1

Deep Learning for Breast Cancer Image Classification using CNN and ResNet

Student’s Name

Institutional Affiliation

Course Number and Name

Instructor’s Name

Assignment Due Date

 2

Abstract

Deep learning models have revolutionized breast cancer research and clinical practice by

enabling personalized risk assessments, treatment recommendations, and image-guided

procedures. These models integrate various factors such as genetic markers, tumor

characteristics, and patient demographics to provide informed decision-making for clinicians.

Image-guided procedures, including biopsies and tumor resections, benefit from real-time image

analysis, improving precision and reducing invasiveness. However, several challenges remain in

harnessing the full potential of deep learning for breast cancer. The availability of diverse and

well-curated datasets is crucial for training accurate and reliable models. Privacy concerns, bias

mitigation, and interpretability of algorithms are also important considerations in model

development and deployment.

In this study, the performance of two models, CNN and Decision Tree Classifier, was evaluated

for breast cancer image classification. The CNN model achieved an accuracy of 87.78%,

precision of 0.8783, F1-score of 0.8770, and recall of 0.8761. On the other hand, the RESNET

achieved an accuracy of 82.52%, precision of 0.8323, F1-score of 0.8261, and recall of 0.8231.

These results demonstrate the effectiveness of deep learning models, particularly CNN, in

accurately differentiating between benign and malignant breast tumors using mammography or

histopathology images. By automating this process, clinicians can benefit from faster diagnosis,

reduced subjectivity, and improved accuracy. Future research should address data-related
 3

challenges and ethical considerations to further enhance the capabilities of deep learning models

in breast cancer research and clinical applications.

 4

Table of Contents

Abstract..........................................................................................................................................2

Deep Learning for Breast Cancer Image Classification using CNN and ResNet....................5

Motivation and Objective..........................................................................................................6

Objectives................................................................................................................................7

Literature Review..........................................................................................................................8

Methodology.................................................................................................................................10

Breast Cancer Image Datasets................................................................................................10

Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM).................................................10

BreakHis................................................................................................................................12

Image processing......................................................................................................................13

Resizing the image....................................................................................................................14

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs)...................................................................................15

Architectural Components..........................................................................................................15

Transfer learning......................................................................................................................17

Residual Learning....................................................................................................................20

Experimental Results.....................................................................................................................23

Discussion.....................................................................................................................................23

Conclusion....................................................................................................................................24

References......................................................................................................................................26
5
 6

Deep Learning for Breast Cancer Image Classification using CNN and ResNet

Millions of people around the world are affected by reast cancer, which is a prevalent condition

with the potential to endanger one's life. A promising method for improving the detection and

diagnosis of breast cancer is deep learning, a subfield of artificial intelligence. Researchers and

healthcare professionals want to make breast cancer detection more accurate and efficient by

utilizing the capabilities of deep neural networks. This will allow for personalized treatment

plans and early intervention. Deep learning algorithms are well-suited for analyzing the

numerous medical imaging and genomic data associated with breast cancer because they excel at

extracting intricate patterns and features from large and complex datasets (Key et al., 2019).

These models can learn to recognize subtle abnormalities that indicate breast cancer by training

them on labeled datasets like mammograms, ultrasound images, or histopathological slides. As a

complement to the expertise of pathologists and radiologists, this automated analysis may speed

up diagnosis and improve accuracy. In addition, deep learning methods make it possible to

combine multi-modal data, such as imaging data, molecular profiles, or clinical data, for a more

comprehensive comprehension and prediction of breast cancer.

Worldwide and in the United Kingdom (UK), breast cancer is a major issue, particularly among

women. In the UK, it is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women. Based on information

from previous years, there were approximately 54,800 new cases of breast cancer reported in

2018. Tragically, the majority of women who die from cancer in the UK also have breast cancer.

In 2017, this disease was the cause of approximately 11,400 deaths. However, there is a glimmer

of hope in the fact that survival rates have shown a positive trend over time. The most recent data

indicate that approximately 85% of women diagnosed with breast cancer in England and Wales

live for at least five years. Worldwide, breast cancer is a major health problem (Sun et al., 2017).
 7

Worldwide, women are diagnosed with cancer the most frequently. According to estimates, there

will be over 2.3 million new cases of breast cancer worldwide in 2020. Sadly, it is also

responsible for a significant number of cancer-related deaths. In the same year, approximately

685,000 women, or roughly half of Hawaii's population, were diagnosed with breast cancer. Be

that as it may, early recognition of bosom disease can fundamentally affect patients' treatment

results and generally forecast.

