Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Invasion of Privacy
Conversation with a Stranger
The inspiration that brought about the
writing of this book is the result of my love
for Hebraic roots teaching since I was
introduced to it about four years ago by my
wonder friend and pastor, Joe Amaral of
Canada.
While the bible was written for us, it was
never written directly to us but to particular
people and culture primarily known as the
Jewish people.
Even though the Reformation gave rise to
evangelicals and sound biblical teaching; its
major challenge became the influence of
western culture on the interpretations of the
Bible. Today, when seminaries and bible
colleges teach the Bible, it is taught from a
western perspective. This has always often
led to interpretational doctrinal errors.
The more I look deeper into Hebraic root
teaching or backstage as Pastor Joe calls it; I
am taken aback by how much is lost to us
because of our limited understanding from a
limited English language translation. When
the full meaning and interpretation of
Scripture is lost, its power to transform lives
becomes ineffective.
The goal of this book is not meant to
condemn any preacher or teacher of the
Bible but that it will encourage us to return
to more Hebraic root studies of the
Scripture.
Having said, I strongly believe that every
pastor needs a Rabbi if not Rabbis if he must
become effective in dividing the word of
truth.
Some of the resources for this book are
taken from what I call My Rabbi’s Archives.
These are notes and inspirations taken from
Rabbis’ teachings from the Jewish Scripture.
My two most prominent are Rabbi Manis
Friedman and Rabbi Daniel Lapin. I have
signed into their resource pages online,
follow their teachings and watch their
YouTube videos. The Rabbi that has gotten
hold of me the most through his teachings is
Rabbi Manis Friedman. In fact, when I was
thinking about the writing of this book, I
wrote him to inform him that as a teacher, I
would like to share some of what I have
come to learn through his teaching from the
Torah.
Most of the materials that made this book
what it is were taken from my written notes
taken from watching Rabbi Manis
Friedman’s YouTube videos. While the
emphasis of the Rabbi’s teachings are on the
Old Testament Scriptures; a deeper
understanding of the Torah, the and the
Prophets only gives me a better perspective
to understanding and interpreting the New
Testament.
Sam-Abel Gbinsay
The Introduction
John 4:1-42
1
Jesus[a] knew the Pharisees had heard that
he was baptizing and making more disciples
than John 2 (though Jesus himself didn’t
baptize them—his disciples did). 3 So he left
Judea and returned to Galilee.
4
He had to go through Samaria on the
way. 5 Eventually he came to the Samaritan
village of Sychar, near the field that Jacob
gave to his son Joseph. 6 Jacob’s well was
there; and Jesus, tired from the long walk,
sat wearily beside the well about
noontime. 7 Soon a Samaritan woman came
to draw water, and Jesus said to her, “Please
give me a drink.” 8 He was alone at the time
because his disciples had gone into the
village to buy some food.
9
The woman was surprised, for Jews refuse
to have anything to do with Samaritans. She
said to Jesus, “You are a Jew, and I am a
Samaritan woman. Why are you asking me
for a drink?”
10
Jesus replied, “If you only knew the gift
God has for you and who you are speaking
to, you would ask me, and I would give you
living water.”
11
“But sir, you don’t have a rope or a
bucket,” she said, “and this well is very
deep. Where would you get this living
water? 12 And besides, do you think you’re
greater than our ancestor Jacob, who gave us
this well? How can you offer better water
than he and his sons and his animals
enjoyed?”
13
Jesus replied, “Anyone who drinks this
water will soon become thirsty again. 14 But
those who drink the water I give will never
be thirsty again. It becomes a fresh,
bubbling spring within them, giving them
eternal life.”
15
“Please, sir,” the woman said, “give me
this water! Then I’ll never be thirsty again,
and I won’t have to come here to get water.”
16
“Go and get your husband,” Jesus told her.
17
“I don’t have a husband,” the woman
replied.
Drawn Daggers
Reconciliation or Rebellion
Historically, neither the dispute over the
Jerusalem Temple nor the day-to-day
dispute was the major cause of Jewish and
Samaritan hostility but John Hyrcanus’s
action in destroying the city of Samaria was
the final nail drailed into the coffin of this
racial and religious hostility. From that point
on; the hope or possibility of reconciliation
had completely disappeared. The Samaritan
would go on to maintain their sectarian
integrity and would never assimilate with
Jews as did the Galileans and Idumeans.
