Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What You Need To Know
What You Need To Know
percentage of default than other industry sectors. This finding, however, does not mean that banking
is a low-risk business. In fact, banking is inherently a high-risk business. Over the centuries,
countless banks have failed—and continue to do so today.
Banks can fail individually as a result of financial mismanagement or the misrepresentation of facts to
the regulator (the Reserve Bank of India, or RBI). An example of this type of failure is the 2004 fall
of Global Trust Bank, one of the leading private sector banks in India at the time. Banks can also fail
as a result of systemic events. Examples include the U.S. savings and loan crisis in the 1980s and the
U.S. subprime mortgage market crisis that triggered the 2007–08 global financial crisis.
Banks are susceptible to failure because they operate with very high leverage compared to
commercial and corporate entities. Typical capital ratios are around the 10 percent threshold,
although more recently, regulators have been forcing banks to increase their capital base. In the
case of significant loss, that capital buffer erodes easily.
The main cause of bank failure—and the single biggest risk most banks face—is credit risk. Credit risk
tends to be related to laxity in credit assessment, poor credit portfolio management, systemic crises
in the macroeconomy, or a combination of these factors.
The RBI guidelines provide a brief yet accurate definition of credit risk:
Credit risk is most simply defined as the potential that a bank’s borrower or counterparty may fail to
meet its obligations in accordance with agreed terms. It is the possibility of losses associated with
diminution in the credit quality of borrowers or counterparties. In a bank’s portfolio, losses stem from
outright default due to inability or unwillingness of a customer or a counterparty to meet
commitments in relation to lending, trading, settlement and other financial transactions.
(RBI/2011-12/311 DBOD.No.BP.BC.67/21.06.202/2011-12, 22 December 2011)
Apart from when the borrower defaults in paying dues, a second dimension to credit risk exists even
when the borrower continues to make regular interest and principal payments. Credit risk is also
defined as the loss in value of a credit exposure because of a deterioration in the
creditworthiness of the borrower, even if the borrower continues to service the debt and has not
yet defaulted.
Example
Let’s say a borrower has availed a loan for a commercial property that is secured by
your bank. Although the repayments are made on time, the value of the property
secured by your bank may suddenly depreciate according to market trends. In this case,
a credit risk still exists because the value of the security has been eroded.
The Components of Credit Risk–
Credit risk is not a unitary concept. Credit risk can stem from risks related to the borrower (also
called obligor risk) and risks related to the facility, particular instrument, or security (which is
called facility risk).
A borrower’s default risk is driven by a combination of management risk, industry and business risk,
and financial risk. An assessment of credit risk analysis considers the following four areas:
Financial risk: This concept refers to the risk that a borrower will fail either the
liquidity or solvency test, or both, which may indicate a future failure to service the
debt. A complete financial risk assessment thoroughly analyses:
o Financial statement data and notes
o Financial ratios
o Cash flow
o Projections
Management risk: This term describes when the borrower's management lacks
the ability or willingness to run the business in a way that generates sufficient cash
to service debt as initially agreed.
Industry and business risk: This concept refers to the risk that the competitive
marketplace in which the borrower operates may lead to impacts that cannot be
readily managed or mitigated, increasing the likelihood of a failure to service debt.
Facility risk: This term describes the risk that a credit exposure has not been
structured in an adequate manner, which adds unnecessary stress to the credit
relationship or fails to protect the lender if the borrower is unable to service the
debt.
One of the most important tasks for a banker is the estimation of credit losses. The key components
of measuring credit risk include:
For example, the bank gives Mr. Verma, the proprietor of M/s Verma Enterprises, a
business loan of Rs. 15.00 lacs to finance a property worth Rs. 9.00 lacs. The probability
of default is determined by analysing the financial performance and the PD for similar
borrowers. In this case, the PD is 5 percent, meaning the probability of M/s Verma
Enterprises defaulting on the loan is 5 percent.
Loss Given Default (LGD)
The term loss given default (LGD) refers to the amount a lender expects to lose
should a default actually take place. It is expressed as a percentage of the total
exposure. LGD is a function of the amount outstanding on the loan at the time of
default, called the exposure at default (EAD), and the amount recovered via security
(i.e., collateral and/or guarantees), called the recovery rate (RR).
Example
LGD = 1 – RR, where RR is the recovery rate.
The recovery rate is defined as the proportion of bad debt that can be recovered.
RR is calculated as follows:
RR = Value of Collateral / Value of Loan
EAD is the amount outstanding when the default occurs. It is the maximum loss a bank
may incur in case of default.
In the example above, the balance outstanding is Rs. 15.00 lacs at the time of default,
because we are not aware of any payments made to reduce the outstanding balance.
Hence, the EAD is Rs. 15.00 lacs.
Maturity
The second element of facility risk is related to the length, or maturity, of the credit
exposure. Long-term debt facilities are riskier than short-term facilities because many
more negative events can happen in the future term of a long-term facility.
In other words, maturity refers to the expected timeframe in which default is likely to
occur. In the example above, since the loan is a short-term loan, the maturity is one
year. Hence, maturity is 1.