The advantages of early detection cover a wide range of aspects of the disease and its treatment.

The availability of a wider range of treatment options is one of the primary advantages of early

diagnosis. When breast cancer is detected early, when the tumors are smaller and more localized,

more conservative treatment options are available. Instead of removing the breasts completely

(mastectomy), a surgical procedure like a lumpectomy may be an option (Sutherland et al.,

2019). In addition, early-stage cancers may benefit from less aggressive treatments like hormone

therapy or targeted therapies. Early-stage breast cancers may not require intensive treatments like

chemotherapy or radiation because of their smaller tumor sizes and limited spread. This can

improve the patient's overall quality of life both during and after treatment, as well as reduce the

likelihood of negative side effects. Individuals are given the opportunity to make well-informed

decisions based on their preferences and medical considerations when they are given the

opportunity to select from a wider range of treatment options. This increases the likelihood of

successful outcomes.

Motivation and Objective

Radiologists often face significant challenges in diagnosing breast cancer and they may miss

approximately 20% of cases. Early breast cancer diagnosis is further complicated by the

complexity of low-contrast mammograms. To address these issues, computer-aided diagnosis

 8

(CAD) systems have been developed (Abdelrahman et al., 2021). Convolutional Neural

Networks (CNNs) have recently been shown to have potential for mammogram classification. In

a variety of tasks related to image classification, CNNs have demonstrated remarkable

performance.

This study aims to contrast various CNN architectures by focusing on the classification of benign

and malignant tumors in mammogram images. By accomplishing this objective, a number of

advantages can be realized. In the first place, physically clarifying mammograms would be

essentially more straightforward with a powerful classifier for the whole picture. Second,

accurate classification can help reduce the number of patient callbacks by assisting in the

identification of potential cancer cases during the initial evaluation (Alanazi et al., 2021). Time

can be saved, patient anxiety can be reduced, and healthcare resources can be utilized to their full

potential. Thirdly, a dependable classifier can help cut down on false positives and unnecessary

follow-up tests, easing the burden on patients and cutting costs associated with healthcare.

Objectives

1. Collection of Images from Mammograms: The study will make use of a publicly accessible

online database that includes images from both cancerous and noncancerous mammograms. For

purposes of training and evaluation, this database will provide a diverse selection of images.

2.The creation of a mechanism for automatic detection: From the collected mammogram images,

a system for automatic detection will be developed to classify breast cancer masses as well as

noncancerous masses. To accurately classify and extract meaningful features, this mechanism

will make use of the power of CNNs.

 9

3. CNN Model Comparison: The CNN model with the highest level of accuracy in classifying

benign and malignant tumors will be chosen by comparing the results of various CNN models.

Researchers will be able to choose the best CNN architecture for mammogram classification

thanks to this comparative analysis.

The study aims to use the power of deep learning to advance the diagnosis of breast cancer by

conducting this comparative analysis of CNN architectures. This study's findings may lead to

improved patient outcomes, earlier detection, fewer false positives, and improved accuracy and

efficiency in mammogram interpretation.

Literature Review

Some experts have studied how to tell apart less harmful and more dangerous breast cancer. They

used different computer programs to help with this. These studies have been looking at how well

computer programs can help diagnose things. They want to know how accurate and fast the

programs are.

DA Ragab and some people suggested using a computer program to tell the difference between

harmless and dangerous mammogram pictures. They used two methods to divide the data into

sections: one based on the area of interest and another based on specific criteria like color or size.

To make things more accurate, they used a special computer program called a support vector

machine instead of using a normal layer of the program. They also used another special program

called a Deep Convolutional Neural Network to help pick out important details. The first way of

dividing the DDSM dataset was better than the second because it gave more precise results.

Charan and his team. A better version of the neural network model called DenseNet-II came out

in 2018. They fixed a problem with overfitting by adding a new layer to the first three layers of
 10

the network. This happened because the network had a lot of settings and was too complex. The

mammogram pictures were improved with additional information to avoid mistakes caused by

not having enough data. The beginning part of the DenseNet computer model was switched with

something called InceptionNet. Researchers named Charan and others made this change in 2018.

