Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In the age of neck to neck competition, much importance is given to practical knowledge.
The theory to knowledge is not sufficient to understand the boundless field of Business
Management.
Today every person wants to be master in the field they are in; the practical training is the life of
management students. In modern world the importance of management is increasing day by day.
With these factors in mind, the students are required to prepare a project report on a topic in any
company. In this regard I have prepared an internship project report on REVENUE COST
ANALYSIS in OHPC Ltd. as per the syllabus of BIJU PATNAIK UNIVERSITY OF
TECHNOLOGY. This is presented in best possible manner and to best of mobility.
It is really a great pleasure to have this opportunity to describe the feeling of gratitude
imprisoned in the core of my heart. I convey my sincere gratitude to Mrs.ALIVA MOHANTY
for giving me the opportunity to prepare my project work in OHPC Ltd. I express my sincere
thanks to all the staff members of OHPC.
I am thankful to PROF.SUBRAT KUMAR ROUT for his guidance during my project work
and sparing his valuable time for the same.
I express my sincere obligation and thanks to all the Faculties of UNITED SCHOOL OF
BUSINESS MANAGEMENT for their valuable advice in guiding me at every stage in bringing
out this report.
I am also thankful to my family for their kind co-operation which made my take easy.
ROLL NO : 2206274175
DECLARATION
I, MISS SIMRAN PRADHAN, student of Master Of Finance And Marketing, bearing Roll no
2206274175,from BIJU PATNAIK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY,ROURKELA, hereby
declare that the presented report of internship titled “CASHFLOW AND RATIO ANALYSIS”
of OHPC Ltd is uniquely prepared by me after the 45 days’ work at Bhubaneswar, main
branch of OHPC Ltd. I also confirm that, the report is only prepared for my academic
requirement not for any other purpose.
This is to certify that the project report entitled “revenue cost analysis at OHPC Ltd.”,
Bhubaneswar has been prepared by SIMRAN PRADHAN under my supervision and
guidance, as the fulfilment for the requirement of MBA (Finance) from BIJU PATNAIK
UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY. Her hard work is satisfactory.
This is to certify that the project report entitled “revenue cost analysis at OHPC Ltd.”,
Bhubaneswar has been prepared by SIMRAN PRADHAN under my supervision and guidance,
as the fulfilment for the requirement of MBA (Finance) from UNITED SCHOOL OF
BUSINESS MANAGEMENT. Her hard work is satisfactory.
(Mrs.Aliva Mohanty)
OHPC, BBSR.
INDEX
SL NO. TOPICS PAGE
CHAPTER- 1 1. INTRODUCTION
2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
3. NEED OF THE STUDY
4. OBJECTIVES
5. SCOPE
6. METHODOLOGY
7. LIMITATIONS
CHAPTER -2 1. COMPANY PROFILE
2. OHPC COMPANY PROFILE
3. OHPC POWER STATION MAPS
4. AT A GLANCE
5. 3 HEADS : FINANCE TECHNICAL HRD
6. VISION
7. MISSION AND OBJECTIVES
8. BIRTH OF OHPC
CHAPTER-3 CONCEPTUAL STUDY
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION TO FINANCE: The economic development of any country depends upon
the Existence of a well-organized financial system. It is the financial system which supplies the
necessary financial inputs for the Production of goods and services which in turn promote the
well-being and standard of living of the people of a country. Finance is the life blood of
business. Without finance, the heart and brain of business organization cannot function implying
there by its natural death. Right from conceiving the idea of birth of a business to its liquidation,
finance is required. Inputs are made available only with finance. Even managerial ability can be
had with only finance. So, finance is the pivot around which the whole business operations
cluster. Therefore, there is an imperative need to efficiently manage the finances of a company.
Actually, sometimes, it is not the inadequate finance that is the cause of failure of a business but
the mismanagement of sources which is ultimately responsible for it. Proper finance is the real
key to the success of any business enterprise. Without proper finance no business can survive
nor can it be expanded and modernized. It is Useful in decision making. It is a key determinant
of business success. Financial information or results is useful in measurement of performance. It
enables for basis of planning, coordination and control. It is useful to shareholders and investors.
Financial Management is an integral part of Business Management. It is one of the key functions
in an organisation.
MEANING OF COST:
MEANING OF REVENUE - We know revenue can refer to income, sales or turnover, monetaryunits or
just plain money. From here, we get the idea of what revenue analysis means. It’s a deliberate, detailed and well-
researched report that indicates revenue for all activities in a company. This can range from sales (products and
services), costs, income, and other variables. Revenue analysis is important for business. With it, you can ensure
your plansandstrategiesdo not deviate fromyour goal.
Review of literature:
Phill Carroll (Carroll, 1953) in his books on “How to Control Production Costs”
stresses the need for improved cost analysis and control by business to secure
reasonable profit expectations. The book points out various inaccurate and illogical
cost-accounting techniques used by many companies. Every effort is made to create a
questioning attitude by management which will make it aware of its company’s faulty
procedures and lead to improved practical methods of cost control. Great emphasis is
placed upon the need for more detailed cost accounting, depicting actual conditions so
that good judgment can be applied to control and reduce costs.
Charles T. Horngren, the Edmund W. Littlefield (Horngren, Datar, & Rajan, 2014)
Professor of Accounting, Emeritus, at the Stanford Graduate School of Business,
credited with inventive modern-day cost management practices known to everyone as
Chuck. Horngren was inducted into the Accounting Hall of Fame and was honoured
repeatedly for his contributions to the American Accounting Association in 1969, for
which he served as president and director of research. His textbook of Cost
Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis which is now in its 14th edition. It is just one of
several of his books that have shaped the education of generations of accounting
students of the whole world.
Dr. Pramod Kumar (Kumar, 1991) published a Book in 1991, “Analysis of Financial
statements of Indian industries.” The study covered the 17 private, 5 state owned and
1 central public sector companies. He studied the analysis of activities, profitability
assessment, return on capital investment, analysis of financial structure, analysis of
fixed assets and working capital. In his research he discusses several challenges faced
by cement industries and suggested possible solutions. He also suggested for the
improvement of profitability and techniques of cost control.