(1womeninthebible.net/Copyright 2006/
Elizabeth Fletcher)
2
John Hyrcanus-Taking advantage of unrest
in the Seleucid Empire, he was able to assert
Judean independence and conquer new
territories. High Priest, John Hyrcanus is
remembered in rabbinic literature as having
made several outstanding enactments and
deeds worthy of memorial. The one worthy
of note is that he cancelled the requirement
of saying the avowal mentioned in
Deuteronomy 26:12–15 once in every three
years. He realized that in Israel, the people
had ceased to separate the First Tithe in its
proper manner and which, by making the
avowal, and saying "I have hearkened to the
voice of the Lord my God, and have done
according to all that you have commanded
me," he makes himself dishonest before his
Maker and liable to God's wrath. At that
time, The First Tithe, which was meant to be
given unto the Levites, was given instead to
the priests of Aaron's lineage, after Ezra had
fined the Levites for not returning in full
force to the Land of Israel. By not being able
to give the First Tithe unto the Levites, as
originally commanded by God, this made
the avowal null and void. Another thing that
John Hyrcanus is remembered for is
cancelling the reading of Psalm 44:23,
formerly chanted daily by the Levites in the
Temple precincts, and which words,
"Awake! Why do you sleep, O Lord? etc."
He felt it seemed inappropriate, as if they
were imposing their own will over God's, or
that God was actually sleeping. John
Hyrcanus, the High Priest, further went on
to cancel an ill-practice had by the people to
cause bleeding near the eyes of sacrificial
calves by beating their heads so as to stun
them, prior to their being bound and
slaughtered, since by beating the animal in
such a way they ran the risk of causing a
blemish in the animal's membrane lining its
brain. To prevent this from happening, the
High Priest made rings in the ground of the
Temple court for helping to secure the
animals before slaughter. (2Wikipedia).
1. Conversation with a
Stranger
Jesus replied, “If you only knew the gift
God has for you and who you are speaking
to, you would ask me, and I would give you
living water.” (v. 10)
Jesus recognizes the fact that, to this
woman; he’s indeed a stranger and is about
to stir up a racial and religious contention.
He should have never entered any
conversation with this Samaritan woman
neither asked her for a drink. That was an
unspoken rule that both Jesus and this
woman knew.
If you only knew: Reality check number
one: I don’t know whom I’m speaking to; so
how can this stranger even start talking
about something so sensitive and important
as “gift God has for you” and asking him to
“give you living water?”
This stranger who has just invaded my
privacy is claiming to be “the Gift of God”
and the One who offers “living water.” He
can’t be serious.
Reading from a 21st century perspective,
there seems to be nothing unusual about the
conversation and how it begins. Everything
seems to be normal and straight forward. In
fact, there is nothing wrong with meeting
someone for the first time and starting a
conversation that goes from race, religion
and then to personal family matters. We see
something similar every day and some of us
may have even experienced that a couple of
times.
Social media platforms have even taken that
to a far greater level where one can share
videos and pictures with a total stranger
somewhere else across the globe. You tend
to accept the individual based on the profile
they create about themselves; in many cases,
those profiles are not usually what they
appear to be.
In the days of Jesus, the Christ, everything
was completely different than it is today.
There were strong laws and traditions that
prohibit Jews from associating with
strangers especially women. It was
unlawfully for Jesus, a Jew to interact or talk
with that Samaritan woman given the
historical nature of the enmity between Jews
and Samaritans. In any case, Jesus still did
talk to her and breaking rules but not meant
to be rude.
Today, such laws and traditions would be
considered as discriminatory and unlawful
with the label “human rights, freedom of
association and movement.”
While sometimes a law could be legal but
unjust and illegal but just; a person who
breaks laws may be referred to as a lawless
person or a deviant whether the law is just or
unjust. There was a
Jesus being a Jewish rabbi, was not
ignorance of the enmity that existed between
Jews and Samaritans and consequences of
crossing the line; which in most cases would
have been tantamount to death by stoning.
