You are on page 1of 10

Research

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi respond to the substrate pH


Blackwell Science, Ltd

of their extraradical mycelium by altered growth and root


colonization
Ingrid M. van Aarle, Pål Axel Olsson and Bengt Söderström
Department of Microbial Ecology, Ecology Building, Lund University, SE–223 62 Lund, Sweden

Summary

Author for correspondence: • To test the response of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi to a difference in soil
Ingrid M. van Aarle pH, the extraradical mycelium of Scutellospora calospora or Glomus intraradices, in
Tel: + 46 46 2223760 association with Plantago lanceolata, was exposed to two different pH treatments,
Fax: + 46 46 2224158
Email: Ingrid.van_Aarle@mbioekol.lu.se
while the root substrate pH was left unchanged.
• Seedlings of P. lanceolata, colonized by one or other of the fungal symbionts, and
Received: 12 November 2001
nonmycorrhizal controls, were grown in mesh bags placed in pots containing pH-
Accepted: 5 March 2002
buffered sand (pH around 5 or 6). The systems were harvested at approximately
2-wk intervals between 20 and 80 d.
• Both fungi formed more extraradical mycelium at the higher pH. Glomus intra-
radices formed almost no detectable extraradical mycelium at lower pH. The extra-
radical mycelium of S. calospora had higher acid phosphatase activity than that of
G. intraradices. Total AM root colonization decreased for both fungi at the higher
pH, and high pH also reduced arbuscule and vesicle formation in G. intraradices.
• In conclusion, soil pH influences AM root colonization as well as the growth and
phosphatase activities of extraradical mycelium, although the two fungi responded
differently.

Key words: arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, extraradical mycelium, Glomus intra-


radices, pH, phosphatase activity, root colonization, Scutellospora calospora.

© New Phytologist (2002) 155: 173–182

extraradical mycelium may also be of importance (Jakobsen


Introduction et al., 1992a; Boddington & Dodd, 1998). The positive
In nature, there is a large variation in plant growth and effects of AM fungi on plant growth have often been related
phosphorus uptake in response to colonization by different to an increased uptake of less mobile nutrients, especially
arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi (Ravnskov & Jakobsen, phosphorus (Bolan, 1991), from soil regions not accessible to
1995; van der Heijden et al., 1998a,b). The AM fungal the root hairs. Whether AM fungal phosphatase activities
isolates differ in their phosphorus uptake efficiency (Jakobsen contribute significantly to the phosphorus nutrition of AM
et al., 1992a; Joner & Jakobsen, 1994), and in their supply of plants is still unclear (Joner et al., 2000).
phosphorus to their host ( Jakobsen et al., 1992b; Pearson & The observed differences in plant response to AM coloni-
Jakobsen, 1993). Most AM fungi increase the phosphorus zation may not only result from the use of different plant hosts
content of plants, although some, such as Scutellospora or fungal isolates, but may also result from variations in envi-
calospora, are often rather inefficient in phosphorus transport ronmental conditions. For example, three Glomus isolates
to the host plant, and in some plants no, or only a small, exhibited similar efficiencies in mineral acquisition when
growth response can be seen ( Jakobsen et al., 1992a). These grown in acidic soils, but their efficiencies differed when they
variations may be the result of differences in fungal root were grown in alkaline soil (Clark & Zeto, 1996b). Soil pH is
colonization or physiological characteristics, but the ability of known to have considerable influence on plant growth in
different AM fungal isolates to produce different amounts of particular because it influences the mobilization, and thus the

© New Phytologist (2002) 155: 173–182 www.newphytologist.com 173


14698137, 2002, 1, Downloaded from https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00439.x by UFRB - Universidade Federal do Reconcavo da Bahia, Wiley Online Library on [14/08/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
174 Research

availability, of nutrients (Haynes, 1990; Marschner, 1995). moraine clay loam (Jakobsen & Nielsen, 1983) and river sand
Also, root colonization and the ability to form extraradical (1 : 1), which had been irradiated (10 kGy) to eliminate
mycelium were changed when AM fungi were grown with indigenous AM fungi. Inoculum (soil–root mixture) of either
their host plants in soils of different pH (Abbott & Robson, S. calospora (Nicol. & Gerd.) Walker & Sanders (BEG 43) or
1985; Porter et al., 1987). However, in these studies, the AM G. intraradices Schenck & Smith (BEG 87) was mixed into
fungal extraradical mycelium and the plant roots were both the growth medium in the proportions 1 : 14. Scutellospora
exposed to the pH treatment. calospora was originally isolated from a Mediterranean
To test the response of AM fungi specifically to a difference grassland with a pH of 4.4 in Western Australia and G.
in soil pH, we allowed the hyphae of S. calospora and Glomus intraradices from a temperate grassland with a pH of 6.0 in
intraradices, in association with Plantago lanceolata, to grow Denmark. One-hundred and fifty grams of the soil/inoculum
out into root-free compartments at different pH values. We mixture were added to the mesh bags with a mesh size of
studied not only the amount of extraradical mycelium formed 20 µm. For the non-mycorrhizal controls, 150 g of the soil
at different pH values, but also its phosphatase activities. without inoculum were used. Nutrients were added to the
Since effects of a pH treatment may also be caused indirectly growth medium as described by Olsson et al. (1996). Bacterial
by the interactions with saprotrophic fungi and bacteria (Olsson inoculum was added as a soil extract from pots with
et al., 1998; Ravnskov & Jakobsen, 1999), we also estimated nonmycorrhizal Cucumis sativus L. plants. The mesh bags
their biomass. Furthermore, we studied the possible influence were moistened with distilled water to a water-holding
of the different pH treatments on total AM colonization of capacity of 60%.
the roots and the distribution of internal fungal structures. Seeds of P. lanceolata L. were surface-sterilized for 15 min
in 5% calcium hypochlorite solution, washed with water and
transferred to Petri dishes containing moistened filter paper.
Materials and Methods The seeds were pregerminated at room temperature for 7 d in
the dark and subsequently for 4 d in daylight. After germina-
Experimental set-up
tion, four seedlings were transplanted into each mesh bag,
Plantago lanceolata L. was grown in soil-filled mesh bags (root and the surface of the pots was covered with plastic pellets to
compartment) placed centrally in a pot and surrounded with reduce evaporation. The plants were grown in a greenhouse
quartz sand (hyphal compartment). Four hundred grams of at an average temperature of 28°C during the day, and 20°C
acid-washed sand, at a pH adjusted to 5 or 6, were used for at night (16-h day, photosynthetic photon flux density of
each pot. To establish the lower pH of the sand, it was flushed 150 µmol m−2 s−1 and a relative humidity of 60%). The sys-
with 1.0 l of a 1 mM 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulphonic acid tem was maintained at a water-holding capacity of 60% by
(MES) buffer adjusted to pH 4 over a 24-h period. For the watering the root compartment with distilled water, and the
higher pH, a MES buffer adjusted to pH 7 was used. The sand hyphal compartment with a 0.5 mM MES buffer, set at either
was air-dried to a water-holding capacity of 60%. The growth pH 4 or pH 7, which maintained the pH of the sand at 5 or
medium used for the root compartment was a mixture of a 6, respectively (Table 1). Sets of four pots of each fungal