Boardman (Boardman, Greenberg, Vining, & Weimer, 1996) identifies nine different
steps that are important for cost benefit analysis. He expands these steps and discusses
different drawbacks and difficulties. The Bank of England’s Monetary and Financial
John Christian, Gillin, Amar Pandeya (Christian, Gillin, & Pandeya, 1997) talks about
the problems faced by facility managers in any organization. One such problem is the
estimation of operating and maintenance costs in the future. Such predictions are
extremely difficult to make, no matter how accurate or close to reality they are.
Accuracy is obtained by gathering earlier cost analysis and by studying the various
factors that determine and affect the cost. In the research, he described that fourteen
university facilities and eight government offices were investigated “Quantitative data
on the historical operating and maintenance costs of these facilities, along with
knowledge of the factors affecting the costs were elicited through various sources.
Cost prediction models developed, using neural networks, regression analyses, and
random deviation detection methods.
Roland T. Rust, Christine Moorman and Peter R. (Roland T. Rust, Oct 2002), states
that financial benefits in terms of profit and cash flows may be derived from revenue
expansion, cost reduction or both simultaneously. The literature on both market
orientation and customer satisfaction provides support for revenue expansion whereas
the literature on both quality and operations provide impressive support for the cost
reduction perspective.
OBJECTIVES
Cost analysis can be used at several levels. At the most basic level, cost allocation is simply
part of good program budgeting and accounting practices, which allow managers to
determine the true cost of providing a given unit of service. It deals with cost allocation, cost
effectiveness and cost benefit.
Five Tiers:
Tier 2 – Accountability
Research Methodology:
Information is collected through secondary sources during the project. That information was
utilized for calculating performance evaluation and based on that, interpretations were made.
Sources of secondary data:
1. Most of the calculations are made on the financial statements of the company provided
statements.
2. Referring standard texts and referred books collected some of the information regarding
theoretical aspects.
3. Method- to assess the performance of the company method of observation of the work in
finance department in followed.
LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
I have to put whole heart to the project, but still are certain limitations while doing the project
work. Some of the limitations are as follows.
• Unavailability of sufficient time. The project has been done in a short period of time.
• As the study is based on secondary data, the inherent limitation of the secondary data
Chapter Plan:
Chapter 1 - Introduction
Chapter 2 - Company profile
Chapter 3 – Conceptual Study
Chapter 4 - Data analysis
Chapter 5 - Findings and suggestions
Chapter 6 – Bibiliography
Chapter 7 - Conclusion
CHAPTER 2
COMPANY PROFILE
COMPANY PROFILE
Consequent to the reform in power sector in Odisha, Odisha Hydro Power Corporation Ltd.
(OHPC) was incorporated in 21st April 1995 under the companies Act 1956.
• To acquire, establish, operate, maintain, renovate, modernize in the State of Odisha and else
while hydroelectric generating stations, thermal and nuclear electric generating stations and any
other electric generating stations based on any non-conventional sources of energy.
• To study, investigate, collect information and data, review operations, plan, research, design,
prepare feasibility reports, prepare project reports, diagnose operational difficulties and
weaknesses and advise on the remedial measures to improve and modernize existing stations
and facilitate and to undertake for and on behalf of others the setting up of hydroelectric power
plants, thermal and nuclear electric power plants and any other power plants based on any non-
conventional source of energy.
The objectives incidental or ancillary to the attainment of the main objects are to acquire
business / companies for carrying on business of electric power, to acquire know-how, to carry
on consultancy services in any field of activity in which it is engaged, to act as an entrepreneur
on behalf of the Central or any State Govt. It is leading profit making state public sector
undertaking company which has its power plants at six locations.
• BURLA
• CHIPLIMA
• RENGALI
• UPPER KOLAB
• UPPER INDRAVATI
• BALIMELA
3 HEADS:
OHPC being a large company, has segregated its works into 3 different heads where there are
different activities carried out in different heads. Those are as follows:
1. Technical wings
2. Finance wings
3. HRD wings
Technical wings:
For efficient running of their Hydro Power stations, the technical wing of OHPC has been
reorganized to carry out the following activities.
After formation of OHPC under the Reform Act a separate Finance wing with experienced and
qualified executives has been created to manage the corporate finance.
Activities
• Resource management
• Banking
• Taxation
• Personnel Entitlement
FUNCTIONS:
• Implementation of Personnel Policies and rules
• Personnel records
VISION:
To be a leading power utility in the energy sector through diversified energy portfolio with due
care & concern to the environment.
MISSION:
• To develop water resources in the State and elsewhere in the Country while augmenting
hydro power generating capacity by setting up new hydro power projects.
• To adopt state of the art technology for up gradation of the existing hydro power stations to
achieve the highest level of efficiency.
• To establish and operate thermal power plants through joint ventures and also explore the
opportunities to develop renewable energy resources viz. small hydro, wind, solar.
• To develop & operate coal mines allocated jointly in favours of OHPC and other public
sector undertakings by the Ministry of Coal, Govt. of India.
• To improve productivity through effective planning and implementation of ERP system with
development of robust & concurrent IT infrastructure.
• To professionalize the work force in line with the modern management / technical know-how.
OBJECTIVES
• To develop the hydro resources in the state on its own or in joint venture with state and/or
central PSUs.
• To renovate and modernize the existing hydro power plant to improve efficiency and supply
reliable and quality power to the state in a cost effective manner.
• To develop renewable sources of energy available in the state for sustainable development of
state.
• To develop thermal power by itself or in joint venture for long term energy security of the
state.
BIRTH OF OHPC;
The power sector in Odisha suffered from high transmission and distribution losses, inadequate
accountability for various segments, poor financial performance, poor quality of service and
manpower related issues. There was a pressing need to solve the financial problems of Odisha
State Electrical Board -OSEB and meet the projected demand of funds for investment in
generation, transmission and distribution system.
The Govt. of Odisha decided to restructure and substantially privatize the power sector, to make
supply more efficient and to be able to meet the investment needs of the sector. The Odisha
Govt.’s ultimate objective was to withdraw from the power sector as an operator of utilities,
having instead privately managed utilities operating in a competitive and appropriately regulated
power market.
Two Govt. owned corporate utilities were formed with agreement ensuring full autonomy with
effect from 1st April 1996. There were;
• Pursuant to the Odisha Electricity, Reform rules, 1998, Govt. of Odisha transferred the
distribution companies with effect from 26th November1998. These four distribution companies
are CESCO, NESCO, WESCO and SOUTHCO
After the heavy floods in 1937, Er. M. Visveswaraya gave proposal for detail investigation for
storage reservoirs in Mahanadi basin to tackle problem of flood in Mahanadi delta. The
multipurpose Hirakud Dam project is the first stage of the plan of Dr. Ajodhya NathKhosla, the
then Governor of Odisha. The commissioning of Unit III of Burla Power House was completed
on 18.12 56. The project was formally inaugurated by Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru on 13th January
1957.