Here is Jesus, on his way to from Judea to
Galilee as he escapes confrontations with the
Pharisees over allegation of “he is making or
baptizing more disciples than John;” he had
to go through the Samaritan village of
Sychar. The last thing he wants on his
resume’ is allegation of any act of
impropriety. In other words, Jesus is leaving
where he is at because he wants to avoid
problem with the religious authorities who
often manipulated the crowds against him
and political authorities into arresting him.
They had often falsely accused him of many
things regarding the laws and were always
looking for the least opportunity to kill him.
Any rational person in that case would really
want to be careful and rightly so.
On the contrary, Jesus does the most
unacceptable and unusual thing. Being tired
in the journey from Judea to Galilee; he sat
by a well known as Jacob’s well in the
Samaritan village of Sychar. He is alone
because the disciples had gone to town to
buy them some food. He is definitely a total
stranger in that region. They haven’t heard
of him and his many miraculous works in
other places. Back then news didn’t travel
like we have them today. Unlike today when
you can watch live event thousands of miles
away from your location; back then it would
take days, weeks, months, and even years
for you to know what was taking place
around you. Especially where there was a
deeply rooted cultural and religious hatred;
it would make it even more difficult for
news to go across from one people to
another. To avoid any national security
emergency; it was only appropriate that
everyone kept to his own business.
So, the total stranger that walks by and sits
at the well near this Samaritan town of
Sychar is not the popular Jewish Rabbi and
miracle worker of Galilee, nor the Savior of
the world as we know him today. He is just
some unknown young Jewish male who
happens to pass by and is about to ignite a
religious and racial tension.
With that understanding; it’s easier to have
an appreciation for the way the Samaritan
woman reacts to this Jewish stranger. This is
a complete intruder who comes by with no
regards for laws and customs that have
existed for many generations.
By chance, Jesus sits by a well that was dug
by Jacob, the father of Israel and the Jewish
people but its ownership is claimed by the
Samaritans.
The first thing Jesus, as a stranger, does is
asks the woman for a drink. He doesn’t
introduce himself or his mission as a Jew in
that environment. That should be a major
cause for alarm by the woman. Imagine a
stranger just walk pass your house alone the
highway and without introducing himself
and what brought him there in the first
place; when he ought not to be there. The
first thing he ask you for is water. I can be
imaging you looking him up and down with
his feet all dusty up from the long walk.
Haven’t shaved in days and the hair so
rough and his clothes not took welcoming
and familiar to men in your surroundings. I
guess you are going embrace him with
opened arms and all smiles. Honestly, I
don’t think. You would do just similar to
what this woman did under such
circumstance taking into account your safety
first.
If you think I don’t know you then you are
dead wrong. You are a total stranger without
and any impressive profile and in addition to
that; you Jews have nothing to do with
Samaritans. My question to you is what has
changed that got you breaking your long
held tradition and have the guts to ask me a
Samaritan for water? She was right even in
her limited and narrow minded view.
Something was about to change about her
life, her character, her personality and how
society view her, and it was about to change
for her village, her religious beliefs, and
place of worship. Protocols and laws are
about to be broken to introduce the spirit and
truth of worship.
2. Israel’s Struggles with
Identity Crisis
At the time of Christ, Israel’s struggles with
identity crisis had reached such peak so
much so that the nation was very much
divided into both religious and political sects
with each trying to answer the question as to
“who was a real Jew?”
The Sadducees
The name Sadducees is most likely thought
to have come from the name Zadok who was
the priest that anointed Solomon as king (1
Kings 1:32-40). Zadok’s descendants were
recognized as the only legitimate priests by
Ezekiel (44:9-31) and by the writer of the
Chronicles. Apparently, the Sadducees were
of the elite and wealthy class that was
closely allied with the highly priestly
families, and they had a greater following
among the rich only. In the book of Acts,
they are associated with the high priest and
the Jerusalem temple (Acts 4:1-2, 5:17). The
high priest is named by Josephus as Ananus,
a Sadducee. The high priest was appointed
by King Herod in New Testament times who
was the puppet king of Rome, then by
Archelaeus, Herod’s son, and later by the
Roman rulers of Judea. The Sadducees’
connection with the high priestly families
brought them into close ties with Roman
rule in Palestine.