Table 1 The pH of the hyphal and root


pH (in H2O; n = 3) compartments at the different harvesting
times
Scutellospora Glomus
Nonmycorrhizal calospora intraradices

Compartment Time (d) Low High Low High Low High

Hyphal 20 5.25 6.17* 4.92 6.08* 4.64 5.98*


32 5.04 5.88* 4.61 5.96* 4.54 5.64*
53 4.93 5.43 4.48 5.53* 4.50 5.53*
67 5.08 5.94* 4.83 5.68* 4.79 5.99*
80 4.96 6.02* 5.19 6.06* 4.73 6.13*

Root 20 7.12 7.07 6.91 6.88 6.92 6.91


32 6.89 6.94 6.62 6.89* 6.74 7.03
53 6.61 6.76 6.30 6.65 6.52 6.85*
67 6.26 6.43 6.00 6.48* 6.13 6.41
80 6.06 6.14 5.86 6.06 5.69 6.11

Means marked with an asterisk are significantly different (P < 0.05) for low- and high pH
treatment (two-tailed t-test with unequal variances). Low, low pH treatment; High, high pH
treatment.

www.newphytologist.com © New Phytologist (2002) 155: 173–182


14698137, 2002, 1, Downloaded from https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00439.x by UFRB - Universidade Federal do Reconcavo da Bahia, Wiley Online Library on [14/08/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Research 175

(nonmycorrhizal, S. calospora or G. intraradices) at each pH determination alkaline buffer solution was used (1.5 mol 2-
(low or high) treatment were randomly distributed over amino-2-methyl-1-propanol l −1, pH 10.3; Sigma), and for
plastic trays with transparent covers to prevent contamination the ACP determination citrate buffer (90 mM citrate and
between treatments. These trays, containing in total 90 pots, 10 mM chloride, pH 4.8; Sigma). Adding 2 ml 0.05 M
were distributed at random in the glasshouse. Pots and growth NaOH to the ALP solution or 1 ml 0.1 M NaOH to the ACP
propagators were regularly redistributed. solution after 2 h stopped the reaction. Substrate suspensions
At 20, 32, 53, 67 and 80 d after transplantation, three ran- of each of the fungal treatments were deactivated by heating
domly taken pots from each treatment were harvested. Some to boiling three times in a microwave oven and these were
subsamples of the sand and soil were frozen in order to be able used as substrate blanks to determine background levels of the
to determine the fatty acid content later. Other subsamples substrate. The addition of distilled water instead of the
were immediately used to determine the pH (in H2O; 25 g substrate solution to the buffer solution produced blanks to
fresh weight substrate in 50 ml distilled water, shaken at 200 check the background of the p-nitrophenyl phosphate
rotations min−1 for 2 h, followed by 15 min of sedimenta- substrate. The absorbance was measured at 420 nm after filtra-
tion). A third set of subsamples was used to determine the acid tion through a 0.45-µm hydrophilic PTFE filter (Lida,
phosphatase (ACP) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activities. Werner-Glas & Instrument AB, Kungsängen, Sweden). Enzyme
The remaining sand was used to collect the extraradical activities (expressed as U g−1 dry wt of substrate) were calculated
mycelium by wet sieving (van Aarle et al., 2001). If no hyphae after correction using the blanks. One unit of phosphatase
could be detected by eye, the decanted liquid was checked activity, under the specified conditions, was defined as
under a dissecting microscope for hyphae, and these were the amount of enzyme activity that liberated 1 µmol of
collected with forceps. The fresh weight of the hyphae was p-nitrophenol in 1 h.
measured, after which it was used to study the ACP and
ALP activity. Plants were collected and washed clean of soil.
Fatty acid analysis as a biomass indicator
Dry weights were determined for shoots and for subsamples
of roots. The total root dry weight was estimated by calcula- Lipids were extracted from sand (10 g fresh weight) and soil
tions based on the fresh weight proportion. Another sample (5 g fresh weight) samples by vortexing for 15 s with a one-phase
of the roots was used to study the possible ALP activity, chloroform–methanol–citrate buffer (Olsson et al., 1997).
while a third sample was used to assess the mycorrhizal Lipid extracts were separated from soil pellets after centrifugation
colonization. at 3000 g. The lipids were fractionated into neutral lipids,
glycolipids and phospholipids on prepacked silica columns
(100 mg sorbent mass, Varian, Harbor City, USA) by eluting
Phosphatase activity measurements
with 1.5 ml chloroform, 6 ml acetone and 1.5 ml methanol,
Alkaline and acid phosphatase activities of the extraradical respectively. The fatty acid residues of the neutral lipids and
mycelium and phosphatase activity of mycorrhizal roots were phospholipids were transformed into free fatty acid methyl
visualized with enzyme-labelled fluorescence substrate (ELF, esters, which were identified and quantified using gas
Molecular Probes, Eugene, USA), which is a fluorogenic chromatography, according to the method described by
phosphatase substrate (van Aarle et al., 2001). The overall Frostegård et al. (1993).
phosphatase activity of the mycorrhizal mycelium was assessed The nomenclature of the fatty acids follows that used by
with a light microscope according to a relative scale ranging Tunlid & White (1992). Signature phospholipid fatty acids
from no activity (denoted 0) to high activity (denoted 5) in all indicate the biomass of specific groups of microorganisms
of the mycorrhizal hyphae. At each harvest, roots of one (Tunlid & White, 1992). Phospholipid fatty acids 16:1ω5,
replicate of each fungal treatment and each pH were hand- 18:1ω7c, 20:4 and 20:5 were analysed as possible indicators
sectioned and stained with alkaline ELF buffer solution to of AM fungal biomass (Olsson & Johansen, 2000). These
visualize phosphatase-active intraradical hyphae. phospholipid fatty acids also occur in varying amounts in
To measure ACP and ALP activity of the sand and soil, a other soil microorganisms (Olsson, 1999). Neutral lipid fatty
modified procedure based on that of Tabatabai & Bremner acids 16:1ω7c, 16:1ω5, 18:1ω7c, 20:4 and 20:5 were also
(1969) was used. Phosphatase activities were determined considered since they are common in storage lipids of AM
spectrophotometrically using p-nitrophenyl phosphate as fungi (Graham et al., 1995; Olsson & Johansen, 2000) and
substrate (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA). Five provide sensitive indicators of AM fungi (Olsson, 1999). The
grams of substrate were added to 40 ml of distilled water neutral lipid fatty acid 16:1ω7c may constitute a large part of
and shaken at 200 revolutions min−1 for 15 min. Aliquots of the neutral lipid fatty acids of G. intraradices, while the reason
the suspension, 20 µl for ALP and 40 µl for ACP activity for not including phospholipid fatty acid 16:1ω7c is that it
determination, were incubated in 100 µl p-nitrophenyl has been shown not to be an important part of AM fungal
phosphate solution (4 mg p-nitrophenyl phosphate ml−1 in phospholipid fatty acids ( Johansen et al., 1996). Phospholipid
deionized water) and 100 µl buffer solution. For the ALP and neutral lipid fatty acid 18:2ω6,9 was used as an indicator

