Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1999 - Stress-Strain Relationship of High-Strength Fiber Concrete
1999 - Stress-Strain Relationship of High-Strength Fiber Concrete
IN COMPRESSION
ABSTRACT: Tests conducted to characterize the stress-strain relationship of high-strength fiber concrete in
compression using both cylindrical and prismatic specimens are reported. The concrete strength investigated
ranges from 70 to 120 MPa. Other parameters include volume fraction of steel fibers and direction of casting
in relation to the loading axis. Test results indicate that inclusion of fibers improves the strength and enhances
the strain at peak stress but results in a smaller initial tangent modulus for specimens cast in an upright (vertical)
position. Vertically cast prisms provide higher strains at peak stress and better postpeak ductility than cylindrical
specimens. Based on the test data, an analytical model is proposed to generate the complete stress-strain -ε
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by University of Waterloo on 09/07/13. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
curves of high-strength fiber concrete derived from cylinders and horizontally cast prisms. The proposed model
has been found to agree well with the stress-strain curves generated experimentally.
FIG. 1. Schematic Representation of Shape and Casting Di- Eit = (10,300 ⫺ 400Vf) f 1/3
0 (2)
rection Effects
where Eit and the compressive strength f0 are all expressed in
megapascals; and Vf is in percent. Eq. (2) is valid for Vf ⱕ
internal configuration of fibers and coarse aggregate may in- 1.5%. It was observed in an earlier study (Mansur et al. 1994)
fluence the response of the concrete under loading. In the fol- that for HSC, the initial tangent modulus depends on the type
lowing analysis of the effect of various parameters on the key of coarse aggregate used. Therefore, if a coarse aggregate other
properties and overall shape of the -ε curves, frequent ref- than crushed granite is employed, the relevant relationship
erences are made to these inherent differences. should be established.
A detailed analysis of test data for a particular concrete mix
shows that they fall within a narrow band. Although there is
Compressive Strength
some overlapping, the average result for a particular mix is
distinctly different from the other. In view of this, the average The peak stress (compressive strength) f0 and the corre-
results may be assumed to be a reflection of the variables sponding strain ε0 depend on the response of the specimen at
investigated. or near the ultimate load. At this stage, cracks will form in the
specimen due to lateral expansion of the concrete. These
Initial Tangent Modulus Eit cracks will be directed parallel to the direction of loading.
Fibers aligned normal to the loading direction will therefore
The initial tangent modulus (i.e., the slope of the -ε curve be intercepted by these cracks and offer some resistance to
at the origin) depicts the initial response of the specimen under their growth. As a result, vertically cast specimens are likely
load. Results of horizontally cast plain and fiber concrete to exhibit higher strengths than those cast horizontally. In the
FIG. 2. Initial Tangent Modulus as Function of Compressive Strength — Effect of: (a) Fibers for Cylindrical Specimens; (b) Fibers for
Horizontally Cast Prisms; (c) Specimen Shape; (d) Casting Direction
FIG. 5. Strain at Peak Stress as Function of Compressive Strength — Effect of: (a) Vf for Horizontally Cast Prisms; (b) Specimen
Shape; (c) Casting Direction; (d) Vf for Cylinders
0.00050 ⫹ 0.00000072 ( f0)0.35 (4) ductile response, and the effect is more pronounced in cylin-
drical specimens than in horizontally cast specimens.
where ε0 is expressed in millimeters per millimeter; and f0 in
megapascals. The two most important factors that characterize
Ductility of Concrete
the behavior of fiber reinforced concrete, namely the volume
fraction Vf and the aspect ratio l/ (ACI 544, 1986) were in- A convenient way to quantify ductility is to use the tough-
corporated in (4) to reflect the observed performance of these ness index. Hsu and Hsu (1994) and Taerwe (1991) defined
high-strength fiber concretes (HSFCs). toughness index as the ratio of the toughness of fiber concrete
to that of corresponding plain concrete. Depending on the ex-
Compressive Stress Softening tent of the stress-strain curves obtained, a common strain value
The extent of compressive stress softening or, in other is normally chosen. In this study, the toughness index is de-
words, the shape of the descending branch of the stress-strain fined as the ratio of the area under the stress-strain curve up
curve depends on the postpeak response of the specimen when to a strain of 3ε0 to the area up to a strain of ε0. The toughness
fibers are fully activated due to extensive cracking and dilation indices thus calculated are plotted against the respective com-
of the concrete. pressive strength in Fig. 9.