While ancient Jews had varying beliefs
about life after death, the Sadducees are
thought to have believed that the soul died
along with the body. They did not believe in
resurrection after death nor the existence of
angels. However, the Pharisees did believe
in them all (Acts 28:8).
The Pharisees
While most members of the pharisees were
not priest; they had enormous influence in
Jewish society. They did not hold direct
political offices but their huge following
among the ordinary people allowed them to
influence political leadership as in the case
of the Hasmonean Queen, Salome
Alexandra, and later Herod the Great. We
also see that portrayal in Mark with the
Pharisees plotting to with the Herodians to
destroy Jesus (Mark 3:6, 12:13). They also
served on the Sanhedrin council that advised
the high priest (Acts 5:34, 23:6-9).
The origin of the Pharisees is thought to
have come from the time of the Maccabean
revolt because of their zealous support of the
Torah which later developed into a rabbinic
Judaism. In they gospel the Pharisees are
described as hypocritical and concerned
with more outward appearance that sincere
faith (Mat. 23:3-5, 25-28). Their emphasis
was on applying the details of the Torah
Law to everyday life and giving rise to the
emphasis placed on tradition (Mark 7:3-4).
Essenes
This group is often associated with the
community that lived in the desert
wilderness at Qumran, the site on the
northwestern end of the Dead Sea where the
famous Dead Sea Scrolls were found. They
did not agree with the interpretation and
practice of Torah by the priests at Jerusalem
with their emphasis on the law of purity.
The thought that the best way to keep the
law is to be separated from the rest of
society.
The Herodians
Though not much is often said about them in
the Bible at the time of Christ; they were
mostly a sect of Hellenistic Jews thought to
be a pro Herod Jewish party more connected
to and concerned with politics and power
than with religious matters. In Mark 8:15,
Jesus thus warns about Herod and his
followers with “Watch out; beware of the
leaven of the Pharisees and the leaven of
Herod,” as followers of Herod were those
willing to compromise in order to achieve
personal gain.
At some time during the ministry of Christ
there is a friendship through mutual
adversary by the Pharisees and the
Herodians through their common hatred of
Jesus. “The Pharisees went out and
immediately held counsel with the
Herodians against him, how to destroy him,”
(Mark 3:60).
At the time of Christ, the Messiah, the real
problem that Israel had to struggle with was
an identity crisis. The real crisis was “who
was a real Jew?” Each of these sects claimed
to be more Jewish than the others. The
problem that resulted from this sectarian
division was multitudes of neglected Jews
often referred to as sinners for whom when
Jesus “saw the throngs, He was moved with
pity and sympathy for them, because they
were bewildered (harassed and distressed
and dejected and helpless), like sheep
without a shepherd,” Mat. 9:36, AMPC.
Does that sound familiar to any addicted
God lover? I guess so. Amid all these
religious glamour and publicity stunts;
they’re still many who are “harassed and
destressed and dejected and helpless like
sheep without a shepherd.” At the time of
Christ, it is to that destressed and dejected
group that Jesus was moved with
compassion.
Adam Vs Moses
1
Lev. 1:1 “The Lord called to Moses…” In
the book of Exodus, the Lord speaks to
Moses over and over but never says, the
Lord called to Moses. It often says, God
spoke to Moses. Ex. 3:12-15 “God said to
Moses”.
Why is there a sudden change from “God
said to Moses” to “God called Moses” to
speak to him? The explanation. With other
prophets, let’s take Balaam (the wicked
prophet) for example, it says, the Lord
abruptly or chance upon him to speak to him
and in that case he does it without any
introduction. Does not use the word
VaYikra (Hebrew for “and He called”).
