Natural law dictates that everything has it's own defined and innate purpose since it's NATURAL
conception. Natural law dictates that if
something or someone does not follow it's natural purpose, it's unnatural and therfore morally wrong. LAW EXAMPLE: TODO SOBRE MI MADRE The story begins with a woman who loses her son and decides to go find the man who never found out about his paternity. Along the way, he meets a transgender prostitute, a pregnant nun, and an actress struggling with her lover and partner's addictions. Complex women full of charm. The lives of these women are intertwined in such a way that the problems of one become those of the other. As Manuela deals with the loss of her son, she meets women with different struggles to hers. These strangers end up forming something similar to a family, always respecting their decisions, identity links and sexual orientations. RELIGIONS POSTURE
According to the Scriptures, when God created human beings,
He created them “male and female” and blessed their marital union (Genesis 1:26–28; 2:20–25). Bible also condenates homosexuality and feminity in man because according to bible God created man in his own image and likeness and that should be respected if this statement is not followed it would be unnatural and therefore "evil" Good or bad is not defined by what religion says is POSTURE natural or not. Nature is not a source of obligations or ethical norms. Therefore transexuality and homosexuality is not bad just because religion says ETHICS
so. Diversity in sexual preference and gender identity
does not make harm, it allows people to be who they want to be and be treated as they deserve WHICH SOLUTION SHOULD WE FAVOR?
I think ethics posture is the most reasonable solution, I think
people should be free to be who they want to be, as long as it does not harm anybody. People deserve to be treated with respect no matter their preferences or identity.