Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Knowledge Assessment
(Detailed Answers)
1. A. (i) Lencho was s God-fearing man. He had immense faith in God and hoped that only God could help him
to get out of the difficult situation he was in. He was also a very hard-working man and knew how to
read and write.
(ii) (c) A narrative from the point of view of an omniscient narrator, who knows everything about the story
and the character.
(iii) (b) Write a letter to God
(iv) The given statement indicates that Lencho was a sincere, dedicated and hard working man.
B. (i) The house described in the extract belongs to Lencho and his family.
(ii) The author has described the scene viewed from Lencho’s house very picturesquely. From the
house, one could see a river and the beautiful yellow field of corn.
(iii) (c) Solitary
(iv) dotted
2. (i) Lencho compared the raindrops to ‘new coins’ because his crops were ready for harvest but they
needed a good downpour. With good rains, his crops will flourish and he would be able to sell the
harvest to earn money. The raindrops would make a good harvest and thereby bring new coins to
Lencho.
(ii) To keep the writer’s faith in God, the postmaster answered the letter. Upon reading Lencho’s request
for a hundred pesos, he asked for money from his employees and gave a part of his salary. He was
able to collect a little more than half the required amount and put the money in an envelope
addressed to Lencho.
(iii) When the postmaster read Lencho’s letter requesting God to send him hundred pesos, he was so
affected by it that he collected the money and signed the letter as God so that Lencho’s faith does
not get shaken. He wanted to keep Lencho’s faith in God alive and firm.
(iv) Lencho suspected that the people from the post office had taken his money.
The irony in this situation is that the people he thought took his money were the ones who were
contributing and sending him the money.
(v) No, Lencho did not try to find out who had sent the money to him.
The reason was that he could not believe that it could be anybody other than God who would send him
the money. His faith in God was so strong that he believed that only God had sent money to him.
(vi) According to me, if Lencho’s wife got to know about the letter she would not have supported his idea.
She would have preferred praying to God as a way to seek help. The woman would not have had such
blind faith as to think that she could send a mail to God. She would have considered the letter to be a
foolish act.
38 English Language and Literature Class 10
3. A. The postmaster is rightly depicted as a representative of God because he managed to collect money for
Lencho who was helpless at that time. As God can’t be physically present everywhere to help his children,
people believe that he relieves their sufferings through his representatives. Herein, that representative is
the postmaster who acts as the epitome of humanity.
When Lencho needed money he had written a letter to God asking for 100 pesos. The postmaster found
this letter and eventually decided on helping Lencho. He, using his salary and borrowed little amounts of
money from the other employees, collected 70 pesos and put them in an envelope addressing himself as
God so that Lencho’s faith in God was not broken. When Lencho was in trouble, the postmaster helped
him without looking for anything in return. So, in this way the postmaster was a representative of God.
B. Existence of the Humanity
The story ‘A Letter to God’ written by GL Fuentes reinforces our faith in humanity. After reading the
story, we come to know that there still are people who help others without any self-interest.
In the story, the postmaster and other post office employees illustrate an example of humanity and
kindness for others.
They were so moved by Lencho’s faith in God that they decided to help him to keep his faith alive and firm.
Even though it was not possible for them to collect hundred pesos, they managed to collect seventy pesos
and kept them in the envelope for Lencho. They signed on it ‘God’ to further reinforce Lencho’s sincere faith.
This act shows us the true picture of humanity and motivates us to be noble and kind.
(vi) Mandela always thought that both the oppressor and the oppressed are deprived of their humanity.
According to him, the oppressor is a prisoner of hatred and he is locked behind the bars of prejudice
and narrow mindedness. So, both of them need to be liberated. He always desired people to live with
dignity and respect.
3. A. Monday 24th August, 20XX
9:00 pm
Dear Diary
My heart is filled with sadness as I think of the oppressed who had to tolerate the inhuman attitude of the
oppressors in their own land. Indian farmers were forced by Britishers to grow indigo in place of rice in
their fields. It fetched a handsome amount of money for Britishers but the farmers had to survive on less
food and less income. The English looted the poor women’s dignity. No female was safe in the British era.
Tears roll down my eyes when I think of the physical and mental torture that our freedom fighters faced.
Everyone knows how cruel general Dyer turned a meeting into a massacre! These wounds are
deep-rooted in the hearts of every Indian which can never be healed.
Nelson
B. Discrimination on the basis of caste, creed, skin colour etc. is totally unjustified. The question which
arises in my mind is how one can decide if one is superior to others. Is their birth in the so called upper
caste a virtue for them?
Have the people of the so called lower caste committed some crime by being born into a low caste family?
Definitely not. When Nelson Mandela talks about how discrimination existed in his country one needs to
understand that there can be no convincing argument which proves that any discrimination is correct. We
live in a free society.
