Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Case After Gene Therapy For Sickle Cell Disease
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Case After Gene Therapy For Sickle Cell Disease
Brief Report
Sum m a r y
From Bluebird Bio, Cambridge, MA (S.G., Gene therapy with LentiGlobin for sickle cell disease (bb1111, lovotibeglogene
D.W., H.B., P.D.G., G.P., M.F., A.Y., M.G., autotemcel) consists of autologous transplantation of a patient’s hematopoietic stem
S.B.V., A.M., J.L., R.A.C., M.B.); the Cel-
lular and Molecular Therapeutics Branch, cells transduced with the BB305 lentiviral vector that encodes the βA-T87Q-globin
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Insti- gene. Acute myeloid leukemia developed in a woman approximately 5.5 years after
tute–National Institute of Diabetes and she had received LentiGlobin for sickle cell disease as part of the initial cohort
Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National
Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (J.T.); (Group A) of the HGB-206 study. An analysis of peripheral-blood samples revealed
GeneWerk, Heidelberg, Germany (M.S.); that blast cells contained a BB305 lentiviral vector insertion site. The results of an
the University of Alabama at Birming- investigation of causality indicated that the leukemia was unlikely to be related to
ham, Birmingham (J.K.); and the Division
of Pediatric Hematology–Oncology, Med- vector insertion, given the location of the insertion site, the very low transgene
ical University of South Carolina, Charles- expression in blast cells, and the lack of an effect on expression of surrounding
ton (J.J.). Dr. Bonner can be contacted at genes. Several somatic mutations predisposing to acute myeloid leukemia were
mbonner@bluebirdbio.com or at Bluebird
Bio, 60 Binney St., Cambridge, MA 02142. present after diagnosis, which suggests that patients with sickle cell disease are at
increased risk for hematologic malignant conditions after transplantation, most
This article was published on December
12, 2021, at NEJM.org. likely because of a combination of risks associated with underlying sickle cell disease,
transplantation procedure, and inadequate disease control after treatment. (Funded
N Engl J Med 2022;386:138-47.
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2109167 by Bluebird Bio.)
Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.
S
ickle cell disease is a progressive, genetic disease caused by a
point mutation in the β-globin gene and is associated with substantial mor-
bidity and early mortality.1,2 Sickle hemoglobin production and subsequent
polymerization leads to red-cell sickling, clinically manifesting as chronic hemo-
lytic anemia, vasculopathy, and vaso-occlusion.1,2 Current management of sickle
cell disease relies on lifelong use of palliative short-term and long-term thera-
pies.1,2 Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is the only accepted,
potentially curative treatment option for patients with sickle cell disease; however,
its use is limited by a paucity of matched donors, immunologic complications, and
the inherent risks of transplantation-related morbidity and mortality.1,3,4
Gene therapy with LentiGlobin for sickle cell disease (bb1111, lovotibeglogene
autotemcel) consists of autologous transplantation of the patients’ own hemato-
poietic stem cells (HSCs) transduced with the BB305 lentiviral vector encoding the
βA-T87Q-globin gene, which is designed to produce antisickling hemoglobin (HbAT87Q).5-7
Through the use of autologous HSCs, gene therapy with LentiGlobin circumvents
the need for a donor and may avoid the immunologic complications associated with
allogeneic HSC transplantation. The phase 1–2 HGB-206 study is evaluating the ef-
ficacy and safety of LentiGlobin for sickle cell disease, and an unprespecified in-
terim analysis of the results is now reported in vaso-occlusive crisis in December 2020, the patient
the Journal.8 Here, we report a case of acute my- was noted to have 2% blast cells in peripheral
eloid leukemia that developed in a female patient blood, which was thought to be related to recov-
approximately 5.5 years after she had received ery after infection; the presence of blast cells
gene therapy with LentiGlobin as part of the ini- was not reported in subsequent blood analyses.