The multi-purpose Hirakud Dam across the river Mahanadi was constructed for flood control,
irrigation and power generation. Hirakud Dam is a composite structure of earth, concrete and
masonry. The main dam having an overall length of 4.8 km spans between hills Laxmi-Dungri on
left and Chandli-Dunguri on the right. The dam is flanged by 21 km log earthen dykes, both on
left and right sides to close the low saddles beyond the abutment hills. It has the distinction of
being at one time the longest earth dam in the world, being 25.8 km long with dams and dykes
taken together. It also has the rare distinction of forming the biggest artificial lake in Asia with
reservoir spread of 743 sq km at full reservoir level. Hirakud dam intercepts 83400 sq. km of
Mahanadi catchments. The reservoir has life storage of 5818 million cubic meters with gross
storage of 8136 million cubic meters.
Water from dam enters the turbine through trash-rack, intake structure and penstock and gets
discharged to the tailrace through draft tube. To control the flow, hydraulic intake gates are
provided for each machine.
Rengali Multipurpose Project of Odisha State has been constructed for utilisation water of
Brahmani for power generation benefit and providing flood control in the low lying areas of the
river valley. The main Dam across river Brahmani with the Power Station is situated near village
Rengali of Talcher Sub-Division of Angul District at a distance of 65 K.Ms. upstream of Talcher
Town.
Project Cost
It was approved by planning commission in their letter no. II 2 (64) / 724 KI Dated 04.06.73 for
Rs.3532.68 lakhs.
The requisites Civil and Electrical works for the Balimela Reservoir for Power Generation in
Balimela Power House constitutes the Balimela Power Project. Thus, while the Balimela Dam
Project has been a joint project of Odisha and Andhra Pradesh, the BALIMELA POWER
PROJECT is entirely of ODISHA STATE.
Upper Kolab Hydro Electric Project, Located in the district of Koraput (Odisha) was taken up for
excavation in the year 1976 by the Irrigation and Power Department, Govt. of Odisha at an
estimated cost of Rs. 74.63 Corers. This Project is utilising the water potential of river 'KOLAB a
tributary of river Godavari. It is a multipurpose project aimed at Generation of 95MW(firm)
Hydro Electric Power, providing irrigation facilities to 47,985 H.A. by lift canal irrigation and
supplying drinking water to Damonjodi, Koraput, sunabeda and Jeypore town.
The Project work was completed in two stages i.e. STAGE-I & STAGE-II. In stage -I,3 nos. of
80MW Hydro Generators along with their auxiliaries, 220 KV Switchyard, water conductor
system, Reservoir etc. were completed and commissioned; Under Stage-II, only the Installation
and commissioning of Unit IV was completed. Major Works of Stage-I were completed during
1993. The total revised expenditure for completion of major electrical works under stage-I and
stage-II comes out to be 8880 lakhs (Approx.).
The Upper Indravati Project envisages diversion of water, of the Indravati River in its upper
reaches into the Mahanadi valley for power generation and irrigation. The project would involve
construction of 4 dams across the Indravati and its tributaries 8 dykes and two inter-linking
channels to from a single reservoir with a live capacity of 1435.5 Mcum, 4.32 km. tunnel, a
power house with installation of 4 units of 150 MW each, 9 km. tail race channel and an
irrigation barrage across Hati river with the associated irrigation canals.
Achievements:
Forming subsidiaries & Joint Venture Companies as per the mandate of Govt. of
Odisha towards diversification of its business.
Obtaining Record of Right (RoR) of the land of all the projects in favour of
OHPC.
Implementation of ERP in OHPC across all the domains i.e. HR, Finance and
Technical department.
Cash Flow Statement is statement which describes the inflows (sources) and
outflows (uses) of cash and cash equivalents in an enterprise during a specific period
of time. Such a statement enumerates net effect of various business transactions on
cash and its equivalents and takes into account receipts and disbursement of cash. A
cash flow statement summarises the causes of changes in cash position of a business
enterprise between dates of two balance sheets.
According to Ind AS-7 (Existing AS-3), an enterprise should prepare a cash flow
statement and should present it for each period for which financial statements are
prepared. The cash, cash equivalents and cash flow are used in this statement with
the following meanings:
According to Ind AS-7 (Existing AS-3) the cash flows statement should report
cash flows during the period classified by operating, investing and financing
activities.
In other words, revenue generated activities are called operating activities. The
amount of cash flows arising from operating activities is a key indicator of the extent
to which the operations of the enterprises have generated sufficient cash flows to
maintain the operating capability of the enterprises, pay dividends, repay loans, and
make new investments without recourse to external source of financing.
Investing activities are the acquisition and disposal of long-term assets and
other investments not included in cash equivalents. The separate disclosure of cash
flows arising from investing activities is important because the cash flows represent
the extent to which expenditures have been made for resources intended to
generate future income and cash flows.
Financing activities are activities that result in change in the size and
composition of the owner’s capital (including preference share capital in the case of
a company) and borrowings of the enterprises.
USES:
Since cash flow statement is based on cash basis of accounting it is very much
useful in evaluation of cash position of the firm.
A projected cash flow statement can be prepared in order to know to future
cash position of the concern so as to enable the firm to plan and coordinate
financial operation properly.
Cash flow statement helps in planning the repayment of loans, replacement of
fixed assets and also helps in capital budgeting decision.
A comparison of the historical and projected cash flow statements can be
made so as to find the variations and deficiency or otherwise in the
performance so as to enable the firm to take immediate and effective action.
A series of intra-firm and inter-firm cash flow statements reveals whether the
firm’s liquidity (short-term paying capacity) is improving or deteriorating over
a period of time and in comparison to other firms over a given period of time.
To provide the users of financial statements with a basis to assess the ability
of the enterprises to generate cash equivalents.
To ascertain the inflows of cash and cash equivalents classified under
operating, investing and financing activities.
To ascertain the outflows of cash and cash equivalents.
To ascertain the net increase or decrease in cash and cash equivalents
between the dates of two balance sheets.
