Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DocScanner 17-Jan-2023 17-06
DocScanner 17-Jan-2023 17-06
ENGZ * zongorg eud.z = Wis bl. CRS Cus} aL. Pnpolg us. a woHOK7UCD wUNIS NSA 2'8°9 60comparison of Simulation Results Constant Grid and Variable Load eC of the power system scheme illustrated in Fig.5.1, i em including the controller control strategy detailed in Chapter 4, was implemente; ; using Matlab /Siraulink in Table 5. jons were performed to determine and then compensate voltage 45 ‘The simulated UPQC system Parameters are given 1. Numerical ag, swell and acitive load and sions a ‘goiss due to @ sudden connecting linear inductive load, linear cap so pbs ood. i eemulation was conducted with the following chronology: ik att = 0.0 sec the simulation starts «at =08 to 1 sec voltage sag is created by sudden connected inductive load «ait =15 to L7 sec voltage swell is created by sudden connected capacitive load «at=2 to 2.2 sec by connecting non-linear load, harmonics are created 2 szlation studies, the results are specified without controller, with PQ theory con- =iz taxed UPQC and with VSM controller based UPQC system are operated.(b) Voltage and current at PCC with PQ theory controlled UPQC Lana EEE (c) Voltage and current at PCC with VSM controlled UPQC Figure 5.12: Voltage and current at PCC tae 5.12 (a),(b) and (c) illustrates that the voltage and current waveforms at Fi ee a £=0.8 to 1 sec 30% of sag is created by connecting inductive load and at ely, 88 30% of swell is created by connecting capacitive load, and at t= 2 2. te = are introduced because of non-linear loads. With the comparison of PQ 8g, 8° UPQC, VSM controller based UPQC the sag and swell reduced to 99% “nonics are eliminated. ‘ni 62r we \d Current, ‘yoltage a ot Ca Tina(evcond) wre wt aaa ae wee a (a) Injected voltage and current with PQ theory controlled UPQC eae sot i Ea re eas ae ay ea Baus taken Mee ef Tintecond)| (b) Injected voltage and current with VSM controlled UPQC Figure 5.13: Injected voltage and current The feu 5.13 (a) and (b) illustrates that injected voltage and current with PQ theory ‘ntrolled, UPQC and VSM controlled UPQC. The injected voltage and current is irreg- tr ; 4, teary contrcled UPQC. But at t=0.8 to 1 see VSM controled UPQC inject Mato min imize sag present in the system, at t= 1.5 to 1.7 sec it inject voltage with "= phase to minimize swell present in the system and at t =2 to 2.2 sec it minimize eh, “nwonics present in system.P cat Point of Common Coupling a eee 08 ee hDFPE (a) Vol ——--- 1 CUCU MSNMAI (b) Voltage sag at PCC with PQ th L a9 aaanarerF La sia | es i i SO a ‘Tmo(seconds) (a) Voltage at PCC without controle roller SAN L 1 1 + 2 21 22 ‘Time(seconds) ei ©nie Distortion of Voltage at POC ion" pt ioe (a) THD of voltage at PCC without controller aie acct onan ee (b) THD of voltage at PCC with PQ theory controlled UPQC {I — oul slaaL Meta beataltangtacptiees dere. (c) THD of voltage at PCC with VSM controlled UPQC Figure 5.17: THD of voltage at PCC THD w/e con- THD(PQ- ‘THD(VSM- toller UPQC) UPQC) Table 5.9. "e 52: THD of voltage and current at PCC due to variation of load “sutroller Vatage x 67 ——ti(iésr41 Harmonic Distortion of Current at pee sot (a) THD of current at pec without controller (0) THD of current at pee with PQ theory controlled UPQC iat) 7, Pomemeent WOMe = 2003 THe i gt ett nse a a os (c) THD of current at pec with VSM controlled UPQC Figure 5.18: THD of current at PCC Sa, aia (2),(b) and (c) illustrates that the THD of voltage and 5.18 (@).(b) and n ltat the THD of current at PCC without controller, with PQ controlled 22 SM controlled UPOC respectively. With the comparison of PQ controller rao 5.29 percentage), VSM controller based UPQC reduced Vip to 1.86 % Pals {Es comparison of PQ controller based UPQC' Ira 16.76 percentage), besed UPQC reduced Izyp to 7.23 percentagea active Power of Wind Energy Systom Re aod + Teds, Pea (a) Wind power without controller OS EE aE By OF Os 1 id 1S 4a 1S Ss Bsa “rme(eetonde) (b) Wind powers with PQ theory controller based UPQC T T r T r oy PF SDS GG as or ea ast ia Tag as sa ae asa a ‘Time(seconde) Re a OT ae ae Tae ae ae ey as te ae as ae aT aston) (¢) Wind powers with VSM controller based UPQC Figure 6.20: Active and reactive power of Wind Energy System 5.29 ; hg (@),(b) ana (c) illustrates that the active and reactive power of wind. The atic thesia oe Controllers gives the good results with VSM controller based UPQC * UPQC controller and with PQ controller based UPQC. ip 70i Rosctive Power of SOFC and Nf ee (a) SOFC power without controller (©) SOFC powers with VSM controller based UPQC Figure 5.21; Active and Reactive Power of SOFC ji 5 a (ov) tation of he Without, and (c) illustrates that the active and reactive power of sofe. ‘The Controllers gives the good results with VSM controller based UPQC UPQC controller and with PQ controller based UPQC. ' a(a) Grid powers without controller asananaayle ws Ee es aaa as ae as ae a ae (b) Grid powers with PQ theory controlled UPQC ene (¢) Grid powers with VSM controlled UPQC Figure 5.22: Active and reactive power at grid * fgure Wat gee 2 (4) and (b) iMlustrates that active and reactive power at grid, It shows tty aid reget; Md reactive powers arv within ‘the limit. 12ytant Load and Variable Grid Con? pdt oes Se scheme iustrated in Fig.5.1, including the controllers pe 7 i we 0 ph sewed detuiled in Chapter 4, was implemented using Matlab/Simulink The dated UPQC syetem parameters are given in Table 5.1. Numerical — vs weet protons Wy dAesniinee and then compensate voltage sagewell and sti rt vps OF ty a sudden connecting Jinear inductive load. linear capcitive load and al ; tates i ducted with the following chronology: cession 3108 OH Se nieabon sat = 0g ee the ty Led wwe voltage nag is created in grid simulation starts full load Atal ane Lito Dove voltage selfs created in grid vat = 2510 21 s00 hasmonies are created in grid studies, the results are specified without controller, POC and vith VSM controller based UPQC system are o feelin with PQ theory con- yperated. edie or AO) 73