© New Phytologist (2002) 155: 173–182 www.newphytologist.com


14698137, 2002, 1, Downloaded from https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00439.x by UFRB - Universidade Federal do Reconcavo da Bahia, Wiley Online Library on [14/08/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
176 Research

of the biomass of saprotrophic fungi, and 10 bacteria-specific visual estimates of phosphatase activity of extraradical
phospholipid fatty acids (i15:0, a15:0, i16:0, 10Me16:0, i17:0, mycelium were subjected to Paired sign and Kruskal–
a17:0, cy17:0, 10Me17:0, 10Me18:0 and cy19:0) were Wallis tests, using STATVIEW 5.0.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary,
used as indicators of bacterial biomass (Frostegård & Bååth, NC, USA). The time factor of the ANOVA is not reported
1996). in most cases since its significance is obvious already from
the graphs.
Colonization assessment
Root samples were stained with Trypan blue according
Results
to a modification of the procedure of Phillips & Hayman
Substrate pH
(1970). Total AM fungal root colonization, arbuscular and
vesicular colonization were determined as the percentage The pH of the hyphal compartment was significantly
of root length colonized with the magnified intersections different between the pH treatments for all, except for the
method, as described by McGonigle et al. (1990). Root nonmycorrhizal plants at 53 d (Table 1). The pH of the root
length colonized by fine endophytes (Thippayarugs et al., compartment showed only occasional significant differences
1999) was quantified independently of the AM fungal between the pH treatments and, at the last harvest, no
colonization. differences were found between the pH treatments. In none
of the treatments could a difference in pH (two-tailed t-test
with unequal variances) between the first and the last harvest
Statistical analysis
be detected for the hyphal compartment, whereas the pH
Averages, standard errors and t-tests were calculated using of the root compartment was significantly lower (two-tailed
Microsoft Excel 2000. Data on dry weight, fatty acid t-test with unequal variances) at the last harvest from both
contents, phosphatase activities in the substrate and pH treatments. The experimental system thus seems to have
percentage colonization were subjected to ANOVA, while the worked according to our intentions.

Fig. 1 Fatty acids indicating arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal biomass (n = 3) in the hyphal compartment (a–c) and in the root compartment
(d–i). (a–f) Neutral lipid fatty acids 16:1ω5 and 16:1ω7c; (g–i) phospholipid fatty acid 16:1ω5. Open symbols, low pH treatment; closed symbols,
high pH treatment. Values are mean ± SE; where no error bars can be seen, the SE is smaller than the symbol. The pH treatments were compared
using two-way ANOVA (pH × time) for 20–80 d.

www.newphytologist.com © New Phytologist (2002) 155: 173–182


14698137, 2002, 1, Downloaded from https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00439.x by UFRB - Universidade Federal do Reconcavo da Bahia, Wiley Online Library on [14/08/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Research 177