Despite a number of uses, cash flow statements suffers from the following
limitations:
As cash flow statement is based on cash basis of accounting, it ignores the
basic accounting concept of accrual basis.
Some people feel that as working capital is a wider concept of funds a fund
flow statement provides a more complete picture than cash flow statement.
Cash flow statement is not suitable for judging the profitability of the firm as
non-cash charges are ignored while calculating cash flow from operating
activities.
A cash flow statement is not a substitute of an income statement, it is
complementary to an income statement. Ney cash flow does not mean the
net income of the firm.
A comparative study of cash flow statements may give misleading results.
CASH FLOW FORMAT
PARTICULARS AMOUNT
Difference between profit of current year and previous year XX
Add- Transfer to reserve XX
Add- Proposed dividend of previous year XX
Add- Transfer to any other reserve XX
Add- Closing provision for taxation XX
Add- Extraordinary items XX
Add- Exceptional items XX
Total- PBT and Extraordinary items XXXX
CALCULATION OF OPERATING PROFIT
PARTICULARS AMOUNT
PBT and extraordinary items XX
PARTICULARS AMOUNT
Operating Profit XX
Add- Non cash Expenses
Depreciation XX
Amortisation XX
Cash from operation before tax and extra ordinary items XXXX
Less- Tax paid (XX)
Less- extraordinary items paid (XX)
i- goodwill sold XX
ii- patent sold XX
iii- copyright sold XX
iv- trademark sold XX
Add- Cash and cash equivalent at the beginning of the period XXXX
Cash in hand XX
Cash at bank XX
Short term investment XX
Marketable securities XX
Bank overdraft (XX)
Cash and cash equivalent at the end of the period XXXX
XXXX
RATIO ANALYSIS
5) Utility to government:
Government is interested to know the overall strength of the industry.
Various financial statements published by industrial units are used to calculate
ratios for determining short-term, long-term and overall financial position of
the concern. Profitability indexes can also be prepared with the help of the
ratios. Government may base its future policies on the basis of industrial
information available from various units. The ratios may be used as indicators
of overall financial strength of public as well as private sector. In the absence
of the reliable economic information, governmental plans and policies may
not prove successful.
The ratio analysis is one of the most powerful tools of financial management.
Though ratios are simple to calculate and easy to understand, they suffer from
serious limitations:
Limited use of single ratio: A single ratio, usually does not convey much of a
sense. To make a better interpretation a number of ratios have to be
calculated which is likely to confuse the analyst than help him in making any
meaningful conclusions.
Lack of adequate standards: There are no well accepted standards or rules of
thumb for all ratios which can be accepted as norms. It renders interpretation
of the ratios difficult.
Inherent limitations of accounting: Like financial statements, ratios also suffer
from the inherent weakness of accounting records such their historical nature.
Ratios of the past are not necessarily true indicators of the future.
Change of accounting procedure: Change in accounting procedure by a firm
often makes ratio analysis misleading, example a change in the valuation of
methods of inventories, from FIFO to LIFO increase the cost of sales and
reduces considerably the value of closing stock which makes stock turnover
ratio to be lucrative and an unfavourable gross profit ratio.
Window dressing: Financial statements can easily be window dressed to
present a better picture of its financial and profitability position of outsiders.
Hence one has to be very careful in making a decisions from ratios calculated
from such financial statements. But it may be very difficult for an outsider to
know about the window dressing made by a firm.
Personal bias: Ratio are only means of financial analysis and not an end in
itself. Ratios have to be interpreted and different people may interpret the
same ratio in different ways.
CLASSIFICATION OF RATIOS:
The use of ratios analysis is not confined to financial manager only. There are
different parties interested in the ratios analysis for knowing the financial position of
a firm for different purpose. In view of various users of ratios, there are many types
of ratios which can be calculated from the information given in the financial
statements. The particular purpose of the user determines the particular ratios that
might be used for financial analysis. For example, a supplier of goods of a firm on
credit or a banker advancing a short-term loan to a firm, is interested primarily in the
short term paying capacity of the firm. On the other hand, a financial institution
advancing a long term credit to a firm will be primarily interested in the solvency or
long term financial position of the concern. Similarly, the interest of the owners and
the management also differ. The shareholders are generally interested in the
profitability or dividend position of a firm while management requires information
on almost all the financial aspects of the firm to enable it to protect the interest of all
the parties. Broadly the ratios are classified into four categories.
1. Liquidity Ratio.
2. Activity Ratio.
3. Profitability Ratio.
4. Leverage Ratio
1) LIQUIDITY RATIO:
Liquidity ratio refers to the ability of a concern to meet its obligations as and
when these becomes due. The short term obligations are met by realising amounts
of current, floating or circulating assets. The current assets should either be liquid or
near liquidity. These should be convertible into cash for paying obligations of short
term nature. The sufficiency or insufficiency of current assets should be assessed by
comparing them with short term liabilities. If current assets can pay off current
liabilities, then liquidity position will be satisfactory. On the other hand, if current
liabilities may not be easily met out of current assets then liquidity position will be
bad. The bankers, suppliers of goods and other short term creditors are interested in
the liquidity of the concern. They will extend credit only if they are sure that current
assets are enough to pay out the obligations.
Current ratio
Quick or acid test ratio
Absolute liquid ratio or cash position ratio
2) ACTIVITY RATIO:
3) PROFITABILITY RATIOS:
4) LEVERAGE RATIO:
The term solvency refers to the ability of a concern to meet its long-term
obligation. The long-term creditors of a firm are primarily interested in knowing the
firm’s ability to pay regularly interest on long-term borrowings of the principal
amount on maturity and security of their loans. Long-term solvency ratios indicate a
firm’s ability to meet the fixed interest and costs and payment of long-term
borrowings. The following ratios determine the solvency of the concern.
Debt-Equity Ratio.
Proprietary ratio.
Formula
Operating cash flow ratio is calculated by dividing the cash flow from operations (also
called cash flow from operating activities) by the closing current liabilities.
Operating Cash Flow Ratio = Cash Flow from operating activities (Operations)
Current Liabilities
Cash flow from operations is reported on a company’s statement of cash flows
and the current liabilities is presented on a company’s balance sheet.
If cash flow statement is not available, cash flow from operating activities
(operations) can be determined by starting with net income, adding non-cash
expenses such as depreciation expense, etc., subtracting non-cash gains such as gain
on sale of fixed assets, etc., adding any increase in current liabilities or decrease in
current assets and subtracting any decrease in current liabilities and increase in
current assets.