EL is a function of the likelihood that a loan will default (PD) multiplied by the amount
that will be lost if the loan defaults (LGD) multiplied by the amount outstanding at the
time of default (EAD). Mathematically, EL is expressed as:
EL = PD x LGD x EAD
Using the example of Mr. Verma’s loan, we calculate EL = 0.05 (PD) x 0.4 (LGD) x Rs.15
lacs (EAD). Hence the expected loss (EL) in this case equals Rs. 30,000.
The overall likelihood and the amount of loss must be factored into the credit and
pricing decision for this loan. Indeed, EL is factored into all loans.
Basel Norms
As mentioned, credit risk and the effect of credit losses can have a significant impact on
banks and their depositors. To address this risk, the Basel Committee on Banking
Supervision (BCBS) established a mechanism to cushion the banking sector from the
impact of such losses by way of allocating necessary cash reserves. This is commonly
called Basel norms.
The BCBS developed three sets of regulatory standards known as the Basel Accords (I,
II, and III), which stipulate guidelines for regulators and banks to allocate cash reserves
based on risk weights. Simply put, banks holding riskier assets need to hold more
capital.
Credit risk has to be measured by banks in order to provide the minimum regulatory
capital, which is called a capital-to-risk weighted assets ratio (CRAR). In India, the RBI
has prescribed the CRAR at 9 percent of the risk-weighted assets for credit risk.
Because credit risk is by far the largest risk most banks face, it requires the largest
capital allocation. Basel II distinguishes two distinct methodologies for assessing capital
adequacy:
Basel II: The Standardised Approach to Capital Requirements for Credit Risk–
In the standardised approach, the local regulator (the RBI in India) stipulates specific risk-weighting
percentages for different grades of risk for providing capital.
In India, the RBI issued guidelines that stipulate specific risk weights for different loan types. For
these purposes, we will use two different loan types: corporate and non-corporate exposures.
For corporate exposures, the risk weight is determined by external credit ratings provided by
authorised rating agencies such as Moody’s. Based on the ratings given by these agencies, the risk
weight is finalised and the requisite capital is provided.
The Basel II framework distinguishes among different types of assets and credit products, including
exposure to corporations, governments, and other banks. It stipulates specific risk-weighting
percentages for different grades of risk. The tables below show the proposed risk-weighting for
corporate exposures based on external credit rating ranges. Similar tables and guidelines exist for
other credit products and customer segments. Separate risk-weighting rules also exist for past due
loans. (Image 1).
Evaluating Data
The higher the risk weight, the more capital is provided by the bank, and vice
versa.
The composition of different loans in a bank’s portfolio determines the overall
amount of regulatory capital required.
If the portfolio consists of low-risk loans, the bank is in a position to have a larger
portfolio of healthy assets.
Alternatively, if the bank has high-risk loans that carry high-risk weight, the bank is
required to allocate much more capital. This affects its loan growth potential.
The composition of risk-weighted assets and the capital allocation for risk affects
almost all facets of bank performance.
Most of the banks in India are currently following the standardised approach.
Image 1
While the standardised approach involves a combination of external ratings (corporate exposures)
and regulator-prescribed capital allocation for non-corporate exposures, the internal ratings-based
(IRB) approach relies on a bank’s own assessment of its counterparties and exposures to determine
minimum capital requirements.
Typically, the IRB approach allows for greater granularity in calculating risk-weighted assets and
hence is likely to lead to a lower regulatory capital allocation. Only those banks meeting certain
minimum conditions, disclosure requirements, sophisticated risk-measurement practices and tools,
along with approval from their local regulator, are permitted to use the IRB approach. Few banks in
India meet these requirements and few use the IRB method.
Credit risk plays an important role in a bank’s profits and ability to grow. Since riskier assets and
borrowers require a higher capital allocation than less risky ones, a bank with higher credit-risk
assets consumes more capital because of the high risk-weighted assets on its balance sheet. Overall,
higher risk loans have higher expected losses, and higher expected losses require more regulatory
capital allocation. While this may be mitigated to some extent by pricing for risk, it is critically
important to understand and accurately underwrite credit risk.
As a credit analyst, your work has great value for the broader risk management—and ultimately the
safety and soundness—of your bank. Credit risk assessment should never be done in a mechanistic
way.
As a lender in a small and medium enterprises (SME)–oriented branch, you are approached by two
prospective borrowers (Unit A and Unit B) seeking a working capital loan of Rs. 100.00 lacs. You find
that Unit A has a corporate credit rating of AAA with a risk weight of 20 percent and Unit B has a
credit rating of BB with a risk weight of 150 percent.
You now understand that Unit A carries less risk for the bank when compared with Unit B. You also
understand that for Unit A, the capital to be provided by the bank is Rs. 1.80 lacs (risk weight is 20
percent, which is Rs. 20.00 lacs; and the capital to be provided is at 9 percent of Rs. 20.00 lacs,
which is Rs. 1.80 lacs). For Unit B, the capital to be provided is Rs.13.50 lacs (risk weight is 150
percent, which is Rs. 150.00 lacs; and the capital to be provided is at 9 percent of 150 lacs, which is
Rs. 13.50 lacs).