tial cohort (Group A) of the HGB-206 study, as In January 2021, neutropenia (defined as an ab-
well as the results of investigations to deter- solute neutrophil count of <1000 per microliter)
mine whether the development of acute myeloid developed, and in February 2021, acute myeloid
leukemia was vector-mediated. leukemia (subtype M0 according to the French–
American–British classification) was diagnosed
C a se R ep or t after the detection of 29% blast cells in peripheral
blood and 22 to 50% blast cells in bone marrow
Before receiving gene therapy with LentiGlobin, (Table 1). Given the potential of insertional on-
the patient had sickle cell disease (βS/βS geno- cogenesis by the lentiviral vector and the expo-
type) with recurrent vaso-occlusive crises that had sure to myelotoxic chemotherapy with busulfan,
led to frequent hospitalizations despite the use of the acute myeloid leukemia was studied to deter-
long-term hydroxyurea therapy. She was 31 years mine causality and relation to gene therapy. Chro-
of age when she received a diagnosis of acute mosomal microarray analysis of the bone marrow
myeloid leukemia in February 2021 (Table 1). samples revealed monosomy 7 in 70% of cells
In August 2015, as part of the Group A cohort and partial loss of 11p involving WT1 in 50% of
in the HGB-206 study, the patient received Lenti cells. A next-generation sequencing myeloid mu-
Globin produced from HSCs harvested from bone tation panel revealed a RUNX1 frameshift muta-
marrow through an earlier version of the drug- tion and a PTPN11 missense mutation (Table 1).
product manufacturing process as part of the Retrospective next-generation sequencing and
initial study protocol. The manufacturing process single-nucleotide-polymorphism microarray anal-
was later modified for subsequent patients en- yses of retained pretreatment peripheral-blood
rolled in Groups B and C (Table S1 in the Sup- leukocytes did not reveal any genetic abnormali-
plementary Appendix, available with the full text ties, nor were any abnormalities observed in any
of this article at NEJM.org). The drug product retained post-treatment sample up to month 48
administered in the patient had a total CD34+ (the most recent sample obtained before the di-
cell dose of 2.6 × 106 cells per kilogram of body agnosis of acute myeloid leukemia). Further anal-
weight (of which 1.5 × 106 cells per kilogram were ysis of the peripheral-blood samples revealed that
CD34hi long-term repopulating hematopoietic stem the blast cells were positive for BB305 lentiviral
and progenitor cells [HSPCs]) and a vector copy vector. Specifically, CD34+ blast-enriched cell pop-
number of 0.57 copies per diploid genome (Ta- ulations in samples of both peripheral-blood and
ble 1). At day 16 after LentiGlobin treatment, the bone marrow contained an integrated lentiviral
patient received granulocyte colony-stimulating vector, with vector copy numbers of 1.12 copies
factor because of fever, and subsequent neutro- per diploid genome and 1.17 copies per diploid
phil and platelet engraftments occurred at 19 genome, respectively. The percentage of lentivi-
and 31 days after treatment, respectively. At 6 ral vector–positive cells was 92.1% in the CD34+
months after treatment, the vector copy number peripheral-blood sample and 86.7% in the CD34+
in peripheral blood was 0.05 copies per diploid bone marrow sample. The investigator assessed
genome and the level of gene therapy–derived the acute myeloid leukemia as possibly related to
hemoglobin (HbAT87Q) was 4.33% of total non- her gene therapy.
transfused hemoglobin, findings that suggest low After acute myeloid leukemia was diagnosed,
engraftment of gene-modified cells and low trans- the patient underwent three cycles of induction
gene expression with minimal clinical benefit, chemotherapy, which led to morphologic remis-
because the pretransplantation sickle cell disease sion, but she remained positive for minimal resid-
phenotype persisted and led to the need for ual disease with a blast-cell percentage of 0.2%.
hydroxyurea therapy and packed red-cell trans- She underwent a human leukocyte antigen–hap-
fusions (Table 1 and Table S2). loidentical peripheral-blood stem-cell transplan-
During an emergency department visit for a tation in June 2021 and remained positive for
Table 1. Baseline and Treatment Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes in a Patient with AML after LentiGlobin Treatment for Sickle Cell Disease.*
Table 1. (Continued.)
* AML denotes acute myeloid leukemia, LVV+ lentiviral vector–positive, VAF variant allele frequency, and VCN vector copy number.
† Neutrophil engraftment was defined as the first day of absolute neutrophil count of at least 500 per microliter for three consecutive mea-
surements on different days after the initial post-transplant nadir by day 43, without receiving backup cells at any time during the neutrope-
nic phase.