The operating cash flow ratio is a measure of the number of times a company can
pay off current debts with cash generated within the same period. A high number,
greater than one, indicates that a company has generated more cash in a period than
what is needed to pay off its current liabilities.
An operating cash flow ratio of less than one indicates the opposite—the firm has
not generated enough cash to cover its current liabilities. To investors and analysts, a
low ratio could mean that the firm needs more capital.
However, there could be many interpretations, and not all are indications of poor
financial health.
Current cash debt coverage ratio is a liquidity ratio that measures the
relationship between net cash provided by operating activities (operations)
and the average current liabilities of the company. It indicates the ability of the
business to pay its current liabilities from its operations.
Formula:
Current Cash Debt Coverage Ratio= Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities
(Operations)/ Average Current Liabilities
The two components of the formula are net cash provided by operating
activities and average current liabilities. The net cash provided by operating activities
is the net cash generated from its operations during a particular period. The average
current liabilities are equal to opening liabilities plus closing liabilities divided by two.
A higher current cash debt coverage ratio indicates a better liquidity position.
Generally a ratio of 1: 1 is considered very comfortable because having a ratio of 1: 1
means the business is able to pay all of its current liabilities from the cash flow of its
own operations.
A high amount of net cash flow from operating activities results in a higher
cash coverage debt ratio. There is no standard or acceptable amount of operating
cash flow since it can vary business to business; however, it should be of a value
higher than the average current liabilities balance. A cash debt coverage ratio of 1 or
higher implies that the business is liquid enough to clear all of its debts on time.
Although receivables, debtors and bills receivables are generally more liquid
than inventories, yet there may be doubts regarding their realisation into cash
immediately or in time. Hence some authorities are of the opinion that the absolute
liquid ratio should be calculated together with the current ratio and acid test ratio so
as to exclude even receivables from the current assets and find out the absolute
liquid assets.
OR
Cash ratio = cash and bank + short term securities / current liabilities
Absolute liquid assets include cash in hand and at bank and marketable
securities or temporary investments. The acceptable norm for this ratio is 50 per
cent or 1:2 that is Re 1 worth absolute liquid assets are considered adequate to pay
Rs 2 worth current liabilities in time as all the creditors are not expected to demand
ash at the same time and then cash may also be realised from debtors and
inventories.
The Cash Generating Power Ratio is calculated dividing the cash generated
from operations of the firm (CFO) by the total cash generated by the firm from all
three activities, namely, operations, investments and financing. It measures the
proportion of a company’s positive cash flow that comes from operating the business
vs. cash from investments or financing activities. We calculate this as follows:
It’s a powerful ratio as it measures the company’s ability to generate cash from
its operations compared to the total cash flows. Not that it only uses the cash inflows
from investing and financing, instead of the all investing and financing activities.
Companies want to have a power ratio of at least 1.0, which indicates
expected revenue levels. A higher power ratio indicates a greater amount of revenue
received from the company's audience share. Power ratios show how well media
companies convert their ratings into advertising revenue. Values greater than one
indicate a company that is outperforming its industry.
Power ratios help media firms evaluate their own performance and, in the case of a
possible acquisition or merger, evaluate the performance of a target media
company. Analysts and investors also pay close attention to power ratios because
they provide insight into how efficient companies are at converting ratings into
revenue. Power ratios can also be used to compare the revenue performance of one
category of media (e.g., the Internet) to another category (e.g., newspapers).
Net cash flow to average total assets ratio is the ratio between net cash flows
from operating activities and average total assets employed in the firm. The objective
of this ratio is to evaluate the efficiency with which the resources of a firm are being
used. It can be calculated as:
Net cash flow to average total assets ratio = net cash flow from operating activities
(operations) / average total assets
Cash flow to average total assets ratio is an efficiency ratio that rates actual
cash flow to the company assets without being affected by the income
measurements. The cash flow to average total assets ratio is often used by the firm
management to estimate when the cash will be available and how much cash will be
available for future operations. Management can use this ratio to prepare budgets
and future performance predictions. Investors can also use the cash flow to average
total assets ratio to estimate the quality of a company’s earnings. The cash flow to
average total assets ratio shows the investors how efficiently the business is at using
its assets to collect cash from sales and customers. The higher the ratio, the more
efficient the business is.
This ratio compares the cash flow from financing activities with cash from operation
to show how dependent the company is on financing.
External Financing Index Ratio = Cash from Financing / cash flow from
operating activities (operations)
The higher the number, the more dependent the business is on external money.
If the external financing ratio is positive (greater than 0) the firm is dependent
on the external sources of finance for the growth of its assets. And if the value of the
ratio is negative (less than 0) then it means the company has generated more than
enough cash to finance for the assets growth.
Where:
Invested capital= fixed assets + intangible assets + current assets- cash balance-
current liabilities
If ROIC is greater than a firm's weighted average cost of capital (WACC), the
most common cost of capital metric, value is being created and these firms will trade
at a premium. A common benchmark for evidence of value creation is a return in
excess of 2% of the firm's cost of capital.
Operating cash flow margin is a cash flow ratio which measures cash from
operating activities as a percentage of sales revenue in a given period. Like operating
margin, it is a trusted metric of a company’s profitability and efficiency and its
earnings quality.
Operating cash flow margin measures how efficiently a company converts sales
into cash. It is a good indicator of earnings quality because it only includes
transactions that involve the actual transfer of money.
Cash flow margin/ operating cash flow to sales ratio = Cash flows from
operating activities (operations) / Net sales
Operating cash flow margin/ cash flow to sales ratio measures how efficiently a
company converts sales into cash. It is a good indicator of earnings quality because it
only includes transactions that involve the actual transfer of money.
Just as companies can improve operating cash flow margin, by using working
capital more efficiently, they can also temporarily flatter operating cash flow margin
by delaying the payment of accounts payable, chasing customers for payment or
running down inventory. But if a company’s operating cash flow margin is increasing
from year to year, it indicates its free cash flow is improving, as is its ability to expand
its asset base and create long-term value for shareholders.
Are The Company’s Sales Genuine: The operating cash flow to sales ratio/
cash flow margin provides the analyst insight into the sales of the company. It
is a known fact that companies can fudge the sales number relatively easily.
