You are on page 1of 51

Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol.

5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

Where to Set Up a Unit Linked Life Insurance


Company in Europe
Andreas Svoboda a,*
a
Fernfachhochschule Schweiz (FFHS), Associated to The University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern
Switzerland (SUPSI)

ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT


Article History The insurance industry is one of the profitable and advanced business
sectors. The sector has stood the test of time as strong, sustainable
Submitted 12 Dec 2021
and stable investment of the years. Yet, before considering such an
Accepted 14 Dec 2021 investment, it is vital to engage in industry analysis and develop a
Available online 17 Jan 2022 proper understanding of the opportunities, challenges and drivers of
growth. The current report analyses the European Market with
JEL Classification respect to unit-linked insurance plans (ULIP) with a special focus on
G22 Luxembourg, whether the country is the best for such an insurance
O52 investment. A cross-comparison is done with Ireland and
F30 Liechtenstein in areas like assets managed, life insurance covers,
value premiums, general country profile (including laws, taxation,
M13
quality of life, availability of professionals, GDP, and the regulatory
environment). The data is collected from existing reports and surveys
Keywords (country and industry reports). Overall, Luxembourg emerges as the
Unit-Linked Life Insurance best candidate for ULIP, a country reportedly having the right
Luxembourg professional base, multilingual and multicultural. When compared to
Ireland and Liechtenstein, Luxembourg is the best fit for ULIPs or
Insurance
any wealth insurance because it serves as an insurance and financial
Premiums hub or centre not only for Europe but the world at large. Ease of
Investment doing business is excellent for Luxembourg and registering a
company provides more advantages than Ireland and Liechtenstein.
Luxembourg encourages cross-border employment and attracts
expertise, professional, and skills from multilingual neighbours. The
country has larger and considerate premium assets or insurance assets
while equally enjoyed in its jurisdiction are the many insurance and
reinsurance companies. Cross-border transfers are easier for
insurance premiums, with no tax charged on such transfers for ULIP.
Besides, Luxembourg is a strong regulator with its tripartite
agreement between the Bank, Insurance Company and the Superior
Authority. Hence, Luxembourg is identified as the best candidate.

Journal of Insurance and Financial Management

*Corresponding Author:
Andreas.svoboda@ffhs.ch

Author(s) retain copyright of the submitted paper (Please view the Copyright Notice of JIFM).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Journal of Insurance and Financial Management (ISSN-Canada: 2371-2112)


24 Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

1.0 Introduction

Insurance sector as an investment path remains one of the most admired and pursued business

opportunities (Eling & Jia, 2018). It holds an exceptional relevance in history, and has been

around for many centuries (Gaganis et. al., 2019). One of the reasons for choosing this path for

business venture is that it ranks among the few recession-proof industries. Therefore, individual

entrepreneurs or businesses are driven by the nature of the industry of remaining stable and

sustainable as a promising endeavour (Kaffash et. al., 2020), a prolific investment are for

protecting each nation’s valuable assets (Nicholson, 2019). Many willing and emerging

entrepreneurs would love to establish a company in a lucrative economy, especially regions

like the European market with the best regulatory instruments, tools, and environment for

safeguarding such investments.

The particular focus of this report is Unit Linked Insurance Plan (ULIP) as investments made

by considering the risks associated with capital markets (Ostrowska-Dankiewicz, 2017).

However, the asset risk in this security assortment is carried by the policy holder (Gupta, 2012).

Furthermore, the investment decisions are made by considering the future needs for funds

(Yuldashev, 2020). In so doing, insurance providers always focus on providing a variety of

unit-linked insurance products suitable for the investment goals, whether for health, retirement

plan, marriage, children’s education, or even investment purposes (Singh et. al., 2018). ULIP

is a broader or extensive product combining assurance cover and associated asset exposure

within a lone subscription (Dacev, 2017; Nagarajan et. al., 2013; Bosserhoff & Stadje, 2021).

ULIP can be used in different benefit pay-outs like education expenses, retirement income, and

life insurance (Vojinović et. al., 2018). Mostly, investors open ULIP for offering these

categories of coverage for their beneficiaries (Van der Heide, 2020). Therefore, with a contract

containing ULIP life insurance, a benefactor receives payments following the policy holder’s

death (Alhakim & Yohanes, 2017; Luca, 2018). The policy holder can commit the entirety of
Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73 25

his or her payment lump sum when purchasing the ULIP for the first time, then followed by

other arrangements like premium, semi-annual, monthly or annual remittances (Siregar et. al.,

2019; Nagarajan et. al., 2013). Yet, the uniqueness of ULIP is that they ensure elasticity to

investors who may possibly be fine-tuning their stock prediction in the entire investment

period. For example: when relying on the venture needs, investors can move between bond

funds, stock and diversified reserves (Bosserhoff & Stadje, 2019).

ULIP is suitable for those who have the need for closely tracking their investments, as they

also offer the flexibility of switching the investor’s capital between funds with varying risk-

return profiles (Poufinas & Michaelide, 2018). It is also suitable to those individuals with

medium to long-term investment horizon, ideal for those who are ready to stay invested for a

relatively longer period of time (Ostrowska-Dankiewicz, 2015). Equally, this is considered by

those individuals with varying risk profiles, because equity component varies from zero to a

maximum 100 per cent (Halder, 2020). In so doing, choices of funds are available for a variety

of investors or different types of investors, implying that they are applicable for investors across

different life stages.

1.1 Purpose and Objective

Given the opportunity presented in the insurance sector, the focus of this article is to evaluate,

assess, and identify the best place in Europe for an insurance company to be established.

Moreover, in this kind of environment, the premium payment is mainly once off and not

regular. The main aim of this investment (setting up the company) is to profit from tax deferral

in Europe. Therefore, the policy needs to be held in most countries until the holder reaches the

retirement age. With this, the policyholder can not only participate in the investment gains and

certain death coverage, but also benefit from deciding the inheritance clause according to local

legislation as some of the countries might have forced heirship rules. In addition, the heirs or
26 Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

beneficiaries of such an insurance policy might have tax benefits when receiving the money

upon the death of the insured person. Tax benefits include the deferrals and exemptions.

This analysis is focuses on the general economic condition in the country, including ease of

doing business, professionals available, languages spoken (whether language barrier exists),

social cohesion, work and life balance. Yet, of importance is evaluating the professional

qualifications of the country’s insurance professionals, and using the information to analyse

both qualitative and quantitative data of Luxembourg, Ireland and Liechtenstein’s insurance

sectors.

To address this issue, a country-comparison task pitting Luxembourg against Liechtenstein and

Ireland has been conducted. It compares the major pros and cons upon various topics, such as,

professionals available, languages spoken, regulatory, DTTs, and EU or European Economic

Area (EEA) passporting. This extensive analysis contributes to explaining whether and why

Luxembourg is the ideal place to set up an insurance company in Europe, or Ireland and

Liechtenstein are better suited as the best destination for establishing an insurance company

offering Unit-linked life insurance plans (ULIPs).

The ULIP are not retail life insurance; hence no regular premium payment and normally will

not be pooled (van der Heide, 2020). Therefore, the policyholder can decide the investments

according to the regulation in this country (Luca, 2018). Each policy will have a separate

account with the bank; hence, it is very easy to allocate the client’s asset. Meanwhile, of

consideration is the triangle of security which Luxembourg makes good advertisement with

(Alhakim & Yohanes, 2017). That is to say, in case of bankruptcy of the insurance company,

these policy assets are segregated and therefore do not fall into the bankrupt’s estate.
Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73 27

2.0 Materials and Methods

This exploratory study was based mainly on secondary data by reviewing documented reports,

country surveys, and analyses. The document analysis focuses on the general insurance (life

insurance) trends in Europe, including opportunities and challenges, prospects for investing the

particular market, and narrows down to Luxembourg. The analysis of documents (secondary

methodology) provides insight into the ULIP trends or general market in Europe and

Luxembourg, comparing the country to alternatives like Ireland and Liechtenstein.

3.0 Findings

3.2.0 Trends in the European Market

3.2.1 Europe’s General Insurance Market Trends: Opportunities and Challenges

First of all, the European life insurance industry experiences different challenges and emerging

opportunities owing to the changing demographic and technological trends (the emergence and

introduction of new technologies) (Borda et. al., 2020; Iqbal et al., 2017).

Firstly, there is the emergence of new technologies being used in claims and under-writing

management processes with transforms on the business practices targeted at life insurance

(Barbara et. al., 2017). Procuring a life cover product has become quicker and convenient than

ever imagined (Borda et al., 2020). Yet, with the new technologies leading to life insurance

sector digitalisation, new challenges and concerns have emerged owing to the need for new

approaches for managing risks and calculating premiums (Bohnert et. al., 2019).

The second identified trend is the demographic changes across Europe, especially the ageing

population. Health status of the populations has improved owing to the progresses in diagnostic

and medical technologies (Borda et. al., 2020). Moreover, the transition into healthy lifestyles
28 Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

and educational structure has increased the populations’ social awareness on health issues

(Arshad & Yusuf, 2021). All these changes prolong the life expectancy and have resulted in

more people living longer (Mitra, 2017). Yet, a lengthier lifespan expectation implies longer

retirement age to which the retired person’s financial needs equally increase, leading to the

amplified healthcare demands for the elderly (Borda et, al., 2020). This presents opportunity

for insurance firms as they can offer innovative health and life insurance products for

complementing social insurance and pension systems to manage this increasing longevity risk.

Third, gross written premiums for life insurance have been rising. Recently, the region reported

5.7% in Gross Written Premiums (GWPs) for life insurance, further defined by the insurance

having profit participation of around 3.8% as well as a 17.9% upsurge or growth increment in

other life insurance (EIOPA, 2019).

The fourth trend is the EEA return ratio targeting assets held in unit-linked and index-linked

assets plummeting from 8% in the year 2017 to a concerning low of -5% in 2018 (EIOPA,

2019). Yet, the concern was the significant differences in the insurance undertakings.

Furthermore, the returns were specifically reported to have been affected by costs.

