 357
Boswell Engineering Inc. 405
WK Dickson & Co. Inc. 396 GRAEF372 J-U-B Engineers Inc. 284
Boulder Associates Architects 410
DLR Group 63 Greeley and Hansen 193
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.
BR+A Consulting Engineers
172
243
DLZ Corp. 127 HR Green Inc. 209 K
Dokken Engineering 474 GreenbergFarrow285
Braun Intertec 117 Kapur & Associates 391
DOWL261 Greenman-Pedersen Inc. 66
Bridgefarmer & Associates Inc. 439
Draper Aden Associates Inc. 309 KBR Inc. 4
Brown and Caldwell 41 Gresham Smith 81
DRMP Inc. 240 KCI Technologies Inc. 65
BRPH Architects Engineers Inc. 219 Grimm + Parker Architects 453
Kendall/Heaton Associates Inc. 314
BSA LifeStructures 291 GRW Engineers Inc. 436
Buchart Horn Inc. 487 E GSBS Architects 425
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Inc.
Kiely Family of Cos.
212
485
Burgess & Niple Inc. 196 Guernsey449
E4H Environments for Health Architecture 341 Kiewit Corp. 31
The Burke Group Ltd. 164 Gulf Interstate Engineering Co. 49
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology Inc. PBC 137 GZA114 Kimley-Horn21
Burns & McDonnell 10
The EADS Group Inc. 479 Kirksey Architecture 340
Burns Engineering Inc. 289
Burrow Global LLC 153
ECS72
Electrical Consultants Inc. 176
H Kisinger Campo & Associates Corp.
Kleinfelder67
312
BWBR350
Elkus Manfredi Architects 166 H2M architects + engineers 245 KLJ162
C EMH&T271
EN Engineering LLC 74
Haley & Aldrich Inc.
Halff Associates Inc.
97
121
Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates PC
KPFF Consulting Engineers
88
84
C&I Engineering 359 Enercon Services Inc. 75 Hanson Professional Services Inc. 190 Krazan & Associates 448
C&S Cos. 154 England-Thims & Miller Inc. 380 Hardesty & Hanover LLC 156 KS Engineers PC 454
CannonDesign69 Ennead Architects LLC 268 Hargrove Engineers + Constructors 51 KTGY Architecture + Planning 168
Cardno Inc. 48 EnSafe Inc. 258 Harley Ellis Devereaux (HED) 174 kW Mission Critical Engineering 455
THE TOP 500 CONTRACTORS DIRECTORY
L NELSON71
Waldemar S. Nelson and Co. Inc. 342
S Twining Inc. 278
LaBella Associates DPC 145 Newcomb & Boyd 484 S&B Engineers and Constructors Ltd. and affiliates 27 U
Lamp Rynearson 441 Niles Bolton Associates 381 S&ME Inc. 98
Ninyo & Moore Geotech. and Environ. Ulteig Engineers Inc. 211
Landrum & Brown Inc. 300 The S/L/A/M Collaborative 305
Sciences Consultants 200 United Consulting 478
LANGAN61 Salas O’Brien 188
NORR130 UniversalPegasus International 79
Lanier & Associates Consulting Engineers Inc. 486 SAM LLC 92
NOVA Engineering & Environmental LLC 318
Larson Design Group Inc.
Lawrence Group
325
495 NV5 Global Inc. 34
Sanborn, Head & Associates Inc.
Sargent & Lundy
500
40 V
Leidos22 Sasaki257
Leighton Group Inc. 354 O SB Architects 493
V3 Cos.
Vanderweil Engineers
426
135
LHB413 Schnabel Engineering 229 VHB62
OBG, Part of Ramboll 108
T.Y. Lin International 43 SCS Engineers 94 VLK Architects 324
OHM Advisors 251 SEPI Engineering and Construction Inc. 369
Lionakis355 Vocon456
Olsson Inc. 96 Shalom Baranes Associates PC 294
The LiRo Group 457 Volkert Inc. 87
On-Board Engineering Corp. 343 Shannon & Wilson Inc. 228
Little Diversified Architectural Consulting 248
LJA Engineering 90
OPN Architects
Orbital Engineering Inc.
446
265
Shepley Bulfinch
Shive-Hattery263
317
W
LMN Architects 327 Otak Inc. 249 Short Elliott Hendrickson (SEH) 131 Wade Trim 205
Lochmueller Group Inc. 406 OZ Architecture 403 Simpson Gumpertz & Heger 115 Walker Consultants 239
H.W. Lochner Inc. 125
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP (SOM) 44 Wallace Montgomery & Associates LLP 392
Looney Ricks Kiss
Loring Consulting Engineers Inc.
459
444
P SLCE Architects LLP 475 Walter P Moore 144
SME310 Ware Malcomb 150
LPA Inc. 146 P2S Inc. 370
Smith Seckman Reid Inc. 223 WATG191
LS3P195 Page Southerland Page Inc. (Page) 112
Adrian Smith + Gordon Gill Architecture 382 WD Partners 321
Pape-Dawson Engineers Inc. 128
M Parametrix151
T. Baker Smith LLC
SmithGroup57
376 WDG Architecture
Wendel408
445