This can be done by changing the revenue recognition policy which allows
accountants to book future income as income today. Sometimes companies
do fake transactions to ensure that sales numbers look good to the stock
market. However, the acid test comes when sales need to be converted to
cash. Only genuine sales bring in cash flow. Thus analysts can make more
accurate prediction of the future year’s cash flows and therefore value the
stock more accurately.
Compare with Days Sales Outstanding: The operating cash flow to sales ratio/
cash flow margin should also be somewhat in line with the days receivables
outstanding ratio. For instance if 90 days receivables are outstanding, it means
on an average the company extends credit for (90/360), 25% of its sales at any
given point of time. Thus in this case the operating cash flow to sales ratio
must be 75% or close. This makes the analysts surer that the financial
statements of the firm are indeed genuine.
CHAPTER 4:
DATA ANALYSIS
&
INTERPRETATION
CAPACITY UTILISATION
18000
16000
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
The operating cash flow ratio is a measure of the number of times a company
can pay off current debts with cash generated within the same period. A high
number, greater than one, indicates that a company has generated more cash in a
period than what is needed to pay off its current liabilities.
An operating cash flow ratio of less than one indicates the opposite—the firm
has not generated enough cash to cover its current liabilities. To investors and
analysts, a low ratio could mean that the firm needs more capital.
2.5
1.5
0.5
0
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
CASHFLOW FROM 39595.43 22884.02 -17049.62 5880.11 24636.6 13458.04
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
CURRENT LIABILITIES 13845.32 8,18,31.24 63,010.03 68,160.32 81,238.22 93427.44
(FINANCIAL LIABILITIES)
OPERATING CASH FLOW 2.85 0.27 0.27 0.086 0.30 0.14
RATIO
TABLE: Operating Cash Flow Ratio
As per the data provided by the above graph and table, the value of
the Operating Cash flow Ratio in 2013-14 is 2.85, for the year 2014-15 is 0.27, for the
year 2015-16 is 0.27, for the year 2016-17 is 0.086, for the year 2017-18 is 0.30 and
for the year 2018-19 is 0.14 . By analysing the flow of operating cash flow ratio from
the above mentioned years the value of the ratio in the financial year 2013-14 is 2.85
which is an excellent sign of well managed performance and effective and efficient
use of all the available cash and operating resources to meet the firm’s current
obligations. However in the next financial year of 2014-15 the value of the operating
cash flow ratio is 0.27 which is less than the desirable and adequate performance,
and in the next financial year of 2015-16 the operating cash flow ratio remain
constant to 0.27 and it affected the firm’s performance a lot as in this particular year
the company was facing trouble to manage its operating cash flow to meet up the
current liabilities.
In the financial year of 2016-17 the performance and the value of operating
cash flow ratio again went up to 0.086 and this clearly shows that the company is
cash flow from operation is positive but as current liabilities is more the ratio is
lower. But the next financial years of 2017-18 had a score of 0.30 and in the financial
year of 2018-19 the ratio was at the least position of 0.14.
In these years the firm is unable to create and maintain a good operating cash flow
ratio. However as the team is fully qualified and efficient to solve this issue very soon
and the management would improve the operating cash flow ratio and raise the
value above the suitable and adequate value.
A high amount of net cash flow from operating activities results in a higher cash
coverage debt ratio. There is no standard or acceptable amount of operating cash
flow since it can vary business to business; however, it should be of a value higher
than the average current liabilities balance. A cash debt coverage ratio of 1 or higher
implies that the business is liquid enough to clear all of its debts on time.
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
CASHFLOW FROM 39595.43 22884.02 -17049.62 5880.11 24636.6 13458.04
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
AVERAGE CURRENT 13845.32 22154.01 36811.71 10609.9 295.17 4377.89
LIABILITIES
CURRENT CASH DEBT 2.85 1.03 0.46 0.55 83.46 3.07
COVERAGE RATIO
TABLE: Current Cash Debt Coverage Ratio
As per the data provided by the above graph and table, the value of the current
cash debt coverage ratio in 2013-14 is 2.85, for the year 2014-15 is 1.03, for the year
2015-16 is 0.46, for the year 2016-17 is 0.55, for the year 2017-18 is 83.46 and for
the year 2018-19 is 3.07. By analysing the flow of the current cash debt coverage
ratio from the above mentioned years the value of the ratio in the financial year
2013-14 is 2.85 which is an excellent sign of well managed performance and effective
and efficient use of all the available cash and operating resources to meet the firm’s
current obligations. However in the next financial year of 2014-15 the value of the
current cash debt coverage ratio is 1.03 which is less than the desirable and
adequate performance, and in the next financial year of 2015-16 the current cash
debt coverage ratio went down to 0.46 and it affected the firm’s performance a lot
as in this particular year the company was facing trouble to manage its operating
cash flow to meet up the current liabilities.
In the financial year of 2016-17 the performance and the value of operating
cash flow ratio again went up to 0.55 and this clearly shows that the company is
working on the improvement of the firm’s management to meet its short term
obligations. But the next financial years of 2017-18 had a score of 83.46 and in the
financial year of 2018-19 the ratio was at the least position of 3.07.
In these years the firm is unable to create and maintain a good current cash debt
coverage ratio, However as the team is fully qualified and efficient to solve this issue
very soon and the management would improve the operating cash flow ratio and
raise the value above the suitable and adequate value.
Absolute liquid assets include cash in hand and at bank and marketable
securities or temporary investments. The acceptable norm for this ratio is 50 per
cent or 1:2 that is Re 1 worth absolute liquid assets are considered adequate to pay
Rest 2 worth current liabilities in time as all the creditors are not expected to
demand ash at the same time and then cash may also be realised from debtors and
inventories.
0
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
ABSOLUTE 86233.74 88146.96 109536.39 111944.89 18218.36 15861.67
LIQUID
ASSETS
CURRENT 13845.32 81831.24 63010.03 68160.32 81238.22 93427.44
LIABILITIES
ABSOLUTE 6.22 1.07 1.73 1.64 0.22 0.16
LIQUID RATIO
TABLE: Absolute Liquid Ratio
As per the data provided by the above graph and table, the absolute liquid ratio
for the year 2013-14 is 6.22, for the year 2014-15 is 1.07, for the year 2015-16 is
1.73, for the year 2016-17 is 1.64, for the year 2017-18 is 0.22, for the year 2018-19
is 0.16. By analysing the flow of absolute liquid ratio among these years indicates
that the firm OHPC was initially having a very good liquidity position starting from
the year 2013-14 which was much above than the satisfactory level, however in the
next following year of 2014-15 the ratio value decreased to 1.07 which was also good
and in the next financial year of 2015-16 the value of the absolute liquid ratio went
up to the value of 1.73 and it clearly shows that the firm OHPC was having a very
good liquidity position and they have also shown improvement in maintaining their
desirable current ratio and liquidity position of the firm, The firm was efficient to
meet the needs of its current liabilities with the available current assets.