Every section of the society has equal rights. We can’t call ourselves free if social and racial segregation
exist in our country.
3. The story of the young seagull is a very good example for showing how fear can hold you as a prisoner. The
seagull is a bird. It is meant to fly. Without flying, it cannot survive. But the young seagull is so scared that it
doesn’t want to fly or even try to fly. He constantly fears that he would get hurt and stays hungry and helpless
on the cliff.
The same thing happens with humans also. Fear cripples one’s mind. We cannot live to our full potential if
we are caught in the shackles of fear. One should aim to be free from fear. If one wants to achieve success
in life, one has to fight one’s demons. Only then can one move ahead in life to reach one’s goal.
(iii) Mr. Keesing assigned Anne to write an essay. She wrote in her essay that talking was a necessary trait
for any student.
(iv) (a) An autobiographical account describing the author’s feelings and thought regarding an event in her
life.
2. (i) A good introduction helps to draw the reader’s attention. By providing a brief sketch of her life, Anne
gives an overview of herself, her family, her relatives and her surroundings. This helps the reader to
develop a connection with her.
(ii) Anne, while writing her diary, says that no one could understand her intensity of her love for her
grandmother. Moreover, the heart touching gesture of lighting up one candle for her grandmother on her
birthdays shows that she loved her grandmother.
(iii) Anne justified her being a chatterbox in her essay by explaining that talking was a student’s trait and
that she would try to cure it. But being talkative was incurable as she had inherited this trait from her
mother and no one could cure an inherited trait.
(iv) Anne was a talkative student in the class. She got punished by Mr. Keesing her maths teacher. He
asked her to write essays as a punishment which is learning in disguise because he wanted her to
focus on her studies.
(v) Mr. Keesing like most teachers seemed to be a strict teacher. But he actually believed in taking actions
with good intentions and for the development of children. He tried to control Anne’s bad habit of talking
too much. However, as soon as he was convinced that her habit did not affect her studies, he
overlooked Anne’s shortcoming.
(vi) Anne believes that no one would be interested in reading a diary of a 13-year old teenager. In addition,
she would not let anyone read her diary because she would share all her secrets with it.
These statements by Anne are ironical because after her death, her father Otto Frank published it and
then it was translated in many languages of the world. Today, it had become one of the most read
books of all time.
3. A. ‘From the Diary of Anne Frank’ clearly describes the teacher-student relationship, class atmosphere and
discipline. Anne, who talks a lot in the class, gets punished by Mr. Keesing, her Maths teacher. He gets
annoyed with her because of her talkative nature and gave her a punishment. He asked her to write
essays on the subject, ‘A Chatterbox’.
It was actually a blessing in disguise because he wanted her to focus on studies. He could not be blamed
for the punishment as he did it for the development of Anne. Thus, here the teacher-student relationship is
very respectful. Such a relationship is about discipline and classroom manners. These are essential for
every student as well as a teacher, otherwise both teaching and learning could be hampered.
This relationship is clearly shown in Mr. Keesing’s and Anne Frank’s actions. They both try to play a joke
on each other, but in a very humorous and healthy manner. So, this healthy relationship is needed in the
classroom for effective teaching and learning.
B. There is an old saying that an eye for an eye will make the whole world blind. This saying is absolutely true.
War is not a way to settle disputes. The whole world is a big family. Often in a family, disputes occur. But
we don’t fight with our family members or think ill of them. We try to settle our differences in a peaceful
manner.
The same approach should be applied to other affairs also. Anne’s story is based at the time of World War
II. It presents how a young girl lived a happy life and how war ruined it. War only brings destruction. There
are no winners in a war. All it leads to a loss of not only friends and family but also of peace and happiness.
(iii) When the children were pushed aside by the baker they climbed a bench or the parapet to peep into
the baker’s basket.
(iv) (b) A nostalgic remembrance of the daily routine of the narrator when he was a child.
2. (i) The phrase ’jackfruit-like appearance’ means having a plump physique, like a jackfruit. Such a
physique was linked to the bakers because they never starved. Baking was a profitable profession.
The baker and his family always looked happy and prosperous and had a jackfruit like appearance.
(ii) The baker’s furnace was essential in a traditional Goan village because different kinds of breads were
required for different occasions. Marriage gifts are meaningless without the sweet bread known as Bol.
The lady of the house must prepare sandwiches on the occasion of her daughter’s engagement.
(iii) The children were attracted to the sweet fragrance of the bread loaves. They liked to eat the bread
bangles or the special sweet breads meant for them. Moreover, they treated the baker as their friends,
companion and guide. So, they would run to meet him when he came.
(iv) The baker made his entry with the jingling sound of his especially made bamboo stick. His one hand
supported the basket on his head and the other hand banged the bamboo on the ground. It was like a
musical entry to get people’s attention.
