The document discusses proof by contraposition and provides 4 exercises to prove using this method. Proof by contraposition relies on the equivalence that (p → q) is logically equivalent to (not q → not p). This allows proving a statement by assuming not q and proving not p, rather than directly proving p implies q. The exercises provide 4 mathematical statements to prove using this contraposition method.
The document discusses proof by contraposition and provides 4 exercises to prove using this method. Proof by contraposition relies on the equivalence that (p → q) is logically equivalent to (not q → not p). This allows proving a statement by assuming not q and proving not p, rather than directly proving p implies q. The exercises provide 4 mathematical statements to prove using this contraposition method.
The document discusses proof by contraposition and provides 4 exercises to prove using this method. Proof by contraposition relies on the equivalence that (p → q) is logically equivalent to (not q → not p). This allows proving a statement by assuming not q and proving not p, rather than directly proving p implies q. The exercises provide 4 mathematical statements to prove using this contraposition method.
The method of Proof by contraposition is relying on the tautology ( p → q ) ( q → p ) .
This means that, instead of assuming that p is true and prove that q is true, we assume that q is true and prove that p is true.
Exercises:
25. Prove that, if x is an integer such that 7 x + 9 is even, then x is odd.
26. Prove that, if x is an integer such that x 2 − 6 x + 5 is even, then x is odd. 27. Suppose x, y . Prove that, if y 3 + yx 2 x3 + xy 2 , then y x . 28. Prove that xy 5 x 5 and y 5 .