‡ Platelet engraftment was defined as the first of 3 consecutive platelet counts of at least 50,000 per microliter on different days after the ini-
tial post-treatment nadir, without platelet transfusions for 7 days immediately preceding and during the evaluation period.
§ The drug-product manufacturing process was later modified for subsequent patients enrolled in Groups B and C in the HGB-206 study.
minimal residual disease. The patient had a re- ed specific quantitative polymerase-chain-reac-
lapse with the reappearance of circulating blast tion analyses designed to estimate the fractional
cells 90 days after transplantation and underwent contribution of the clone carrying the VAMP4
additional chemotherapy; however, she later died insertion site in peripheral blood. Until January
from complications of progressive acute myeloid 2020 (54 months after treatment), the VAMP4
leukemia. insertion site was present in approximately 1%
of peripheral-blood cells in the patient, and by
August 2020, this increased to 7% of peripheral-
Me thods
blood cells (Fig. 1B). This increase coincided
The phase 1–2 HGB-206 study evaluated the use with an overall increase in the vector copy num-
of LentiGlobin in patients with sickle cell disease. ber in peripheral blood during this period,
The drug product was manufactured by trans- which increased from approximately 0.05 copies
duction of autologous enriched CD34+ stem per diploid genome to 0.13 copies per diploid
cells with BB305 lentiviral vector encoding the genome. Concurrent with this rise, decreases in
antisickling βA-T87Q-globin gene. The structure of white-cell and absolute neutrophil counts were
the BB305 lentiviral vector has been previously also observed; these findings suggest a potential
described.5 To assess whether the acute myeloid correlation of these measures (Fig. 1C).
leukemia in the patient was due to insertional A single insertion was identified in VAMP4 in
oncogenesis, we performed integration site analy- the intronic region between exons 4 and 5 that
sis and RNA sequencing, as described previous- did not disrupt a putative enhancer (approxi-
ly9-13 and detailed in the Supplementary Appendix. mately 5 kilobases upstream) or the promoter
(approximately 30 kilobases upstream). An in-
sertion site in the VAMP4 gene body was present
R e sult s
in most patients (25 of 35 [71%]) in the HGB-206
Integration Site Analysis study who had received LentiGlobin and had
We performed an integration site analysis to available data from integration site analysis. A
evaluate the role of vector insertion in the devel- total of 60 unique insertions in the VAMP4 gene
opment of acute myeloid leukemia. Many unique locus were mapped, of which 14 were localized
insertion sites (a total of 2997) were detected in to the intronic region between exons 4 and 5,
the patient; however, the insertion site in the including the VAMP4 insertion site in the patient
vesicle-associated membrane protein 4 gene with acute myeloid leukemia (Fig. 1D). As com-
(VAMP4) increased over time, reaching a relative pared with other protein-coding genes, VAMP4
frequency of more than 60% in August 2020 was in the 68th percentile for insertion sites when
(Fig. 1A) and 98.6% in February 2021. The in- normalized for gene length. In all other patients
crease in VAMP4 insertion-site frequency prompt- in the HGB-206 study, VAMP4 insertion sites were
A B
100 VAMP4 1.0
0 0.0
August 2020 0 12 24 36 48 60 72
Months since LentiGlobin Treatment
C
20,000
White-cell count
Cell Count (per microliter)
15,000
10,000
5,000
Absolute neutrophil count
0
0.0 0.5 1.0 12 24 36 48 60 64 65 66 67
Months since LentiGlobin Treatment
D
BB305 VAMP4 insertion sites BB305 VAMP4 insertion sites BB305 VAMP4 insertion site
in all patients with insertion sites in all patients with insertion sites in patient with AML
outside the intronic region between inside the intronic region between
exons 4 and 5 exons 4 and 5
BB305
Insertion Site
VAMP4
Exon 8 Exon 7 Exon 5 Exon 4 Exon 3 Exon 2 Exon 1
Exon 6
17,167× 104 17,168× 104 17,169× 104 17,170× 104 17,171× 104 17,172× 104 17,173× 104
Location on Chromosome 1 (no. of base pairs)
not associated with sequelae, including clonal was similar to that in mobilized peripheral-blood
expansion. CD34+ cells from a healthy donor (Fig. 2A and
Table S3). Next, we measured HBB expression lev-
Gene Expression Analysis els, including lentiviral vector–derived βA-T87Q and
We performed RNA-sequencing analysis to de- endogenous βS transcripts, in different cell frac-
termine the transcriptional effect of the VAMP4 tions. The highest expression levels of HBA1 and
insertion site. Given the location of the insertion HBB were in unsorted and CD34− bone marrow