The content of the AM fungal signature phospholipid fatty


Growth of the extraradical mycelium
acid (16:1ω5) in the root compartment (Fig. 1g–i) was
The AM fungal signature neutral lipid fatty acid 16:1ω5 was roughly similar for S. calospora and G. intraradices treatments
detected in both the hyphal and the root compartment for and slightly, but significantly, higher than in the nonmycor-
both the S. calospora and G. intraradices treatments, but not rhizal treatment. The background level of phospholipid fatty
the nonmycorrhizal samples (Fig. 1a–f ). Neutral lipid fatty acid 16:1ω5 in the nonmycorrhizal treatment can be attrib-
acid 16:1ω7 was detected in the hyphal compartment only uted to bacteria (Olsson, 1999). With S. calospora, the low
for the G. intraradices treatment. These neutral lipid fatty pH-treated system exhibited a significantly higher content of
acids increased significantly over time and in the hyphal phospholipid fatty acid 16:1ω5 than the high pH treatment.
compartment a significantly greater increase was observed at In the hyphal compartment the phospholipid fatty acid
the higher pH than at the lower pH. The amounts of neutral 16:1ω5 could not be detected. Other possible AM fungal sig-
lipid fatty acids were higher in the root compartment than nature fatty acids (18:1ω7c, 20:4 and 20:5) were not higher
in the hyphal compartment, and in the root compartment in S. calospora and G. intraradices treatments than in nonmy-
significantly more of the neutral lipid fatty acids were found corrhizal treatment at the first four harvests. These were there-
with G. intraradices treatment than with S. calospora or fore not used as indicators of extraradical mycelium growth in
nonmycorrhizal treatments. The nonmycorrhizal treatments this study.
did not show any changes in neutral lipid fatty acids over time.
No mycelium was found by wet sieving at the first two
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal root colonization
harvests, while at the third harvest (53 d), mycelium could be
collected from the sand of the hyphal compartment from both To examine the influence of pH on mycorrhizal colonization
the S. calospora and G. intraradices treatments (except for the low only the data from the last three harvests, where mycelium was
pH treatment of G. intraradices). There was large variation in present in the hyphal compartment, were included in the
the amount of extraradical mycelium between replicates, but two-way ANOVA. Total root colonization by S. calospora was
generally the amount of extraradical mycelium increased over significantly higher in the low pH treatments from 53 to 80 d
time. No mycelium was recovered from the nonmycorrhizal (Fig. 2a). Root colonization by S. calospora at 80 d was low
treatment. The pH treatment did not influence the amount of but still increasing, and at the last harvest an average of 23%
extraradical mycelium formed in the root compartment while and 18% of the total root length had been colonized for
it did affect the amount in the hyphal compartment. low- and high pH treatment, respectively. The highest root

Fig. 2 Total (a,b), arbuscular (c,d) and


vesicular (e,f) colonization (n = 3) by
Scutellospora calospora (a,c) and Glomus
intraradices (b,d,f). No colonization of the
roots was seen in the nonmycorrhizal
controls. Open symbols, low pH treatment;
closed symbols, high pH treatment. Values
are mean ± SE; where no error bars can be
seen, the SE is smaller than the symbol. The
pH treatments were compared using two-
way ANOVA (pH × time) for 53–80 d, because
in these cases mycelium had grown out into
the hyphal compartment.

© New Phytologist (2002) 155: 173–182 www.newphytologist.com


14698137, 2002, 1, Downloaded from https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00439.x by UFRB - Universidade Federal do Reconcavo da Bahia, Wiley Online Library on [14/08/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
178 Research

Table 2 Phosphatase activity of the extraradical mycelium of two intraradices. The S. calospora extraradical mycelium seemed to
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Scutellospora calospora and Glomus have higher phosphatase activity at low pH than at high pH
intraradices
and the ACP activity was higher than the ALP activity
S. calospora G. intraradices (P = 0.016). This contrasts with G. intraradices where ALP
seemed to have the higher activity (P = 0.22). For both pH
Low High Low High treatments the phosphatase activity of the intraradical
(n = 9) (n = 8) (n = 9) mycelium of both species (n = 1), as determined by staining
with alkaline ELF substrate solution, increased over time and
ALP 2.8 2.1 nd 1.7
(2–3) (1–3) (0 – 4) reached a maximum at 67 d. Overall, the roots colonized by
G. intraradices showed more phosphatase active intraradical
ACP 3.3 3.1 nd 0.8 mycelium than roots colonized by S. calospora, and maximum
(3– 4) (1– 4) (0 –1)
values estimated were 2 and 4 (according to a relative scale)
Alkaline (ALP) and acid (ACP) phosphatase activities, from 53 to respectively.
80 d, were estimated after staining with the enzyme-labelled In general, the phosphatase activities of the substrates in the
fluorescence substrate; 0 = no activity to 5 = high activity. Average hyphal and root compartment were for both fungi similar to
values are given with the minimum and maximum values in those of the nonmycorrhizal samples (results not shown).
parentheses. Low, low pH treatment; High, high pH treatment;
Phosphatase activities were occasionally found in the hyphal
nd, not determined since no hyphae were found in the hyphal
compartment. compartment, and the highest values detected were 2.2 U g−1
for ALP, and 1.4 U g−1 for ACP. In the root compartment ACP
activity was normally higher than in the hyphal compartment,
colonization by G. intraradices was at 67 d, there being 84% where the highest ACP activity detected was 12.3 U g−1,
and 79%, respectively, for low pH and high pH treatment while the highest ALP activity was only 6.1 U g−1.
(Fig. 2b). Total colonization was significantly higher for the
low pH treatment between 53 d and 80 d. Roots colonized by
Growth of plants, bacteria and saprotrophic fungi
G. intraradices were also colonized by a fine endophyte
(Thippayarugs et al., 1999). The fine endophyte colonization, Neither the plants colonized by S. calospora or G. intraradices,
estimated independently from the colonization by G. nor the nonmycorrhizal plants showed any significant
intraradices, appeared first after 20 d, and increased after that difference in total plant or shoot dry weight between the high
linearly over time. The increase was similar for both pH treat- pH and the low pH treatment (Table 3). The S. calospora-
ments, that is 58% and 44% of the root length for low (R 2 = colonized plants had a significantly higher root dry weight at
0.94) and high (R 2 = 0.84) pH treatment at 80 d, respectively. the higher pH, but Glomus intraradices-colonized roots were
Neither the roots colonized by S. calospora nor nonmycorrhizal significantly heavier only at the last harvest in the high pH
roots showed any colonization by fine endophytes. treatment. Shoot, root and total plant dry weight of G.
Arbuscular colonization by S. calospora occurred in 9% of intraradices-colonized plants were significantly lower than
the total root length for both of the pH treatments at 80 d those of plants colonized by S. calospora or nonmycorrhizal
(Fig. 2c). This fungus does not form any vesicles. Glomus plants (three-way ANOVA).
intraradices showed significantly higher root lengths with The bacterial biomass, as indicated by bacteria-specific
arbuscules and vesicles for the low pH treatment (Fig. 2d,f ). phospholipid fatty acids, increased significantly over time for
Root length with arbuscules and vesicles reached the maxi- all fungal treatments in the hyphal compartment (two-way
mum estimated value at 53 d. The maximum root length ANOVA, Fig. 3). Both G. intraradices and S. calospora seemed to
showing arbuscular formation by G. intraradices was 40% of depress bacterial colonization of the hyphal compartment
total root length for both pH treatments and for vesicles the at higher pH (Fig. 3). The pH treatment had no effect on
values were 20% and 16% for the low pH and high pH treat- bacterial biomass in the non-mycorrhizal treatment (Fig. 3,
ments, respectively. Table 4). For the root compartment only the S. calospora
treatment showed a difference between the pH treatments:
amounts of bacteria-specific phospholipid fatty acids were
Phosphatase activities
greater at the lower pH (two-way ANOVA, Table 4). In the root
The phosphatase activities of the extraradical mycelium, as compartment a significantly higher bacterial biomass was
visualized by the ELF substrate, were, except for a few found for S. calospora- than for G. intraradices-treated pots.
extremes, constant for all samples within each treatment. In The bacterial biomass of the S. calospora treatment signifi-
Table 2 the data from each fungus at each pH treatment were cantly increased in the root compartment over time. Both S.
averaged and the minimum and maximum are also given. calospora and G. intraradices treatments showed significantly
Both ACP (P < 0.001) and ALP (P = 0.15) activities were higher amounts of bacteria-specific phospholipid fatty acids
higher for the extraradical mycelium of S. calospora than G. in the root compartment than the nonmycorrhizal treatment