The fifth trend is the growing insurance commissions in the European market. For instance, the

latest report has specified that from the 176 insurance undertaking experiencing the 5% growth

rate in 2018, around 122 of them had beyond or above the EEA weighted average of around

2.3% with another 64 having their rates of commissions beyond the non-weighted average of

the Member States amounting to 6.6% (EIOPA, 2019).

In summary, these trends across the European market points to the growing insurance market

with both life and non-life insurance reporting increasing penetration rates throughout the EEA.
Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73 29

Despite this outstanding growth, there are issues with complex unit-linked contracts that

continue to be a challenge for the national competent authorities (NCAs) (EIOPA, 2019). The

major issues are reported with these types of insurance premium covers, including limited

customer’s comprehension of the products, lack of transparency, conflict of interests, product

complexity, and inadequate returns, along with the overall increased selling of the unit-linked

policies to vulnerable customers or subscribers (Grima, 2020).

In Europe, there has been much focus on strengthening consumer protection, triggered by the

increasing market risks (Giantsios & Noulas, 2020). Investing in the European’s insurance

market or industry calls for focusing and understanding the associated market risks, especially

overregulation of the market along with the opportunities for innovating services and products

(Borda et. al., 2020). The focus should be on highlighting the necessary conditions or

opportunities for digitalization of the services including new categories of risks (Grima, 2020).

Yet, with new technologies, consumer protection and regulations, there are opportunities for

success in the European market.

A major challenge across Europe is that irrespective of improved practices in disclosure, which

is an insight from the customers, there have been noteworthy issues with product review and

product design processes (Relan, 2020). The area is set to attract new and major changes,

especially when the new Product Oversight and Governance (POG) necessities are set to be

implemented (Borda et. al., 2020). This, in essence, is a new regulatory requirement whereby

product manufacturers are being compelled or driven into accounting and considering

customer’s needs throughout the lifecycle of their products.

The European insurance has seen an emerging abuse and misselling insurance products. This

implies the need and search for various approaches for supervising and regulating the industry

(Borda et. al., 2020). It also means the need to focus on exploring and responding to these
30 Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

systematic connections including the increasing numbers of regulatory incentives (Pradhan et.

al., 2020). All these have profound implications for insurance companies in Europe, further

exacerbated by compliance risks. Furthermore, the market reports an increasing prevalence of

conduct issues associated with credit life or credit protection and unit-link insurance besides

add-on insurance products. Other notable trends in the region include the remaining concern

for claims management for the motor insurance covers (Borda et. al., 2020).

In summary, the general identified trends in the European market include: three major industry

trends of demographic and technological changes. Yet, for life insurance, the gross written

premium for life insurance have been rising but EEA return ratio for the assets held in index-

linked and unity-liked assets have plummeted over the years, but life insurance commissions

have risen or increased over the past.

3.2.2 Europe’s Life Insurance Sector

The market trend of the life insurance sector for the EEA has reported a growth. Yet, the unit-

linked and index-linked insurance continue to be representing the largest business line.

National Competent Authority (NCA) has been concerned about the complex unit-linked

contracts (EIOPA, 2019). When setting up an insurance company in Europe, some of major

areas include improper consumer understanding, lack of transparency, and the complexity of

the products (Flyverbom, 2017; Ostrowska-Dankiewicz, 2019). The new company or firm will

equally have to confront issues and challenges with conflicts of interests, product information,

management of claims, digitalization issues and concerns, customer segmentation, cross-

selling, financial education, advise provision, and product governance and administration

(EIOPA, 2019).
Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73 31

3.2.3 Unit-Linked Insurance Plans in Europe

The European market in general, report uniform patterns in ULIP covers, especially available

technical knowledge and expertise, good communications and relationships, efficient and fast

partner services (Dacev, 2017; Ostrowska-Dankiewicz, 2020). The market is generally defined

with the ability of managing complex cases, accuracy of customer reports, offering services

through digital channels, speedy operation procession, customer policy information easy

access, and customized customer reports user-friendly and quality client extranets (Vojinović

et al., 2018; Grishchenko, 2020).

Lombard International Group, (2021) carried out a wealth survey on ULIP and noted the

growing wealth assurance market, need for awareness and education on wealth assurance,

multi-faceted decision-making criteria as well as digitalisation imperative. The report noted

that around 30% of wealth professionals confirmed to over half of their clients using unit-linked

life insurance, with 57% of the respondents agreeing that these types of insurance covers are

good, recommending to clients when necessary and possible. The report also outlined a specific

issue with succession planning, the top motivating factor across wealth professionals for

recommending the ULIP.

However, the report identified and noted concerns with the need for education and awareness

on wealth assurance benefits. For instance, 26% of those interviewed noted how discretionary

managed accounts are the common ULIP alternative in wealth planning (Lombard International

Group, 2021). Secondly, the perceived set-up price was identified as the single most barriers

to choosing ULIP. Finally, from family officers, they admitted that the lack of knowledge and

complexity of the solutions, a part from costs, were second barriers to ULIP usage.
32 Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

The report also outlines the criteria that clients use in decision-making. For one, customers will

focus on quality of service as the most important criterion when identifying the most preferred

provider (Lombard International Group, 2021). Secondly, there is a need for digitalisation of

the services. There is the inherent need for improving digital services in the industry generally,

as the satisfactory score is only 2.89 out of a possible 5, as 1 is considered the highest score by

the wealth professionals (Lombard International Group, 2021). Besides, 75% of the wealth

professionals are expecting a very high digitalisation level in the coming year. Furthermore,

customer service technology is on demand including mobile technologies and cyber security

issues. These are some of the tech-enabled imperatives for ULIP offerings in the European

market.

Yet, the third issue is the complexity of the cases ranking among the most vital decision-making

issues. The advisers currently using ULIP noted that the chosen providers must prioritise the

advancement of the capabilities to manage complex cases. This includes provide detailed

insight into fees charged and offering the necessary support to the clients to adapt the speedily

changing or evolving regulatory environment.

Finally, the Lombard International Group report noted that the ULIP sector is expected to rise

in response to the opportunities and challenges presented by modern life. Particularly, the group

noted customer experience, market conditions, and regulations as the biggest challenges

confronting wealth professionals. Secondly, the report noted that around 70% of insurance

brokers have predicted an increment in ULIP usage in the next five years (Lombard

International Group, 2021). Key drivers of the industry include regulatory, tax and compliance

responsibilities as the primary motivators for choosing ULIP solutions in the near future.

In summary, the European market reports uniform patterns in ULIP covers but there is still

concerns over the need for education and awareness on associated benefits with wealth
Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73 33

assurance. The second trend issue is the need for digitalisation of services. Finally, there are

concerns over the complexity in the decision-making criteria for insurance covers. Despite

these challenges, the ULIP is expected to grow, owing to the owing the opportunities and

challenges of modern life that create the need for life insurance covers.

3.3.0 Overview of Luxembourg

3.3.1 General Overview of Luxembourg

Luxembourg is a nation that has ever incorporated the knowledge of its citizens and equally

the cross-border travellers along with immigrations from other parts of the world. The country

has leveraged their contribution and input towards its growth and development (Zhelyazkova

et. al., 2018). Luxembourg is multi-cultural with 70% of the workforce comprising

immigrations or better still, cross-border workers (Le Gourverment du Grand-duche de

Luxembourg, 2021). It enjoys around 200,000 cross-border commuters from France, Belgium,

and Germany working in the country. This implies a ready market for regional expatriates if

an insurance company established in the country. Particularly, France represents around 50%

of the country’s workforce, providing the largest contingent, followed by Belgium at 25% as

Germans constitute the last 25%. This means that 45% of foreign expatriates in Luxembourg

are cross-border domestic workers. Therefore, the country enjoys a readily available cross-

border or regional workforce that speaks major languages of Luxembourg, understands the

market, and equally has the necessary expertise for the insurance profession. The cross-border

workforce is complemented by the 10,000 international civil servants and officials (Le

Gourverment du Grand-duche de Luxembourg, 2021).

Any insurance company established in this country will benefit from its highly qualified

workforce. For instance, the World Economic Forum’s 2015 report had placed Luxembourg at
34 Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

the highest ranking due to the large skilled labour or workforce in the surveyed active

population (Le Gourverment du Grand-duche de Luxembourg, 2021). This also adds to the

ease of communicating, as there are French, Luxembourgish and German speakers but English

is equally widely spoken. Furthermore, it means that problems with language barrier may not

hinder a professional from working in the Luxembourg.

Luxembourg equally boasts of multilingual and international working environment. The

country has developed in main sectors including e-commerce, information, and communication

technology, and biotechnology while similarly encourages research and development

incentives or measures. The labour and economic attractiveness explains why Luxembourg

hosts several international industrial groups including Guardian, Dupont, Goodyear, and

ArcelorMittal. Yet, country is a financial centre playing a key role at the international level

with many European financial institutions located in the Luxembourg capital.

Economic conditions also make Luxembourg a better investment destination. For instance, the

unemployment rate in the country is below the European average, standing at 5.5% (Le

Gourverment du Grand-duche de Luxembourg, 2021). The country’s National Employment

Agency has been tasked with the responsibility of helping and linking jobseekers with the most

appropriate employment opportunities, along with helping employers to locate suitable staffs

that resonate with their business.

As the target country and focus for establishing the insurance company, Luxembourg could be

a choice where there is an excellent work-life balance with sporting and leisure activities. The

country boasts of scenic landscapes that allows cycling, hiking, and enjoyment of outdoor

activities possible. Hence, there are a myriad of opportunities for unwinding (Le Gourverment

du Grand-duche de Luxembourg, 2021). This is also the best place for foreigners to enjoy

sightseeing and nightlife, especially the Philharmonie concert renowned for international
Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73 35

performances. The small geographical scope similarly makes commuting around the country

easier, a country measuring 57 kilometres wide and 82 kilometres long. Any place in

Luxembourg is accessible by train, tram, bus, and car (Le Gourverment du Grand-duche de

Luxembourg, 2021). This is also considerably the best place for raising children and a foreigner

will not have a problem tagging his or her family along the work expedition. Furthermore, there

are day-care facilities and international schools network. It provides the opportunity for

children to learn more languages and this means the opportunity for developing a unique and

true international setting.