3. Yes, I think that our traditions, heritage, values and practices are the roots that nourish us. They shape our
personality and provide us with emotional support. They make us mentally strong and enable us to face a
difficult situation. They even impact our behavioural pattern towards the other people in the society. The
story highlights the importance of the traditional practice of making breads at every occasion. In Goa,
every occasion is incomplete without bread. A marriage is incomplete if it does not include a sweet bread
known as ‘Bol’. All festival and feasts are incomplete without cakes and bolinhas. Even today, the elders
remember those famous breads baked by the Portuguese bakers.
From childhood till their old age, they remember the Portuguese bread. This shows that bread is an
important part of the Goan life that continues even today. Thus, our traditional practices keep our heritage
alive and also nourishes us.
(PART 2 : Coorg)
1. A. (i) (d) All of these
(ii) A long black coat with an embroidered waist-belt resembling the Kuffia is the point of similarlity
between the Kodavus and Arabs.
(iii) (c) A brochure which gives us a picture of the places’ culture, people and tourist destination.
(iv) In the given extract, the author’s tone is informative.
B. (i) (a) Into high energy adventurists
(ii) River rafting, canoeing, rappelling, rock-climbing and mountain-biking can be done in Coorg.
(iii) False
(iv) When in Coorg, the most laidback individuals change to become people who love participating in
adventure sports.
2. (i) One story about the descent of Kodagu is that they are descendants of Greeks or Arabs. A section of
Alexander’s army moved South along the coast and settled here. These people married among the
locals which influence their clothing, martial practices and marriage rituals and show a difference
from Hindu tradition.
(ii) Coorgis are said to belong to a valorous and hospitable race as their homes have tradition of
hospitality. There are innumerable tales of courage related to the people belonging to Coorg. In fact,
the Coorg Regiment is one of the most decorated in the Indian Army and the first Chief of the Indian
Army, General Cariappa, was a Coorgi. Even now, Kodavus are the only people in India permitted to
carry firearms without a licence.
(iii) The Coorgi tradition of courage and bravery has been recognised in India by awarding the Coorg
Regiment with the most number of gallantry awards.
Besides, the Coorgis are the only Indians allowed to carry guns without a licence. The first Chief of the
Indian Army, General Cariappa, was also a Coorgi.
(iv) The river Kaveri originates from the hills of Coorg. Mahaseer, a large freshwater fish are found in
abundance in its water. Kingfishers dive in this river for fish while elephants are bathed by their Mahout
in the river. Further, wild animals such as squirrels and langurs drop half-eaten fruit for the mischief of
enjoying the splash and ripple effect produced in the clear water.
Knowledge Assessment 43
3. As I stepped into the land of evergreen forests, I was blown away by the pristine beauty and lush greenery of
Coorg. The invigorating coffee and spices flavour reminds us that we are in a heavenly place. This land stands
in complete contrast to the concrete jungle that we can find in the city where I live. Its natural bounty, which is
full of coffee plantations, brings one at peace and releases all the stresses and worries of city life.
The land of Coorg has plenty to offer a nature lover like me. From the variety of species of flora and fauna
to the different adventure sports that the land offers, Coorg was a pleasant surprise for me. Not to forget,
the Tibetan culture of Bylakuppe was all that was needed to make my visit to Coorg worthwhile.
1. A. (i) The wise don’t grieve because they understand that death is inevitable. They understand that the all
hiving beings are afflicted with death and deary.
(ii) According to the extract, those who do not grieve are wise.
(iii) (d) An ox
(iv) therefore’
46 English Language and Literature Class 10
B. (i) The Buddha said the given lines in her sermon at Benares. in the extract, he highlights that no one in
this world can escape death.
(ii) (a) ripe fruits
(iii) Buddha means the awakened or the enlightened.
(iv) Buddha said about death and suffering that they are part and parcel of life. None can avoid this truth.
We have to meet our destined end one day. Whoever has come to the world, will die one day.
2. (i) Kisa Gotami went to the Buddha for help when she could not accept the reality of her son’s death.
Gautama Buddha asked her to bring a handful of mustard seeds from a house where death had never
occurred to show her that death is common to all.
(ii) When the Buddha had attained enlightenment, he renamed the tree as the Bodhi Tree (Tree of
Wisdom) and began to teach and share his new understandings. At that point, he became known as
the Buddha (the Awakened or the Enlightened).
(iii) While going for hunting Gautama saw a sick man, an aged man, a funeral procession and a monk
begging for alms.
These sights shocked him deeply and he realised that the world is full of sorrows.
(iv) One day while hunting, Prince Siddharatha saw a sick man, then an aged man, a funeral procession
and finally a monk begging for alms. Looking at this for the first time, he left the palace to search for
enlightenment and became a beggar.
(v) Kisa Gotami realised that life and death is a normal process when she went from house to house but
was unable to find one house where nobody had died. It was when she sat down that she realised that
death is common to everyone. Those who are born will die one day.