www.newphytologist.com © New Phytologist (2002) 155: 173–182


14698137, 2002, 1, Downloaded from https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00439.x by UFRB - Universidade Federal do Reconcavo da Bahia, Wiley Online Library on [14/08/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Research 179

Table 3 The average shoot and root dry


weight of Plantago lanceolata, measured at Plant dry wt (g; n = 3)
the different harvesting times
Scutellospora Glomus
Nonmycorrhizal calospora intraradices

Time (d) Low High Low High Low High

Shoot 20 0.052 0.072 0.061 0.054 0.054 0.047


32 0.185 0.190 0.154 0.162 0.127 0.118
53 0.394 0.420 0.377 0.355 0.305 0.251
67 0.820 0.869 0.778 0.781 0.705 0.718
80 1.082 1.341 1.278 1.390 1.256 1.319

P-value pH 0.094 0.56 0.94


Time < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
pH × time 0.22 0.69 0.37

Root 20 0.018 0.033 0.023 0.027 0.035 0.031


32 0.075 0.062 0.066 0.093 0.077 0.055
53 0.333 0.207 0.239 0.229 0.201 0.161
67 0.428 0.412 0.384 0.443 0.307 0.291
80 0.874 0.763 0.652 0.900 0.505 0.691

P-value pH 0.089 0.022 0.16


Time < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
pH × time 0.42 0.034 < 0.001

Low, low pH treatment; High, high pH treatment.

Fig. 3 Bacterial phospholipid fatty acid content (n = 3) in the hyphal compartment of the nonmycorrhizal (a), Scutellospora calospora (b) and
Glomus intraradices (c) treatments. Open symbols, low pH treatment; closed symbols, high pH treatment. Values are mean ± SE; where no error
bars can be seen, the SE is smaller than the symbol. The pH treatments were compared using two-way ANOVA (pH × time) for 20 – 80 d.

(three-way ANOVA), and a considerable increase was observed exposed to the same pH. In earlier studies where the effect of
in the last harvest. pH on AM hyphal development, root colonization and plant
Low amounts of saprotrophic fungal biomass, as indicated growth has been examined, both symbionts were subjected to
by neutral lipid and phospholipid fatty acid 18:2ω6,9, were the same pH (Abbott & Robson, 1985; Clark & Zeto,
detected in the hyphal compartment. Saprotrophic fungi were 1996a). By using mesh bags we created a hyphal
only occasionally detected in the hyphal compartment by compartment that excluded the host roots. Here, we have
microscopic observations. In the root compartment the bio- shown that the pH of a substrate colonized by the AM fungal
mass of saprotrophic fungi increased significantly over time mycelium influences not only the growth of the mycelium but
for all fungal treatments (see Table 4 for values at 80 d). For also the AM colonization of the host plant roots.
S. calospora, it was initially relatively constant but at the final The increased extent of root length with vesicles and arbus-
harvest a marked increase was observed. cules in G. intraradices at the lower pH could indicate a stress
response, especially since no hyphae were found in the hyphal
compartment (Figs 1a–c and 2d,f ). Siqueira et al. (1984)
Discussion found no correlation between total root colonization and pH
This study demonstrated an effect of pH on AM fungal of the soil, and they suggested that the effect of the pH might
hyphae even though the roots of the host plant were not be greater on the fungus than on the host plant. Other studies

© New Phytologist (2002) 155: 173–182 www.newphytologist.com


14698137, 2002, 1, Downloaded from https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00439.x by UFRB - Universidade Federal do Reconcavo da Bahia, Wiley Online Library on [14/08/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
180 Research

Table 4 Fatty acids indicating bacterial and saprotrophic fungi (SE in parentheses) at 80 d in hyphal and root compartments

