UNIT II.

CONTENT AND CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS OF PRIMARY

RESOURCES

Overview

Learning the historical context of a primary source is critical for understanding the
attitudes and influences that shaped the creation of the primary cause. If not placed into a
historical context, a primary source's true meaning might be misinterpreted.

Learning Objectives

At the end of this chapter, I can:

1. analyze the context and perspective of different kinds of primary sources;
2. determine the contribution of different types of primary sources in understanding
Philippine History; and
3. develop critical and analytical skills with exposure to primary sources.

Lesson Proper

Primary sources

 Primary sources are valuable tools to develop an understanding of Philippine History.

Analyzing the content and context behind these sources can lead to a critical appraisal of
certain situations or periods in the country's history.

Identification of the Historical Importance of Texts

 Primary historical sources are essential in understanding the political, economic, social, and
cultural aspects of Philippine History.
 First-hand accounts written or in audiovisual or digital form have provided different
perspectives on specific historical events.

Example

They were identifying the historical importance of former President Corazon Aquino's
Speech before the U.S. Congress. In 1986, a former President, Corazon Aquino, stood before the
U.S. Congress in what is considered one of the most important political and diplomatic events in
Philippine History. She did so as the first female President of the country.

Types of Historical Criticisms

 External criticism involves questioning the authenticity of a document or piece of evidence.

 Internal criticism involves questioning the truthfulness accuracy and context of the
production of the document.
Example

 Analysis of Antonio Pigafetta's First Voyage Around the World. The Chronicles document
Magellan's arrival in the Visayas, his interaction with the locals and his death, and his fleet's
subsequent departure. That said, no primary source should be exempt from scrutiny.
 Antonio Pigafetta was an Italian nobleman commissioned by Spain's king to document the
Spanish empire's expansion. His loyalties and social standing, compounded with the
circumstance of the-text production, influenced his narrative of pre-colonial Philippines.