You clearly understand that the quality of the loan is important not only from the risk point of view,
but also for the provision of capital, which affects your bank’s bottom line. With the same amount of
capital, your bank will be able to give loans to a large number of borrowers with lower risk weights as
compared with borrowers with higher risk weights, which affects your bank’s top line.
As a responsible credit professional, it is important that you understand the importance of credit risk,
its components and its impact on the bank. The following questions will further enhance your insight
into this critical aspect of lending:
Question 1
Select to flip
As you monitor and/or review your loans, have any key factors changed that may warrant a change
in the risk ratings?
Question 2
If you are aware that critical factors have changed, should you wait for the next formal review
meeting before you take any action?
Question 3
How can the credit terms and conditions be structured to adequately safeguard against credit
migration?
Answer
The key components of credit risk include probability of default, loss given default, and exposure at default.
Probability of default (PD) relates to the borrower/obligor. The factors affecting the likelihood of an obligor’s
default drive its PD. From a fundamental point of view, an obligor’s default risk is driven by the combination of
management risk, industry and business risk, and financial risk.
Credit risk has to be measured by banks in order to provide the minimum regulatory capital, which is called
a capital-to-risk weighted assets ratio (CRAR). In India, the RBI has prescribed the CRAR at 9 percent of the risk-
weighted assets for credit risk.
While the standardised approach involves a combination of external ratings (corporate exposures) and
regulator-prescribed capital allocation for non-corporate exposures, the internal ratings-based (IRB) approach
relies on a bank’s own assessment of its counterparties and exposures to determine minimum capital
requirements.
A bank’s profitability and capital conservation are significantly affected by credit risk. Therefore, it is crucial to
understand how credit risk is assessed and to adopt a structured framework to thoroughly assess it.
1. Financial risk
2. Management risk
3. Industry and business risk
4. Facility risk
1. The liquidity test determines whether the business is generating enough cash from normal
day-to-day operations to cover all normally occurring expenses, including interest and loan
repayments.
2. The solvency test determines whether there is enough cash from other sources—primarily
the liquidation of assets outside the operating cycle—to pay all debt principal and any
accrued interest.
A complete financial risk assessment consists of the thorough analysis of financial statement data and notes,
financial ratios, cash flow, and projections. It involves analysing the key cash drivers that affect the company’s
top- and bottom-line performance, and how management decisions influence the ability of the unit to deliver
consistent financial performance. The goal is to address the concerns of the lender from liquidity and solvency
perspectives.
Elements to Analyse:
A key objective of financial analysis is to determine not only how a business performs but the reasons it
performs in that way.
Industry and Business Risk–
Business risk is the combination of a macro-level industrial risk and the individual business operating risk that
the company faces as part of its day-to-day operations. Business risk is influenced by numerous factors,
including sales volume, per-unit price, input costs, competition, overall economic climate, and government
regulations. Hence, business risk assessment includes analysis of the general business environment, industry
status, competition, and individual business vulnerability.
1. Determine the historical, current, and potential impact of macro-level factors on a business,
namely elements over which management has little or no control.
2. Consider how management anticipates and guides the business in the context of its external,
competitive environment.
The above forces have a direct impact on the financial performance of the business. As you can now see,
although financial risk and business risk are two different components of credit risk, they affect each other and
hence are always considered together when analyzing a proposal from a risk perspective.
A change in government, or in the political power in control, can result in significant regulatory change or
direction. Assessing industry risk involves understanding the risk factors associated with the borrower's
industry. Industry plays a major role in determining operating characteristics, including the structure of the asset
base, capital requirements, the timing and nature of cash flow, competition, and regulation.
An industry’s risk level also varies depending on the stage of the industry's life cycle. Emerging and declining
industries generally carry more risk, whereas growing and mature industries tend to be less risky.
Management Risk–
Management drives a business, sets its strategy, and makes operating and financing decisions, all within the
context of the industry and the broader external environment. Therefore, management determines—and is
responsible for—the company’s performance. Understanding management and performing a thorough
management risk assessment is one of the most critical components of any credit risk analysis.
It is management’s decisions and their implementation that ultimately lead to the generation of cash flow to
service the company’s debt.
This insight is reflected in the banker’s adage “Good management can weather a bad balance sheet, but a good
balance sheet cannot weather bad management.”
Management risk assessment is a judgmental process. As a credit professional, a credit analyst must assess
management’s behaviour, the decisions they have made in response to forces in the external environment, and
their past conduct.
The risk in a business is linked directly to its management’s integrity, skill and execution,
and scope.
All aspects of a business work together to contribute to a company’s success (or failure)—
from product offering to general operations to sales and distribution.
However, if a company’s management is unskilled, dishonest, or inconsistent, this potential
may be wasted.
Conversely, a business that has a history of addressing customer needs poorly, is run inefficiently, and is headed
for demise can be turned around by high-quality executives who win the co-operation of workers, investors, and
clients.