Fatty acids (nmol g−1 dry wt)

Saprotrophic fungi
Bacterial Phospholipid Neutral lipid Phospholipid

Compartment Low High Low High Low High

Hyphal Non-mycorrhizal 0.29 0.23 0.05 0.06 0.09 0.04


(0.11) (0.01) (0.00) (0.00) (0.04) (0.00)
Scutellospora calospora 0.37 0.25 0.11 0.06 –a 0.01
(0.01) (0.01) (0.05) (0.00) (0.01)
Glomus intraradices 0.30 0.24 0.07 0.09 – 0.04
(0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.00) (0.00)
Root Non-mycorrhizal 8.68 8.99 1.01 1.26 2.28 3.25
(0.69) (0.42) (0.20) (0.12) (0.56) (0.55)
S. calospora 19.67 16.01 1.66 1.39 5.25 4.49
(1.21) (0.18) (0.53) (0.27) (1.05) (1.19)
G. intraradices 13.99 12.15 1.56 1.49 3.23 3.14
(2.98) (1.86) (0.20) (0.29) (0.87) (0.67)

Low, low pH treatment; High, high pH treatment. aNo saprotrophic fungal fatty acid could be detected.

(Medeiros et al., 1994; Clark & Zeto, 1996a) indicate that our experiment did not appear to be severely stressed at this
AM fungal colonization can be strongly affected by pH per se, lower pH, since their ALP activity was not reduced (Table 2).
although the effects on different fungal isolates differed. In In other studies it was shown that stress caused by simulated
this study the amount of extraradical mycelium in the hyphal acid rain (pH 3–4) reduced the ALP activity of AM fungal
compartment did not appear to be related to the fungal colo- extraradical mycelium in a range of substrates (Vosatka &
nization of the roots. However, a large amount of AM fungal Dodd, 1998; Malcová et al., 1999). Local responses of AM
neutral lipid fatty acids in the root compartment for G. intra- fungal extraradical mycelium have been found, mainly as
radices was correlated with high AM fungal colonization, and proliferation in patches rich in organic material (Mosse, 1959;
for S. calospora both neutral lipid fatty acid content in the root St John et al., 1983; Ravnskov et al., 1999). This stresses the
compartment and colonization were low (Figs 1e,f and 2). importance of using experimental systems that allow separa-
The pH of the root compartment declined strongly during tion of extraradical mycelium and roots when studying effects
the experimental period, while only a small effect of the pH on extraradical mycelium, since in nature mycorrhizal hyphae
treatment on soil pH was detectable (Table 1). The decreased can reach patches not available to plant roots.
soil pH at the low pH treatment probably contributed to In the present study, the pH of the hyphal compartment
a higher root colonization and AM fungal biomass of S. was buffered with a MES buffer. MES has been shown to
calospora in the root compartment (Figs 1h and 2a). This may stimulate extraradical mycelium growth, but only signifi-
look like a contradiction to the result in the hyphal compart- cantly so at concentrations 100 times higher than in our study
ment (Fig. 1b), but the actual pH value was close to 6 both in (Vilariño et al., 1997). In our study, similar amounts of MES
the root compartment at the low pH treatment and in the were added for all treatments and so it is unlikely to be the
hyphal compartment at the high pH treatment (Table 1). cause of differences in extraradical mycelium biomass. The
This indicates that S. calospora has a pH optimum of c. 6. The addition of MES to the hyphal compartment, containing
pH treatment influenced root growth only in AM colonized acid-washed sand largely deprived of nutrients, should not
plants, indicating that this effect was mediated by the AM influence the nutrient uptake. It has been observed to affect
fungal responses to pH. nutrient uptake in plants (Medeiros et al., 1993), although at
The lower pH of the growth substrate of the extraradical a concentration four times higher than here, and plants were
mycelium inhibited mycelial growth and possibly spore for- grown in a nutrient solution. Since the decrease in pH of the
mation in both species (Fig. 1b,c). This agrees with Abbott & root compartment over time was greater than the difference in
Robson (1985), who showed that the spread of extraradical the pH levels employed (Table 1), we conclude that the acid-
mycelium by a Glomus isolate was strongly inhibited at low ifying capacity of the roots had a stronger influence on the pH
soil pH. It is likely that low growth of extraradical mycelium of the root compartment than the effect of diffusion of MES
at lower pH was caused by aversion to the substrate. Acidic from the hyphal compartment to the root compartment.
soils are known to have a fungistatic effect on spores of Glomus Our results show that the ELF substrate can be used both
mosseae (Siqueira et al., 1984). The hyphae of S. calospora in to detect and estimate the extent of extraradical mycelium

www.newphytologist.com © New Phytologist (2002) 155: 173–182


14698137, 2002, 1, Downloaded from https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00439.x by UFRB - Universidade Federal do Reconcavo da Bahia, Wiley Online Library on [14/08/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Research 181

