You are on page 1of 3

L1 - Doing Philosophy + Principle of Sufficient Reason – nothing exists without a

sufficient reason for its being and existence


A philosophical question always contains a bigger problem.
Metaphysics
The Meaning of Philosophy - only an extension of a fundamental and necessary drive in every
- Etymologically: word “philosophy” comes from two Greek words, human being to know what is real
Philo, meaning “to love”, and Sophia, meaning “wisdom” - how to account for this unreal thing in terms of what you can
- Philosophy: originally meant, “love of wisdom”, and in a broad accept is real
sense, wisdom is still the goal of philosophy - big part of the metaphysician’s task is to explain that part of our
- defined as the science that by natural light of reason studies the experience, which we call unreal in terms of what we call real.
first causes or highest principles of all things
Ethics
Science - How do we tell good from evil or right from wrong? Ethics is the
- called science because the investigation is systematic branch of philosophy that explores the nature of moral virtue and
- follows certain steps, or it employs certain procedures evaluates human actions. Ethics is generally a study of the nature
- an organized body of knowledge just like any other sciences of moral judgments.

Natural Light of Reason Epistemology


- Philosophy investigates things not by using any other laboratory - deals with nature, sources, limitations, and validity of knowledge
instrument or investigative tools (Soccio 2007)
- isn’t based on supernatural revelation, otherwise it becomes - Epistemological questions are basic to all other philosophical
theology inquiries
- the philosopher uses his natural capacity to think or simply, - (1) how we know what we claim to know
human reason alone or the so-called unaided reason - (2) how we can find out what we wish to know
- (3) how we can differentiate truth from falsehood.
Study of All Things - addresses varied problems: the reliability, extent, and kinds of
- distinction between philosophy from other sciences knowledge; truth; language; and science and scientific knowledge
- all other sciences concern themselves with a particular object of
investigation Logic
- anthropologists’ study human beings in relation with the society - Reasoning is the concern of the logician
- sociologists study society, its form, structures, and functions - could be reasoning in science and medicine, in ethics and law, in
- botanists focus their attention to plants politics and commerce, in sports and games, and in the mundane
- linguists limit themselves with language affairs of everyday living
- theologians investigate God - varied kinds of reasoning may be used, and all are of interest to the
- a philosopher studies human beings, society, religion, language, logician
God, and plants, among other concerns.
Aesthetics
First Cause or Highest Principle - also spelled esthetics, the philosophical study of beauty and taste
- a principle is that from which something proceeds in any manner - closely related to the philosophy of art, which is concerned with the
whatsoever. The First Principles: nature of art and the concepts in terms of which individual works
+ Principle of Identity – whatever is is, and whatever is not is not; of art are interpreted and evaluated
everything is what it is. Everything is its own being, and not being
is not being
+ Principle of Non-Contradiction – it is impossible for a thing to be
and not to be at the same time, and at the same respect
+ Principle of Excluded Middle – a thing is either is or is not;
everything must be either be or not be; between being and
not-being, there is no middle ground possible
L2 - Logic and Critical Thinking: Tools in Reasoning - to detect fallacies, it is required to examine the argument’s
content
Logic is centered in the analysis and construction of arguments. - some of the usually committed errors in reasoning and thus,
coming up with false conclusion and worse, distorting the truth
Critical thinking is distinguishing facts and opinions or personal
feelings. In making rational choices, first, we suspend beliefs and Appeal to Pity (Argumentum ad misericordiam)
judgment until all facts have been gathered and considered. - a specific kind of appeal to emotion in which someone tries to win
support for an argument or idea by exploiting his or her opponent’s
Logic and critical thinking serve as paths to freedom from half-truths and feelings of pity or guilt
deceptions.
Equivocation
- Though facts are important, critical thinking also takes into - a logical chain of reasoning of a term or a word several times but
consideration cultural systems, values, and beliefs. giving the particular word a different meaning each time
- Critical thinking helps us uncover bias and prejudice and open to - example: Human beings have hands; the clock has hands. He is
new ideas not necessarily in agreement with previous thought. drinking from the pitcher of water; he is a baseball pitcher

Two basic types of reasoning: Deductive and Inductive Composition


Inductive reasoning - infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is
- based on observations in order to make generalizations true of some part of the whole. The reverse of this fallacy is
- reasoning is often applied in prediction, forecasting, or behavior. division

Deductive reasoning Division


- draws conclusion from usually one broad judgment or definition - One reasons logically that something true of a thing must also be
and one more specific assertion, often an inference. true of all or some of its parts

Validity and Soundness of an Argument Against the Person (Argumentum ad hominem)


- Based on the previous example (or Syllogism), if the two premises - attempts to link the validity of a premise to a characteristic or
are constructed logically, then the conclusion must follow logically, belief of the person advocating the premise
the deductive argument is valid - in some instances, questions of personal conduct, character,
- does not necessarily mean that the conclusion is true or false motives, etc., are legitimate if relevant to the issue
- validity comes from a logical conclusion based on logically constructed
premises (Reed 2010) Appeal to force (Argumentum ad baculum)
- argument where force, coercion, or the threat of force, is given as
Strength of an Argument a justification for a conclusion
- On the other hand, inductive arguments cannot prove if the
premises are true which will also determine the truth of the Appeal to the people (Argumentum ad populum)
conclusion - argument that appeals or exploits people’s vanities, desire for
- proves only probable support is a strong argument esteem, and anchoring on popularity
- While an inductive argument that fails to provide such support is
weak, a strong argument with true premises is said to be cogent False cause (post hoc)
- both a statistical argument and a predictive argument, which are - that event followed this one, that event must have been caused by
two common patterns of inductive reasoning. Also, the conclusion this one
does not follow necessarily from the premises - also referred to as coincidental correlation, or correlation not
causation
Fallacies
- a fallacy is a defect in an argument other than it having false Hasty generalization
premises - One commits errors if one reaches an inductive generalization based
on insufficient evidence
- commonly based on a broad conclusion upon the statistics of a
survey of a small group that fails to sufficiently represent the
whole population
- Begging the question (petition principii)
- a type of fallacy in which the proposition to be proven is assumed
implicitly or explicitly in the premise

Applying Logic and Fallacies in Determining Truth from


Opinion
- Tractatus identifies the relationship between language and reality and
to define the limits of science
- is recognized as a significant philosophical work of the twentieth
century
- It is in the possibility of agreeing or disagreeing with reality, thus
being true or false, that the meaning of the picture lies.

WITTGENSTEIN (Ludwig)
- same thoughts occur later when Wittgenstein describes spoken and
written language, that is, propositions, as one of these pictures and
defines its meaning in terms of its capacity for being true or false.

- If the purpose of a sentence is to inform or state a fact,


some of its words must refer to things, events or
properties. In other words, some of its words must refer
to things, events or properties. In other words, some of its
words have cognitive meaning.
- However, words also have emotive meaning – that is, they also may
have emotive whether positive or negative overtones.

You might also like