If you are dealing with a new prospective credit customer, you will need to spend considerable time gathering
the necessary information. However, it will be time well spent. No bank wants to engage in a credit relationship
in which the willingness of the borrower to uphold the contract is in question. At the most basic level, if you are
not wholly comfortable with management’s willingness to repay debt, you should not enter into a credit
relationship with that entity.
Facility Risk–
Facility risk is the risk that credit has been structured inadequately, stressing the credit relationship and not
adequately protecting the lender in the case of non-performance by the borrower.
Appropriate structuring of credit facilities is an important element of sound credit underwriting practices. Credit
facilities should be structured in a manner such that they suitably match the cash flow requirements and
repayment sources of their customers.
Credit enhancements are to be adequately backed by collateral security to mitigate the loss in the event of
default.
The insights gained from the credit risk assessment will help include the necessary appropriate terms and
conditions for the credit agreement.
Structuring the loan is done for identification and minimisation of risks. If a credit is not structured properly, it
can result in non-payment or delayed payment of loans.
The following actions should help you to achieve the desired results:
Financial risk plays a key role in the overall credit risk assessment process. Keep the
following factors in mind:
The overall credit decision process and the roles played by liquidity and solvency,
including how to interpret the results of the liquidity and solvency tests
The four crucial assessments that are typically performed within the credit risk
analysis process aligned with the credit policy of the bank
The specific elements involved in financial risk assessment
The goal of credit risk assessment is to determine the likelihood that credit will be
repaid in full and on time
Management Risk
Facility Risk
You need to ensure that the credit facility is properly structured so that it helps not
only identify, but also minimise, risks.
You must realize that failure to structure a credit properly can result in default or
delayed repayment of loans.
of a business. The following questions may be particularly helpful when you are looking into the risk aspects of
a credit proposal:
Question 1
Select to flip
How do the financial, business, and management risks affect liquidity and solvency for this prospective
borrower?
Question 2
How are these factors likely to change? What effect will this have on repayment risk?
Question 3
Do I understand the financial analysis—what happened—in relation to business and management impacts—
why it happened?
reliable and effective credit underwriting approach is paramount to a bank’s small and medium enterprise
(SME) lending operations. It is also the basis for sound risk management.
The credit underwriting approach is documented as part of the bank’s credit policy and is generally approved by
the bank’s board of directors. It sets out the bank’s lending strategies, risk assessment criteria, facility
structuring guidelines, covenants and conditions, acceptable pricing, and rules for determining the approving
authority.
The foundation of a reliable and effective credit underwriting approach is governance that ensures that the right
people make the right decisions based on the right information. Hence, it is important that adequate controls are
applied within each stage of the approach.
It is also important to continuously review the approach through processes that help provide feedback and drive
further improvements, such as the loan review mechanism (LRM).
A credit operations group, usually a middle office, which supports data analysis, due diligence
checks, and post-sanction documentation and disbursement.
Organisational Units–
The business development and relationship management team sources potential credit opportunities
by considering the parameters of the bank’s overall credit strategy, including target markets and risk
acceptance criteria, as laid out in the credit underwriting standards. It gathers all the necessary
information from the client, carries out all the checks and due diligence, and draws up a proposal
note in a format prescribed by the bank.
The proposal is evaluated by the credit underwriting team in terms of credit policy and internal
guidelines. It is then transferred to the credit risk group, which independently evaluates the request
and assigns a credit rating.
The proposal is then presented to the sanctioning authority. Most public-sector banks follow a
committee system of sanction, in which the proposal is presented at a committee meeting of senior
executives, who decide on the proposal. In the case of private-sector banks, in most cases the
lending approval authority is delegated to an individual credit officer, but the approval limits decide
the required level of seniority for approvals.
The Credit Underwriting Approach
Banks use the appropriate credit underwriting approach based on the nature of the borrower
segment and risk profile. The credit underwriting approach involves the use of a structured credit risk
analysis to evaluate the borrower’s credit standing, repayment capacity, and the proposed facility
structure.
The focus of an effective credit analysis is to evaluate the risk that the credit extended will be repaid
in cash when due. The credit analysis approach considers three key aspects:
Quantitative risk analysis: includes analysis of financial statements and other related financial
documents
Qualitative risk analysis: includes evaluation of key industry, management, and business risks
Lending facility structure analysis: includes evaluation of the loan structure that not only
meets the overall client needs but protects the bank as well. This evaluation also covers the
availability of collateral security, guarantees, and any government support such as the Credit
Guarantee Fund Trust for Micro and Small Enterprises (CGTMSE).
The credit underwriting approach provides the operational methodology to make day-to-day lending
decisions using a structured credit analysis (as discussed above). Banks generally use two credit
underwriting approaches:
Discretionary lending
Program lending
Regardless of the underwriting approach, credit scoring is the basis used to grade all customers. A
credit grade (CG) is a numerical expression based on a standardised analysis of a client’s financial
and behavioural metrics to represent a borrower’s creditworthiness. The bank uses credit grades to
evaluate the potential risk posed by lending to a client and to mitigate losses due to bad debt. The
bank also uses credit scores to determine who qualifies for a loan, at what interest rate, and at what
credit limit.