with active phosphatases (Table 2). Most studies on phos- that the way in which AM fungi species respond to pH may
phatases of AM fungal extraradical mycelium have focused on vary between species. This study also reveals a possible
ALP activity. Our results indicate that ACP activity of the connection between the response of the extraradical mycelium
extraradical mycelium contributed significantly to total phos- and the colonization strategy within the host root. Finally, the
phatase activity, in agreement with recent findings by Joner results support the view that the external phosphatases of AM
& Johansen (2000). Thus, ACP activity should also be con- fungi are of little importance.
sidered in phosphatase studies, especially since recent obser-
vations have shown the vacuoles of AM fungi to be acidic
(Ezawa et al., 2001). Our results (Table 2) indicate that phos-
Acknowledgements
phatase activity of the extraradical mycelium can be highest The financial support of the Swedish Council for Forestry and
at a substrate pH quite different from the pH for optimal Agricultural Research is gratefully acknowledged. We thank
enzyme activity. In most cases no significant phosphatase Professor Anne Ashford for critically reading the manuscript.
activity could be detected in the substrate of the hyphal com-
partment. However, where phosphatase activity was detected References
in the substrate, the values were of the same order as those
observed by Joner & Jakobsen (1995) and Joner et al. (1995). Abbott LK, Robson AD. 1985. The effect of soil pH on the formation of
VA mycorrhizas by two species of Glomus. Australian Journal of Soil
In the root compartment, the observed ACP activity in the Research 23: 253–261.
substrate probably did not originate from the AM fungi, since Ames RN, Reid CPP, Ingham ER. 1984. Rhizosphere bacterial population
similar values were found for all fungal treatments. This responses to root colonization by a vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal
supports the view of Joner et al. (2000) that AM fungal phos- fungus. New Phytologist 96: 555–563.
phatases are not actively released into the soil. van Aarle IM, Olsson PA, Söderström B. 2001. Microscopic detection of
phosphatase activity of saprophytic and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi using
Interaction studies between AM fungi and saprotrophic a fluorogenic substrate. Mycologia 93: 17–24.
microorganisms have often reported conflicting results (Ames Bago B, Pfeffer PE, Shachar-Hill Y. 2000. Carbon metabolism and
et al., 1984; Posta et al., 1994; Olsson et al., 1996). As shown transport in arbuscular mycorrhizas. Plant Physiology 124: 949 –
in Fig. 3, temporal differences may be one factor explaining 957.
such discrepancies. In an earlier study, saprotrophic fungi, Boddington CL, Dodd JC. 1998. A comparison of the development and
metabolic activity of mycorrhizas formed by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
detected by phospholipid fatty acid 18:2ω6,9, were inhibited from different genera on two tropical forage legumes. Mycorrhiza 8:
by AM fungal extraradical mycelium in root-free dune sand 149–157.
(Olsson et al., 1998). This could not be confirmed here since Bolan NS. 1991. A critical review on the role of mycorrhizal fungi in the
the biomass of saprotrophic fungi was too variable (Table 4). uptake of phosphorus by plants. Plant and Soil 134: 189 –207.
The two fungi showed differences in their ability to colo- Clark RB, Zeto SK. 1996a. Growth and root colonization of mycorrhizal
maize grown on acid and alkaline soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 28:
nize the roots and to produce extraradical mycelium biomass 1505–1511.
(Figs 1 and 2, respectively). These differences persisted Clark RB, Zeto SK. 1996b. Mineral acquisition by mycorrhizal maize
throughout the experiment and can not be explained only by grown on acid and alkaline soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 28:
a difference in infective propagule density of the inoculum. 1495 –1503.
Since AM fungal signature neutral lipid fatty acids have been Ezawa T, Smith SE, Smith FA. 2001. Differentiation of polyphosphate
metabolism between the extra- and intraradical hyphae of arbuscular
shown to correlate with the number of spores formed by the mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 149: 555 –563.
extraradical mycelium (Olsson et al., 1997), the high neutral Frostegård Å, Bååth E. 1996. The use of phospholipid fatty acid analysis to
lipid fatty acid values indicate that sporulation was higher in estimate bacterial and fungal biomass in soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils
G. intraradices. High amounts of AM fungal neutral lipid fatty 22: 59–65.
acids in the extraradical mycelium indicate that high amounts Frostegård Å, Tunlid A, Bååth E. 1993. Phospholipid fatty acid
composition, biomass and activity of microbial communities from two soil
of neutral lipids, mainly triacylglycerides, have been trans- types experimentally exposed to different heavy metals. Applied and
ported from the intraradical mycelium (Bago et al., 2000). Environmental Microbiology 59: 3605–3617.
This carbon cost to the plants may have caused the lower Graham JH, Hodge NC, Morton JB. 1995. Fatty acid methyl ester profiles
weight of G. intraradices-colonized plants compared with for characterization of Glomalean fungi and their endomycorrhizae.
S. calospora-colonized and nonmycorrhizal plants. The differ- Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61: 58 – 64.
Haynes RJ. 1990. Active ion uptake and maintenance of cation-anion
ences in responses of the AM fungal isolates support previous balance: a critical examination of their role in regulating rhizosphere pH.
reports showing the importance of studying more than one Plant and Soil 126: 247–264.
fungal isolate (van der Heijden et al., 1998a,b; Smith et al., van der Heijden MGA, Boller T, Wiemken A, Sanders IR. 1998a. Different
2000; Ezawa et al., 2001). arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species are potential determinants of plant
In conclusion, the results show that the growth of AM fun- community structure. Ecology 79: 2082–2091.
van der Heijden MGA, Klironomos JN, Ursic M, Moutoglis P,
gal mycelia is directly influenced by the pH of the substrate. Streitwolf-Engel R, Boller T, Wiemken A, Sanders IR. 1998b.
This is further evidence that AM fungi are organisms that Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem
respond to a heterogeneous environment. We have also shown variability and productivity. Nature 396: 69 –72.

© New Phytologist (2002) 155: 173–182 www.newphytologist.com


14698137, 2002, 1, Downloaded from https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00439.x by UFRB - Universidade Federal do Reconcavo da Bahia, Wiley Online Library on [14/08/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
182 Research