In summary, Luxembourg as a country exploits the knowledge and expertise of both citizens

and cross-borders in addition to immigrants worldwide. The country is multicultural and enjoys

a portfolio of multi-talented and skilled workforce from within, regionally and internationally.

Besides, the country has one of the lowest unemployment rates, below the European average.

Quality of life is also high with proper work-life balance, enabled through leisure and sporting

activities.

3.3.2 Professionals Available

Luxembourg enjoys a powerful economy that produces a constant movement of dissimilar,

safe, in addition to lucrative employment openings that can give an individual the job prospects

(Le Gourverment du Grand-duche de Luxembourg, 2021). The country is similarly a vivacious

commercial hub and pays homage to a number of European establishments, relying on

extremely experienced aptitudes for fuelling the circular, data-driven, and viable economy. The

key business sectors provide a ready market for insurance companies including automotive,

life science, space technologies, logistics, and Fintech, clean technologies along with being

tremendously linked and reliant on best-in-class ICT expansions (Le Gourverment du Grand-

duche de Luxembourg, 2021). The country similarly enjoys a booming construction sector,
36 Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

along with the extensively developed or advanced service sector. These opportunities and

aspects of economic growth and development explain why Luxembourg has been a target

destination for companies, corporations, and employees alike. The size of the country has been

attracting different talents worldwide, apparently ranked second with regards to talent

attraction globally along with the world leading in highly skilled employment (Le Gourverment

du Grand-duche de Luxembourg, 2021).

The availability of cross-border professionals is motivated by the stable and potent economy

producing an incessant influx of assorted, confident, as well as well-paying employment

openings (Le Gourverment du Grand-duche de Luxembourg, 2021). Luxembourg has been

recording a stably growing economy, documenting higher than the EU average economy

performance, posting an employment increment of over 50% in the last 15 years, enjoying one

of the world’s highest GDP per capita (Le Gourverment du Grand-duche de Luxembourg,

2021). This is reportedly one of the world’s safety places, with strong social cohesion,

favourable tax regime, and first-rate healthcare system suitable for highly skilled workforce.

The jobs in this country are covered under permanent contract; hence greater enjoy job security.

The quality of life in Luxembourg also makes the country the perfect destination for foreign

workers because it supports both sporting and leisure (Le Gourverment du Grand-duche de

Luxembourg, 2021). For instance, individuals have the choice and fun of enjoying outdoors,

cycling, hiking and every opportunity, especially weekends, is for unwinding. The country’s

Philharmonie concert provides opportunity for foreigners to engage with various international

artists and performers (Le Gourverment du Grand-duche de Luxembourg, 2021). The concert

correspondingly attracts a larger international artist base, especially bands. As mentioned

above, the relatively small size of the country makes it accessible conveniently for

professionals crossing over the neighbouring countries. Foreigners and expatriates would wish
Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73 37

moving with families to Luxembourg, as it provides favourable conditions for their own career

and their next generation (Le Gourverment du Grand-duche de Luxembourg, 2021).

Overall, Luxembourg has a powerful economy with able professionals attracted by the size of

the country and employment opportunities. There is a readily available cross-border

professional workforce and the country attracts a large number of global professionals (skilled

and experienced workforce from other parts of the world).

3.4.0 Country Comparisons: Luxembourg, Ireland, and Liechtenstein

3.4.1 Insurance Companies

With regards to the total number of the present insurance companies and reinsurance firms,

Luxemburg surpasses Ireland. For instance, by July 2018, Luxembourg had around 300

insurance companies, compared to 130 insurance companies in Ireland as of 2017

(Pourplanche, n.d). Besides, Luxembourg’s 52 companies offer life insurance and employees

around 2400 employees. This is higher than Ireland’s 32 companies offering international life

insurance (Pourplanche, n.d). Hence, in terms of the number of insurance companies,

Luxembourg is superior to Ireland and could be considered as a country with more

opportunities for establishing or building an insurance company.

In comparison, Liechtenstein only has 36 insurance companies, mainly in life insurance.

Reportedly, life insurers are enjoying a considerably strong retail business besides, innovate

risk insurance for private clients with high-net worth (Zgraggen, 2019). In Liechtenstein,

insurers are profiting from direct insurance treaty that the country has with Switzerland with

the opportunity of distributing insurance solutions from Liechtenstein and equally harness

these with the relevant laws in the specific target markets (Heiss, 2017). There are flexible,

innovative and Europe-compliant insurance solutions harmonised with the tax and legal
38 Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

statutory provisions of each target market have been the reason behind the growth and success

of Liechtenstein’s insurance market (Kraus et al., 2017). Besides, the Liechtenstein Insurance

Association, founded in 1999, is the umbrella organisation representing the different interests

of member companies at international and national levels (International Association of

Universities (IAU), 2019). Its objective, through a 33-member team, is for developing and

expanding Liechtenstein’s insurance centre.

In summary, Luxembourg has more insurance companies than Ireland and Liechtenstein

offering life insurance covers. This is an indication of a thriving sector and prospects for

success for any new establishment.

3.4.2 Assets under Management

Luxembourg enjoys a substantive amount and value of assets managed, with over 4.20 trillion

pounds being managed (Pourplanche, n.d). However, these are spread in over 70 centres in the

country, and two thirds are internationally distributed. In comparison, Ireland has 4.82 trillion

pounds of assets under management (Pourplanche, n.d). Although this value and volume is

larger than Luxembourg’s, the former enjoys a better position in insurance cover or

management with international distribution of its assets. In comparison, Liechtenstein’s asset

value for insurance companies was CHF 31 billion as of 2020 (Liechtenstein Finance, 2021).

Ireland has a larger asset value under management, although Luxembourg slightly higher than

Luxembourg’s 4.20 trillion pounds of assets as reported by Life Insurance 360 website

(Pourplanche, n.d)

3.4.3 New Business opportunities

The third perspective for comparing the countries is the new businesses that have been opened

in the recent years, evaluated based on company headquarter distributions within each country.
Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73 39

Luxembourg enjoyed major developments in 2018, with +2.9% new business opportunities or

openings regarding premiums (Pourplanche, n.d). This value amounted to between €22.50 and

€25.00 trillion in premium investments, including around €20.00 billion in terms of Full

Payment Submission (FPS) premiums.

Table 1: Units of Account Breakdown (average premium and share)

Source: (Pourplanche, n.d).

From Table 1, Luxembourg has been experiencing an overall decrease in its bonds in the past

or recent years, especially less than 5% in public sector ponds. Yet, the country still has a bigger

normal first-class 38,784,331 million as per written payments, from which life insurance

amounts to 23,840,743 (Pourplanche, n.d). This is lower than Ireland whose average total

written premiums were 15,410.3 billion, with 11, 841 billion written as life insurance

(Pourplanche, n.d). As such, Luxembourg’s average premiums as measured in terms of units

of account are lower and experiencing a downward spiral as compared to Ireland. No data exists

for Liechtenstein. In summary, Ireland’s new business opportunities for financial services are

slightly higher than Luxembourg, with no data for Liechtenstein.


40 Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

3.4.4 Security (Regulations)

In summary, all the countries have sound regulatory framework for the insurance sector. Yet,

Liechtenstein is not part of EU, although insurers can access it through Swiss laws to which

the country is part of Switzerland’s agreements on insurance laws. Particularly, Luxembourg

has the best regulatory framework, the triangle as a security triangle requiring each assurance

corporation to credit the technical assets of the policies with self-governing curator banks

thereby providing the necessary protection to the investors. This means stronger regulatory

protection for the insurance providers in the country.

As regards to the existing regulations to protect and provide insurance security, Luxemburg

outperforms Ireland. Luxembourg has a security triangle requiring each assurance corporation

to credit the technical assets of the policies with self-governing curator banks thereby providing

the necessary protection to the investors. This includes the tripartite agreement signed or

entered between the Bank, Insurance Company and the Superior Authority (the Commissariat

Aux Assurances). The regulatory requirement exists in Ireland under Article 9 of the Irish Law

(Pourplanche, n.d). This obligates or compels any Irish insurance firm with the similar

compulsion for depositing the technical capitals of the policies with self-regulating guardian

banks all for protecting the investors.

Furthermore, it is also interesting to compare these two from the perspective of super privilege

regulatory requirement or arrangement. In Luxembourg for instance, there is the law

compelling subscribers and policyholders as leading creditors when the corporation has been

confirmed insolvent. Hence, in an instance of the business’s isolated assets are not enough for

reimbursing policyholders or the subscribers, then the latter enjoys preferential right over other

assets. Yet, the country’s regulatory requirement or arrangement places some exceptions to the

privilege. The same applies in Ireland. Therefore, the two countries have the same super
Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73 41

privilege security or regulation. Yet, the only privilege and advantage that insurers have in

Luxembourg is that the country has established multi-currency life cover plans. Under such

arrangements, non-nationals are presented with the advantage of avoiding foreign exchange

risks.

Ireland and Luxembourg also compares to Lietchestein in terms of regulation, bringing

supervision laws for insurance to align with the expected European standards. As an EEA

member, any insurance company in the country can freely access the EEA (Naegele, 2008).

This means the business activities being subjected to EU-conformity insurance supervision.

There is also the agreement between the Principality of Liechtenstein on direct insurance

coming into force in January. The agreement allows Swiss and Liechtenstein insurance firms

to operate as direct insurers in each country, or in the respect other country. The regulatory

arrangement is an opportunity and advantage for non-domestic insurance companies in

accessing the Swiss market along with the EEA market through establishing subsidiaries in

Liechtenstein. The regulatory framework allows for offering insurance products or services on

a free market instead of using subsidiaries.