Discretionary Lending
Discretionary lending is widely used for sophisticated corporate and commercial borrowers.
Their borrowing requirements are complex and require expert-level credit judgement based on
specific industry and market insights.
The availability of reliable and detailed financial and market information aids this type of
underwriting.
The credit policy parameters and guidelines are kept at a broad advisory level in this type of
underwriting and hence offer a wider scope to apply discretionary judgement on a case-by-
case basis.
Program Lending
For program lending, the credit evaluation is based on a rule-based approach. A set of
parameterised credit policy rules are established to ensure a quick and efficient way to
underwrite loan requests.
The revenue and risks view are taken at a portfolio level rather than a case-by-case level,
hence the underwriting criteria.
Program lending is best suited for evaluating small business lending decisions because:
o Small business customers require simplified and quick access to credit. A rule-based
underwriting approach supports this high-volume lending business by providing a fast,
uniform way to identify and mitigate key risks and make lending decisions.
o It drives standardisation and simplicity and reduces subjective evaluation. For example,
the predefined standardisation of acceptable collaterals, maximum unsecured exposure
norms, and loan-to-value benchmarks help both the front-line sales and credit
underwriting teams by providing a uniform understanding of key client acceptance
parameters.
o The use of surrogate financial documents, such as bank statements and tax records,
provides a strong comfort to drive financial risk.
The credit decision process starts with document collection and ends with a credit decision. Its
multiple steps are grouped in the following stages:
(Image 1)
Post-sanction follow-up
The review is usually undertaken within three to six months of the credit sanction or renewal.
Independent officers should undertake the review, and review findings must be reported directly to
the bank’s board or other designated committees.
Image 1
What You Need to Do
Having a strong appreciation of the credit risk assessment approach is critical in your ability to identify the right
type of small business clients while being able to underwrite the credit request efficiently and effectively. To
enhance your skills in this area, you should:
Familiarise yourself with your bank’s underwriting approach for the SME segment in order to apply the correct
underwriting approach as expertly as possible.
Understand the crucial quantitative and qualitative assessments that are typically performed within the credit
analysis approach that help you identify and mitigate risk when reviewing credit requests.
Familiarise yourself with the detailed step-by-step stages in the underwriting process in order to understand the
documentation and action steps you need to take to help the bank achieve a quick turnaround time in loan
disbursals.
Use the loan review mechanism (LRM) as an effective tool for the ongoing monitoring of the quality of the
credit portfolio.
You know that certain analytical steps are typically followed to assess the credit risk. You
also know that the borrower has to meet prescribed benchmarks to establish his
repayment capacity and security sufficiency in order to qualify for credit at your bank.
Therefore, you feel you have a roadmap to follow when determining the loan decision.
You know that you must work through the following three-stage process and be well
prepared to improve your ability to process the loan quickly:
1. Prospecting stage: You will collect the documents relating to the applicant’s
business (trade licence, government approvals, business orders, Know Your
Customer (KYC) documents, etc.), screen the documents, and review the bank
statements.
2. Login stage: You will conduct spot inspection and due diligence, discuss (interview)
with the applicant, and conduct assessment and appraisal.
3. Approval or rejection stage: Based on your assessment, you will take the next steps
and either sanction or decline the proposal.
You will be able to collect the right set of documents from the applicant for evaluating his
financials under the program lending policy. You will also be able to review the available
qualitative and quantitative information upfront in order to conduct a well-guided
personal discussion with the applicant. You feel confident in participating in a process
that leads to a logical, defensible assessment of the likelihood that the loan will be repaid
in full and on time.
following questions as you proceed through the credit assessment and decision process:
Question 1
Select to flip
Have I developed a thorough understanding of the bank’s credit policy for effectively underwriting various loan
products according to the underwriting norms?
Question 2
Am I ready with a checklist of documents that need to be gathered from the applicant?
Question 3
Have I prepared a checklist of items for when I visit the applicant’s site, and do I know how to check these
items?
Question 4
Am I ready with the type of questions to be asked when I interview the applicant? Do I have all the required
documents, data, and details to conduct the appraisal? Have I gone through the appraisal mechanism in order to
make a sound credit decision?
Question 5
Am I able to make a sound credit decision? For example, am I able to justify my decision with competent
authority?
Question 6
Am I able to communicate effectively with the applicant about credit approval or credit decline with due
justification? Am I in line with the post-disbursement review mechanism according to the prescribed
guidelines?
In this lesson, we will focus on the step-by-step activities within a typical SME loan sanctioning and monitoring
process: application, appraisal, sanction, disbursement, and monitoring. We will also focus on the need for a
sound credit process and sequential approach.
A better understanding of the decision-making process will help the credit officer improve the quality of the
credit decision. The credit risk assessment comprises two parts.