Jakobsen I, Nielsen NE. 1983. Vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhiza in Olsson PA, Bååth E, Jakobsen I. 1997. Phosphorus effects on the mycelium
field-grown crops. I. Mycorrhizal infection in cereals and peas at various and storage structures of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus as studied in the
times and soil depths. New Phytologist 93: 401–413. soil and roots by analysis of fatty acid signatures. Applied and
Jakobsen I, Abbott LK, Robson AD. 1992a. External hyphae of Environmental Microbiology 63: 3531–3538.
vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with Trifolium Olsson PA, Francis R, Read DJ, Söderström B. 1998. Growth of arbuscular
subterraneum L. 1. Spread of hyphae and phosphorus inflow into roots. mycorrhizal mycelium in calcareous dune sand and its interaction with
New Phytologist 120: 371– 380. other soil microorganisms as estimated by measurement of specific fatty
Jakobsen I, Abbott LK, Robson AD. 1992b. External hyphae of acids. Plant and Soil 201: 9–16.
vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with Trifolium Pearson JN, Jakobsen I. 1993. Symbiotic exchange of carbon and
subterraneum L. 2. Hyphal transport of 32P over defined distances. phosphorus between cucumber and three arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.
New Phytologist 120: 509 –516. New Phytologist 124: 481–488.
Johansen A, Finlay RD, Olsson PA. 1996. Nitrogen metabolism of external Phillips JM, Hayman DS. 1970. Improved procedures for clearing roots and
hyphae of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices. New staining parasitic and vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid
Phytologist 133: 705 –712. assessment of infection. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 55:
Joner EJ, Jakobsen I. 1994. Contribution by two arbuscular mycorrhizal 158–161.
fungi to P uptake by cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) from 32P-labelled Porter WM, Robson AD, Abbott LK. 1987. Field survey of the distribution
organic matter during mineralization in soil. Plant and Soil 163: 203–209. of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in relation to soil pH. Journal of
Joner EJ, Jakobsen I. 1995. Growth and extracellular phosphatase activity of Applied Ecology 24: 659–662.
arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae as influenced by soil organic matter. Soil Posta K, Marschner H, Römheld V. 1994. Manganese reduction in the
Biology and Biochemistry 27: 1153 –1159. rhizosphere of mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal maize. Mycorrhiza 5:
Joner EJ, Johansen A. 2000. Phosphatase activity of external hyphae of two 119–124.
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Mycological Research 104: 81–86. Ravnskov S, Jakobsen I. 1995. Functional compatibility in arbuscular
Joner EJ, Magid J, Gahoonia TS, Jakobsen I. 1995. P depletion and activity mycorrhizas measured as hyphal P transport to the plant. New Phytologist
of phosphatases in the rhizosphere of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal 129: 611–618.
cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Soil Biology and Biochemistry 27: Ravnskov S, Jakobsen I. 1999. Effects of Pseudomonas fluorescens DF57 on
1145 –1151. growth and P uptake of two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in symbiosis
Joner EJ, van Aarle IM, Vosatka M. 2000. Phosphatase activity of with cucumber. Mycorrhiza 8: 329–334.
extra-radical arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae: a review. Plant and Soil 226: Ravnskov S, Larsen J, Olsson PA, Jakobsen I. 1999. Effects of various
199 –210. organic compounds on growth and phosphorus uptake of an arbuscular
Malcová R, Vosátka M, Albrechtová J. 1999. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. New Phytologist 141: 517–524.
mycorrhizal fungi and simulated acid rain on the growth and coexistence Siqueira JO, Hubbell DH, Mahmud AW. 1984. Effect of liming
of the grasses Calamagrostis villosa and Deschampsia flexuosa. Plant and Soil on spore germination, germ tube growth and root colonization by
207: 45 –57. vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant and Soil 76: 115 –124.
Marschner H. 1995. Mineral nutrition of higher plants, 2nd edn. London, Smith FA, Jakobsen I, Smith SE. 2000. Spatial differences in acquisition of
UK: Academic Press Ltd. soil phosphate between two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in symbiosis
McGonigle TP, Miller MH, Evans DG, Fairchild GL, Swan JA. 1990. A with Medicago truncatula. New Phytologist 147: 357–366.
new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by St John TV, Coleman DC, Reid CPP. 1983. Association of
vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 115: 495–501. vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae with soil organic particles.
Medeiros CAB, Clark RB, Ellis JR. 1993. Effects of MES Ecology 64: 957–959.
[2 (N-Morpholino)-ethanesulfonic acid] and pH on mineral nutrient Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM. 1969. Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for
uptake by mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal maize. Journal of Plant assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 1:
Nutrition 16: 2255 –2272. 301–307.
Medeiros CAB, Clark RB, Ellis JR. 1994. Growth and nutrient uptake of Thippayarugs S, Bansal M, Abbott LK. 1999. Morphology and infectivity
sorghum cultivated with vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhiza isolates at of fine endophyte in a Mediterranean environment. Mycological Research
varying pH. Mycorrhiza 4: 185 –191. 103: 1369–1379.
Mosse B. 1959. Observation on the extra-matrical mycelium of a Tunlid A, White DC. 1992. Biochemical analysis of biomass, community
vesicular-arbuscular endophyte. Transactions of the British Mycological structure, nutritional status, and metabolic activity of microbial
Society 42: 439 – 448. communities in soil. In: Stotzky G, Bollag J-M, eds. Soil biochemistry,
Olsson PA. 1999. Signature fatty acids provide tools for determination of Vol. 7. New York, NY, USA: Dekker, 229–262.
distribution and interactions of mycorrhizal fungi in soil. FEMS Vilariño A, Frey B, Shüepp H. 1997. MES [2-(N-morpholino)-ethane
Microbiology Ecology 29: 303 –310. sulphonic acid] buffer promotes the growth of external hyphae of the
Olsson PA, Johansen A. 2000. Lipid and fatty acid composition of hyphae arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices in an alkaline sand.
and spores of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi at different growth stages. Biology and Fertility of Soils 25: 79–81.
Mycological Research 104: 429 – 434. Vosatka M, Dodd JC. 1998. The role of different arbuscular mycorrhizal
Olsson PA, Bååth E, Jakobsen I, Söderström B. 1996. Soil bacteria respond fungi in the growth of Calamagrostis villosa and Deschampsia flexuosa,
to presence of roots but not to arbuscular mycorrhizal mycelium. in experiments with simulated acid rain. Plant and Soil 200: 251–
Soil Biology and Biochemistry 28: 463 – 470. 263.

www.newphytologist.com © New Phytologist (2002) 155: 173–182

You might also like