The DenseNet-II computer system did better than other systems like DenseNet, AlexNet,

VGGNet, and GoogleNet. The DenseNet-II network did really well: it got 94. 55% of its

predictions right. It was also good at detecting true positives (95. 6%) and avoiding false

positives (95. 3%) To make the information for this study, 2042 pictures of mammograms were

collected from the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University.

N used a combination of computer programs called CNN and random forest to make predictions.

Dhungel and other experts find lumps in breast X-rays. They used a computer program to look

for things that seemed strange. After that, some computer tools were used to sort them out. We

were able to correctly identify breast abnormalities in 85 to 90% of cases when using two sets of

data called INbreast and DDSM-BCRP.

Phu T used the BreakHis dataset. Nguyen and some other people are trying to figure out if breast

cancer is a safe or dangerous kind. They made a special computer program that changed the size

of pictures to sort them into categories. The BreakHis collection has 7909 pictures of breast

cancer. Among them, 2440 are harmless and 5429 are harmful. The group of non-cancerous

things is divided into four smaller groups. The group of cancerous things is also divided into four

smaller groups.

Shen Li and his team made a computer program that can find signs of breast cancer in

mammogram pictures using advanced technology called deep learning. In their tests, they

showed that using digitized film mammograms from the CBIS-DDSM set made different
 11

mammography machines work better and more accurately. They put together the top four models

by using the VGG16 and ResNet50 models as classifiers. The score for the single model was 0.

88, but when four models were combined, the score increased to 0. 91 In the INbreast database,

images of a certain type were tested and the results showed that using one model had a 95%

accuracy rate, while using four models together had a 98% accuracy rate. The sensitivity and

specificity values were also the same for both methods.

Richa Agarwal and her team created a computer program that finds lumps in breast x-rays by

looking at small sections of the image at a time. The computer program was first taught how to

recognize breast images using the CBIS-DDSM collection. Then, it was examined if the program

works with the INbreast database. The technique of using knowledge gained from the CBIS-

DDSM dataset to understand the INbreast dataset worked well, with a success rate of 98%.

Levy and his team taught computer models how to recognize patterns by using techniques like

transfer learning, adding more data, and making the data easier for the computer to understand.

They taught three different computer structures called CNNs. One was not very complex, one

was called AlexNet, and one was called GoogleNet. They discovered that GoogleNet was the

best with a score of 0. 92 They used the DDSM data in their tests.

Li, Huynh, and their team compared three ways to tell if a growth is safe or dangerous. The

researchers tried three different ways to analyze the tumor images. One used a computer program

that was already programmed to recognize certain features of tumors, and then another program

to make a decision. The second way looked at different sections of the tumor and made a

decision using another program. The third way used a combination of different programs to make

a decision. The ensemble classifier did better than the other two ways by a lot, with a score of 0.

86.
 12

Methodology

Breast Cancer Image Datasets

The data used for this research was collected at baseline include breast ultrasound images. The

dataset included images from 600 female patients aged between 25 and 75 years old. The dataset

consisted of 780 images, with an average image size of 500x500 pixels. The images were in

PNG format. Each image had a corresponding ground truth image, providing the original

representation. The images were categorized into three classes: normal, benign, and malignant,

allowing for classification and analysis of different breast conditions. (Al-Dhabyani W, Gomaa

M, Khaled H, Fahmy A. Dataset of breast ultrasound images. Data in Brief. 2020 Feb;28:104863.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104863.).
 13

Image processing

The dataset was divided into a training set and a test set for performance comparison of different

methods. The training set was used to train the models and fine-tune their parameters, while the

test set was used to evaluate their predictive performance. However, to address the class

imbalance, the dataset was balanced using the SMOTEtomek algorithm. This algorithm
 14

combines the SMOTE technique, which generates synthetic samples for the minority class, with

Tomek links, which remove overlapping data points. The SMOTE technique helps increase the

representation of the minority class by creating synthetic samples through interpolation. Tomek

links identify pairs of samples from different classes that are close to each other and remove

them to enhance class separation. Applying the SMOTEtomek algorithm resulted in a balanced

dataset where all classes have a similar number of samples. This process ensures that the

classifiers can effectively learn from both the minority and majority classes and minimizes biases

towards the majority class, leading to more reliable evaluation of classifiers and more accurate

performance comparison of different methods.