First, the credit officer must assess the creditworthiness of the borrower, then rate the borrower and price the
product accordingly. Second, the credit officer must monitor the advances and recovery according to the terms
of the sanction. The various stages in the life cycle of a loan are illustrated below:
A traditional loan decision process (i.e., one that does not include automated risk rating inputs) may involve
several steps. These steps range from gathering data to determining policy compliance to structuring and pricing
the credit request.
The Steps of the Lending Decision Process–
The size of the loan or credit exposure may vary from a small amount to a fairly large amount. Hence, the
lending process differs based on loan size. Generally, the process is simplified for small loans in order to
guarantee a quicker turnaround time (TAT) than the TAT of larger loans.
Here are the steps of the lending decision process, with the critical activities generally followed.
Small Loans
Small loans usually follow the retail lending process, which involves only a few steps and is typically
scorecard-driven. Borrowers expect a simplified process, basic documentation, and quick decision-making.
Large Loans
While some of the steps in the small loans decision process are common (initial verification checks, credit
bureau checks), the larger credit exposure loans have a much more detailed underwriting process.
Understand:
The key documents and activities at the prospecting stage in order to improve the TAT of
loan decision-making
The various components in a Credit Information Bureau India Ltd. (CIBIL) report and how
they can be used to make credit decisions
The process of preparing credit scorecards
The importance of obtaining adequate and appropriate securities or guarantees
Develop:
The skills to interview the client in order to gather the relevant information
The skills to compare the bank’s scorecard rating with the SMERA rating and identify any
variations
Price the Product:
Price the loan product based on the bank’s scorecard rating.
You have been asked to process a business loan proposal for an automobile servicing unit ( an authorised
servicing agent for Maruthi Cars). It is seeking a working capital limit of Rs. 75.00 lacs. As one of your reputed
clients, it routes all its transactions through a current account in your branch. It also owns term deposits worth
Rs. 30.00 lacs. How will you handle this proposal?
By understanding the following key steps of the underwriting process, you will help to facilitate a quick
decision that will in turn delight the client:
Capture the applicant’s business profile appropriately.
Form an initial assessment based on gathered inputs (analyse eligibility and credit history).
Visit the applicant’s site and discuss with the applicant the required matters.
Obtain CIBIL or SMERA reports as applicable.
Perform a credit appraisal according to the prescribed format and make a decision to sanction or to decline the
request.
As a lender, consider the following questions as you work through the credit assessment and decision process:
Question 1
Select to flip
Am I able to prepare an appropriate checklist in order to gather complete information from the applicant?
Question 2
Do I have the adequate knowledge to screen the documents before conducting the applicant interview?
Question 3
Have I developed the necessary interview skills to collect the relevant information to cross-verify the data
gathered either through documents or from information that is not available in the documents?
Question 4
Am I up-to-date with the latest credit policy guidelines in order to relate the credit policy provisions while
appraising the proposals?
Question 5
Have I developed the judgement capabilities based on credit risk components either to sanction or to decline the
proposal? Am I able to justify either the sanction or the decline of the proposal on its merits and communicate
this decision convincingly?
Question 6
Am I familiar with the documentation process for a specific type of loan and disbursements thereof?
SME borrowers expect quicker turnaround time (TAT) because their needs are immediate. With SME
borrowers, banks face a challenge because relatively less financial information is available for financial analysis
and credit assessment. In such cases, banks have to depend on surrogate information and available documents in
order to make credit decisions. Therefore, initial due diligence plays a crucial role in financing SME borrowers.
Typically, SME borrowers with sizable loan requests maintain books and other financial statements. In such
instances, it is necessary for the lender to complete the entire credit process in order to arrive at a credit
decision. This takes considerable time and resources.
It is crucial that a lender be familiar with the pre-screening practices that filter the right quality of clients to the
next stage of credit appraisal. The qualitative and quantitative aspects of due diligence are important in each
step of the process. Improper screening results in a higher rate of rejection at later stages. This result not only
leads to poor customer experience but also consumes critical resources.
In this lesson, you will learn the importance of pre-screening practices to filter the right quality of clients to the
next stage of credit appraisal. We will also focus on the quantitative and qualitative aspects of due diligence.
The various credit verification methods adopted by banks are specifically designed to enhance analysis and
information accuracy while underwriting a loan request. In the case of small business lending, effective client
verification becomes crucial when one considers the limited availability of public information at an individual
borrower level.
The aim of evaluating a borrower’s repayment capability and overall credit behaviour is to gain a deeper
understanding of the financial transaction patterns and credit behaviours of the key individuals running the
business.
Cash flow trends (e.g., monthly fluctuations, average balances, cash volatility, and turnover)
Transactional or payment behaviour, such as:
o Customer-issued cheques being returned due to shortage of funds
o Third-party cheques deposited into the customer's account being returned
Loan repayment history (regular equated monthly instalment [EMI] outflows and repayment
record)
In the case of overdraft statements, the information on utilisation behaviour and hard usage
statistics
A healthy and stable average balance reflects the business’s ability to pay for fixed
obligations and other business-related obligations while ensuring adequate cash on hand to
keep the business operations running smoothly.
A high level of cash volatility, with instances of cash balances going into the negative or
over the limit, indicates poor cash management by the borrower.
