You are on page 1of 3

RISK MANAGEMENT 3.

Design
Framework of ISO 31000 (process.st) We now come to the final four components of the
framework: design, implementation, evaluation, and
1. Leadership and commitment improvement.
Central to the ISO 31000 framework for risk
management is the importance of leadership and This sequence of four stages is also known as the Plan-Do-
commitment. Study-Act cycle, which is a model for continuous quality
This component includes things like: improvement.

 Aligning risk management with the overall Despite the naming difference, the approach is largely the
business objectives, strategies, and culture of same. Four distinct stages, beginning with planning (or
the company, design), and ending with improvement (or learning), with the
 Issuing statements, announcements, or policies common goal of improving the risk management framework.
that clearly describe the risk management
approach, planning, objectives, or actions, This component includes things like:
 Making sure resources are adequately allocated  Understanding the organization and its context
and available for the risk management program, (both internal and external)
 Determining the acceptable degree of risk that  Planning and allocating resources for the risk
the organization can handle (“risk appetite”). management program
 Establishing communication protocols
2. Integration
Perhaps second only to leadership and commitment, 4. Implementation
integration is super important in any risk management Putting the plans in action. Although, there is still a bit of
framework. The effectiveness of your entire risk management planning that happens here; namely, the specific planning
approach will depend on how extensively (and efficiently) it is regarding the implementation of the risk management
integrated into all aspects of your organization, including approach.
decision-making processes.
For example, some processes, like an electrical inspection This component includes things like:
checklist, will have some level of risk involved. This could  Setting objectives and deadlines
mean that the decision-making process involves multiple  Clearly defining the decision-making process
individuals, which could easily lead to a bottleneck, and result  Evaluating and making changes to the decision-
in a slow, inefficient process. making process where appropriate

By effectively integrating the risk management process, these 5. Evaluation


bottlenecks can be bypassed. One way of doing this is by Taking a look at what’s working, what’s not, and figuring out
utilizing a BPM software like Process Street to streamline if the risk management system is working as it should be.
each step along the way. This involves looking at the perceived versus the desired
outcome (e.g., performing a gap analysis), and any other
Using the same example, if a problem was detected by the analytics or feedback from the process and implementation
electrician, they could swiftly notify management, or the so far.
client, or whoever might be the most relevant interested
party with Process Street’s rich form fields and conditional It might include things like:
logic.  Measuring the performance of the risk
management system
That’s just one example. There are a ton of other ways you  Assessing success rate
could use software like Process Street to simplify and improve
 Determining whether or not objectives are
your risk management framework. For more ideas, check out
feasible
this introductory webinar:

Returning to the ISO 31000 framework, this component also 6. Improvement


includes things like: Risk management is a cyclic and wholly continuous approach.
That means there is always room for improvement.
 Roles and responsibilities of organizational
management Despite the fact that there is a step in the ISO 31000
 Making sure risk management is part of framework dedicated to it, and that the framework is laid out
(integrated) all aspects of the organization as a series of consecutive steps, the most effective risk
management systems adopt a truly continuous approach to
improvement.
A big part of that is making sure employees are on board with arising from a combination of
the risk management approach and that they understand and the
are able to take ownership of the processes they’re impact and the probability of
interacting with most frequently. Only by giving process potential events.
owners the motivation and responsibility to take action on Institute of Internal The uncertainty of an event
improving their processes will risk management thrive in a Auditors occurring that could have an
business environment. impact on the achievement of
The improvement component includes things like:
the objectives. Risk is
 Continuously monitoring all aspects of the risk
measured in terms of
management framework consequences and likelihood.
 Addressing internal and external changes
 Planning and taking actions to improve value
TYPES OF RISKS
creation within the risk management system
 Compliance (or mandatory) risks -
 Hazard (or pure) risks - events that can only result
in negative outcomes. Maybe thought of as
operational or insurable risks.
Example: Theft and Fire