(vi) Siddhartha demonstrated compassion, kindness and his determination in his decision to leave behind
his family and princehood. He felt sympathetic towards others. He was disturbed to see people’s
sufferings and wanted to find out a solution to eradicate their sufferings and diseases.
3. A. Gautama Buddha was born in 563 BC in a royal family. His name was Siddhartha Gautama. At the age of
twelve, he was sent away for schooling. He studied all the sacred Hindu scriptures. At the age of sixteen,
he married a princess and later they had a son. He lived a royal life for ten years and was shielded from the
sufferings of the world.
However, when he was twenty five, he saw a sick man, then an aged man and a funeral procession.
Finally, he came across a monk begging for alms. This was his first encounter with the harsh realities of
life. These sights made him so sad that he decided to renounce the worldly pleasures. He left his family
and became a monk. He went out into the world to seek spiritual knowledge.
Siddhartha Gautama wandered for seven years in search of wisdom and truth. Finally, he sat down under
a big peepal tree to mediate. He vowed to stay there until he got enlightenment. After seven days,
Gautama got enlightenment. He became known as 'The Buddha' which means ‘enlightened’ or ‘the
awakened’. He began to teach and spread his message of wisdom and truth.
B. A little help and guidance to those who are experiencing grief definitely helps them understand and
overcome it. Kisa Gotami suffered due to the death of her beloved son. She wanted to bring him back to
life and, thus, went to Gautama Buddha. Gautama Buddha relieved her from her pain by his guidance
and kindness. The valuable lesson that he gave her helped her realise the truth of human life. As a result,
she understood that all men are mortal and one who is born is sure to die. She also understood that death
was common to all. She was relieved, as she was extended timely support and care that she needed.
2. (i) Lomov says that on the Marusinsky hunt, Guess ran neck-to-neck with the Count’s dog while Squeezer
was very much behind. Further, the dogs ran after a fox, but Squeezer went after a sheep to show that his
dog, Guess is better than her Squeezer.
(ii) ‘The Proposal’ is a very appropriate title. Lomov goes to Natalya’s house to propose marriage to her.
He doesn’t propose at once. It is only in the end that he proposes to Natalya who too wants this
marriage but is hindered due to their arguments.
(iii) At first, Chubukov suspected that Lomov had come to borrow money. Chubukov was not sincere when
he told Lomov that he had always loved him like his own son because he had decided not to give any
money to him.
(iv) When Natalya came to know that Lomov had come to propose her, she was shocked. Her angry stance
completely changed, she started crying and asked her father to fetch Lomov back. Her reaction pointed
that she had been wanting to marry him for a long time.
(v) To insult Lomov for not being a good hunter. Natalya says that he should go and lie on the kitchen
oven. She also adds that he should catch black beetles instead of foxes. Chubukov says that Lomov of
ought to sit at home with his palpitations.
(vi) Lomov wishes to propose to Natalya because he feels that she is an excellent housekeeper, not bad
looking and is also well-educated. Moreover, he feels that he is already thirty-five, which is a critical age
to lead a settled life.
3. A. It is true that the principle ‘forgive and forget’ is the foundation of all the cordial relationships in our society.
Any communication gap or misunderstandings develop better feeling which leads to enmity. In such
cases, one must sit together and resolve the issue calmly. One must learn to forgive another and forget
the issue.
In the play ‘The proposal', Anton Chekov conveys this message through two neighbours, Lomov and
Chubukov as well as Chubukov’s daughter Natalya. They started quarrelling over small issues. Initially,
the argument was about the ownership of Oxen Meadows. Then it was about their dogs. Their arguments
slowly developed into fights and they started abusing each other.
This damaged their relationship. Because of their quarrel, important issues were left behind. It was only
when Natalya came to know that Lomov had come to propose her then only the argument was left
behind. Natalya and Chubukov both asked for forgiveness and even forgot the initial argument. Hence, it
is essential to remember the principle of ‘forgive or forget’ if one wants to have cordial relationship with
others.
B. Neighbours must have a cordial relationship which Lomov and Natalya lacked. When Lomov came to
Chubukov’s house to ask for Natalya’s hand in marriage, Chubukov became extremely happy.
When Natalya entered the house, she also talked politely with Lomov. At the moment, when they started
talking about a stretch of land called ‘Oxen Meadows', they started arguing over its ownership claiming
the land to be theirs.
Chubukov also started arguing in favour of Natalya and cursed Lomov. As soon as this argument got
over, Lomov and Natalya again started arguing over whose dog was better. These arguments show that
they both lost their tempers on trivial issues and forgot about the marriage proposal.
They should have followed the principle of forgive and forget. They should have been courteous to each
other. They should not complaint and blame each other for trivial things. They should develop mutual
understanding and help each other.