3.4. 5 Luxembourg vs. Ireland

Luxembourg and Ireland are best compared by looking at their financial hub capacities within

the international trading platform. Table outlines this comparison in terms of value of

premiums the two countries have in different markets and cross-border insurance opportunities

or investments.
42 Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

Table 2: Financial Hub Capacity (The International trading platform) (Pourplanche, n.d)

Comparison Luxembourg Ireland


criteria
Value of • French market: : €8, 085, 048, 299 Italian market: €14,418,508
premiums
• Nordic markets : €594,175, 497 €

• Spanish market: €475,982, 124. 57 Spanish market: €102,790

• Remaining EEA markets : €9, 979, German market: €141,220


88, 434

• German market : €1, 594, 825, 179 Remaining EEA markets : €254,79

• Italian market : €6,120, 291, 847 UK market: €2,161,244

• Belgian market : €1, 689, 595, 741.17 Non-EEA market : €136,769

• Portuguese market : €558, 182, 159,4

• Markets outside the EEA :


€7.402.623

Banking Services • The country has around 140 Ireland only has 58 banks
international banks offering various operating in the country
service including treasury, asset
reengineering, custody and funds and
banking services
• As regards passporting, it takes
European passport

Cross-border • Luxembourg is European’s hub or In comparison, Ireland has a


insurance centre for providing cross-border strategic international or
insurance and the country equally worldwide location
enjoys committed insurance regulator
• The country equally enjoys strategic
worldwide location and better than
other nations or countries with its
world class connectivity

Source: (Pourplanche, n.d)

Table 2 shows Luxembourg’s stronger international value premiums, with 8 billion premiums

in French Market, €475 million in the Spanish market compared to Ireland’s 102,790 in the
Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73 43

same country. For instance, Luxembourg has invested €1, 5594, 825, 179 compared to Ireland’s

€141,220 value premiums in the same market. Therefore, when compared with international

investment, Luxembourg enjoys greater value premiums than Ireland. Furthermore, the country

has€ 7,402,623 in value premiums beyond the EEA region unlike Ireland that does not have

such an investment. Luxembourg also has a strong banking sector, with 140 international banks

compared to 58 international banks in the country. Both countries are strategic international

business or investment locations. However, Luxembourg takes an upper hand as the European

financial hub providing cross-border insurance cover and equally strong or robust insurance

regulation. Hence, in terms of international financial trading platform, Luxembourg is superior.

3.4.6 Luxembourg vs. Liechtenstein

Liechtenstein is the second country of comparison in Europe. The country holds the history as

one of the nations that faced the devastating impacts of the world wars. However, one of the

main drivers of economic development in the country has been the low tax regimes spurring

the nation’s unique and outstanding economic growth. Other insights of consideration in this

country is the 2000 limitations and weaknesses in the banking regulatory oversight triggering

concerns over the loopholes of using the country’s financial institutions for laundering money.

Yet, through its anti-money laundering legislation as well as the Mutual Legal Assistance

Treaty effected between the country and the USA, the protection of financial institutions and

services has been improved in the state.

Liechtenstein, similar to Luxembourg, also has a highly and properly regulated insurance sector

or market under the Insurance Act of 2001. However, as the country has adopted part of the

Australian laws and obligations, the European and Austrian jurisdiction along with the

appropriate documentation must be reflected or considered when assessing and evaluating the

insurance contracts. A company being set up in Liechtenstein must also adhere to the
44 Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

established laws by the country’s Financial Market Authority (FMA) before entering into any

insurance contract. The FMA is tasked with the mandate of supervising insurance

intermediaries in the country and as such, guarantees the necessary or proper supervision for

the insurance cross-border activities. Other regulations include the Insurance Supervision Act

of 2015 as considerably relevant or of consideration when writing insurance contracts in the

country.

Table 3: Liechtenstein vs. Luxembourg (Quality of Life)

Liechtenstein Luxembourg

GDP 139,100 105,100

(per capita, in
Euro)
Unemployment 2.4% 5.8%

Rate

Top Tax rate 24.% 43.6%

Education 2.6% 3.9%

(in % of GDP)

Source: MyLifeElsewhere (2020)

As exhibited above in Table 3, compared to Luxemburg, Liechtenstein has a higher GDP per

capita – roughly 32.4% more GDP per capita. The unemployment rate is also much lower in

Liechtenstein – a normal employee in Liechtenstein has 58.6% less likelihood of becoming

unemployed, compared to that in Luxembourg. In respect of top tax rate, Liechtenstein

outperforms Luxembourg as well. As shown in Table 3 43.6% top tax rate Luxembourg, 24%

in Liechtenstein. It implies that an ordinary tax payer has 45% lower opportunity for paying

top tax rate in Liechtenstein as compared when he/she in Luxembourg. This provides a rather

favourable condition. However, Luxembourg invests more on education. 3.9% of the GDP is
Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73 45

spent on education, while Liechtenstein only 2.6%. It implies that Liechtenstein has 33.3% less

expenditure on education in comparison to Luxembourg.

The country’s insurance sector is equally highly regulated as that in Luxembourg. For instance,

Article 2 VersAG subjects companies into extensive insurance supervision, a provision that

equally applies or covers the reinsurance companies (MyLifeElsewhere, 2020).

There are also arrangements and considerations for foreign ownership. For instance, FMA must

be informed prior to writing undertaken or considered by the interest groups concerning the

intended sale or purchase of qualifying participations, which is around 10% set minimum in an

insurance company, whether indirect or direct (MyLifeElsewhere, 2020). Furthermore, every

intention to increase or sell qualifying participation have to be reported in writing when it

exceeds 50% share capital or voting rights of such a typology or insurance undertaking. The

foreign interested seller or purchaser not residing in Liechtenstein but with qualifying

participations, whether indirectly or directly, must make announcement about the delivery

address of the domicile. Moreover, FMA compels the need for providing ancillary information

when the interested individual purchase is operating as the legal entity from a third county,

especially foreign financial authority statement and clearance certification (MyLifeElsewhere,

2020). Liechtenstein is also considered a market with higher market access barriers owing to

the stringent regulatory requirements.

As opposed to Luxembourg, Liechtenstein charges tax on particular insurance premiums. For

instance, there is a 5% rate charged on cash premium, targeting 2.5% for life insurance (PwC,

2021). There is also no flexibility in currency transactions like in Luxembourg as the cash

premium held in foreign current must be converted into Swiss francs when the tax claims arise.
46 Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

Also considerate are the number of insurance companies in the market. A data analysis or

survey between 2011 and 2019 confirmed that there has been a decline in the market, with 37

companies operating as of 2019, both domestic and the total insurance market participation or

engagement in Liechtenstein (Statista, 2021). In country, the insurance premiums targeted for

policies held by the domestic portfolio being supervised and insurers are subjected to insurance

premiums tax. Furthermore, premium remittances for policies that are concluded by any

domestic policy holder with foreign non-supervised insurer also have to be subjected to the tax.

In summary, the striking point of comparison is GDP. Liechtenstein has a bigger GDP, all

attributed to its small population and size. Yet, Luxembourg has a considerably bigger GDP

with a larger percentage spent on education (to ensure professional and development).

3. 5. 0 Setting up a Business (Registering a Company)

The three countries can be compared on the basis of setting up a business, including the process

of registering a company and necessary requirements obligated for companies. This

comparison considers the advantages and disadvantages of registering a company in each

country.

3. 5. 1 Ireland’s Advantages

By registering a company in Ireland, the business has an opportunity to join the European

Economic Area (EEA). Ireland also uses Euro as a currency and the only English speaking EU

member after Brexit (Healy Consultants, 2021c). This also provides the strategic access to the

UK as the countries are sharing the same border. Irish employees can equally move through

and easily across the EU block where they can work and live.
Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73 47

Ireland enjoys law tax, with a 12.5% corporation tax rate, EEA’s third lowest after Hungary

and Bulgaria. Besides, outgoing overseas funds transfers enjoy the ease of legally eliminating

withholding tax, with annual corporation bill apparently reduced to 25% (Healy Consultants,

2021c). In the country, no withhold taxes are charged on a company established in Ireland for

the outbound payments for a maximum of 73 double taxation signatory countries. Furthermore,

the Irish Tax Authorities allow both phone and email communications, they are helpful,

providing clear information on tax rules as well as any clarification as regards tax laws.

Multinational Corporations operating in Ireland with subsidiaries have numerous benefits not

limited to 0% corporate tax rate (Healy Consultants, 2021c). When properly structured, a

company will enjoy tax-exemption from subsidiary dividends, foreign branch profits, royalty,

interest, and patent income. In the country, there are greater benefits including consolidated tax

returns filing exemption, along with the inter-company transfer of trading excesses

management expenses, losses and capital allowances. Any large Irish company or firm that has

been registered as non-resident enjoys benefits from the absence of ‘Thin Capitalization rules’.

Furthermore, a newly established company in the country is entitled to a grant of 10,000 euros

as a grant for each hired staff member from the long-term unemployed pool (Healy Consultants,

2021c). The employees also receive re-skilling courses and free re-training.

There are major benefits directed at foreign employees who are moving to Ireland for setting

up businesses, enjoy the low tax incentive, especially the 30% of more than 75, 000 euros salary

will be exempted from income tax (Healy Consultants, 2021c). Other advantages include the

no benefit-in-kind tax on employee accommodation, stock options, annual school fees,

employee flights back home, and subsistence costs. Foreign employees are also assigned to the

Special Assistance Relief Program (SARP), providing them with income tax relief.
48 Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

Setting up a company in Ireland, especially a multinational and foreign company provides

benefits with the accessibility with the larger number of quality labour assistance as hourly

labour cost is 30.5 euros, among the lowest in EU employers not legally mandated to provide

pensions for their employees, including other benefits like health care. Ireland equally enjoys

the third labour productivity in the EU (Healy Consultants, 2021c). This country also enjoys

the youngest population base, with around 55% of the Irish under 35 years of age, showing

excellent aptitude for interpretation, efficient collection and research information

dissemination. Besides, one million Irish are under full-time education, and around 48% of the

25-34 age back are reportedly third level qualified. Besides, over 520,000 of the Irish citizens

are multilingual, including French, Polish, Russian, German, Romanian, and Spanish (Healy

Consultants, 2021). Besides Swiss and EEA nations do not need a work permit or any visa

application to work in Ireland.

Finally, Ireland enjoys the position of being a technology hub, qualifying for knowledge

development box compliance by the OECD (Healy Consultants, 2021c). The country boasts of

a highly talented and skilled workforce in technology, science, and engineering. This level of

development has rendered the country the largest software developer. Besides, there is a

considerate support from the government through the Business & Technology Parks portfolio’s

strategic locations.