For the purpose of this research, two popular deep learning models, CNN (Convolutional Neural

Network) and ResNet (Residual Neural Network), will be used. During the training process,

evaluation metrics such as F1-score, precision, recall rate, and AUC will be used to assess the
 15

performance of each model. These metrics provide insights into the accuracy, precision, recall,

and discriminatory power of the models in classifying breast cancer images. By utilizing these

evaluation metrics, the effectiveness of the models in accurately identifying and classifying these

images can be determined, aiding in decision-making related to diagnosis and treatment.

When employing Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), image preprocessing is an essential

step in enhancing the performance of Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) systems. Poor

classification performance can result from training CNNs directly on raw images. Before feeding

the raw images into the deep learning classifiers, it is therefore necessary to convert them into

the desired format.

When compared to the format that our network classifiers require, the medical dataset in our

scenario contains images of varying shapes and sizes. The images must be resized or rescaled to

the desired dimensions in order to guarantee compatibility with the network classifier's input

size. There are two primary reasons why this process of resizing or scaling is essential

(Mohapatra et al., 2021). First, it makes sure that all of the images that are fed into the CNN have

the same size, which is a requirement. For efficient processing, CNNs typically anticipate a fixed

size for the input. We create a uniform format that the CNN model can effectively process by

rescaling or resizing the images to match this input size.

Second, image rescaling and resizing can expedite the training process. During training, dealing

with large, high-resolution images can significantly increase the computational load. We can

reduce the amount of computation required without sacrificing the essential characteristics

required for accurate classification by scaling or resizing the images to a smaller size while

maintaining the essential details (Ragab et al., 2019). The CNN model can be processed and

trained more quickly as a result of this.

 16

There is more to image preprocessing than just resizing and scaling. It might also include

normalization, cropping, and filtering, among other methods. In order to eliminate any potential

biases and ensure that all of the image's pixel values fall within a predetermined range,

normalization is frequently used. By focusing solely on the area of interest, cropping can be

utilized to eliminate irrelevant parts of the image. Smoothing and sharpening are two examples

of filtering techniques that can be used to improve or reduce noise in an image.

Resizing the image

Resizing the image is an essential step in preparing it to meet the required input size for CNN

classifiers. The size of the collected input images may not always match the size of the CNN

model's input. Resizing the images ensures compatibility and optimal performance for the

classifiers. The images can be resized in two common ways: scaling and editing Cropping

involves removing the border pixels from the images in order to obtain the desired input size.

However, if this method is used, important features and patterns around the image borders may

be lost. However, according to Sanchez-Cauce et al., reducing the size of the images preserves

the content as a whole. 2021). Scaling is regarded as a reasonable choice because it minimizes

the risk of losing important patterns or features, despite the fact that the images' features and

patterns may slightly deform.

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs)

The classification of breast cancer images has been revolutionized by Convolutional Neural

Networks (CNNs). In this section, we'll go over the architecture of CNNs and how they are used

to find meaningful features in mammogram images.

 17

Architectural Components

CNN architectures are built on the foundation of convolutional layers. They extract local features

from the input images and record the spatial relationships between pixels by applying filters or

kernels. Using element-wise multiplications and summations, each filter traverses the input

image to generate feature maps. CNNs are capable of recognizing various patterns at various

scales, such as edges, textures, and shapes, by employing multiple filters. The feature maps'

spatial dimensions are determined by the size and stride of the filters.

Regularization techniques are used to prevent overfitting. Dropout is a common regularization

technique for CNNs that randomly resets a portion of the neurons' outputs during training to

zero. This encourages the learning of more robust and generalizable representations and helps the

network avoid relying too heavily on particular features.

Backpropagation is an algorithm used to train CNNs that finds the model's parameter gradients

in relation to a given loss function. During the optimization process, the gradients are then used

to update the network's weights and biases. When training CNNs, optimization algorithms like

Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) and its variants like Adam and RMSprop are frequently

utilized. In order to reduce the loss function and improve the model's classification performance,

these algorithms iteratively adjust the parameters.

CNNs make use of images' spatial hierarchies. The underlying layers catch low-level elements,

like edges and corners, while more profound layers learn more dynamic and significant level

portrayals. The network is able to capture both local and global contextual information thanks to

the increasing receptive fields of the feature maps produced by various layers (Wang et al.,

2019). The model is able to recognize subtle patterns and variations that are associated with
 18

various stages and types of cancer thanks to this hierarchical representation learning, which is

essential for the accurate classification of breast cancer images.