First, consider the effect of specimen shape. For this pur- For plain concrete, the toughness index remains essentially
pose, the stress-strain curves of vertically cast prisms and cyl- the same for cylindrical specimens irrespective of concrete
inders are plotted in Fig. 6 for each strength group. Note that strength. Horizontally cast prisms exhibit higher ductility for
the stresses have been normalized (with respect to its peak lower grade concrete but reduce drastically and become about
stress) to account for the differences in concrete strength, and the same as that of cylinders when the concrete strength ap-
only the average curves are presented for clarity. It may be proaches 120 MPa.
seen that at a particular strain value in the softening branch, For fiber concrete with 1% steel fiber, a comparison of the
prisms show a higher stress level as compared to cylinders. solid line with the chain line in Fig. 9 denotes the shape effect
However, this difference decreases with decreasing a water-to- of specimens. It may be seen that the square cross section of
binder ratio of the mix or, in other words, with increasing prisms provides higher ductility than the circular cross section
concrete strength. This effect of specimen shape for fiber con- of cylinders. This shape effect, however, decreases with in-
crete is the same as that for plain concrete as can be noted creasing concrete strength.
FIG. 6. Stress-Strain Curves for Cylinders and Vertically Cast Prisms for Different Concrete Mixes
FIG. 7. Stress-Strain Curves for Both Horizontally and Vertically Cast Prisms for Different Concrete Mixes
FIG. 9. Toughness Index Expressed as Function of Compressive Strength for Concrete Specimens of Different Shape, Casting Di-
rection, and Volume Fraction of Steel Fibers
TABLE 4. Effects of Specimen Shape and Casting Direction (1985) model can adequately describe the ascending branch of
(Fiber Concrete) the curve provided appropriate values of Eit, f0, and ε0 are used.
冋 册
Casting direction Shape effect This equation is given as follows:
effect (vertically (cylinder versus Cylinder versus
Property
(1)
versus horizon-
tally cast prisms)
(2)
vertically cast
prism)
(3)
prism (horizon-
tally cast)
(4)
 冉冊 ε
ε0
冉冊
f = f0  (5)
Compressive Yes (lower for hori- No Higher for cylinder
ε
strength f0 zontally cast spec- ⫺1⫹
imen) ε0
Initial tangent Yes (higher for hori- No Higher for prism
modulus Eit zontally cast spec- where
imen)
Strain at peak Yes (lower for hori- Yes (lower for Higher for cylinder 1
stress ε0 zontally cast spec- cylinder, influ- = (6)
imen, influence re- ence reduces f0
1⫺
duces as
f0 increases)
as f0 increases)
ε0 Eit
Toughness index Yes (lower for hori- Yes (lower for Higher for cylinder
zontally cast spec- cylinder) where f0 = peak stress; and  = material parameter that de-
imen) pends on the shape of the stress-strain diagram.
For the descending branch of the curve, two correction fac-
tors, k1 and k2, are introduced to reflect the effect of fibers and
0.01. This phenomenon was also reported by Wee et al. (1996) to cater for the residual stress. The modified expression for
冋 册
for high-strength plain concrete. the descending branch then becomes
In an earlier study (Wee et al. 1996), a number of available
models of plain concrete had been assessed, and a modified
Carreira and Chu (1985) equation was found to be simple, yet
provided a good correlation with the test data on HSC. The
k1 冉冊 ε
ε0
冉冊
f = f0 k2 (7)
same model has been chosen here for high-strength fiber con- ε
crete (HSFC). An analysis of the test data generated in this k1 ⫺ 1 ⫹
ε0
study reveals that the original form of the Carreira and Chu
FIG. 10. Stress-Strain Curves of Fiber Concrete (Cylinders and Horizontally Cast Prisms) with Different Compressive Strength
FIG. 11. Comparison of Proposed Model with Test Data for Fiber Concrete Cylindrical Specimens
Hsu and Hsu (1994) also used a modified Carreira and Chu For a given concrete strength, f0, Eit, and ε0 are calculated
equation to express the complete -ε curves of unconfined and using (1) – (4). These values are then inserted into (6) to obtain
confined fiber concrete. However, instead of using two cor- . With k1 and k2 estimated from (8) to (11) for the given
rection factors, they proposed a common factor, n, throughout concrete strength and reinforcing index (Vf l/), and  and ε0
such that n = k1 = k2. The value of n depends on the com- being known, the ascending branch of the -ε curve may be
pressive strength and volume fraction of steel fiber. This mod- generated using (5) while the descending branch is obtained
ified Carreira and Chu equation, however, generates a -ε re- from (7).
lationship only up to a strain value equal to 0.6 of the The predictions of the proposed model as compared in Figs.
maximum compressive stress in the descending portion of the 11 and 12 with test data show a very good agreement. Since
stress-strain curve. Beyond this, a separate equation is re-  depends on Eit, the use of a different coarse aggregate may
quired. affect the values of k1 and k2, and the relationship should first
From the analysis of the present set of test data, the follow- be evaluated before the proposed model is used.
ing equations are obtained:
For cylindrical specimens CONCLUSIONS
冉冊冋 冉 冊 册
1.3 ⫺1.1
50 Vf l
k2 = 1 ⫺ 0.11 (9) 1. Initial tangent modulus is not affected by specimen
f0
shapes. However, horizontally cast prisms give a higher
For horizontally cast prisms value than those cast vertically. When compared to plain
再冎
1.3
40 2. Concrete specimens cast vertically have marginally
k2 = B (11) higher compressive strength than those cast horizontally.