A high degree of quarterly fluctuations in credit turnover (the sum of all business-related
payment credits in the account) reflects a seasonal or non-steady business flow aspect of the
business and will require better analysis to understand the cash flow management by the
business owners to support such seasonal variability.
“Large” transactions must be examined closely to assess trends or abnormalities.
A high level of returns in the case of third-party cheques issued favouring the borrower will
need to be evaluated to identify the underlying reasons. This indicator signals a poor
collections discipline and reflects on the quality of the counterparties (buyers) the business
is dealing with.
The return of cheques issued by the borrower is a more concerning issue, because it
indicates management’s poor commitment to honouring payments due and its inability to
meet its obligations.
Frequent overdue or excess entries in overdraft statements alert the lender to poor operating
cycle management and cash flow issues that could potentially disrupt the business unless
adequately addressed.
Credit bureau records offer an effective way to evaluate small business credit behaviour and repayment track
records at both a business and an individual level. Most banks use both to underwrite credit risk. This
information should be analysed for all key owners and managers. Credit records are available in the form of:
Credit bureaus collect factual information about commercial borrowers or individuals from
multiple sources (banks, credit card companies, collection agencies, blacklisted databases,
and various government agencies). This information usually includes:
o Basic borrower details: name, address, identification number, date of birth, date of
incorporation, and so on
o Borrower loan details: type and amount of credit facilities sanctioned, facility start
date, current outstanding and live status, and so on
o Past payment history and overdue information
o Bureau enquiries on the borrower during the past few months by various parties
o Information related to any bankruptcy, settlement, or legal suit against the borrower
Credit bureaus do not provide information about the borrower’s income, revenue, or assets.
Credit bureaus also provide a credit score. The credit score is a result of a mathematical
algorithm applied to a credit report and other available information to predict future
borrower delinquency.
TransUnion CIBIL scorecards range between 300 and 900. Generally, banks in India insist
on a score of 750 and above for the sanction of a loan. The higher the score, the higher the
creditworthiness of the borrower and the higher the chances of sanction.
Verification provides detailed information about the various credit facilities in the name of
the borrowing entity and helps corroborate those details with the bank statements to identify
any missing information or additional information that the lender will require as part of due
diligence.
Verification helps accurately establish the existing debt obligations and outstanding loan
amount, which in turn helps the assessment of a borrower’s debt repayment capacity.
The repayment history provides excellent feedback about the borrower’s repayment
integrity and intention to service the debt. Records that reflect a high level of late payments
(days past due) or non-payments, partial payments, or collection-induced repayments are a
good indicator of the potential risk in lending to the borrower.
While the commercial bureau records of a company may show a good track record, the
individual credit bureau reports of the key owners are also critical because they tend to
reflect the management disposition towards repaying credit as well as any lack of integrity
and intent.
To assess the existence of the business and to corroborate the nature and size of the
operation with the information provided by the borrower
To filter out potentially fraudulent applications and business entities with doubtful
operational premises and inaccessibility issues that may hamper future collections efforts in
the case of default
To validate the address provided in the application form and to check whether the address is
easily accessible
To confirm whether physical sign boards are in place and the relevant commercial operating
licences are properly displayed (e.g., shop and establishment certificate)
To check the surrounding location of the business premises
To observe the level of business activity and the number of employees seen at the business
premises
To survey the neighbours of the borrowing entity and the owners and document any adverse
feedback
To photograph the business premises
The overall credit evaluation also includes a personal discussion or interview with the key promoters of the
borrowing entity. The aim of the interview is to better understand the borrower’s business profile and seek
clarifications on any discrepancies or observations that may be in variance with the policy or profile of the
borrower.
The interview is generally conducted by the credit manager or relationship manager (RM), either on-site and in-
person or by telephone, depending on the customer segment.
The Key Areas of the Personal Discussion or Management Interview
The interview will focus on understanding the reason for the loan, the business model and operating cycle of the
entity, cash flow, stability of income, and how the borrower will be able to repay the loan.
The real functional owner(s) operating the business and their background
The nature of the business, industry type, products, success factors, risks, and the
competency of the key individuals to manage the business successfully
Information about business continuity and succession risk
The key suppliers and buyers and concentration risk-related issues
Business consistency and operating cycle: turnover, profitability, profit margins, and
working capital cycle
The reasons for funding and the details about the nature of use
Any other transactional-related queries: post review of bank statements, credit reports, tax
statements, and so on
Helps to gain first-person insight into the borrower and the business and establish overall
insight into the credibility of the borrower
Helps to elicit more information from the borrower, which betters the lender’s overall
understanding
Helps to evaluate the nature of the borrower’s activity. This evaluation will provide a fair
idea of the borrower’s intentions, which are not evident from the paperwork.
Helps to identify the names of reference persons who are known to both the lender and the
borrower so that opinions can be obtained from these references later
Clearly establishes the purpose of the loan request and the use of funds in order to make the
lending decision
By conducting the central bank and other government agency checks, the lender can proactively use the
information to conduct a further investigation of the borrower’s veracity before making the final lending
decision.