When there's not a lot of labeled information available, transfer learning can be a really useful

way to do deep learning. Transfer learning is being used to help classify pictures of breast cancer.

It works by using already-made models to speed up the process and get better results. This

section will talk about using transfer learning to help identify breast cancer in pictures.

Transfer learning

Utilizing transfer learning, researchers can utilize the knowledge of the pre-trained model to

significantly shorten the amount of time required for the target dataset's training (Charan et al.,

2018). Greater Adaptability: A vast dataset has proactively provided rich, nonexclusive element

portrayals to pre-prepared models. Using these representations, transfer learning makes it

possible for the model to better adapt to the target dataset even with fewer training samples.

Managing a Lack of Data: Annotation datasets for breast cancer image classification tasks

frequently have a limited number of options because it is difficult to obtain and label medical

images. With transfer learning, researchers can use the knowledge from other image

classification tasks to improve the model's performance with less training data.

Extraction of Meaningful Features: The pre-trained models can learn high-level features that can

help identify breast cancer because they are trained on a variety of images from different

domains. These features, which can be used for the target task and capture discriminative

patterns, improve the model's ability to accurately classify mammographic images.

However, when using transfer learning to classify breast cancer images, there are a few things to

keep in mind: Likeness of Datasets: Transfer learning will not be successful unless there is a high
 19

degree of similarity between the target dataset and the dataset that was previously trained.

Despite the fact that low-level features learned by early layers are typically transferable, higher-

level representations may need to be altered to accommodate the particular characteristics of

breast cancer images (Guan et al., 2017). Consequently, selecting a model that has already been

prepared using a dataset with visual properties, such as mammographic images, is crucial.

Overfitting: Transfer learning is prone to overfitting when the target dataset is small. Overfitting

happens when the model neglects to satisfactorily sum up to new, unseen information subsequent

to turning out to be excessively centered around the preparation information. Regularization,

dropout, and early stopping methods can reduce overfitting and improve generalization.

Adaptation to the Domain Breast cancer images exhibit distinctive characteristics and variations

because of factors like imaging techniques, patient demographics, and anatomical variations. To

fine-tune a pre-trained model's ability to capture breast cancer classification-relevant features,

domain adaptation techniques may be required to align the learned representations with the target

dataset.

Residual Learning

In the field of deep learning, Residual Networks (ResNets) have emerged as a significant

architectural innovation specifically designed to address the issue of vanishing gradients during

training. It is difficult to effectively train very deep models in traditional deep neural networks

because the gradients tend to decrease exponentially as the network gets deeper. By introducing

residual connections, ResNets address this issue by enabling the model to learn residual

mappings and capture more complex representations.

 20

The observation that, in an ideal situation, a deeper network should not perform worse than a

shallower network gave rise to the idea of residual learning. Deeper networks, on the other hand,

have a harder time effectively capturing and propagating gradients because of the vanishing

gradient problem, which reduces performance. ResNets solve this issue by introducing skip

connections, also known as shortcut connections. These connections allow information to flow

directly from one layer to a layer below it, effectively bypassing some layers.

ResNets' skip connections let the network learn residual mappings rather than trying to learn the

underlying mapping directly. This suggests that rather than explicitly learning the entire

transformation, the model can concentrate on learning the residual between the input and the

desired output (Masud et al., 2021). ResNets solve the vanishing gradient problem and make it

possible to train networks that are significantly deeper by spreading residual information

throughout the network during backpropagation.

The residual connections can be mathematically represented as:

𝑦 =𝐹 ( 𝑥 ) + 𝑥 , where x is the layer's input, F(x) is the residual mapping the layer learned, and y is

the layer's output. The network can learn the input's residuals using this formulation, capturing

the additional data required to achieve the desired output. The network is able to learn the

residual mapping rather than the entire transformation by starting from scratch thanks to the skip

connections, which guarantee that the initial input is directly added to the residual mapping.

ResNets have demonstrated superior performance in a variety of computer vision tasks,

including the classification of breast cancer images. Researchers have been able to train and

optimize extremely deep networks, surpassing the limitations of previous architectures, thanks to

the introduction of residual connections. ResNets have achieved cutting-edge results in a variety
 21

of image classification challenges, such as the recognition of fine-grained visual categories and

the detection of objects in complex scenes, by facilitating the effective training of deep models.