site, we first determined whether VAMP4 expres- cells, which is expected in cell populations en-
sion had changed. An analysis of the CD34+ cells riched for the presence of erythroblasts and
from the patient showed VAMP4 expression that erythroid progenitors. In contrast, in CD34+ pe-
Patient with AML Healthy Donors Patient with AML Healthy Donors Patient with AML Healthy Donors
B
Chromosome 1 10-Megabase flanking VAMP4
400 25
The
300 20
15
200
10
100
No. of Genes
5
0 0
0 2 4 0 2 4
nejm.org
enriched depleted enriched depleted enriched depleted
8 30 25
6 25 20
n e w e ng l a n d j o u r na l
20 15
10 10
2 5 5
0 0 0
B B PB 1 2 PB
BM , BM ,P ,# ,#
Patient with AML Healthy Donors Patient with AML Healthy Donors
Downloaded from nejm.org at UNIVERSIDAD INTERNACIONAL DEL ECUADOR UIDE on September 18, 2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Brief Report
acute myeloid leukemia. The mechanism behind expression and an inadequate therapeutic response,
the accumulation of these somatic mutations is with ongoing hemolysis and persistent anemia
likely to be multifactorial, with contributions from — outcomes that subjected transplanted and
the transplantation procedure and its associated endogenous bone marrow cells to continued he-
risks, the underlying sickle cell disease, and the matopoietic stress after treatment, providing fur-
continued hematopoietic stress resulting from ther opportunity for accumulation of mutations.
the minimal clinical benefit derived from Lenti- Before the development of malignant disease
Globin, which was observed in both cases.15 in these two patients, alterations to the HGB-206
Among patients with sickle cell disease, the study protocol were necessary to improve clinical
risk of hematologic malignant conditions is 2 to benefit; thus, the initial protocol and manufac-
11 times as high as that in the general popula- turing process used in Group A underwent sev-
tion.20,21 Factors that probably contribute to this eral changes to improve HSC collection and trans-
increased baseline risk include the underlying duction efficiency. The protocol used in Group C
pathophysiological mechanism of chronic hypoxia, includes a minimum of 60 days of packed red-cell
the generation of reactive oxygen species with as- transfusions before HSC collection, HSC collec-
sociated oxidative stress, the chronic inflamma- tion by mobilization with plerixafor followed by
tion, the endothelial and vascular damage and apheresis, and an increased target value for the
constant erythropoietic stress, the high cell turn- area under the plasma busulfan concentration–
over, and the damage to the HSC compartment time curve during conditioning. Some of these
in bone marrow.1,2,20,21 Use of hydroxyurea for modifications have positively affected the quality
sickle cell disease has been suggested as a pos- (CD34hi) and number of HSCs available for ex vivo
sible risk factor, but analyses of data accumu- manipulation (Table S1). In addition, the improve-
lated over decades from patients with sickle cell ment in transduction efficiency resulting from
disease and chronic myeloid leukemia have not the refining of the manufacturing process has
established a link.22 The transplantation proce- resulted in improved levels of antisickling hemo-
dure, including the use of myeloablative condi- globin.27 Together, these protocol improvements
tioning agents such as busulfan, carries inherent are anticipated to reduce proliferative and hema-
risks of malignant disease.23-25 Furthermore, af- topoietic stresses and therefore may contribute
ter myeloablation, the bone marrow niche under- to reducing the risk of acute myeloid leukemia
goes extensive proliferation of HSCs and HSPCs, after transplantation in patients in Group C. Al-
generating proliferative stress that may lead to though follow-up was limited (median duration,
the rise and accumulation of mutations as part 20.9 months [range, 8.5 to 43.1] as of July 26,
of the normal engraftment process.26 If a lower 2021), no cases of malignant disease have been
cell dose is administered to a patient after mye- reported in Group C patients to date.
loablation, fewer HSCs and HSPCs are available In summary, acute myeloid leukemia devel-
to repopulate the bone marrow, which leads to oped in a patient who had received LentiGlobin
the need for more replication cycles and hence for sickle cell disease as part of the initial cohort
additional proliferative stress and a higher prob- (Group A) of the HGB-206 study; the develop-
ability of acquiring a mutation that could lead to ment of this malignant condition was most
acute myeloid leukemia. likely independent of insertional oncogenesis.
