You are on page 1of 1

S. Loibl et al.

Annals of Oncology

52. Bianchi DW, Chudova D, Sehnert AJ, et al. Noninvasive prenatal 73. Van Calsteren K, Verbesselt R, Beijnen J, et al. Transplacental transfer
testing and incidental detection of occult maternal malignancies. of anthracyclines, vinblastine, and 4-hydroxy-cyclophosphamide in a
JAMA. 2015;314(2):162-169. baboon model. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;119(3):594-600.
53. Lenaerts L, Brison N, Maggen C, et al. Comprehensive genome-wide 74. Geijteman ECT, Wensveen CWM, Duvekot JJ, et al. A child with severe
analysis of routine non-invasive test data allows cancer prediction: a hearing loss associated with maternal cisplatin treatment during
single-center retrospective analysis of over 85,000 pregnancies. pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(2 Pt 2 suppl 1):454-456.
EClinicalMedicine. 2021;35:100856. 75. Schmid P, Cortes J, Dent R, et al. Event-free survival with pem-
54. Lenaerts L, Van Calsteren K, Che H, et al. Pregnant women with brolizumab in early triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med.
confirmed neoplasms should not have noninvasive prenatal testing. 2022;386(6):556-567.
Prenat Diagn. 2019;39(12):1162-1165. 76. Schmid P, Dent R, O’Shaughnessy J. Pembrolizumab for early triple-
55. van Gerwen M, Maggen C, Cardonick E, et al. Association of negative breast cancer. reply. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(26):e108.
chemotherapy timing in pregnancy with congenital malformation. 77. Winship AL, Alesi LR, Sant S, et al. Checkpoint inhibitor immuno-
JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(6):e2113180. therapy diminishes oocyte number and quality in mice. Nat Cancer.
56. Loibl S, Han SN, von Minckwitz G, et al. Treatment of breast cancer 2022;3(8):1-13.
during pregnancy: an observational study. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(9): 78. Loibl S, Schmidt A, Gentilini O, et al. Breast cancer diagnosed during
887-896. pregnancy: adapting recent advances in breast cancer care for
57. Wolters V, Heimovaara J, Maggen C, et al. Management of pregnancy pregnant patients. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(8):1145-1153.
in women with cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021;31(3):314-322. 79. Yamasaki K, Noda S, Muroi T, et al. Effects of in utero and lacta-
58. Van Calsteren K, Verbesselt R, Ottevanger N, et al. Pharmacokinetics tional exposure to tamoxifen in SD rats. Toxicol Lett. 2005;156(2):
of chemotherapeutic agents in pregnancy: a preclinical and clinical 289-296.
study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(10):1338-1345. 80. Buonomo B, Brunello A, Noli S, et al. Tamoxifen exposure during
59. Damoiseaux D, Calpe S, Rosing H, et al. Presence of five chemo- pregnancy: a systematic review and three more cases. Breast Care
therapeutic drugs in breast milk as a guide for the safe use of (Basel). 2020;15(2):148-156.
chemotherapy during breastfeeding: results from a case series. Clin 81. Isaacs RJ, Hunter W, Clark K. Tamoxifen as systemic treatment of
Pharmacol Ther. 2022;112(2):404-410. advanced breast cancer during pregnancy–case report and literature
60. Loibl S, Han S, Mayer K, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients review. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;80(3):405-408.
with breast cancer during pregnancy (BCP). J Clin Oncol. 82. Joshi A, Mahfooz S, Maurya VK, et al. PARP1 during embryo im-
2014;32(suppl 15):1071. plantation and its upregulation by oestradiol in mice. Reproduction.
61. Rouzier R, Werkoff G, Uzan C, et al. Pregnancy-associated breast 2014;147(6):765-780.
cancer is as chemosensitive as non-pregnancy-associated breast 83. Kelleher AM, Setlem R, Dantzer F, et al. Deficiency of PARP-1 and
cancer in the neoadjuvant setting. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(7):1582- PARP-2 in the mouse uterus results in decidualization failure
1587. and pregnancy loss. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(40):
62. Murray Brunt A, Haviland JS, Wheatley DA, et al. Hypofractionated e2109252118.
breast radiotherapy for 1 week versus 3 weeks (FAST-Forward): 5- 84. James AD, Schiller H, Marvalin C, et al. An integrated assessment of