ResNets have demonstrated significant promise for enhancing the models' accuracy and

robustness in the classification of breast cancer images. The inherent ability of ResNets to learn

residual mappings and capture complex representations has been particularly helpful in

identifying subtle patterns and variations associated with various types of breast cancer and

stages (Ragab et al., 2019). In medical imaging, where accurate abnormality identification and

classification are necessary for early diagnosis and treatment planning, this capability is

essential.

Pre-trained ResNet models have been fine-tuned or new ResNet models have been trained using

large datasets to use ResNets in breast cancer image classification. These models are able to

capture both low-level and high-level features by utilizing the residual connections, enabling a

more in-depth examination of mammographic images. Deep models can be optimized even with

limited training data thanks to the network's residual connections' ability to effectively propagate

gradients.

In addition, ResNets have demonstrated promising results in resolving other issues related to the

classification of breast cancer images, such as data imbalance. Biased models that favor the

majority class may result from imbalanced datasets in which one class has a significant

advantage over the others. By learning more discriminative features from minority classes,

ResNets can help mitigate the effects of data imbalance and improve overall classification

performance by capturing complex representations.

 22

As a result, residual Networks (ResNets) can be argued to have revolutionized deep learning by

addressing the issue of vanishing gradients during training. The model is now able to learn

residual mappings thanks to the addition of residual connections, which results in the capture of

more intricate representations and a significant boost to the efficiency of deep networks (Wang et

al. 2019). ResNets have demonstrated superior performance in the classification of breast cancer

images, enabling the detection of subtle patterns and variations associated with various types and

stages of breast cancer. Because of their inherent capabilities, ResNets are useful tools in the

creation of computer-aided diagnosis systems that are accurate and dependable, facilitating

earlier detection and improved patient outcomes.

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

The performance results for the two trained models: CNN and ResNet.

CNN
 23

RESNET

The CNN model shows an initial train accuracy of 42.73% and train loss of 14.0964, while the

test accuracy starts at 57.71% with a test loss of 1.9955. However, as the training progresses over

10 epochs, the CNN model significantly improves its performance. By the 10th epoch, the train

accuracy reaches 97.55% with a train loss of 0.1025, and the test accuracy increases to 87.78%

with a test loss of 0.3457. In comparison, the ResNet model starts with a train accuracy of

58.92% and train loss of 0.9147, while the test accuracy begins at 53.01% with a test loss of

9.0642. Despite a relatively higher initial accuracy, the ResNet model faces challenges during

training. However, by the 10th epoch, the ResNet model improves its performance with a train
 24

accuracy of 89.08% and a train loss of 0.2798. The test accuracy also increases to 82.52% with a

test loss of 0.4053.

Analyzing the evaluation metrics, the CNN model achieves an F1-score of 0.8770, a precision of

0.8783, and a recall of 0.8761. On the other hand, the ResNet model achieves an F1-score of

0.8261, a precision of 0.8323, and a recall of 0.8231.

Method Accuracy Precision F1-score Recall

CNN 87.78% 0.8783 0.8770 0.8761

Decision Tree 82.52% 0.8323 0.8261 0.8231

Classifier

Based on these results, it can be concluded that the CNN model outperforms the ResNet model

in terms of accuracy, loss reduction, and evaluation metrics. The CNN model shows a higher

accuracy of 87.78% compared to 82.52% for the ResNet model. Additionally, the CNN model

achieves a lower final train loss of 0.1025 compared to 0.2798 for the ResNet model. The test

loss is also lower for the CNN model (0.3457) compared to the ResNet model (0.4053).

Furthermore, the evaluation metrics, including F1-score, precision, and recall, are slightly higher

for the CNN model, indicating better overall performance.

CONCLUSION
 25

In conclusion, the result from this research shows how the use of deep learning methods can be

used to help in breast cancer diagnosis provided there is access to large dataset and image

variability for training these methods. However, the network models are less accurate as a result

of the limited availability of imaging data. Future research in this area should investigate the use

of various neural network classifiers and their combination with other network algorithms to

overcome this limitation. The accuracy of the classifiers could be improved using this strategy. In

addition, it would be fascinating to observe and analyze these classifiers' performance in greater

detail. This could involve evaluating how well they work with larger and more diverse datasets,

which would make it possible to conduct a thorough evaluation of their capabilities. The

classification models' accuracy could be improved and new insights gained from this

investigation.