 Control (or uncertainty) risks - risks that give rise to


uncertainty about the outcome of a situation.
These are risks associated with unknown and
unexpected events.
Example: Uncertainty about the delivery of the project
on time

 Opportunity (or speculative) risks - involve risks to


achieve positive gains. It is focused on investment.
Example: moving business to a new location and
acquiring new property.
TOPIC 1
RISK MANAGEMENT

Definitions of RISK Risks Organization’s General Action


Compliance Risks Minimize the risks
 “ A chance or the possibility of danger, loss, injury Hazard Risks Mitigate the risks
or other adverse consequences.” – Oxford English Control Risks Manage the risks
Dictionary Opportunity Risks Embrace the risks
 At risk- “exposed to danger”
Organization Definition
ISO Guide 73 Effect of uncertainty on RISK DESCRIPTION
objectives. Note that an effect
 To fully understand risk, a detailed description is
may be positive, negative, or a
deviation from the expected. necessary so that a common understanding of the
Also, risk is often described by risks can be identified and ownership or
an event, a change in responsibilities may be clearly understood.
circumstances or a  Name or Title of Risk
consequence.  Statement of Risk, including the scope of risk and
Institute of Risk Risk is the combination of the details of possible events and dependencies
Management (IRM) probability of an event and its  Nature of risk, including details of the risk
consequence. Consequences classification and timescale of the potential impact
can range from positive to  Stakeholders in the risk, both internal and external
negative.  Likelihood and magnitude of event and
Orange Book from Uncertainty of outcome, consequences should the risk materialize at
HM Treasury within a range of exposure, current/residual level
 Control standard required, the target level of risk or 5. The component or feature of the organization that
risk criteria will be impacted (people, premises, processes , or
 Incident and loss experience products)
 Existing control mechanisms and activities  An important consideration for organizations when
 Responsibility for developing risk strategy and deciding their risk classification system is to
policy determine whether the risks will classified
 Potential for risk improvement and level of according to the source of the risks, the component
confidence in existing controls impacted, or of the consequences of the risk
 Risk improvement recommendations and deadlines materializing.
for implementation  Individual organizations will decide on the risk
 Responsibility for implementing improvements classification system that suits them best,
 Responsibility for auditing risk compliance depending on the nature of the organization and its
activities.
 The risk classification system that is selected should
INHERENT (ABSOLUTE/GROSS) LEVEL OF RISK be fully relevant to the organization concerned.
 This is the level of the risk before any actions have  There is no universal classification system that
been taken to change the likelihood or magnitude fulfills the requirements of all organizations.
of the risk.
 Identifying the inherent level of the risk makes it RISK LIKELIHOOD AND MAGNITUDE
possible to identify the importance of control
measures in place.  Risk likelihood and magnitude are best
 According to IIA: “In the risk assessment, we look demonstrated using a risk matrix.
at the inherent risks before considering any  Risk matrix is very valuable for risk management.
controls.”  The basic style of risk matrix plots the likelihood of
 A risk matrix is used to show the inherent level of an event against the magnitude or impact should
the risk in terms of likelihood and magnitude. the event materialize.
 Crossing the busy road
Crossing a busy road would be inherently dangerous if
there were no controls in place and many more road Magnitude
accidents would occur. When a risk is inherently
dangerous, greater attention is paid to the control
measures in place, because the perception of risk is Low likelihood High likelihood
much higher. Pedestrians do not cross the road without
High
looking and drivers are always aware that pedestrians
may step into the road. Often, other traffic control
Low likelihood High likelihood
measures are necessary to reduce the speed of the
motorists or increase the risk awareness of both
Low magnitude Low Magnitude
motorists and pedestrians
Likelihood

RISK CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS

Risks can be classified according to:

1. The nature of the attributes of the risk (timescale


for impact, nature of the impact, and/or likely
magnitude of the risk);
2. Timescale of the impact after the event occurs;
3. The source of the risk (origin);
4. The nature of the impact (impact on the finances,
activities, infrastructure, or reputation); and

You might also like