The two patients in Group A of the HGB-206 We have suggested possible contributing factors
study in whom acute myeloid leukemia developed to the development of acute myeloid leukemia;
had received LentiGlobin produced from bone however, a higher proportion of transgene-express-
marrow–harvested HSCs through an earlier ver- ing cells may eliminate many of them. Longer
sion of the drug-product manufacturing process. follow-up is required to assess the effect of trans-
Cell collections from the bone marrow with the plant-mediated gene therapy for patients with
use of this process resulted in low cell doses, sickle cell disease.
with fewer CD34hi long-term HSPCs, leading to Supported by Bluebird Bio. Medical writing support was
increased proliferative stress (Table S1). The low provided by Luke K. Burke, Ph.D. (Synergy Medical Communica-
tions, UK) and was funded by Bluebird Bio.
transduction efficiency of the drug product in Disclosure forms by the authors are available with the full
these patients resulted in minimal transgene text of this article at NEJM.org.
We thank the staff at HGB-206 clinical site for their important Smith, Joyce O’Connell (former employee), Perrine Geoffroy,
contributions to the care of the patient described in this article; and Katherine Lewis for their contributions; Donald B. Kohn
members of the Bluebird Bio team: Alberto De Iaco (former em- (Broad Stem Cell Research Center, University of California, Los
ployee), Brandon Gentile, Brandon V. Nguyen, Chetanya Pandya Angeles), Andreas E. Kulozik (Department of Pediatric Oncol-
(former employee), Christopher Mucci, Cynthia Rogers, James ogy, Hematology, and Immunology, University of Heidelberg),
Rottman (former employee), Katie Groglio (former employee), Franco Locatelli (IRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù),
Lauryn M. Christiansen, Madhumita Mahajan (former employ- Ryotaro Nakamura (Division of Hematology and HCT, City of
ee), Maggie Chen (former employee), Mauris Nnamani (former Hope National Medical Center), Eli Pasackow (Generation Bio),
employee), Megan D. Hoban, Nick Fenger, Nick Rouillard (for- Christof von Kalle (National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidel-
mer employee), Noel Namai (former employee), Omar Elbeta- berg and German Cancer Research Center), David A. Williams
nony (former employee), Russell W. Goetze (former employee), (Boston Children’s Hospital and Dana–Farber Cancer Institute,
Ryan Leenay, Shelby LaBarre (former employee), Stephanie Harvard Medical School and Harvard Stem Cell Institute), and
Hintzen-Matoian, Swathi Krishnan (former employee), Tiffany John Wagner (Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation,
Hu (former employee), Xinyan Zhang, Suzanne Plezier Jonkheer, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota) for helpful
Dennis Kim (former employee), Briana Deary, Natalia Mackow- discussions; and Pamela Y. Chan of Bluebird Bio for writing and
iak, Leanne Ianniello, Heidi Elliot, Laura Demopoulos, Frances editorial assistance.
References
1. Kato GJ, Piel FB, Reid CD, et al. Sickle 11. Aiuti A, Biasco L, Scaramuzza S, et al. 20. Brunson A, Keegan THM, Bang H,
cell disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2018;4: Lentiviral hematopoietic stem cell gene Mahajan A, Paulukonis S, Wun T. In-
18010. therapy in patients with Wiskott-Aldrich creased risk of leukemia among sickle cell
2. Sundd P, Gladwin MT, Novelli EM. syndrome. Science 2013;341:1233151. disease patients in California. Blood 2017;
Pathophysiology of sickle cell disease. 12. Paruzynski A, Arens A, Gabriel R, et al. 130:1597-9.