However after this phase the liquidity value and the absolute liquid ratio
decreased to 1.64 in the financial year of 2016-17 and in the next financial year of
2017-18 it continues to decrease to 0.22 which clearly depicts that the liquidity
position of the OHPC is getting weak and the finally in the financial year of 2018-19
the liquidity position of the firm went down to 0.16 and as per this results the
company need to manage its absolute liquid ratio to meet the emergency need and
obligations and the firm can effectively deal and solve the urgent financial needs .
The changes in the economy sector and the changes in the company policies
made it difficult for the firm to make a continues growth in the absolute liquidity
position, however the firm is having a qualified manpower and they would make the
efficient use of the resources to maintain a satisfactory balance between absolute
liquid assets and current liabilities of the at present and they will definitely get the
growth pace very soon in near future.
Analysts and investors also pay close attention to power ratios because they
provide insight into how efficient companies are at converting ratings into revenue.
CASH GENERATING POWER RATIO
25
20
15
10
0
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
In the year 2013-14 the cash generating power ratio is 22. 54 which is higher than
the desirable and expected score from a financial organization. And in the financial
year of 2014-15 the company has made an outstanding and excellent management
of its resources to reach the value of 4.56 which was not very impressive
performance. In the next financial year of 2015-16 the value of the cash generating
power ratio is 0.79 and the value is less than the desirable value to be expected.
Cash flow to average total assets ratio is an efficiency ratio that rates actual
cash flow to the company assets without being affected by the income
measurements. The cash flow to average total assets ratio is often used by the firm
management to estimate when the cash will be available and how much cash will be
available for future operations. Management can use this ratio to prepare budgets
and future performance predictions. Investors can also use the cash flow to average
total assets ratio to estimate the quality of a company’s earnings. The cash flow to
average total assets ratio shows the investors how efficiently the business is at using
its assets to collect cash from sales and customers. The higher the ratio, the more
efficient the business is.
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
CASHFLOW FROM 39595.43 22884.02 (17049.62) 5880.11 24636.6 13458.04
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
As per the information and data received from the above graph, the value of
the cash flow to average total assets ratio for the financial year of 2013-14 is 0.12, for
the financial year of 2014-15 is 0.06, for the financial year of 2015-16 is 0.04, for the
financial year of 2016-17 is 0.01, for the financial year of 2017-18 is 0.06 and for the
financial year of 2018-19 is 0.03. By analysing the above said data of the firm OHPC
we get the information that the company was able to maintain the cash flow to
average total assets ratio and have made proper and optimum utilization of
resources to have a favourable relationship in-between cash flow and total assets of
the firm. In the financial year of 2013-14 the Value of cash flow to average total
assets ratio is 0.12 and this implies that the company is having a good control and are
able to make the best and optimum use of their resources for the smooth
performance of the business and the organization. In the financial year of 2014-15
the firm is having the cash flow to average total assets ratio of 0.06 which is worse
than the previous year figure and this indicates that the firm was try to stabilize and
maintain the good performance. In the next financial year of 2015-16 the cash flow
to average total assets ratio is 0.04 which is also worse than previous year showing a
stable performance in the highly dynamic market environment and conditions.
In the financial year of 2016-17 the company has shown a tremendous growth
in their ability to build up a strong relationship between total assets and cash flow
and by increasing their efficiency to use their assets to obtain cash from sales and
customers by increasing the value of cash flow to average total assets ratio to 0.01
which is quite impressive as the organization has clearly proved that they are highly
capable of getting the growth in this competitive market and environment. In the
financial year of 2017-18 the value of its cash flow to average total assets ratio is 0.06
and in the financial year of 2018-19 the value of its cash flow to average total assets
ratio is 0.03. This indicates that the company has the ability to get greater growth
and cash flow and also they have the efficient and qualified management to maintain
the growth in order to have a smooth flow of the business operations.
The External Financing Index ratio shows if a company is able to finance the
investments from the cash generated by business of if the business needs external
finance to meet its investment needs. The higher the number, the more dependent
the business is on external money.
If the external financing ratio is positive (greater than 0) the firm is dependent
on the external sources of finance for the growth of its assets. And if the value of the
ratio is negative (less than 0) then it means the company has generated more than
enough cash to finance for the assets growth.
GRAPH 6: External Financing Index Ratio
1.6
1.41
1.4
1.2
1.05
1
0.78
0.8
0.6
0.4 0.32
0.2 0.13
0.002
0
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
As per the information and data received from the above graph and table, the
value of the external financing index ratio for the financial year of 2013-14 is 0.78, for
the financial year of 2014-15 is 1.05, for the financial year of 2015-16 is 1.41, for the
financial year of 2016-17 is 0.13, for the financial year of 2017-18 is 0.002 and for the
financial year of 2018-19 is 0.32. By analysing the above said data of the firm OHPC
we get the information that the company was able to maintain the external financing
index ratio and have the sufficient cash resources to meet the investment needs
internally. In the financial year of 2013-14 the value of external financing index ratio
0.78 and this clearly implies that the organization is very less dependent on the
external finance sources very much to meet its investment needs. In the financial
year of 2014-15 the value of the external financing index ratio increased to 1.05
which shows the company is able to regulate a good financial system without getting
much affected from the external business environment. In the financial year of 2015-
16 the value of the external financing index ratio was at the extreme level of 1.41
and in this particular year the company was highly dependent on the external
sources to meet their investment needs and for the growth of its assets. Now the in
the financial year of 2016-17 the firm OHPC has shown a tremendous improvement
and enhanced their scores and value of the external financing index ratio by pulling it
down to 0.13 and this depicts that the organization has successfully managed their
resources in the best efficient way and became completely independent from the
external sources to meet their asset’s growth. In the financial year of 2017-18 the
value of the external financing index ratio is 0.002 which is also very close to zero
and in the financial year of 2018-19 the external financing index ratio is 0.32 which is
very much impressive and all this information clearly shows that the firm OHPC is
highly efficient and are very much dependent for their asset’s growth and
investment needs.