However, with Moses, God called him by
name and speaks to him. VaYikra, here, is a
sign of affection. That is, when God spoke
to Moses or with Moses; it was with
affection. However, this raises a question of
interest which is very important. In Exodus
we see God speaks to Moses many times
without bothering to call him by name first,
why now in the third book of Leviticus that
God calls him by name before speaking to
him? You must understand that Leviticus is
a book of judgement which focuses on what
needs to be redeemed, repaired, what needs
to be elevated, what needs to go from
material to spiritual (more details about that
in my next book; Invasion of Privacy). God
therefore sees it necessary to let the rest of
the world knows that whenever he spoke to
Moses in Leviticus; it was not with regards
to judgement but with kindness and
affection. Whenever there was an expression
of judgement in Scripture; God had to make
it clear by pointing out where the judgement
does not apply. God is speaking to the rest
of the people about judgement and how to
go from negative to positive, from physical
to spiritual but Moses is not included. With
Moses, God spoke always with kindness and
affection.
Here is an interesting point worthy of note.
In the Hebrew spelling of the word VaYikra
is the letter olive, the first letter in the
Hebrew alphabet. It is the A of the Hebrew
Alphabet and must always be handwritten in
small letter in the Torah scroll. That means,
it is a miniature olive. When you see letters
in the Torah in Hebrew, some appear
smaller than the rest and others are larger.
However, every letter in the Hebrew
alphabet gets that kind of treatment.
In showing his affection for Moses, VaYikra
(“and He called” to Moses) shows up with
small olive as Vayikra. That demonstrates
that instead of letting God’s affection for
him goes into his head; he was humbled by
the affection, and it humbled him.
Noah
What is worth mentioning of Noah amid a
perverse society is that “Noah found grace
(favor) in the eyes of the Lord.” Gen. 6:8.
Imagine being surrounded by a generation
so corrupt that they all got swept in a flood,
but Noah wasn’t affected by any of these.
He walked with God God in righteousness
and eventually found favor with God at the
time of the flood. He may be considered the
most righteous human being to have ever
lived in his generation.
Noah lived in a time early in human history
when people were still experimenting with
humanity. The righteousness that got Noah
into favor with God has nothing to do with
believing God, serving God and neither
loving God. The awareness of God to
humanity was still strong as the creation was
very much new and God was very much real
and closed to those who lived in that time.
They didn’t have any doubt about the
creation of the world by God.
Still learning how to be human was
something new that Noah and his generation
had to grapple with. As the result of that, the
people had to experiment with every kind of
lifestyle and behavioral character. That just
made everything chaotic and lawless. Living
within such a messed-up society; Noah
remained decent instead of being destructive
socially.
However, Noah’s decency is not the kind of
righteousness that we understand from the
Bible today. A testament to that is the fact
that while he was decent; his righteousness
did not influence anyone else outside of his
family to be in that ark. Noah lived like a
child who is doing everything right but
unable to have influence on anybody.
While Noah may have found favor in God’s
eyes as an individual; in the 120 years of
building the ark; Noah was not able to
convince a single person to join him in that
ark because he lacked influence.
Noah did a very poor job socially as we
observed from his ineffectiveness. Unlike
Noah, Abraham, on the other hand,
challenged both his family and his world to
rethink their beliefs about God and thus
started a movement as the result.
Genesis 18:19, “For I have known (chosen,
acknowledged) him [as My own], so that he
may teach and command his children and
the sons of his house after him to keep the
way of the Lord and to do what is just and
righteous, so that the Lord may bring
Abraham what He has promised him.”
While Noah waked with God or with God’s
support; Abraham waled before God as God
commended with “walk before me and be
perfect,” and I will bless you. When you
walk before God, it is out of your own
volition and initiative by using your inherent
godliness of your soul.
Even after such a horrific and destructive
flood through which only Noah and his
family are saved; he was unable to influence
his household and generation after him. It is
after Noah that we got the generation of the
Tower of Babel, a thousand years after the
flood. This was a generation that decided
that God no longer runs the world. Since
they were scientifically advanced, they
embarked on build a tower and city that
would reach to heaven. One thing the
generation of the tower had learned was how
to be sociable, coexist, and to work together.
Therefore, they decided to use that to their
advantage to build a tower. God said,
“These people are one…therefore nothing
they have imagine they can do will be
impossible for them,” Gen 11:6.