year efficacy and late normal tissue effects results from a multi- the ADME properties of the CDK4/6 Inhibitor ribociclib utilizing
centre, non-inferiority, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. preclinical in vitro, in vivo, and human ADME data. Pharmacol Res
2020;395(10237):1613-1626. Perspect. 2020;8(3):e00599.
63. Gentilini O, Cremonesi M, Toesca A, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy 85. Lambertini M, Peccatori FA, Azim HA Jr. Targeted agents for cancer
in pregnant patients with breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. treatment during pregnancy. Cancer Treat Rev. 2015;41(4):301-309.
2010;37(1):78-83. 86. Azim HA Jr, Azim H, Peccatori FA. Treatment of cancer during preg-
64. Han SN, Amant F, Cardonick EH, et al. Axillary staging for breast nancy with monoclonal antibodies: a real challenge. Expert Rev Clin
cancer during pregnancy: feasibility and safety of sentinel lymph Immunol. 2010;6(6):821-826.
node biopsy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;168(2):551-557. 87. Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Procter M, Leyland-Jones B, et al. Trastuzumab
65. Guleria I, Khosroshahi A, Ansari MJ, et al. A critical role for the after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J
programmed death ligand 1 in fetomaternal tolerance. J Exp Med. Med. 2005;353(16):1659-1672.
2005;202(2):231-237. 88. Calhoun DA, Rosa C, Christensen RD. Transplacental passage of re-
66. Pentsuk N, van der Laan JW. An interspecies comparison of placental combinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in women
antibody transfer: new insights into developmental toxicity testing of with an imminent preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
monoclonal antibodies. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 1996;174(4):1306-1311.
2009;86(4):328-344. 89. Gregor H, Egarter C, Levin D, et al. The passage of granulocyte-
67. Andrikopoulou A, Korakiti AM, Apostolidou K, et al. Immune check- macrophage colony-stimulating factor across the human placenta
point inhibitor administration during pregnancy: a case series. ESMO perfused in vitro. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 1999;6(6):307-310.
Open. 2021;6(5):100262. 90. Berends C, Maggen C, Lok CAR, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcome
68. Burotto M, Gormaz JG, Samtani S, et al. Viable pregnancy in a patient after the use of G-CSF for cancer treatment during pregnancy. Can-
with metastatic melanoma treated with double checkpoint immu- cers (Basel). 2021;13(6):1214.
notherapy. Semin Oncol. 2018;45(3):164-169. 91. Cardonick E, Gilmandyar D, Somer RA. Maternal and neonatal out-
69. Mehta A, Kim KB, Minor DR. Case report of a pregnancy during Ipi- comes of dose-dense chemotherapy for breast cancer in pregnancy.
limumab therapy. J Glob Oncol. 2018;4:1-3. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(6):1267-1272.
70. Borgers JSW, Heimovaara JH, Cardonick E, et al. Immunotherapy for 92. Cardonick E, Irfan F, Torres N. The use of neupogen (filgrastim) or
cancer treatment during pregnancy. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(12):e550- neulasta (pegfilgrastim) during pregnancy when chemotherapy is
e561. indicated for maternal cancer treatment. J Cancer Ther. 2012;3(2):
71. de Haan J, Verheecke M, Van Calsteren K, et al. Oncological man- 157-161.
agement and obstetric and neonatal outcomes for women diagnosed 93. Boxer LA, Bolyard AA, Kelley ML, et al. Use of granulocyte colony-
with cancer during pregnancy: a 20-year international cohort study of stimulating factor during pregnancy in women with chronic neu-
1170 patients. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(3):337-346. tropenia. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):197-203.
72. Jiang X, Ye Z, Yu W, et al. Chemotherapy for ovarian cancer during 94. Carr R, Modi N, Dore C. G-CSF and GM-CSF for treating or preventing
pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case reports and neonatal infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(3):
series. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021;47(10):3425-3436. CD003066.

Volume xxx - Issue xxx - 2023 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.001 17

You might also like