In addition, considering the use of alternative validation split variations to evaluate their impact

on the models' performance is something to think about. The dataset would be divided into

subsets for training, validation, and testing under this strategy, and then the model's accuracy

would be examined in light of how these subsets affect accuracy. By carrying out such

experiments, researchers can gain a deeper comprehension of the ways in which various methods

of validation affect the classifiers' overall performance and generalizability.

 26

References

Abdelrahman, L., Al Ghamdi, M., Collado-Mesa, F., & Abdel-Mottaleb, M. (2021).

Convolutional neural networks for breast cancer detection in mammography: A

survey. Computers in biology and medicine, 131, 104248.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482521000421

Alanazi, S. A., Kamruzzaman, M. M., Islam Sarker, M. N., Alruwaili, M., Alhwaiti, Y.,

Alshammari, N., & Siddiqi, M. H. (2021). Boosting breast cancer detection using

convolutional neural network. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2021.

https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jhe/2021/5528622/

Charan, S., Khan, M. J., & Khurshid, K. (2018, March). Breast cancer detection in mammograms

using convolutional neural network. In 2018 International Conference on Computing,

Mathematics and Engineering Technologies (iCoMET) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895611118302349

Guan, S., & Loew, M. (2017, October). Breast cancer detection using transfer learning in

convolutional neural networks. In 2017 IEEE Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition

Workshop (AIPR) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8457948/

Guan, S., & Loew, M. (2019). Breast cancer detection using synthetic mammograms from

generative adversarial networks in convolutional neural networks. Journal of Medical

Imaging, 6(3), 031411-031411. https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journals/Journal-of-

Medical-Imaging/volume-6/issue-3/031411/Breast-cancer-detection-using-synthetic-

mammograms-from-generative-adversarial-networks/10.1117/1.JMI.6.3.031411.short
 27

Key, T. J., Verkasalo, P. K., & Banks, E. (2019). Epidemiology of breast cancer. The lancet

oncology, 2(3), 133-140.

Masud, M., Hossain, M. S., Alhumyani, H., Alshamrani, S. S., Cheikhrouhou, O., Ibrahim, S., ...

& Gupta, B. B. (2021). Pre-trained convolutional neural networks for breast cancer

detection using ultrasound images. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology

(TOIT), 21(4), 1-17. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3418355

Mohapatra, S., Muduly, S., Mohanty, S., Ravindra, J. V. R., & Mohanty, S. N. (2022). Evaluation

of deep learning models for detecting breast cancer using histopathological mammograms

Images. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 296-302.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666412722000162

Ragab, D. A., Sharkas, M., Marshall, S., & Ren, J. (2019). Breast cancer detection using deep

convolutional neural networks and support vector machines. PeerJ, 7, e6201.

https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jhe/2021/5528622/

Sánchez-Cauce, R., Pérez-Martín, J., & Luque, M. (2021). Multi-input convolutional neural

network for breast cancer detection using thermal images and clinical data. Computer

Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 204, 106045.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169260721001206

Sun, W., Tseng, T. L. B., Zhang, J., & Qian, W. (2017). Enhancing deep convolutional neural

network scheme for breast cancer diagnosis with unlabeled data. Computerized Medical

Imaging and Graphics, 57, 4-9.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895611116300696
 28

Sun, Y. S., Zhao, Z., Yang, Z. N., Xu, F., Lu, H. J., Zhu, Z. Y., ... & Zhu, H. P. (2017). Risk

factors and preventions of breast cancer. International journal of biological

sciences, 13(11), 1387.

Sutherland, R. L., & Musgrove, E. A. (2019). Cyclins and breast cancer. Journal of mammary

gland biology and neoplasia, 9(1), 95.

Tan, Y. J., Sim, K. S., & Ting, F. F. (2017, November). Breast cancer detection using

convolutional neural networks for mammogram imaging system. In 2017 International

Conference on Robotics, Automation and Sciences (ICORAS) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8308076/

Wang, Z., Li, M., Wang, H., Jiang, H., Yao, Y., Zhang, H., & Xin, J. (2019). Breast cancer

detection using extreme learning machine based on feature fusion with CNN deep

features. IEEE Access, 7, 105146-105158.

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8613773/