With their advancement in science and
technology, they had decided to move from
earth’s atmosphere into the heavenly sphere
scientifically because they thought that the
earth had become a dangerous and unstable
place to live. They believed that as the result
of the unstable nature of the earth’s
atmosphere; there would come a flood every
thousand. They therefore thought to move
out of earth and into heaven.
Their project of building a tower was a clear
demonstration that the flood was not an act
of God but a natural phenomenon and
therefore could be avoided or escape.
King David was wise enough in his
generation to have said, “Where could I go
from Your Spirit? Or where could I flee
from Your presence? If I ascend up into
heaven, You are there; if I make my bed in
Sheol (the place of the dead), behold, You
are there. [Rom. 11:33.] If I take the wings
of the morning or dwell in the uttermost
parts of the sea, Even there shall Your hand
lead me, and Your right hand shall hold me.
If I say, Surely the darkness shall cover me
and the night shall be [the only] light about
me, Even the darkness hides nothing from
You, but the night shines as the day; the
darkness and the light are both alike to You,
Psalms 139:7-12.
God wasn’t against the unity and
corporation but against the project that stood
in opposition to his purpose for humanity to
“multiply and replenish the earth” and not to
escape from it. What did God do then? He
caused some group of people to develop
their own language opposed to the one
language of the project. That resulted in
different people speaking different
languages, creating different cultures,
nations, and boundaries.
What a dramatic turn for the generation of
the flood and the generation of the tower.
The flood generation went from being ok
with God but not being ok with each other.
The generation of the tower became ok with
each other and not being ok with God. Then
comes Abraham who becomes a unifier of
both worlds (earth and heaven). He was an
influencer, he was social, people could relate
to his language, and most importantly, he
had a unique relationship with God because
he “walked before God” unlike Noah who
“walked with God” or needed God’s help
before he made any move. Abraham
combined both a little bit of earth and a little
bit of heaven. While Noah’s godliness can
be compared to that of a child content with
being himself; Abraham’s godliness is
compared to that of an adult whose goal is to
influence those around him.
Abraham
Abraham’s obedience to walking with God
is demonstrated when he is told:
What Journey has no destination?
Abraham is told where to leave from but not
told where to go. What a strange command
when told to go on a journey without a
destination.
The most important part of every journey is
the destination and not the starting point.
Jewish wisdom teaching tells us the
following:
Abraham’s father sought spirituality at the
later stage of his life.
His journey led him out of Ur with his
family to Canaan but was never able to get
there. So, he settled in Haran until his death.
After Terah’s death in Haran, the Lord tells
Abraham to take the toughest decision of his
life.
“Leave for yourself (for your own
advantage)” and “go unto/to yourself,”
(AMPC). Leave for yourself to discover
yourself!
Abraham’s father decided to take his family
on this unknown destination but got stuck
along the way and finally died in his
journey.
Now God tells Abraham to take the journey
for himself and to his own advantage if he
must discover himself.
The most difficult part of this journey
(which has seen his father died) for
Abraham is that it lacks a destination.
Imagine someone inviting you for
graduation ceremony but only tells you
where to leave from and not where the
ceremony is taking place. That’s the
problem right there.
That problem presents a serious challenge
which sets the stage for everything Abraham
must deal with in the journey to get to his
destination.
The Process of the journey
The first challenge is to identify a
destination and to do that you need to have a
clear goal. Your goal identifies the way that
leads to the destination.
The final thing is to identify what will it cost
you to get you there. The process of the
journey begins in the mind. You must
picture and process in your mind the clear
destination you expect to arrive at. The
image you create is dependent on the
information received.
You may only know the details and realities
of where you are now but to get to the
destination; you got to come to the end of
yourself and your human reasoning or the
information feeding you through your
senses.
The blessing is in the obedience and the
obedience is carried out by faith when you
can’t understand all the details of what the
destination looks like apart from what you
can imagine.
“Abraham believed God and…”
“Whatsoever is not of faith is sin.”