Annu Rev Pathol 2019;14:263-92. Genome-wide high-throughput integrome 21. Seminog OO, Ogunlaja OI, Yeates D,
3. Sheth S, Licursi M, Bhatia M. Sickle analyses by nrLAM-PCR and next-genera- Goldacre MJ. Risk of individual malig-
cell disease: time for a closer look at treat- tion sequencing. Nat Protoc 2010;5:1379- nant neoplasms in patients with sickle
ment options? Br J Haematol 2013; 162: 95. cell disease: English national record link-
455-64. 13. Schmidt M, Schwarzwaelder K, Bar- age study. J R Soc Med 2016;109:303-9.
4. Walters MC, De Castro LM, Sullivan tholomae C, et al. High-resolution inser- 22. Cuthbert D, Stein BL. Therapy-associ-
KM, et al. Indications and results of HLA- tion-site analysis by linear amplification- ated leukemic transformation in myelo-
identical sibling hematopoietic cell trans- mediated PCR (LAM-PCR). Nat Methods proliferative neoplasms — what do we
plantation for sickle cell disease. Biol 2007;4:1051-7. know? Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2019;
Blood Marrow Transplant 2016;22:207-11. 14. Agarwal A, Bolosky WJ, Wilson DB, 32:65-73.
5. Negre O, Bartholomae C, Beuzard Y, et al. Differentiation of leukemic blasts is 23. Pagano L, Pulsoni A, Tosti ME, et al.
et al. Preclinical evaluation of efficacy not completely blocked in acute myeloid Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia occurring
and safety of an improved lentiviral vector leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019; as second malignancy: report of the
for the treatment of β-thalassemia and 116:24593-9. GIMEMA archive of adult acute leukae-
sickle cell disease. Curr Gene Ther 2015; 15. Hsieh MM, Bonner M, Pierciey FJ, et al. mia. Br J Haematol 1999;106:1037-40.
15:64-81. Myelodysplastic syndrome unrelated to 24. Adès L, Guardiola P, Sociè G. Second
6. Ribeil JA, Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Payen lentiviral vector in a patient treated with malignancies after allogeneic hematopoi-
E, et al. Gene therapy in a patient with gene therapy for sickle cell disease. Blood etic stem cell transplantation: new insight
sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med 2017;376: Adv 2020;4:2058-63. and current problems. Blood Rev 2002;16:
848-55. 16. Shitara A, Shibui T, Okayama M, et al. 135-46.
7. Thompson AA, Walters MC, Kwiat- VAMP4 is required to maintain the ribbon 25. Leone G, Mele L, Pulsoni A, Equitani
kowski J, et al. Gene therapy in patients structure of the Golgi apparatus. Mol Cell F, Pagano L. The incidence of secondary
with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia. Biochem 2013;380:11-21. leukemias. Haematologica 1999;84:937-
N Engl J Med 2018;378:1479-93. 17. Tran THT, Zeng Q, Hong W. VAMP4 45.
8. Kanter J, Walters MC, Krishnamurti cycles from the cell surface to the trans- 26. Nawas MT, Schetelig J, Damm F, et al.
L, et al. Biologic and clinical efficacy of Golgi network via sorting and recycling The clinical implications of clonal hema-
LentiGlobin for sickle cell disease. N Engl endosomes. J Cell Sci 2007;120:1028-41. topoiesis in hematopoietic cell transplan-
J Med. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2117175. 18. Heffner GC, Bonner M, Christiansen tation. Blood Rev 2021;46:100744.
9. Six E, Guilloux A, Denis A, et al. Clon- L, et al. Prostaglandin E2 increases lentivi- 27. Tisdale JF, Pierciey FJ Jr, Bonner M, et al.
al tracking in gene therapy patients re- ral vector transduction efficiency of adult Safety and feasibility of hematopoietic
veals a diversity of human hematopoietic human hematopoietic stem and progeni- progenitor stem cell collection by mobili-
differentiation programs. Blood 2020; tor cells. Mol Ther 2018;26:320-8. zation with plerixafor followed by apher-
135:1219-31. 19. Shao W, Shan J, Kearney MF, et al. esis vs bone marrow harvest in patients
10. Oshlack A, Robinson MD, Young MD. Retrovirus Integration Database (RID): with sickle cell disease in the multi-center
From RNA-seq reads to differential ex- a public database for retroviral insertion HGB-206 trial. Am J Hematol 2020;95(9):
pression results. Genome Biol 2010;11: sites into host genomes. Retrovirology E239-E242.
220. 2016;13:47. Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.