Therefore, registering a company in Ireland presents numerous benefits and advantages as part

of EEA, a strong current (Euro), strategic location for cross-border business, law tax,

government grants for new companies, foreign employee exemption from income tax, highly

skilled and professional multilingual labour force and a technology hub.


Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73 49

3.5. 2 Disadvantages of Ireland

Before setting up a company in Ireland, care should be taken to assess whether the company

will be subjected to Irish VAT for imported services and goods which goes up to a maximum

of 23%. There is also the 25% corporation tax to be charged on a limited company on annual

net profits for any passive income in local rents, or local investment income (Healy

Consultants, 2021c). Professionals or small tax residents in the country are equally exposed to

a 20% surcharge on rental income and undistributed investment. Accordingly, professional

services corporations will pay a 7.5% surcharge for their undistributed trading income. Any

Irish company as well as subsidiary firms are obligated by the regulator to submit their annual

financial statements to be reviewed and evaluated by an independent statutory audit

irrespective of their income levels. Before setting up a company in the country, company

secretary and resident director must be recruited, with a 25,000 (in euros) bond deposit with

the Irish Business Registrar.

Ireland’s work environment is defined by a complicated employer-employee relationship as

there is an 11.05% PSRI mandatory contribution by government employee (Healy Consultants,

2021c). Besides, the country has one of the strongest and powerful industrial unionization. The

employee is also obligated to compensate employees dismissed for redundancy. Employees

compel a mandatory attendance of the Employment Appeals Tribunals on unfair dismissals.

Besides income tax there is the unpopular punitive Universal Social Charge, reaching up to 8%

of their gross salary. Employees are also entitled to a maximum 48 hour average, including

overtime payments under the collective agreement (Healy Consultants, 2021c).

Ireland as a country is equally exposed to external shocks. Particularly, the country was worse

affected by Brexit regarding trade relations with the UK, leading to increased costs of trading.
50 Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

Furthermore, the country experiences the rising US protectionism reducing exports with

possible adverse effects on the country.

Therefore, Irish VAT tax, corporation tax, surcharge rental income tax, need to submit annual

financial statements and requirements for a resident directory and company secretary from the

country are prohibitive and bond deposits with the Irish Business Registrar are all prohibitive.

The situation is worsened by complex employer-employee relationships and also powerful

industrial unionization and concerns over external shocks drive away investments.

3.5. 3 Luxembourg Advantages

The associated and highlighted advantages are linked to the benefits of having a Luxembourg

company. For one, establishing a company in Luxembourg, a Luxembourg holding company

provides the associated benefits of the legal exemption for every local tax, including capital

gains, corporation, and withholding tax when the company holds a minimum 10% in an EU

resident share subsidiary for a 12-month continuous period (Healy Consultants, 2021b). The

tax incentive or vehicle is exploited in managing privately owned family investment portfolio.

A registered company in Luxembourg is only changed a 6% corporation ta for trademarks,

patents and registered designs. Furthermore, there is an advantage or enjoyment of zero

withholding tax charged on distribution payments. Furthermore, the country is both the World

Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) member and the EU. Hence, a company registered

in Luxembourg is the perfect way to holding internationally enforced intellectual property

rights. Other advantages are summarized as below:

• Luxembourg is the popular host country for the registration of European investment

funds as collective invest fund vehicles including SICAVs, all exempted from capital

gains, corporation and withholding tax


Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73 51

• Withholding taxes were eliminated by the European Union Parent Subsidiary on

divides to be remitted between companies in the region

• No withholding taxes charged on royalties, interest or technical service fees needed to

be paid for any non-resident firm

• SICAR law exempts withholding tax on dividends reimbursed to shareholders for a

private equity firm.

• Opportunity for foreign owned companies for invest in all business areas as there are

no restrictions

• There is a highly skilled workforce in Luxembourg, a workforce enjoying 99% literacy

rate, with a 90% technical advancement. Hence, employees are productive and

efficient

• As a registered EU member, the business registration in Luxembourg ensures

unrestricted access to EU as well as the Shenghen market area for 26 developed

countries

• A globally competitive economy, ranking 18th for the possible 141 position for global

competitiveness on Global Competitiveness Index (Healy Consultants, 2021b)

Overall, Tax exemptions, elimination of withholding tax, no tax on interests or royalties, and

no restrictions for foreign investment, globally competitive economy and EU membership all

makes Luxembourg the best destination for registering a company.

3.5.4 Luxembourg Disadvantages

Luxembourg is perceived as a tax haven by all the member states of EU. Hence, EU

membership implies the obligation of the country to withhold the legal exemptions or holidays

for any holding company. Secondly, by registering a Luxembourg as a subsidiary operating

locally, there is a requirement or obligation on business permits and equally obligated to ensure
52 Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

that there is a resident director (Healy Consultants, 2021b). Concerns have also been raised

about banking secrecy laws in Luxembourg, a major drawback for registering a company in

the country. The process of starting up a company in the country is considerably lengthy, taking

around three weeks and entirely a cumbersome process. Furthermore, major bottlenecks

associated with registering a company in Luxembourg include:

• Getting bank credit approvals is a complex process

• It is time-consuming to procure electricity in the country since it takes around 56

days to be connected

• There are no or little protection for investors. For instance, this country was ranked

at bottom 100 nations on investor protection

Overall, Luxembourg has a few disadvantages especially the complexity of getting credit

approvals, challenges with electricity access, limited investor protection. Business permit

requirements, bank secrecy laws, and a length process for establishing a business a company

in the country.

3.5.5 Liechtenstein Advantages

Registering a company in Liechtenstein comes with some advantages. For one, such a

registration, when properly outlined, enjoys a 2.5% effective corporate tax on the firm’s net

profits on global income related to trademarks, patents, and designs (Healy Consultants,

2021a). Furthermore, the country’s network of tax treaties provides incentives for reducing the

third country-imposed withholding tax. Besides, a business registered in Liechtenstein enjoys:

• Annual flat rate corporation tax of 12.5% charged on the firm’s net profits

• Free of withholding tax and capital gains tax


Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73 53

• Offering and providing services through EU and EEA as enabled by the Markets in

Financial Instruments Directive

• Investment income are free of local tax including royalties, dividends and interest

• Legal exemption from rental income from foreign dividends, real estate and capital

gains

A major advantage associated with Liechtenstein is its smallest size as a country and entirely

German-speaking nation not bordering Germany. Furthermore, the nation is renowned as the

efficient and discreet financial centre in Europe (Healy Consultants, 2021a). This makes it’s

the preferred and promising destination for establishing financial and banking service

businesses.

Generally, Liechtenstein enjoys low annual flat corporate tax, reduced third country-imposed

withholding tax, services offered through EEA and EU, free from local taxes and rental income

exemption from foreign real estate, dividends, and capital gains.

3.5.6 Liechtenstein Disadvantages

Liechtenstein’s law obligates all commercial entities in the country to have a residential

director, paid around 30,000 euros of capital shares with corporate directors not permitted

(Healy Consultants, 2021a). Businesses must submit their annual unaudited financial

statements to the Tax Authority of Liechtenstein. Furthermore, permission for doing business

is necessary and this comes as an obstacle or barrier that hinders business operations. Besides,

business registration is expensive in Liechtenstein, with yearly costs ranging from 15,000 euros

including tax and accounting fees, government license fees as well as the payment remitted to

the local director. It is also a concern that the country is signatory to limited double taxation

treaties. Besides, it is challenging minimizing global withholding tax when getting funds from
54 Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

subsidiaries outside Europe. The country is relatively small, with below 40,000 residents

(Dumienski, 2017). Besides, it enjoys low unemployment rate ranging to 1.9% (Healy

Consultants, 2021a). This implies that hiring employees will be a challenge. Employer’s issues

are further worsened by the higher skills and educational levels. The most concern is that the

country is not in EU, meaning that it is not part of the VAT Information Exchange System

(VIES). The nation equally adopts Swiss VAT laws while but uses its own VAT administration.

This means that methods used in charging VAT is complex.

Generally, registering a company in Liechtenstein comes with major disadvantages including

the need for a residential director, submitting unaudited financial statements to the relevant

authority, the need to have the permission for doing business, expensive registration process,

and small country size with a small population.

Summary

Despite the tax exemption advantages, registering a company in Ireland is associated with

major disadvantages. For instance, there is the concern over the complex employer-employee

relations, especially the 11.05% PSRI mandatory contribution that must be directed to the

government. Stronger unionization is equally a concern. Employees have a lot of powers in the

country. Besides, being exposed to external shocks is not good for business, especially reported

as the worse affected by Brexit as regards trade relations with the UK. Hence, costs of doing

business are high in the country.

Apart from these limited advantages, registering a company in Liechtenstein is entirely

expensive. The country is relatively small, with around 40,000 residents, which beats the logic

of the larger GDP. Accordingly, the low unemployment rate of 1.90% implies that it will be a
Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73 55

challenge to get or hire employees. The country is not an EU member and uses Swiss VAT tax

laws thereby complicating the VAT charging complex.

Tax exemptions make Luxembourg a better investment destination because of advantages that

a company will have in tax deferrals. There are no restrictions for foreign investment with no

taxes on royalties and interest. Besides, Luxembourg is a globally competitive economy which

makes it attract foreign direct investment (hence more insurance market). Besides, EU

membership makes the country the perfect destination with its relaxed passporting laws.

Stronger regulatory environment also makes the country the best for insurance investment.

3.6. 0 Ease of Doing Business

The three countries are also compared by focusing on ease of doing business, focusing on areas

like starting a business, taxes, cross-border trading, contract enforcement, and minority investor

protection.
56 Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

3. 6. 1 Luxembourg

Figure 1: Ease of doing business in Luxembourg (The World Bank, 2020b)

Figure 1 shows how Luxembourg ranks fairly in terms of ease of doing business, number 72

overall, with the scores for starting a business at 76. Although the protection of minority

investors is low, the country’s ranking for trading a cross borders is 1 and scores 100 overall.

This means that it is easier to set up a foreign company in Luxembourg and also attract cross-

border workers. Besides, contract enforcement scores high, 73.3, at number 18. This means

that enforcing insurance contracts will not be a problem in the country.


Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73 57

3.6.2 Ireland

Figure 2: Ease of Doing Business in Ireland (The World Bank, 2020a)

Figure 2 highlights how Ireland ranks fairly well in comparison to Luxembourg as the ease of

doing business score is 79.6, ranking 24 overall. The country fairs well in starting a business,

ranking 23rd, protection of minority investors at number 13, paying taxes 4th but ranks poorly

in enforcing contracts, 91st. Insurance covers and policies are about contract enforcement with

poor ranking in Ireland, this would not be the best destination for setting up an insurance

company offering ULIP.


58 Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

3.6.3 Liechtenstein

Figure 3: Ease of Doing Business in Liechtenstein (The World Bank, 2020c)

Doing business scores in Lietchtenstein is low, at 64.8 overall with a 73.0 scores on starting a

business as shown in Figure 3. Protecting minority investors also scores low, at 30.0, and scores

for contract enforcement is also low at 59.8.

Summary

Luxembourg scores better in terms of the ease of doing business, at position 72 overall with 76

points in terms of starting a business. The country ranks number 1 in cross-border trading and

contract enforcement scores 73.3 and number 18 overall. This compares to Ireland with a score

of 70.6 on ease of doing business and 24th position. Yet, a concern is the poor enforcement of

contract, as Ireland ranks 91st. This means there will be a challenge enforcing business contracts
Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73 59

and insurance claims. Liechtenstein scores lowest in terms of ease of doing business, 64.8

points. Furthermore, enforcing contracts criterion for Luxembourg scores low, only 59.8

compared to Luxembourg’s 73.3 points. Hence, overall, Luxembourg ranks better in terms of

ease of doing business especially contract enforcement.

4.0 Discussion: Why Luxembourg

The reports, evidence and analyses point to Luxembourg as a success and promising country

for life insurance. Although the European region continues to grapple with the Brexit challenge,

this country’s policies on insurance shows a major investment potential for the proposed

company. The implication is that the country encourages freedom in carrying life insurance.

Accordingly, Luxembourg is a nation that leverages the large single market advantage in

growing its insurance sector. The large single market has favourable passporting and gives the

passport for selling services beyond Luxembourg; in all other countries of the target single

market with over 500 million customers. This has been the investment focus and consideration

of the country and explains why the country is apparently the leading in cross-border life

insurance services. For instance, the country boasts of around 20 billion held in premiums and

demonstrates an increasing trend. Of profound consideration is the strong growth in non-life

insurance, recording a record growth of over 20% to hold 3 billion in premiums held.

Secondly, the attractiveness of Luxembourg is evident with its ranking as AAA+ country. As

such, insurers are most likely to focus on a safer country. The country, therefore, ranks among

the 10 triple-A countries. Another aspect or element that makes Luxembourg attractive is the

nation’s interesting wider product ranking which responds to different cultures, specific needs,

as well as the client’s languages. Therefore, the multiculturalism and multilingualism of the

country makes it attractive for setting up a foreign insurance company. In addition, financial

and world of insurance centres are linked. As a world and regional centre, this is attractive for
60 Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

both private banking as well as investment funds which complement the services offered by

life insurance.

Thirdly, setting up an insurance company in Luxembourg should also be subject to considering

and evaluating the impacts of Brexit. However, Luxembourg has been performing excellently

within the Brexit context. The country has been pushing for a soft Brexit which although

impossible, has not led to the burning of bridges with the UK. Luxembourg continues to make

and consider the concerted efforts for maintaining links and cooperating with the London

financial centre. For example, despite Brexit, in 2019, 11 insurance companies made the

decisions to set up in Luxembourg. This could only mean and point to the current situation in

Luxembourg, especially the already existing dynamic financial environment and centre.

Furthermore, Commissariat aux Assurances (CAA) is an able regulator specialized in dealing

with insurance issues. Although this regulator does not cover banks or investment funds, its

aim and focus has been on insurance.

Last but not least, the ever-increasing complexity of insurance products and their

personalisation contributes as an irreplaceable argument to makes Luxembourg a lucrative and

sound insurance destination. Luxembourg’s market is designed in a manner that everything is

being done and considered as possible for making the customers considerably happy. This is

reflected in the country’s insurance sector with commendable and amazing or satisfactory

results.

Before setting this company, opportunities and threats are equally of profound consideration in

Luxembourg. For instance, freedom to provide services within the insurance sector is firstly

affected by the opportunities in the economic digitalisation, which entails how companies

deliver the insurance services or benefits to their esteemed customers. E-commerce and

digitalisation imply more direct marketing whereby fewer intermediaries are involved. This is
Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73 61

a benefit or advantage to Luxembourg as a country with an exceedingly powerful and unique

data centre network, a properly and well-organised country and strategically located in Europe

thereby improving accessibility.

Another factor or area of profound consideration making Luxembourg an attractive country for

setting up an insurance company is that there has been the emergence of green finance. For

instance, this links to using life insurance and linking up the product or services to sustainable

finance. The country continues to be strongly involved or advocating for sustainable economy

as well as leveraging financial centres for realising the Paris Agreement on Climate Change

goals. The country is committed to promoting and investing in insurance products appealing to

the needs of the customers, especially their ecological demands like the ecological conscience

customers, which are considered as part of private interests by the customers.

However, investing in and establishing an insurance firm in the country also faces the profound

issues and challenges with threats, especially political and macroeconomic threats. One of the

challenges is the rising trade tension between China and the United States as well as the tension

between Europe and the US. The implication is that the freedom of providing the necessary

insurance services is enhanced by open markets policies and when the trade and economic

tensions among or between countries continue, the markets end up closing and that becomes

negative for the life insurance. Furthermore, there have been political tensions, especially with

the parliament elections in Europe. Despite these challenges, single market insurance services

continue unhinged and there is a greater growth prospect for the country’s life insurance sector.

4.1.0 Luxembourg Life Insurance Policy

Luxembourg as a country offers a life insurance policy through the Freedom to Provide

Services policy. Under this provision, the prudential law determines both the protection rules
62 Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

of the invested savings and the related or associated rules linked to the underlying investments

acceptance. This is the underlying or central life insurance law in Luxembourg. However, the

contractual side of the insurance policy (life insurance) is defined or determined by the place

of residence of the policyholder. Accordingly, in Luxembourg, the tax regimes are dependent

solely on the policyholder’s place of residence which in some cases the beneficiaries within an

international inheritance regime. Hence, the specific law related to the life insurance policy is

determined by the policyholder’s place of residence. One of the advantages in Luxembourg is

that the company will be benefit from tax deferment as the policy holder is not liable for tax.

Therefore, the country enjoys tax neutrality. For instance, when a policy holder is a French

resident, the policy is not referred to as Luxembourg policy. Rather, it should be viewed as a

French policy being executed by a life insurance company in Luxembourg to which the

Luxembourg’s prudential rules are applicable.

4.1.2 Life Insurance Laws in Luxembourg

When setting up an insurance company in Luxembourg, both the laws of the policyholder’s

residence and Luxembourg should be considered. For instance, for the policyholder’s country

of residence, laws including the contractual aspects and effects are confines to issues like right

of surrendering, the right of nominating a beneficiary, the ability of accepting the clause’s

irrevocability.

Yet in Luxembourg, the law focuses on the policy’s financial aspects. For instance, when

setting up an insurance company, the company and its customers are assured of laws protecting

the invested savings, including the status of the policyholder as the preferred creditor as well

as assets segregation. Furthermore, the country’s law protects their policyholder’s underlying

assets acceptance as provided under the Circular-Letter 15/3 of the Luxembourg Insurance

Authority - CAA. Another inherent law of consideration is the legal provisions in public
Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73 63

interest. These laws or provisions are more of concerned with the Luxembourg as a country,

including accounting, financial and prudential standards which are guided by the Home

Country Control rule.

Other legal provisions and considerations are taken within the context of international laws on

insurance coverage. For instance, with the signing of the Treaty of Rome, 1980, policyholders

have the freedom of choosing the relevant law aligned or aligning with their insurance policies.

Hence, they always consider from their home country. Also, of profound consideration in this

regard is the public interest regulations that align with the residence country of the

policyholder. Therefore, such rules are considered as applicable when they show profound

justifications, non-discriminatory, proportionately and objectively necessary for the pursued

objectives.

Investing in Luxembourg equally presents the opportunity of harnessing and leveraging the

opportunity of the available professionals in the insurance sector. For instance, the country has

insurance professionals with many years of experience in developing solutions and incentives

for meeting the challenges facing multinational corporations. Therefore, they are best suited in

the contemporary business environment that is defined and characterized by dynamism and

incessant changes or transformations. Moreover, these professionals operate or function as

highly mobile individuals and world citizens. With investment funds and banks, most insurers

have been exploiting the international expertise and talent from Luxembourg. They are

multilingual in nature with the sales team speaking the language of the client. Accordingly,

most of the professionals in Luxembourg understand and are well-versed with the skills and

expertise for providing insurance products for clients across the European region in compliance

with the local tax rules and regulations. Setting an insurance company in Luxembourg is a
64 Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

ticket to enjoying a prolific insurance market or environment with 91 insurance companies and

a host to 196 reinsurance corporations.

4.2.0 Luxembourg’s Dedicated Insurance Regulation

Another area of profound consideration that makes a country lucrative for insurance

development and investment is the regulatory environment. For instance, Luxembourg, as

shown from the above analysis is a country with a sound and constructive regulatory

environment along with supervisory quality (LuxembourgforFinance, 2021). As such, these

two elements and aspects of insurance market are key and crucial to the international insurance

companies and explain why Luxembourg is considered or chosen as a preferred EU base. CAA

oversees the insurers based in Luxembourg, a body considered as the best dedicated regulator

within the UE region. This offers protection to the investors through the enforcement of strict

conformity with EU and international standards. In so doing, the dedicated regulator provides

Luxembourg with the secure and advanced framework for safeguarding maximum security to

the customers.

