You are on page 1of 1

C HA PTER 10 Concepts of Radiographic Image Quality 163

The less precise terms detail and recorded detail


sometimes are used instead of spatial resolution and

R
ADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE quality is the exact- contrast resolution. These terms refer to the degree of
ness of representation of the patient’s anatomy sharpness of structural lines on a radiograph. Visibility
on a radiographic image. High-quality images of detail refers to the ability to visualize recorded detail
are required so that radiologists can make when image contrast and optical density (OD) are
accurate diagnoses. To produce high-quality images, optimized.
radiographers apply knowledge of the three major Noise
interrelated categories of radiographic quality: film Noise is a term that is borrowed from electrical engi-
factors, geometric factors, and subject factors. Each neering. The flutter, hum, and whistle heard from an
of these factors influences the quality of a radio- audio system constitute audio noise that is inherent in
graphic image, and each is under the control of the design of the system. The “snow” on television
radiologic technologists. The selection of radio- screens, especially in weak signal areas, is video noise,
and it is also inherent in the system.
graphic technique factors is discussed in this chapter.

Radiographic noise is the random fluctuation in


DEFINITIONS the OD of the image.
Radiographic Image Quality
The term radiographic image quality refers to the fidel-
ity with which the anatomical structure that is being Radiographic noise also is inherent in the imaging
examined is rendered on the radiograph. A radiograph system (Figure 10-1). A number of factors contribute to
that faithfully reproduces structure and tissues is identi- radiographic noise, including some that are under the
fied as a high-quality radiograph. control of radiologic technologists. Lower noise results
The quality of a radiographic image is not easy to in a better radiographic image because it improves con-
define, and it cannot be measured precisely. A number trast resolution.
of factors affect radiographic image quality, but no Radiographic noise has four components: film graini-
precise, universally accepted measures by which to judge ness, structure mottle, quantum mottle, and scatter
it have been identified. radiation. The principal source of radiographic noise—
The most important characteristics of radiographic scatter radiation—is discussed in Chapter 13.
image quality are spatial resolution, contrast resolution, Film graininess refers to the distribution in size and
noise, and artifacts. Artifacts are discussed in Chapter space of silver halide grains in the emulsion. Structure
18. Furthermore, this chapter deals with screen-film mottle is similar to film graininess but refers to the
radiography. Digital radiography is covered in Part IV. phosphor of the radiographic intensifying screen. Film
graininess and structure mottle are inherent in the
Resolution screen-film image receptor. They are not under the
Resolution is the ability to image two separate objects control of the radiologic technologist, and they contrib-
and visually distinguish one from the other. Spatial reso- ute very little to radiographic noise, with the exception
lution refers to the ability to image small objects that of mammography.
have high subject contrast, such as a bone–soft tissue Quantum mottle is somewhat under the control of
interface, a breast microcalcification, or a calcified lung the radiologic technologist and is a principal contribu-
nodule. Screen-film radiography has excellent spatial tor to radiographic noise in many radiographic imaging
resolution. The measure of spatial resolution is dis- procedures. Quantum mottle refers to the random
cussed more completely in Chapter 28. nature by which x-rays interact with the image
receptor.
Spatial resolution improves as screen blur If an image is produced with just a few x-rays, the
decreases, motion blur decreases, and geometric quantum mottle will be higher than if the image is
blur decreases. formed from a large number of x-rays. The use of very
fast intensifying screens results in increased quantum
Contrast resolution is the ability to distinguish ana- mottle.
tomical structures of similar subject contrast such as
liver–spleen and gray matter–white matter. The actual
size of objects that can be imaged is always smaller The use of high-mAs, low-kVp and of slower
under conditions of high subject contrast than under image receptors reduces quantum mottle.
conditions of low subject contrast.

You might also like