Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MGT703 SM Outline 2023new
MGT703 SM Outline 2023new
SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT
COURSE OUTLINE
SEMESTER 2, 2023
Timetable
Day Time Room No.
1
1.0 Welcome
Welcome
I welcome you to this Unit and hope that you will find it enriching and interesting. The overall
objective of this course is to impart basic knowledge and skills in formulating, implementing and
evaluating strategic management process in an organization in the context of emerging
environments for achieving sustained competitive advantage for the organization.
This course is about running the total business enterprise. It seeks to understand the challenges
and the environment in which the business operates, the direction the management intends to
head, the strategic plans for getting the enterprise moving in the intended direction and the tasks
of implementing the chosen strategy successfully. This course aims to equip students with the
core concepts, frameworks and the techniques of strategic management, which will allow you to
understand what managers must do to make an organization – be it a for – profit or a non- profit
one – to achieve superior performance.
3. 0 Learning Outcomes
2
4.0 Semester Calendar
WEEKS DATES TOPICS ASSESSMENTS
13 09/10 – 13/10 Topic 10: Lessons from Japan and East Asia
3
15 23/10 – 27/10 STUDY WEEK
5.0 Resources
Hanson D., Peter Dowling, Michael A. Hitt, Ireland R. Duane, Robert E. Hoskisson, Strategic
Management: Competitiveness and Globalization, Pacific Rim Second Edition, Nelson Thomson
Learning, Sydney, 2005.
Students must also read the listed readings after every topic.
Supplementary
1. Arthur A. Thompson, A.J. Strickland and John E. Gamble, Crafting and Executing Strategy:
The Quest for Competitive Advantage, 14th Edition, McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York, 2000
2. Dess, G. Gregory and Lumpkin, G.T. Strategic Management: CreatingCompetitive
Advantages, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York, 2005.
3. Fitzroy, Peter and James Hulbert, Strategic Management: Creating Value in Turbulent
Times, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2005
4. John A. Pearce and Richard B. Robinson, Strategic Management: Formulation,
Implementation and Control, Ninth Edition, McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York, 2005.
5. Parthasarathy, Fundamentals of Strategic management, Haughton Mifflin,
Boston,2007.
6. Peter Fitzroy and James Hulbert, Strategic management Creating value in turbulent
Times, John Wiley & Sons,2005.
7. Thompson and Strickland, Strategic Management Concepts and cases, McGraw Hill,
Twelfth edition, 2005
8. Charles L Hill and Gareth R Jones, Cases in Strategic Management, Haughton Mifflin,
Boston, 2001.
9. Hill, Charles WL and Gareth R Jones. Strategic Management: An Integrated Approach.
Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, USA, 1996
4
6.0 Assessment
1.1 Grades
(a) The overall mark for the unit depends on performance during the trimester (50%) and
performance in the final examination (50%).
In Class Assessment
(b) In order to pass the unit, that is, to obtain a grade of C or better, it is necessary to score at
least 40% (ie 20/50) in the final examination. It is highly recommended that students
attend all tutorials/labs/workshops
5
1.2 Letter Grade Scale
The following grading scales would be used:
The academic conducts of the students are governed by the University Academic and Students Regulation (UASR). All
students must obtain a copy of the UASR from the FNU academic office and familiarize themselves with all academic matters.
Should a student be dissatisfied with either the internal or external assessment, they can take the following steps to get redress
of their grievance.
Internal Assessment: The student can refer the work back to the unit coordinator for checking and reassessment. Following
this reassessment, if the student is still dissatisfied, the student may refer the work to the HOD. The HOD will then appoint
another lecturer to examine the work and result will then stand.
Final Exam: The student can apply for re-check of the grade as per the procedures laid down in the UASR.
Plagiarism and dishonest practices are serious offences for which offenders shall be penalized. Students must read the
relevant section of UASR to understand the various types of cases defined as dishonest practices in academic work
and to also know the penalties associated with these kinds of practices.
9.2 Applications for reconsideration shall be made within five days of the result being
released if the student wishes to pursue a course to which the course(s) under
reconsideration is a prerequisite, or 21 days of the date of release of the results
otherwise. Applications need to be made by lodging a duly completed ‘Reconsideration
of Assessment’ form, together with the necessary fees for the reconsideration, to the
Academic Office, which shall submit the application to the respective Dean. 9.3 The
Dean or the Head of the Academic Section authorized by the Dean to deal with
applications for reconsideration of grades shall cause the reconsideration to be done
expeditiously and independently.
9.5 The application shall be considered and a decision communicated to the Academic Office
within five working days of the receipt of the application for reconsideration from the
Academic Office if the course under reconsideration is a prerequisite to a course that the
student is required to undertake in the term immediately following to complete his/her
Program, or within ten working days otherwise.
9.6 The outcome of the reconsideration shall be communicated to the student by the
Academic Office within two days of the receipt of the report from the Dean.
9.7 If the student is dissatisfied with the outcome of the application, the student may apply
to the College Academic Appeals Committee for reconsideration of the grade/result.
Appeals shall be made within five working days of the date of the notification of the
outcome of the application for reconsideration. Applications shall be made by lodging a
duly completed form prescribed for this purpose to the Academic Office, which then
shall be sent by the Academic Office to the College Appeals Committee within one
working day of its receipt. The Appeals Committee shall cause a careful reconsideration
of the documents as listed in s15.5 above, as well as cause to be carried out a careful
examination of all or a sample of other scripts (with such sample determined by a
specified process by the Academic Office) for the Course to ensure consistency of
marking and assessment.
9.8 The College Academic Appeals Committee shall advise the Academic Office of the
outcome of the appeal within five working days from the date of the receipt of the
application from the Academic Office if the course is a prerequisite to a course that the
student would need to do in the term immediately following to complete a Program or
within 15 working days otherwise. The Academic Office shall advise the student within
24 hours by email or phone.
9.9 A grade may be unchanged, raised or lowered following reconsideration under this
section.
9.10 A student who is dissatisfied with the award of the College Academic Appeals Committee
may appeal further to the Students’ Appeals Committee for reconsideration of the
decision of the College Academic Appeals Committee. This appeal must be lodged within
two working days from the date of the notification if the course under reconsideration is
a prerequisite to a course that the student is required to undertake in the term
immediately following to complete his/her Program or within ten working days
otherwise.
9.11 Appeals against the decision of the College Academic Appeals Committee shall be made
by lodging the prescribed application form [‘Appeal: Reconsideration of Assessment’] to
the Academic Office.
9.12 The Students’ Appeals Committee shall advice the Academic Office of the outcome of
the appeal within five working days of the date of the lodgment of the appeal if the
appeal concerns a prerequisite to another Course that the student needs to do in the
term immediately following to complete the Program, or 20 working days otherwise.
9.13 A student may be given provisional admission into a Course if the Course whose grade is
under reconsideration or is under appeal is a prerequisite. The admission would be
confirmed if the student’s application succeeds. If the application fails, the student shall
be deregistered from the Course, with no loss of fee paid for the Course.
9.14 Any and all fee paid for reconsideration of a Course grade, including the fees to get a
copy of the script and to view the marking guide, shall be refunded to the candidate, if,
as a result of the reconsideration or appeals, the grade for the Course is raised.
THE END !