Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cerda Garcia Rojas
Cerda Garcia Rojas
The I3C NMR assignments of four I):C-fnedours-7-ene derivatives were carried out OR the basis of 2D shift-
correlated NMR techniques (HETCOR and FLOCK), revealing that the signal for CH,-28 appears always very
deshielded (cu. S = 38.0). The conformation of the triterpene skeleton, obtained by MMX calculations, is compared
with that of multiflor-'l-ene.
KBY WORDS NMR; 13CNMR: D : C-friedours-7-ene derivatives;triterpenes; abnormal chemical shift; conformation; MMX
calculations
INTRODUCTION
',C-'H correlation diagram obtained with the FLOCK The assignments of the I3C signals of rings C, D and
pulse sequence." The data are summarized in Table 1. E were carried out according to the following pro-
The I3C NMR spectrum of 3 showed only 29 lines, cedure. Inspection of structure 3 revealed that the
while the DEPT trace for all protonated carbons dis- hydrogens of the methyl groups (CH,-26 to CH,-30)
played the expected 23 lines. Therefore, the missing can in each case be long-range coupled (through two
signal corresponds to a quaternary carbon, as evidenced and three bonds) with several 13C atoms bearing differ-
by an APT spectrum obtained with z = 4 ms, which ent numbers of hydrogens, as is known from the DEPT
allowed us to observe the seven quaternary carbon and APT spectra. For example, CH,-28 is the only
signals, thus revealing that the line at 6 = 32.03, assign- methyl group that can be long-range coupled with two
ed to a methine (C-20), also contained a signal for a methylene carbons (C-16 and C-22), a quaternary
quaternary carbon (C-17). carbon (C-17) and a methine carbon (C-18); CH3-30 is
Although the I3C signals of rings A and B can easily the only methyl group that can be long-range coupled
be assigned by comparison with the reported data for with a methylene carbon (C-21) and two methine
compounds with similar molecular frameworks,' the
3314 carbons (C-19 and C-20); and so forth. Since each
two-and three-bond correlations shown in Table 1 con- methyl signal showed the expected pattern of long-
firmed all the assignments. For example, the signal of range correlations in the FLOCK diagram, the methyl
the quaternary carbon C-4 showed correlations with hydrogen assignments were achieved as shown in Table
H-5, CH,-23 and CH3-24, while the signal of methine 1. This information also allowed the unambiguous
carbon C-5 showed correlations with CH,-23, CH,-24 assignment of C-12, (2-15, C-17, C-18 and C-21 and the
and CH,-25 (see Table 1). Even though the protons of assignment, although not individually, of the pairs C-13
CH,-23 and CH3-28 have the same chemical shift and (2-14, C-16 and (2-22, and C-19 and C-20. The
(6 = 1.04), the long-range correlations of each methyl remaining CH, signal was ascribed to C-11. Addi-
group can be clearly distinguished, assuming that the tionally, the HETCOR correlations individually assign-
carbons showing a correlation with CH,-23 should also ed the signals for the methyl carbons C-26 to C-30.
have a correlation with CH3-24, which in turn appears The distinction between C-13 and C-14 was achieved
at 6 = 1.11. when the 'H coupled 13C NMR spectrum of 3 was
Table 1. 13C NMR data., 'H chemical shifts and long-range correlations for
D :C-friedours-7-en-3-one (3)
Long-range correlations'
Position 6°C 6' H C--CH C--C-c--H
compared with that obtained under single-frequency at 7.5 Hz and therefore the observed correlation corre-
irradiation of the vinylic proton (H-7). The signal for sponds to the coupling between H-18 and C-22.