Gen. 14:13-17
“Then one who had escaped came and told
Abram the Hebrew [one from the other
side], who was living by the oaks or
terebinths of Mamre the Amorite, a brother
of Eshcol and of Aner–these were allies of
Abram. When Abram heard that [his
nephew] had been captured, he armed (led
forth) the 318 trained servants born in his
own house and pursued the enemy as far as
Dan. He divided his forces against them by
night, he and his servants, and attacked and
routed them, and pursued them as far as
Hobah, which is north of Damascus. And he
brought back all the goods and also brought
back his kinsman Lot and his possessions,
the women also and the people. After his
[Abram's] return from the defeat and slaying
of Chedorlaomer and the kings who were
with him, the king of Sodom went out to
meet him at the Valley of Shaveh, that is,
the King's Valley.”
Joseph
Genesis 37:18-20, 25-28 KJV
“And when they saw him afar off, even
before he came near unto them, they
conspired against him to slay him. And they
said one to another, Behold, this dreamer
cometh. Come now therefore, and let us slay
him, and cast him into some pit, and we will
say, Some evil beast hath devoured him: and
we shall see what will become of his
dreams. And they sat down to eat bread: and
they lifted up their eyes and looked, and
behold, a company of Ishmeelites came
from Gilead with their camels bearing
spicery and balm and myrrh, going to carry
it down to Egypt. And Judah said unto his
brethren, What profit is it if we slay our
brother, and conceal his blood? Come, and
let us sell him to the Ishmeelites, and let not
our hand be upon him; for he is our brother
and our flesh. And his brethren were
content. Then there passed by Midianites
merchantmen; and they drew and lifted
Joseph out of the pit and sold Joseph to the
Ishmeelites for twenty pieces of silver: and
they brought Joseph into Egypt.”
v These are God’s chosen people
through whom redemption will come
for the rest of humanity.
v They supposed to be morally good
and holy, but the general view is that
they hated their brother for his
dreams and the coat of many colors
his father Jacob made for him.
v Think about that. What kind of
reasonable person will hate his
brother for his dreams and a coat that
his father made for him so much so
that you can plan to destroy him.
v He’s not hated for any wealth or
inheritance, but we’re told that he’s
hated for dreams and coat.
v Is there something more to the story
that we are missing?
v Are these brothers just blinded by
ignorance and hatred to the point that
they don’t care to reason?
v Can we go deeper into this story
beyond the conventional
understanding and see the point
we’re missing?
v Jacob showed favoritism and so he
gets bad result. It must be something
more.
v If this is the chosen people through
whom the rest of humanity expects
redemption; then there must be
something more to the story.
This whole family rivalry beginning with
Cain and Abel, Esau and Jaco, and now
Joseph and his brothers is all about
philosophy regarding the vast eternal plan of
redeeming the world and making it a perfect
place.
The brothers’ hatred of Joseph was that they
believed that his philosophy was dangerous
and went totally against the vast eternal plan
of God for the Jewish people. They were so
much convinced that the result of Joseph’s
philosophy would be fatal to the Jewish and
therefore threatened their very existence.
They get uncomfortable with Joseph each
passing day and begin to think that with him
around, the eternal plan of God for the
Jewish people will never be able to pick up.
However, when it came to the future of the
Jewish people; Joseph's idea was the right
idea and his brothers were mistaken.
The brothers were shepherds and being
shepherds; they believed that being
shepherds and removing themselves from
the rest of society was the best idea. That’s
why they took their sheep way into the
jungle and Joseph had to go see how they
were doing. As God’s holy people, they
thought that separating themselves from the
rest of society, from the corruptions of
business and being out there by themselves
to commune with God was the only way to
remain a holy people.
Joseph said to them, separating yourself
from the rest of society doesn’t make you
holy. In fact, isolating from society is
something that anybody can do.
Joseph’s idea on holiness was this. To be a
holy people, you have to make your world
holy. Holiness is not meant to be kept but to
be spread. You were given a
talent/responsibility for holiness to make the
world holy and why are you hiding in the
jungles and separating yourself from
everyone and think that’s going to make you
any holier.
By doing that, you’re letting the rest of the
world go about blindly without any
direction.
Joseph insisted that you must go out into the
world, stay in contact with the world and
have a positive effect.