7) Interpretation of Return On Invested Capital:
If ROIC is greater than a firm's weighted average cost of capital (WACC), the
most common cost of capital metric, value is being created and these firms will trade
at a premium. Some firms run at a zero-return level, these companies have no excess
capital to invest in future growth.
Chart Title
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 1017-18 2018-19
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
NET 879.55 1559.44 8729.73 12911.41 9869.94 14439.3
PROFIT
AFTER
TAX
INVESTED 223864.29 146028.15 171781.71 174463.02 267150.22 278067.69
CAPITAL
RETURN 0.0039 0.0106 0.0508 0.074 0.0369 0.0519
ON
INVESTED
CAPITAL
As per the data provided by the above graph, the cash generating power ratio
for the financial year 2013-14 is 0.0039, for the financial year 2014-15 is 0.0106, for
the financial year of 2015-16 is 0.0508, for the financial year of 2016-17 is 0.074, for
the financial year of 2017-18 is 0.0369 and for the financial year of 2018-19 is 0.0519.
By analysing all the values and data from the financial reports and statements of the
firm OHPC, the observations regarding the performance and the
In the financial year of 2013-14 the return on invested capital is 0.0039 and in the
financial year of 2014-15 the value is 0.0106 which indicates that the firm is not able
to maintain a stable return on invested capital to have a safe business performance.
In the financial year of 2015-16 the value of return on invested capital decreased to
0.0508 which is shows in this year the company had a small amount of profit to
invest in future. In the financial year of 2016-17 the value of the return on invested
capital again decreased to 0.074 which clearly implies that the company is not able
to manage the ratio by proper utilization of resources. In the financial year of 2017-
18 the value of the return on invested capital is 0.0369 which is higher than the
previous performance, however it also implies that the company is having a margin
of profit and they provide the services with a very attractive rates and prices. In the
next financial year of 2018-19 the firm OHPC again showed the perfect sign of
improvement and development by increasing the value of its return on invested
capital to 0.0519 and this gives a conclusion that the company is having a highly
qualified management system to have a stable return on invested capital for the
firm.
Operating cash flow margin measures how efficiently a company converts sales
into cash. It is a good indicator of earnings quality because it only includes
transactions that involve the actual transfer of money. Because cash flow is driven
by revenues, overhead and operating efficiency, it can be very telling, especially when
comparing performance to competitors in the same industry.
The operating cash flow to sales ratio provides the analyst insight into the sales
of the company. It is a known fact that companies can fudge the sales number
relatively easily. This can be done by changing the revenue recognition policy which
allows accountants to book future income as income today. The operating cash flow
to sales ratio should also be somewhat in line with the day’s receivables outstanding
ratio.
GRAPH 8: Operating Cash Flow Margin
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
As per the information and data received from the above graph, the value of the
operating cash flow margin for the financial year of 2013-14 is 0.87, for the financial
year of 2014-15 is 0.46, for the financial year of 2015-16 is 0.40, for the financial year
of 2016-17 is 0.13, for the financial year of 2017-18 is 0.52 and for the financial year
of 2018-19 is 0.28. By analysing the above said data of the firm OHPC we get the
information that the company was able to maintain the operating cash flow margin
and have made proper and optimum utilization of resources to convert the sales into
cash and have a favourable relationship in-between them. In the financial year of
2013-14 the Value of operating cash flow margin is 0.87 and this implies that the
company is having a good control and are able to make the best and optimum use of
their resources for the smooth performance of the business and the organization. In
the financial year of 2014-15 the firm is having the operating ash flow margin of 0.46
which is not very less than the previous year figure and this indicates that the firm
also has the ability to stabilize and maintain the good performance. In the next
financial year of 2015-16 the operating cash flow margin value is 0.40 which is also
showing a stable performance in the highly dynamic market environment and
conditions.
In the financial year of 2016-17 the company has shown a tremendous growth
in their ability to convert their sales to operating cash by increasing the value of its
operating cash flow margin to 0.13 which is quite impressive as the organization has
clearly proved that they are highly capable of getting the growth in this competitive
market and environment. In the financial year of 2017-18 the value of its operating
cash flow margin is 0.52 and in the financial year of 2018-19 the value of its
operating cash flow margin is 0.28. And this flow of the operating cash flow margin
depicts that the company was slowly coming down to have a stable and favourable
growth which is good for the company as well as for the consumers to whom the
company provides the services. The firm OHPC gives greater importance to the
quality of its services and the satisfaction and this scope has given a lot of
opportunities and growth to the business.
CHAPTER 5:
FINDINGS &
SUGGESTION
FINDINGS
The following are the findings of the study for the year 2013 to 2019:
The company should give more attention to higher utilisation of its capacity
and curtail unplanned expenses to increase the further profit.
The management should generate a systematic financial plan for better Cash
Flow Management. There should be a better and proper guidelines for
working capital management. It should get detailed view of the operations;
find out the financial requirement on accounts of operation after taking into
consideration the different financial statements.
The corporation should invest more in current assets. If the corporation will
give emphasis on investment in current assets then it will increase the
liquidity position of the corporation.
CHAPTER 6:
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION
Odisha Hydro Power Corporation (OHPC) started operations in the year 21st
April 1995. OHPC is one of the gold rated PSU of the state. OHPC has its registered
office at Bhubaneswar. The organization have a very good financial performance and
they also have the capacity and ability to increase their effectiveness and efficiency
to a much greater extent. And all these factors and key areas have been analysed
critically to evaluate the actual performance and also to evolve their further scope
for improvement.
The changes in the economy sector and the changes in the company
policies made it difficult for the firm to make a continues growth in the absolute
liquidity position, however the firm is having a qualified manpower and they would
make the efficient use of the resources to maintain a satisfactory balance between
absolute liquid assets and current liabilities of the at present and they will definitely
get the growth pace very soon in near future. As the analysis of the OHPC and their
financial performance by using the financial analysis tools like Cash Flow Analysis and
Ratio Analysis the results have shown a great performance of the business and they
do have some lacuna but they have the resources available with them to ensure the
variations from the desired could be minimized or completely erased.
The company with its java GEDCOL promoting green and renewable energy.