C- 14 lost the corresponding vicinal coupling constant The assignments of the signals for D : C-friedours-
H(7)-C-C-C(14), while the signal for C-13 remained 7-en-3B-01 acetate (l),D :C-friedours-7-en-3B-01(2) and
unchanged. Since the assignment of H-20 followed from D :C-friedours-7-ene (4) followed from comparison with
a homonuclear irradiation of the CH,-30 doublet, the the I3C NMR spectrum of 3 on consideration of the
distinction between C-19 and C-20 became readily corresponding substituent effects at C-3. DEPT, APT
evident in the HETCOR contour plot. The distinction (z = 4 ms) and HETCOR spectra were also obtained for
between C-16 and C-22 was carried out from the fol- these three substances, whose assignments are listed in
lowing information. Although H-18 is three bonds away Table 2. According to these data, in addition to the
from either (2-16 or C-22, H-18 showed a FLOCK signal for C-28, the signals for C-16, C-20 and C-22 of
correlation with only one of these carbon atoms. Three- acetate 1 were incorrectly ascribed in the previous
bond 13C-'H coupling constants depend on the
H-C-C-I3C dihedral angle according to the The unambiguous assignments of the methyl proton
Karplus-type equation parametrized by Aydin and signals of 1, 2 and 4 (Table 3), were based on the corre-
Gunther.' The calculated dihedral angles H(1 8 w - lations observed in the HETCOR spectra as well as the
C-I3C(16) and H(18)--C-C-13C(22) are 72" and multiplicity of the signals (s or d). According to these
162", respectively, in the minimum energy conformation results, the previous 'H NMR assignment5 for the
of ketone 3, as obtained by MMX calculations, which is methyl groups CH,-27 and CH,-29 of 2 must be cor-
very similar to that found in the solid state for D :C- rected, since they were interchanged. Note that the 'H
friedours-7-en-3p-01 acetate (l)."The angle values (72" chemical shifts of the gem-dimethyl group are reversed
and 162") correspond to coupling constants of 0.8 and on going from 1 to 2.
8.7 Hz, respectively. In the FLOCK experiment, the The minimum energy conformation of D : C -
long-range coupling constant value [J(NXH)] was set friedours-7-ene (4), obtained by MMX calculations
[EM,, = 78.9 kcal mol-' (1 kcal = 4.184 kJ)], revealed
that rings D and E have chair and boat conformations,
respectively. As shown in Fig. l(a), there is a complete
lack of interactions between C-28 and syn-diaxial hydro-
Table 2. ''C NMR data' for D : C-friedours- gens on y-carbon atoms. Therefore, there is virtually
7-enes 1 , 2 and 4 no shielding y-effect, which could be a reason for the
Carbon l b 2 4 unusual chemical shift of C-28. We also compared the
1 36.63 t 36.92 t 38.78 t
minimum energy conformation of D : C-friedours-7-ene
2 24.26 t 27.74 t 19.14 t (4) with that recently reported'" for multiflor-7-ene (5).
3 81.19 d 79.21 d 42.45 t As shown in Fig. 1, rings A, B and C have the same
4 37.85 s 38.88 s 33.13 s conformation in both substances, whereas rings D and
5 50.68 d 50.48 d 51.21 d E show significant differences. In multiflor-7-ene (5),
6 24.04 t 24.19 t 24.64 t E M , , = 78.4 kcal mol-' (lit.'" E M , , = 78.6 kcal rnol-'),
7 116.34 d 116.49 d 1 16.56 d rings D and E display the boat conformation and C-28
8 145.50 s 145.31 s 145.55 s shifts to a less abnormal value14 (6 = 30.95). According
9 48.27 d 48.29 d 48.45 d to the MMX calculations, C-28 in 5 should experience
10 35.16 s 35.23 s 35.45 s one strong y-interaction and one weak y-interaction
11 16.91 t 16.86 t 16.88 t
12 32.53 t 32.49 t 32.62 t
with H-21B and H-l5/?, respectively, corresponding to
13 37.85 s 37.76 s 37.81 s the calculated MMX distances, which are 2.76 and 3.18
14 41.33 s 41.26 s 41.34 s respectively.
