Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The term malocclusion was first described by Edward Hartley Angle in 1899. Malocclusion is
described as teeth that were rotated or irregularly aligned 1. Dental crowding is defined as a
discrepancy between size of tooth and size of arch resulting in teeth malposition and or rotation 2.
Crowding is one of the most primary reasons people seek orthodontic treatment 3. Myriad
of factors, particularly dental arch length and width, mesio-distal dimension of tooth, and dental
proportions, have been investigated and found to be associated to anterior dental crowding,
however, it is still a subject of discussion 4. It can be mild, moderate, or severe determined by the
The relationship between dental crowding and size of tooth has previously been investigated,
although the results have been inconclusive 6. It is hypothesized that tooth size does not represent
the only factor in determining the origin of dental crowding 7. Lower anterior crowding is
directly related with the eruption of lower third molars 8. Crowding is typically associated with
dental arch widths, arch length, mesio-distal tooth dimensions and dental proportions 9. If
dental crowding is mostly caused by the first two issues and is mild to moderate in severity,
interproximal stripping and/or arch extension are more acceptable treatment options. However,
when dental crowding is moderate to severe and is caused by tooth size and transverse arch
dimension, it is highly likely that the underlying issue is inadequate apical base lengths 9.
Therefore, extractions would likely be the best therapeutic option in these instances.
A study conducted by RR Singh et al in 2019 with total 152 number of patients identified a
subjects with complete class II malocclusion and moderate to severe mandibular crowding have
significantly smaller base lengths as compared to the subjects with same malocclusion with
slight crowding or spacing 10. A weak to moderate inverse correlation was found between the
amount of dental crowding and maxillary and mandibular base lengths. An inverse correlation of
-0.377 was observed between mandibular crowding and maxillary base length (Co-Pt A), and -
0.247 between mandibular crowding and mandibular base length (Co-Gn). Strong positive
correlations of 0.570 and 0.608 were found between maxillary and mandibular crowding and
In another study conducted by Waim Ijaz in 2015 with total number of 124 consecutive patients
(ages 14-25), showed patients with class II malocclusion had significantly smaller mandibular
base length correlation between mandibular dental crowding and mandibular base length (for
males, r = 0.148 and for females r = 0.199). these values shows a weak correlation between
Only a limited number of studies have investigated the relationship between maxillary and
mandibular base lengths and dental crowding in patients of Class II malocclusions. Therefore,
the aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship of maxillary and mandibular base lengths to
Objective:
To determine the correlation between maxillary and mandibular base lengths and dental
Operational Definitions:
Dental Crowding: Dental crowding is characterized by a discrepancy between tooth size and
jaw size that leads to a misalignment of the tooth row. It can result from excessively large teeth,
small jaws, or a combination of both. The severity of dental crowding is typically measured in
millimeters (mm) by subtracting the sum of the total tooth widths for each jaw from the
perimeter of the respective jaw bone arch. The difference in mm determines the degree of
severity of dental crowding. Mild crowding <3mm and moderate to severe crowding ≥3mm.
Open bite: In open bite, there is no vertical overlap between upper and lower incisors. It is
measured from upper incisal edge to lower incisal edge in mm. 0-2 mm overlap considered as
Cross bite: A cross bite is a type of malocclusion, or a misalignment of teeth, where upper teeth
fit inside of lower teeth. This misalignment can affect a single tooth or groups of teeth, involving
the front teeth, back teeth, or both: Posterior cross bite: If the back teeth are affected, upper teeth
Condylion(Co) to Gnathion(Gn).
in order to determine the correlation r = 0.247, with a power of 80%, using two sided
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Patients between the ages of 18-40 years.
Exclusion Criteria:
Ethical approval for the study will be obtained from the ethics committee at Nishtar Institute of
Dentistry, Multan, Pakistan. A written informed consent form will be obtained from all the study
participants. 126 patients who satisfy the inclusion criteria will be selected. The pre-treatment
dental casts and lateral cephalograms will be measured. All lateral cephalograms will be obtained
using the same radiography device and traced by the single examiner. Tracing on acetate sheets
will be using a 0.35" pencil. The mesio-distal diameters of individual teeth will be measured by
using a Vernier caliper. Crowding and maxillary & mandibular base lengths will be measured as
per operational definition. All the data will be noted on proforma (attached).
DATA ANALYSIS: The statistical data analysis will performed by using SPSS version 25.
Quantitative variable i.e. age, base lengths and crowding will be presented as mean and standard
deviation. Qualitative variables, gender and residential will be presented as frequency and
percentage. Correlation between the maxillary and mandibular base lengths and dental crowding
will be determined through the Pearson correlation (r). Data will be stratified on age, gender,
residential area to determine the effect on correlation between arch perimeter and base lengths
REFERENCES:
1. Ilankizhai R, Jain RK, Madhulaxmi M. Prevalence and associated factors for crowding in patients
with class iii malocclusion visiting a private dental college in Chennai. Eur J Mol Clin Med.7(01):2020.
2. Nidhi K, Felicita AS. Prevalence of crowding in orthodontic patients reporting for treatment.
3. do Amaral BA, Filgueira ACG, da Silva-Neto JP, de Lima KC. Relationship between normative and
self-perceived criteria for orthodontic treatment need and satisfaction with esthetics and mastication in
4. Ueno K, Kumabe S, Nakatsuka M, Tamura I. Factors influencing dental arch form. Okajimas Folia
5. Daoud R, Bencze M-A, Albu C-C, Teodorescu E, Dragomirescu A-O, Vasilache A, et al.
Implications of permanent teeth dimensions and arch lengths on dental crowding during the mixed
6. Amini F, Hamedi S, Ghadimi MH, Rakhshan V. Associations between occlusion, jaw relationships,
craniofacial dimensions and the occurrence of palatally-displaced canines. Int Orthod. 2017;15(1):69-81.
7. Shafique HZ, Zaheer R, Jan A, Fazal A. Comparison of tooth widths, arch widths and arch lengths
in class-I normal dentition to class-I and II crowded dentitions. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(2):345-58.
8. Vergara AD, Llinás HJ, Bustillo JM. Incidence of lower anterior third molars on dental crowding. A
9. Crossley AM, Campbell PM, Tadlock LP, Schneiderman E, Buschang PH. Is there a relationship
between dental crowding and the size of the maxillary or mandibular apical base? Angle Orthod.
2020;90(2):216-23.
10. Singh R-R, Verma P, Pradhan D, Bhardwaj R, Kour S. Association between maxillary and
mandibular apical base lengths and severity of dental crowding or spacing in Class II malocclusion
11. Ijaz W, Raza HA, Rasool G, Shah SS, Iqbal A. Correlation between mandibular base length and
12. Khan SQ, Ashraf B, Khan AQ, Mehdi H. Prevalence of malocclusion and its relation with crowding
Reg #: __________________________________________________________
Name: __________________________________________________________
In maxilla:
In mandible: