Count One of the indictment alleges Production of child pornography. The government must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt. Count Two alleges productionof obscene visual Representations of the sexual abuse of children.
Count One of the indictment alleges Production of child pornography. The government must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt. Count Two alleges productionof obscene visual Representations of the sexual abuse of children.
Count One of the indictment alleges Production of child pornography. The government must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt. Count Two alleges productionof obscene visual Representations of the sexual abuse of children.
BUDDY WAYNE ANDERSON FACTUAL RESUME Buddy Wayne Anderson (Anderson), the defendant, James Walker. the defendant's attorney, and the United States of America (the government) agree to the law and facts as follows: ELEMENTS OF mE OFFENSE CountOn!< Production of Child Pornography (Violation of 18 U.S.C. 2251 (a)) In order to establish the offense alleged in Count One of the indictment, the government must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt: That thc detendant employed, used, persuaded, or coerced a minor to cngage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing a visual depiction of such conduct; Second: That at the time of the offense, the minor was under the age of eightcen years; and lbird: That the visual depiction was produced using materials that had been mailed, shipped, or transportcd across state lines or in foreign commerce. Faeidal Resume Page 1 Case 3:11-cr-00104-N Document 13 Filed 05/13/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID 30 Count Two Production of Obscene Visual Representations of the Sexual Abuse of Children (Violation of 18 U.S.C. 1466A(a)(l) and 2252A(b)(l In order to establish the offense alleged in Count Two ofthe indictment, the government must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt: First: 'Ihat the defendant knowingly produced a visual dcpiction, of any kind, that depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; Second: That the visual depiction was produced using materials that had been mailed, or shipped, or transported in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer; and Third: That the visual depiction is obscene. Obscene Material (the Miller Test): Whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the material, taken as a whole, appeals to the "prurient" interest; Second: Whether the average person, applying contemporary standards, would find that the material is depicted or described in a "patently offensive" manner; and Whether the material taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value. STIPULATED FACTS On a date between on or about May 18, 1999 and on or about December 11,2003, in the Dallas Division ofthe Northern District of Texas, Buddy Wayne Anderson (Anderson), defendant. did and attempted to knowingly employ, use, persuade, induce, Fadual Resume - Page 2 Case 3:11-cr-00104-N Document 13 Filed 05/13/11 Page 2 of 7 PageID 31 entice and coerce Janc Doe, a person under the age of eighteen (18) years, to engage in sexually cxplicit conduct for the purpose ofproducing visual depictions of such conduct, which visual depictions were produccd using materials that had been mailed, shipped and transported in and affecting interstate and foreign commcrce by any means, including by computer, by taking photographs of Jane Doe, who was then four to eight-years old, with a Polaroid camera to create visual depictions ofJane Doe engaged in sexually explicit conduct, as dermed in 18 U.S.C. 2256, including the following described images: Image 1 A Polaroid photograph depicting Jane Doe, a nude. female child, wearing only a bib with her genitals exposed in a lewd ! and lascivious manner. Jane Doe is leaning against a woman who is wearing blue and green plaid boxer shorts. Image 2 A Polaroid lewd and lascivious photograph depicting Jane Doe, a nude, prepubescent female child, with her genitals exposed (close-up). A woman's arms are seen holding Jane Doe's legs to support the pose Image 3 A Polaroid lewd and lascivious photograph depicting Jane Doc, a nude, female child, wearing only a bib, with her genitals exposed. Jane Doe is sitting on a bed spreading her legs and holding a photograph. A male leg is seen in the photograph. More specifically, defendant, Buddy Wayne Anderson, admits that he, with the assistance and consent of Sharon Lee Anderson, who was his wite and Jane Doe's Factual Resume - Page 3 Case 3:11-cr-00104-N Document 13 Filed 05/13/11 Page 3 of 7 PageID 32 mother, took photographs (Images 1 through 3) of Jane Doe, who was then only four to eight years old, that depicted the lewd and lascivious exhibition ofher genitals, in that Jane Doe's bare vagina and/or anus was exposed in the images, her genitalia was a focal point of the images, and the images werc intended to elicit a sexual response in the viewer - including Anderson and his wife. Anderson further admits that his wife, Sharon Lee Anderson, is the woman depicted in Images 1 and 2, and that his leg is the leg depicted in Image 3. Anderson agrees and admits that he took these photographs while he lived at 210 Ranch 2 Road in Ferris, Texas. Anderson acknowledges that the film and camera that he used to produce the images of Jane Doe in Images I through 3 in the indictment were not manufactured in the State of Texas, and, thus, moved in and affected interstate commerce. Anderson also admits that he knowingly and intentionally committed a sexual act on Jane Doe, as defined by 18 U.S.C. 2246(2), by placing his Hngers in her vagina. Further, as his step-daughter, Jane Doe lived with Anderson and Sharon Lee Anderson. Anderson, thcrefore, acknowledges that Jane Doe was otherwise in his custody, care, or control when he committed the offense. Further, on or about July 30, 20I 0, in the Dallas Division of the Northern District of Texas, Anderson did knowingly produce and attempted to produce a video of photographs of the vi.sual depictions ofthc lewd and lascivious exhibition of the genitals and pubic area of minor children that was produced using materials that had been mailed, !'aema! Resume - Pag., 4 Case 3:11-cr-00104-N Document 13 Filed 05/13/11 Page 4 of 7 PageID 33 shipped and transported in interstate and foreign commerce by any means, including by computer, and is obscene; by creating a digital slide show on compact disk (CD) of photographs of nude children that zooms ill and focuses on the gcnital area of the children depicted in these photographs. More specifically, Anderson agrees and admits that on July 30, 2010, while he was residing in the Northern District of Texas, he knowingly created a CD that contained images of nude, prepubescent children. The defendant admits that in creating these images to bum to the CD, he manipulated and changed them first by zooming in and focusing on the nude genital area of these children, in some instances, so much so that their faces no longer fit in the frame of the images. After he manipulated the images, he used computer software to compile thcm into a slide show format, and then, burned them in the slide show format to a CD. He agrees these images he created through manipulation were lewd and lascivious as defmed by 18 U.S.C. 2256 and he acknowledges that each ofthese images was obscene in that the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the material: 1) taken as a whole appeals to the prurient interest, 2) is patently offensive, and that it 3) lacks serious literary, artistic, political. or scientific value. Anderson also acknowledges that the CD was not manufactured in Texas and, therefore, was material that moved in and affected interstate commerce. Finally, Anderson agrees and admits that after he discovered the police had found Fadual Resume - Page 5 Case 3:11-cr-00104-N Document 13 Filed 05/13/11 Page 5 of 7 PageID 34 his child pornography collection, including Images 1 through 3 of Jane Doe, he fled the State of Texas - traveling to Arizona and Nevada" to avoid arrest and prosecution for these and other offenses. Toward that end, he agrees that he and his wife also substantially changed their appearance. Anderson further acknowledges that after he was found and captured in Nevada, he was transported from Nevada to the Eunis County Jail in Ennis, Texas. There, after having knowingly an voluntarily waived his Miranda rights, Anderson acknowledges that he admitted to Homeland Security Investigations (HSl) Special Agents Bradley Hudson and Jesse Lara, and Ennis Detective Mark Mahoney that he had taken the pornographic photographs of Jane Doe for his sexual gratification. He also admitted that all the child pornography seized from his apartment in Ennis, Texas on February 8, 2011, and from the house/storage unit in Frost, Texas on February \8,2011, by the Ennis Police Department, belonged to him. Anderson admits that his collection included ehild pornography and child obscenity, including images of Anderson performing anal sexual intercourse, vaginal sexual intercourse, and oral sexual intercourse on life-sized baby dolls whose genital areas had been cut open and hollowed out to allow Anderson to penetrate the openings with his penis. Factual Resume Page 6 Case 3:11-cr-00104-N Document 13 Filed 05/13/11 Page 6 of 7 PageID 35 Anderson also admits that he possessed at least 100 still images and at least two videos of child pornography. , "i'h. AGREED TO AND SIGNED this 1- day of May, 2011. JAMES T. JACKS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Defendant
Attorney for the Defendant &VIlLiL.t J EWpctJl a CAMILLE E. SPARKS Assistant United States Attorney Texas State Bar No. 00790878 1100 Commerce Street, Third Floor Dallas, Texas 75242 Telephone: 214.659.8600 Facsimile: 214.767.4100 Email: C81nille.Sparks@usdoj.gov Fadual Resume - Palle 7 Case 3:11-cr-00104-N Document 13 Filed 05/13/11 Page 7 of 7 PageID 36
United States v. Ronald Doyle Hines, United States of America v. Gary J. Peed, United States of America v. Teresa Eleazar, United States of America v. James Maurice Jackson, United States of America v. James C. Coddington, United States of America v. Jeffrey Craig Bumgardner, 717 F.2d 1481, 4th Cir. (1983)