The Purpose of the Central Bank and Other Government Agency Checks
These searches are conducted to identify any negative or adverse information that may have been recorded
against the borrowing entity or the key owners and to unearth potential adverse information that may affect the
business operation.
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) publishes a defaulters list to disseminate information
about wilful defaulters to other banks and financial institutions so that further financing will
not be provided to such borrowers. Wilful default is defined by the RBI as deliberate non-
payment of dues despite adequate cash flow and net worth, siphoning off funds, the selling
off of financed assets and the diversion of funds for activities other than the core business,
the misrepresentation of facts, or fraudulent transactions by the borrower.
The Central Registry of Securitisation Asset Reconstruction and Security Interest of India
(CERSAI) provides a platform for filing the registration of transactions of securitisation,
asset reconstruction, and security interest by banks and financial institutions. A CERSAI
database search will reveal any charges registered on immovable properties in favour of
financial institutions.
The Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India (ECGC) periodically publishes a caution
list of entities that have violated export-related rules. If the borrower’s name appears on this
list, details have to be examined and action initiated.
Information from the Central Bank and Other Government Agency Checks
This information includes
Negative news flow or adverse media coverage about the borrowing entity or the key
owner(s)
Information about any strictures or cases initiated by government agencies or litigation and
tax investigations; and
Helps to identify any politically exposed person linked to the individual owner(s), which
may affect the bank’s reputation as a lender or generate adverse media or regulatory
implications
Fraud control checks provide for an independent verification of the borrower’s documents, credit initiation, and
vendor management process. These checks are generally performed by the bank’s in-house fraud control officer
or an agency deputed by the bank.
Fraud is likely to arise through first-party actions perpetuated by front-line sales staff, site inspectors, or bank
agencies. Key concerns include fraudulent income documents (e.g., tax returns or bank statements), fraudulent
transaction documents (e.g., invoices), inflated valuation reports to achieve higher loan eligibility, the issue of
fictitious properties, or multiple loans on the same property.
Anti-Fraud Verification
Having detailed information about key verification checks helps you to gain a better appreciation while
undertaking borrower credit analysis and to make the right credit decisions. To enhance your skills in this area,
you should:
Perform:
All required verification steps to make sure that you’re working with the highest quality
information possible.
Understand:
The key aspects of a bank statement analysis in order to effectively evaluate the borrower’s
financial health and creditworthiness.
The credit bureau scorecards and how to analyse the various factors involved.
Review:
The bureau records to ascertain key aspects of the borrower’s prior personal and business accounts
and credit facilities with various banks.
Assess:
The level of repayment risk as evidenced by information in the credit bureau and from other
verification checks, and how it might affect the borrower’s ability and willingness to repay debt.
Conduct:
Google searches to identify any adverse media information and reputational issues that the bank
may face if it advances a loan to a borrower with negative market information.
You have received a loan proposal from M/s Adharsha Enterprises, which is in the
electronics spare parts business. Adharsha is a regular supplier to M/s ABC Pvt. Limited,
which is a reputed corporate business group. You learned from a recent newspaper
article that ABC’s directors were investigated by the income tax authorities.
Although this has no direct impact on Adharsha’s loan proposal, the company may face
cash flow issues. Under these conditions, your due diligence plays a critical role in
safeguarding the interest of the bank.
You have also received an SME loan proposal from M/s Quality Springs for Rs. 50.00 lacs.
Quality Springs manufactures springs and supplies various automobile industries.
Currently, Quality Springs is dealing with another public-sector bank.
As part of your due diligence, you have obtained the bank account statements from
Quality Spring's existing bankers. While analysing the statements, you find that the credit
summation of the account from the past 12 months is approximately Rs. 30.00 lacs
against a sales turnover of Rs. 35.00 lacs showed in the books of accounts. Quality
Springs has projected sales of Rs. 50.00 lacs during the current year. The inputs provided
here will help you relate the credit summation to the sales and determine whether
Quality Springs’s dealings appear to be genuine.
Asking the right questions based on the verification inputs is key to ensuring the right loan decision is made.
Questions such as these can help ensure you are able to size up the information while making the loan decision:
Bank Statements:
Question 1
Select to flip
Are there EMIs in the current account statements that have not been declared by the borrower in its application
form when checked against the credit bureau live loan records?
Question 2
Are there repeated cheque returns from the same buyer? Is there a concern that the buyer is having cash flow
problems, especially if that buyer is a major customer? How will this affect your borrower in a worst-case
scenario?
Question 3
Do high-value, rounded credit and debit entries appear in the bank accounts? What do those entries represent?
Question 4
Is there a high degree of account volatility from month to month? If so, why?
Credit Bureaus:
Question 5
Select to flip
How has the business owner handled credit relationships in the past? If there have been issues, how have they
been resolved?
Question 6
Are there any adverse indications in the existing and past accounts and loan relationships with the bank?
Question 7
Are there any past payment problems that require explanation? If so, what are the explanations?
Question 8
Are there any recent loans availed past the credit bureau report date?