Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tugas Pertemuan1-Accounting Theory
Tugas Pertemuan1-Accounting Theory
It would have been insane for US president Barack Obama not to nominate Ben
Bernanke to a second term as chairman of the Federal Reserve. The economics
dictated it, as did the politics.
We will never know whether the world might have suffered a depression if
Bernanke's Fed had not responded so aggressively.
Early this year, the Nobel Prize-winning economist and New York Times columnist
Paul Krugman issued depression warnings.
It is not that Bernanke's performance was flawless. Far from it. He made two
blunders. First, he didn't see the crisis coming. Even after the collapse of the
investment bank Bear Stearns in March 2008, he didn't foresee a widespread
financial panic or a savage recession.
In the summer of 2008, the economy was weakening but seemed-to Bernanke and
most economists-to be suffering from inflationary overheating. Consumer prices
were rising at a 5 per cent annual rate, oil was peaking at $147 a barrel.
Second, along with the then-treasury secretary Henry Paulson, Bernanke allowed
Lehman Brothers to go bankrupt in September. Both have said they lacked the
legal power to rescue Lehman and that no one wanted to buy it.
Although there were other actors, the Fed's interventions were decisive in
halting the panic. It is an open question whether any other Fed chairman detailed
knowledge of the Depression someone without Bernanke's would have been so bold
in supporting credit markets. Moreover, Bernanke's approach inspired similar
moves abroad. But this is also Bernanke's burden. If the Fed doesn't withdraw
all that extra credit quickly enough, it may spawn inflation. If it withdraws it too
quickly, it may subvert recovery.
Source: Excerpts from The Australian Financial Review, 27 August 2009, p. 63, www.afr.com
Questions
1. The article describes how a particular theoretical approach has been replaced
by another. Explain why one theory replaces another, and who, or what,
determines whether an existing theory survives.
2. Does the reintroduction of a theory mean that it should not have been replaced
in the first place?
BAGIAN 2-ESSAY