15 28.98 t 28.91 t 28.94 t In other molecules, such as taraxasteryl acetate,16
16 37.79 t 37.71 t 37.81 t C-28 appears at 6 = 19.49 regardless of the chair con-
17 32.09 s 32.06 s 32.13 s formation of ring D and the boat conformation of ring
18 55.06 d 54.97 d 55.01 d E. However, the orientation of C-28 in taraxasteryl
19 35.45 d 35.39 d 35.41 d acetate remains axial with respect to ring D, as can be
20 32.14 d 32.06 d 32.13 d assumed from the x-ray structure of taraxasterol.I6 This
21 29.29 t 29.26 t 29.30 t
22 31.61 t 31.55 t 31.61 t 3029
23 27.55 q 27.56 q 32.95 q \.:
24
25
15.81 q
13.07 q
14.66 q
12.99 q
21.27 q
12.97 q
27 li
26 23.69 q 23.65 q 23.73 q
27 22.70 q 22.67 q 22.72 q
28 38.02 q 37.99 q 38.03 q
29 25.68 q 25.65 q 25.66 q
30 22.54 q 22.55 q 22.57 q
.Chemical shifts measured in CDCI, at 75.4
MHz using TMS as internal standard. Multiplic-
ities from DEPT for protonated carbons and
from APT ( T = 4 ms) for quaternary carbons.
b6(CH,COO) : 170.85 and 21.26. 5
780 C. M. CERDA-GARCfA-ROJAS, H. H. HERNANDEZ-VIDAL AND P. JOSEPH-NATHAN
NMR measurements
was 1 s, A1 = 0.0667 s and A2 = 0.0333 s. A value of versity of Georgia, as implemented in the PCMODEL
lJCH = 130 Hz was assumed in calculating the delay z program.
for the BIRD pulses.
Acknowledgements
MMX calculations
We are indebted to Dr Wolfgang Bremser (BASF, Germany) for the
13C N M R data bank search and to Professor William F. Reynolds
were generated using MMX force- (University of Toronto, Canada) for implementing the FLOCK pulse
field calculations which is a derived version of the MM2 sequence in our spectrometer. Partial financial suppo,.t from
program developed by N. L. Allinger (QCPE 395), Uni- CoNaCyT (Mexico) is acknowledged.
REFERENCES
1. F. N. Lahey and M. V. Leeding, Proc. Chem. SOC. London 10. W. Bremser and W. Fachinger, Magn. Reson. Chem. 23,1056
342 (1958). (1985).
2. D. R. Baigent and K. G. Lewis, Aust. J. Chem. 31, 1375 11. M. Fukuoka and S. Natori, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 20, 974
(1978). (1972).
3. J. P. Carnpello and A. J. Marsaioli, Phytochemistry 14, 2300 12. W. F. Reynolds, S. McLean, M. Perpick-Durnont and R. G.
(1975). Enriquez, Magn. Reson. Chem. 27,162 (1989).
4. 5.Tinant, G. Gerrnain, J. P. Declercq, M. Van Meerssche, J. F. 13. J. Polonsky, 2. Varon and R. M. Rabanal, Isr. J. Chem. 16, 16
Ciccio and P. Hoet, Bull. SOC.Chim. Belg. 91, 117 (1982). (1977).
5. D.Meksuriyen, N. P. D. Nanayakkara, C. H. Phoebe, Jr and G. 14. H. Ageta, Y. Arai, H. Suzuki, T. Kiyotani and M. Kitabayashi,
A. Cordell, Phflochemisrry 25,1685 (1 986). Chem. Pharm. Bull. 43,198 (1995).
6. T. K. Devon and A. I. Scott, Handbook of Naturally Occurring 15. R. Aydin and H. Gunther, Magn. Reson. Chem. 28, 448
Compounds, Vol. II, p. 282. Academic Press, New York (1990).
(1972). 16. W. F. Reynolds, J. F. Sawyer, R. G. Enriquez, L. I. Escobar, M.
7. A. K. Chakravarty, B. Das and S. Mukhopadhyay, Tetrahedron A. Chavez and J. N. Shoolery, Can. J. Chem. 63, 1048
47,2337 (1991 ). (1985).
8. P.Joseph-Nathan, C. M. Cerda-Garcia-Rojas, S. Castrejbn, L. 17. L. U. Roman, R. E. del Rio, J. D. Hernandez, C. M. Cerda, D.
U. Roman and J. D. Hernandez, Phytochem. Anal. 2. 77 Cervantes, R. Castaiieda and P. Joseph-Nathan, J. Org.
(1 991 1. Chem. 50,3965 (1985).
9. W. Brernser, Magn. Reson. Chem. 23,271 (1985).