4.2.1 Higher Investor Protection Levels

Another reason for choosing Luxembourg as the preferred destination or choice for setting up

an insurance company is its triangle of security. This security arrangement or set up offers and

provides an extra extent of investor security and protection, a unique arrangement within the

European region (LuxembourgforFinance, 2021). This triangle, as seen from the above

analysis, focuses on three major and sound elements. For one, the regulator is obliged to

approving the custodian bank choice of the insurer. Therefore, the regulator has the opportunity

or mandate of freezing the life insurance company’s assets when unforeseen uncertainty or

risks are evident or imminent (Rupeika-Apoga et al., 2020). Also, part of this triangle entails
Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73 65

the three-way contract between the regulator, insurance firm and the custodian bank specifying

that all three parties govern the custody of the assets (Merouani, 2018). Another form or aspect

of security comes from the consideration that all assets aligned to life insurance contracts have

to be separated from other assets of the insurance company and deposited in a different or

separate bank account. This type of arrangement protects or cushions the policyholder against

any form of uncertainty or risks in the market (LuxembourgforFinance, 2021). The final aspect

or element of the triangle is the custodian bank being obligated to separate assets that have

been linked to the life insurance contracts from the company’s other assets. In Luxembourg,

an insurance company enjoys the Super Privilege guarantee. Under such arrangement or

consideration, the insurance contract holders have a preferential claim over all involved parties

when a default occurs.

4.2.2 Life Insurance through sophisticated Management Tool

One major advantage of operating in Luxembourg is the country’s complex life insurance

contracts, presented or reported as the country’s international wealth management provision.

The implication is that the life insurance products and service offerings in Luxembourg are

unique since they provide better and unique protection levels for the sophisticated clients along

with their families (LuxembourgforFinance, 2021). Investing in this country will be the most

fruitful and prolific because the life insurance is backed by one of the strictest investor

protection jurisdiction worldwide through national law which equally has a higher flexibility.

In so doing, Luxembourg life insurance agreements or contracts are among the best incentives

and tools for managing assets and planning for succession (Rupeika-Apoga et al., 2020). The

success of managing insurance policies and products in this country is specifically attributed

to the international product portability along with investment flexibility, especially the contract

currency choice, product choices along with the possibility of combining contracts having
66 Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

different financial vehicles (Hou et al., 2012). This means that the asset management

approaches or solutions can be easily and conveniently adapted to the international lifestyle of

different policyholders in addition to permitting the organization of different portfolios

scattered throughout diverse geographical regions.

Furthermore, investing in Luxembourg is an advantage and opportunity for enjoying the

country’s long history as the major captive reinsurance centre. This is evidenced by many

international leading non-life insurers setting up EU continental hub in the country to ensure

that they can serve their European clients effectively. This include CAN Hardy, FM Global,

AIG, Swiss Re, Liberty Mutual along with Asian firms like Tokio Marine Japanese Sompo

International notwithstanding Aioi Nissay (LuxembourgforFinance, 2021).

4.3 Case Example

The case study on mobility of ULIP is provided by the Life Insurance 360 (2021). The context

of the case is of a French national who has been residing in Luxembourg as a tax resident. The

heirs are his two daughters who are French tax residents. The objective of the case is on

transferring the old man’s asset between Luxembourg and France, ensuring that his net equal

amounts have been inherited on equal basis by each daughter.

The first case of consideration is what happens upon the father’s death. This is a scenario of a

French national who has taken two insurance policies on his life as permitted by the

Luxembourg law. Therefore, each daughter has been nominated as a beneficiary. The first life

insurance policy (life insurance policy A) entails the father as the policy holder, and the assured

asset is his life (Father Life assured) and the first daughter is nominated as the beneficiary. The

second life insurance policy is Policy B for the second daughter.


Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73 67

Second scenario consideration is that five years later, one of the daughters has moved to

Luxembourg to pursue a career opportunity. Therefore, the father makes a decision on

redeeming policy A completely and making a gift to this daughter who has become a

Luxembourg resident. From this, the daughter reinvests the lump sum money by taking up a

life insurance under the Luxembourg insurance policy law (LifeInsurance360, 2021). This

creates life insurance policy C, with the first daughter becoming the policyholder, has assured

her life and first daughter beneficiaries. The term of this policy is more than 6 months and there

are no charged taxes on the surrender value.

After the father has reached 70 years, he has knowledge about his two daughters not expected

to receive the same amount upon his death. This is because there are differences in taxation

between France and Luxembourg. This prompts him to take up another new life insurance for

the daughter living in France as a French tax residence. He makes the decision of switching the

policies into investments in private equity funds. This is aimed at generating long-term capital

gain and also to ensure compensation for the difference between the two daughters regarding

the taxation. Therefore, the question to be asked is what will happen if the father dies 10 years

to come. Life Policy B (for the second daughter) and Life insurance policy D (which the father

took) will be remitted to the second daughter as the beneficiary. Therefore, contract D will be

about the premiums transferred to the second daughter as the beneficiary when the father was

below 70 years to the second daughter. This will include 15, 250 tax deductions in France, with

a 20% flat-rate tax for up to 700,000 policy value and above this, 31.5% (LifeInsurance360,

2021). Contract D include the premiums transferred after 70 years. This will include 30,500

tax deductions on the insurance premiums with an imposed up to 45% inheritance on the

premiums to be paid. Life insurance Policy C is for the first daughter who changed or

subscribed to life insurance under Luxembourg’s laws. She will keep the policy and there will

be no inheritance tax charged on her.


68 Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

When the father dies, lump sum death benefits will be paid without inheritance tax in

Luxembourg. When a daughter is living in Luxembourg and the father’s insurer is in

Luxembourg, the daughter has two options for following the claims (LifeInsurance360, 2021).

One of the options is keeping the policy under the prevailing Luxembourg law. Secondly, she

has the option of changing the applicable law so that France law can be adopted. In such a

scenario, she will be subjected to the tax laws or regimes in France as her country of residence.

Such an example shows the flexibility of the Luxembourg’s insurance regulatory environment.

5.0 Conclusion

Overall, setting up an insurance firm for offering life cover and non-life cover coverage in

Luxembourg should be subject to a proper understanding of the European insurance market.

Factors driving this market or product area include new technology for innovation, regulation,

and demographic changes. For example, technology means that the success of the venture will

depend on the degree and capacity of digitalizing the insurance service provision to the target

customers or audience. Many people now want easier and convenient services especially when

they want premium writing contracts and pursuing claims. Also, there is a demographic change

in the past decades as life expectancy continues to improve or increase in Europe. The general

notion or issue of consideration is that with many ageing populations, there is a call for

insurance companies to focus on product diversification and innovation to meet the change.

Yet, the most important factor is the regulator environment in Europe. Insurance as wealth is

all about the security that the firms provides or guarantees for the vested or invested premiums.

The European market has the necessary measures and incentives for protecting policyholder’s

insurance policies. This makes it a prolific and prospective market for any insurance business

set up.
Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73 69

The focus has been on Luxembourg, a country reportedly having the right professional base,

multilingual and multicultural. When compared to Ireland and Liechtenstein, Luxembourg is

the best fit for ULIPs or any wealth insurance because it serves as an insurance and financial

hub or centre not only for Europe but the world at large. Furthermore, there are many cross-

border professionals from France, Belgium, and Germany whom the company or business will

rely upon for professional skills, expertise, and experience. The country has larger and

considerate premium assets or insurance assets while equally enjoyed in its jurisdiction are the

many insurance and reinsurance companies. The ease of doing business is also a driving factor

as the country is home to different foreigners whose life and transition into the European nation

is made easier by the high quality of life. For the life insurance premiums and plans, cross-

border transfers are easier as the policyholder’s next of kin can choose the country or laws

which he or she wishes to apply. There are also no tax charges on such transfers and the

company will enjoy or benefits from such tax defers. The security triangle also protects

investors and Luxembourg is reported as a strong regulator that safeguards the investment of

different customers.

References

Albrecher, H., Bommier, A., Filipović, D., Koch-Medina, P., Loisel, S. and Schmeiser, H.,
2019. Insurance: models, digitalization, and data science. European Actuarial Journal,
9(2), pp.349-360.
Alhakim, M.R. and Yohanes, Y., 2017, August. Analysis of Value-Added Tax Treatment of
Unit Linked Life Insurance Services. In 6th International Accounting Conference (IAC
2017) (pp. 184-188). Atlantis Press.
Arshad, N.A. and Yusuf, M.M., 2021. A Systematic Review on The Insurability Risk for Long-
Term Care Insurance in Europe and Asia Countries. Malaysian Journal of Science
Health & Technology, 7(Special Issue).
Barbara, C., Cortis, D., Perotti, R., Sammut, C. and Vella, A., 2017. The european insurance
industry: A PEST analysis. International Journal of Financial Studies, 5(2), p.14.
Bohnert, A., Fritzsche, A. and Gregor, S., 2019. Digital agendas in the insurance industry: the
importance of comprehensive approaches. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-
Issues and Practice, 44(1), pp.1-19.
70 Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