f0
The shape of the specimen has, however, no effect on
In (10) and (11), A = 0.96 and B = 0.80 for fiber concretes the strength provided the aspect ratio remains the same.
while A = 1.00 and B = 1.00 for plain concrete. In case of 3. An increase in Vf increases the strain at peak stress for
plain concrete, Vf l/ = 0. Eqs. (8) and (9) then reduce to the cylindrical specimens, but it does not affect this value
same forms as proposed by Wee et al. (1996) for plain con- for horizontally cast prisms. Vertically cast prisms have
crete. higher strain at peak stress than the corresponding cyl-
28 / JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING / FEBRUARY 1999
FIG. 12. Comparison of Proposed Model with Test Data for Horizontally Cast Fiber Concrete Prisms
inders. These shape and casting direction effects, how- Mansur, M. A., Wee, T. H., and Chin, M. S. (1995). ‘‘Derivation of the
ever, decrease with an increase in concrete strength. complete stress-strain curves for concrete in compression.’’ Mag. of
Concrete Res., 47(173), 285 – 290.
4. In the postpeak region, cylinders exhibit better ductility Taerwe, L. R. (1991). ‘‘Influence of steel fibers on strain-softening of
than the corresponding horizontally cast prisms. high-strength concrete.’’ ACI Mat. J., 88(6), 54 – 60.
5. The Carriera and Chu equation, as modified herein by Tanigawa, Y., Hatanaka, S., and Mori, H. (1980). ‘‘Stress-strain behavior
introducing two correction factors (k1 and k2) for the de- of steel fiber reinforced concrete under compression.’’ Trans. of the
scending branch, gives good predictions of the complete Japan Concrete Inst., Japan, 2, 187 – 194.
-ε response of HSFC. Wafa, F. F., and Ashor, S. A. (1992). ‘‘Mechanical properties of high-
strength fiber reinforced concrete.’’ ACI Mat. J., 89(5), 449 – 455.
Wee, T. H., Chin, M. S., and Mansur, M. A. (1996). ‘‘Stress-strain rela-
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS tionship of high-strength concrete in compression.’’ J. Mat. in Civ.
The research reported in this paper was financially supported by Re- Engrg., ASCE, 8(2), 70 – 76.
search Grant No. RP 910706 from the National University of Singapore.
The writers gratefully acknowledge this generous support. APPENDIX II. NOTATION
The following symbols are used in this paper:
APPENDIX I. REFERENCES
ACI Committee 544. (1982). ‘‘State-of-the-art report on fiber reinforced A, B = constants in Eqs. (10) and (11);
concrete.’’ Concrete Int.: Des. and Constr., American Concrete Insti- Eit = initial tangent modulus;
tute, Detroit, 4(5), 9 – 29. f ⬘c = cylinder (100 ⫻ 200 mm) compressive strength of con-
Carreira, D. J., and Chu, K. H. (1985). ‘‘Stress-strain relationship for plain crete;
concrete in compression.’’ ACI J., 83(6), 797 – 804.
Chin, M. S., Mansur, M. A., and Wee, T. H. (1997). ‘‘Effects of shape,
fcu = cube (100 ⫻ 100 ⫻ 100 mm) compressive strength of
size and casting direction of specimens on stress-strain curves of high- concrete;
strength concrete.’’ ACI Mat. J., 94(3), 209 – 219. f0 = compressive strength (peak stress) of concrete specimen;
Ezeldin, A. S. (1989). ‘‘Bond and compression behaviour of normal and fp(H) = compressive strength of horizontally cast prisms (100 ⫻
high-strength fiber-reinforced concrete subjected to generalized load- 100 ⫻ 200 mm);
ing,’’ PhD thesis, Rutgers — The State University, New Brunswick, fp(V) = compressive strength of vertically cast prisms (100 ⫻
N.J., 355. 100 ⫻ 200 mm);
Fanella, D. A., and Naaman, A. E. (1985). ‘‘Stress-strain properties of k1, k2 = correction factors, Eq. (7);
fiber-reinforced mortar in compression.’’ ACI J., 82(4), 475 – 483. l = length of fiber;
Hsu, L. S. M.,and Hsu, C. T. T. (1994). ‘‘Stress-strain behavior of steel
fiber high-strength concrete under compression.’’ ACI Mat. J., 91(4),
Vf = volume fraction of steel fiber;
448 – 457.  = material parameter given by Eq. (6);
Mansur, M. A., Wee, T. H., and Chin, M. S. (1994). ‘‘Some engineering ε = concrete strain;
properties of locally produced high-strength concrete.’’ Proc., 19th ε0 = concrete strain at peak stress; and
Conf. on Our Worlds in Concrete and Struct., Cl-Premier, 97 – 106. = diameter of fiber.