Borda, M., Chmielowiec-Lewczuk, M. and Kwiecień, I., 2020. European Life Insurance
Market: Analysis of Current Situation and Development Prospects. In Life Insurance
in Europe (pp. 3-17). Springer, Cham.
Borda, M., Grima, S. and Kwiecień, I., 2020. Life Insurance in Europe. Springer.
Borda, M., Grima, S. and Kwiecień, I., 2020. Life Insurance in Europe. Springer.
Bosserhoff, F. and Stadje, M., 2019. Mean-variance hedging of unit linked life insurance
contracts in a jump-diffusion model. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.05534.
Bosserhoff, F. and Stadje, M., 2021. Time-consistent mean-variance investment with unit
linked life insurance contracts in a jump-diffusion setting. Insurance: Mathematics and
Economics.
Dacev, N., 2017. The necessity oflegal arrangement of unit-linked life insurance
products. UTMS Journal of Economics, 8(3), pp.259-269.
Eling, M. and Jia, R., 2018. Business failure, efficiency, and volatility: Evidence from the
European insurance industry. International Review of Financial Analysis, 59, pp.58-76.
Eling, M. and Lehmann, M., 2018. The impact of digitalization on the insurance value chain
and the insurability of risks. The Geneva papers on risk and insurance-issues and
practice, 43(3), pp.359-396.
European Insurance and Occupations Pension Authority, 2019.Consumer Trends 2019.
Viewed from
https://www.eiopa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/publications/reports/2019.6124-
eiopa_consumer-trends-report.pdf
Flyverbom, M., 2017. Datafication, transparency and trust in the digital domain. Trust at risk.
Implications for EU policies and institutions, pp.69-84.
Gaganis, C., Hasan, I., Papadimitri, P. and Tasiou, M., 2019. National culture and risk-taking:
Evidence from the insurance industry. Journal of Business Research, 97, pp.104-116.
Giantsios, D.G. and Noulas, A.G., 2020. Cost Efficiency and Convergence in the European
Nonlife Insurance Industry. Journal of Applied Finance and Banking, 10(6), pp.117-
133.
Grima, S., 2020. Life Insurance in Europe: Risk Analysis and Market Challenges. Springer
Nature.
Grishchenko, N., 2020. Social Determinants of Life Insurance in the European Union. In Life
Insurance in Europe (pp. 19-27). Springer, Cham.
Gupta, A., 2012. Unit linked insurance products (ULIPs)-Insurance or investment?. Procedia-
Social and Behavioral Sciences, 37, pp.67-85.
Halder, A., 2020. Risk Assessment and Quantification of Wealthsurance Equity Growth Fund
of IDBI Federal Life Insurance. International Journal of Management, 10(4), p.2019.
Healy Consultants, 2021c. Doing business in Liechtenstein in 2021. Viewed from
https://www.healyconsultants.com/liechtenstein-company-registration/
Healy consultants, 2021a. Doing business in Liechtenstein. Viewed from
https://www.healyconsultants.com/liechtenstein-company-registration/accounting-
legal/
Healy consultants, 2021b. Doing business in Luxembourg.
https://www.healyconsultants.com/luxembourg-company-registration/
Healy Consultants, 2021c. Doing Business in Ireland. Viewed from
https://www.healyconsultants.com/ireland-company-registration/
Hou, H., Cheng, S.Y. and Yu, C.P., 2012. Life insurance and Euro Zone's economic growth.
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 57, pp.126-131.
https://adem.public.lu/en/marche-emploi-luxembourg/panorama-marche-emploi.html
Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73 71

Iqbal, M., Novkaniza, F. and Novita, M., 2017, July. Pricing unit-linked insurance with
guaranteed benefit. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1862, No. 1, p. 030139). AIP
Publishing LLC.
Kaffash, S., Azizi, R., Huang, Y. and Zhu, J., 2020. A survey of data envelopment analysis
applications in the insurance industry 1993–2018. European Journal of Operational
Research, 284(3), pp.801-813.
Le Gourverment du Grand-duche de Luxembourg, 2021. Overview of the labour market.
Viewed from https://adem.public.lu/en/marche-emploi-luxembourg/panorama-
marche-emploi.html
Liechtenstein Finance, (2021). Viewed from https://www.finance.li/en/insurance-companies/
LifeInsurance360, 2021. Viewed from https://www.life-insurance360.com/en/freedom-
provide-services/A-comparison-of-financial-centres-Luxembourg-and-Ireland
Lombard International Group, 2021, March. The European Wealth Assurance Report.
Retrieved from https://eu.lombardinternational.com/en-GB/Newsroom/News-
Insights/News-2021/european-wealth-assurance-survey-report-unveiled
Luca, D., 2018. Does prevention as an investment strategy explain the intention to purchase
guarantees for unit-linked life insurance?. Journal of Financial Services
Marketing, 23(3), pp.153-167.
Luca, D., 2018. Does prevention as an investment strategy explain the intention to purchase
guarantees for unit-linked life insurance?. Journal of Financial Services
Marketing, 23(3), pp.153-167.
LuxembourgforFinance, (2021). Insurance. Viewed from
https://www.luxembourgforfinance.com/en/financial-centre/insurance/
Łyskawa, K., Kędra, A., Klapkiv, L. and Klapkiv, J., 2019, May. Digitalization in insurance
companies. In International Scientific Conference: Contemporary Issues In Business,
Management And Economics Engineering (pp. 9-10).
Mitra, A., 2017. Influencers of Life Insurance Investments--Empirical Evidence from Europe.
Australasian Accounting Business & Finance Journal, 11(3).
MyLifeElsewhere, 2020. Quality of life comparison. Viewed from
https://www.mylifeelsewhere.com/compare/luxembourg/liechtenstein
Naegele, P. (2008). Liechtenstein: Liechtenstein insurance center. Viewed from
https://www.mondaq.com/insurance-laws-and-products/70582/liechtenstein-
insurance-centre
Nagarajan, G., Ali, M.A.A. and Sathyanarayana, M.N., 2013. A Study on Performance of Unit-
Linked Insurance Plans (ULIP) Offered By Indian Private Insurance
Companies. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social
Sciences, 2(8), pp.114-127.
Nicholson, J.E., 2019. Challenges for the Insurance Industry in the Future. Journal of
Insurance Regulation, 38(6).
Ostrowska-Dankiewicz, A., 2015. The Research on the effectiveness of unit-linked insurance
plans. Wiadomości Ubezpieczeniowe, 4, pp.53-62.
Ostrowska-Dankiewicz, A., 2017. The Polish life insurance market in view of consumer
protection issues. Rozprawy Ubezpieczeniowe. Konsument na rynku usług
finansowych, 3(25), pp.87-99.
Ostrowska-Dankiewicz, A., 2019. Consumer protection policy in the Polish life insurance
market in the aspect of current legal regulations.“. Investment Management and
Financial Innovations, 16(4), pp.168-180.
Ostrowska-Dankiewicz, A., 2020. A New Model of Investment Life Insurance Distribution in
the Context of Consumer Protection EU Policy. In Life Insurance in Europe (pp. 73-
86). Springer, Cham.
72 Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73

Poufinas, T. and Michaelide, G., 2018. Determinants of life insurance policy


surrenders. Modern Economy, 9(8), pp.1400-1422.
Pourplanche, M. (n.d). A comparison of financial centers: Luxembourg and Ireland. Viewed
from https://www.life-insurance360.com/en/freedom-provide-services/A-comparison-
of-financial-centres-Luxembourg-and-Ireland
Pradhan, R.P., Arvin, M.B., Nair, M. and Bennett, S.E., 2020. Unveiling the causal
relationships among banking competition, stock and insurance market development,
and economic growth in Europe. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 55,
pp.74-87.
PwC, 2021. Corporate - Other taxes. Retrieved from
https://taxsummaries.pwc.com/liechtenstein/corporate/other-taxes
Relan, M., 2020. Digitalization in the Bancassurance Model of Distribution-Opportunities and
Challenges. Bimaquest, 20(3).
Singh, P.K., Nasa, P.T. and Nasa, H., 2018. A Study of Awareness of Common Investors about
SENSEX & NAV Indices of Unit Linked Insurance Plans. Research Bulletin, 44(2),
pp.13-24.
Siregar, S., Kholis, N. and Nasution, M.Y., 2019. Measuring the Benefit of Islamic Unit Linked
for Customer by ANP (Analytic Network Process). Journal of Islamic Economics
Lariba, 4(2), pp.57-70.
Statista, 2021. Number of companies operating on the insurance market in Liechtenstein from
2011 to 2019. Viewed from https://www.statista.com/statistics/421987/number-of-
companies-operating-liechtenstein-insurance-market/
Tedesco, S., Barton, J. and O’Flynn, B., 2017. A review of activity trackers for senior citizens:
Research perspectives, commercial landscape and the role of the insurance industry.
Sensors, 17(6), p.1277.
The World Bank, 2021a. Ease of doing business in Ireland. Viewed from
https://www.doingbusiness.org/en/data/exploreeconomies/ireland
The World Bank, 2021c. Ease of doing business in Liechtenstein. Viewed from
https://www.doingbusiness.org/en/data/exploreeconomies/liechtenstein
The World Bank, 2021b. Ease of doing business in Luxembourg. Viewed from
https://www.doingbusiness.org/en/data/exploreeconomies/luxembourg/
Van der Heide, A., 2020. Making financial uncertainty count: Unit‐linked insurance,
investment and the individualisation of financial risk in British life insurance. The
British Journal of Sociology, 71(5), pp.985-999.
Vojinović, Ž., Zelenović, V. and Savai, A., 2018. Life insurance linked to investment units:
Comparison of the Serbian and Hungarian markets. Anali Ekonomskog fakulteta u
Subotici, (39), pp.171-185.
Vojinović, Ž., Zelenović, V. and Savai, A., 2018. Life insurance linked to investment units:
Comparison of the Serbian and Hungarian markets. Anali Ekonomskog fakulteta u
Subotici, (39), pp.171-185.
Yuldashev, O., 2020. Development prospects of investment insurance product “Unit-
Linked”. International Finance and Accounting, 2020(5), p.5.
Zhelyazkova, N., Loutsch, M., Berger, F. and Valentova, M., 2018. Luxembourg country note.
In International Review of Leave Policies and Research 2018 (pp. 270-278).
International Network on Leave Policies & Research.
Rupeika-Apoga, R., Romānova, I. and Grima, S., 2020. The Challenges Faced by Life
Insurance Companies in the Baltic States. In Life Insurance in Europe (pp. 29-44).
Springer, Cham.
Merouani, W., 2018. How Patient are Consumers? Evidence from Luxembourg Wealth Study
(No. 28). LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
Svoboda A. / Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, Vol. 5, Issue 2 (2022) 23-73 73

International Association of Universities (IAU), 2019. Liechtenstein. International Handbook


of Universities 2019, pp.3965-3967.
Zgraggen, R.R., 2019, June. Cyber Security Supervision in the Insurance Sector: Smart
Contracts and Chosen Issues. In 2019 International Conference on Cyber Security and
Protection of Digital Services (Cyber Security) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
Heiss, H., 2017. Liechtenstein. In Encyclopedia of Private International Law (pp. 2277-2286).
Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Kraus, S., Schmid, J. and Gast, J., 2017. Innovation through coopetition: An analysis of small-
and medium-sized trust companies operating in the Liechtenstein financial centre.
International Journal of Business Science & Applied Management (IJBSAM), 12(1),
pp.44-60.
Dumienski, Z., 2017. Political survival and economic development in microstates: The cases
of Liechtenstein, the Cook Islands and Niue (Doctoral dissertation, ResearchSpace@
Auckland).

You might also like