Visit Website
Fibery vs. Coda
Read full story (approx. 10 min.)
Where Coda
works better?
Mobile apps. Complex work processes
that don’t demand heavy text scenarios
(roadmapping, product management,
etc). Overall, Fibery and Coda areas of
applicability are quite close.
Where Fibery
works better?
Processes and work management for
medium and large teams. Complex
processes like product management,
feedback management, user research,
software development tracking.
 Visit Website

Fibery Coda
strengths weaknesses

💪 You can connect tables much beer
and work with relations as first-class
citizens (formulas, views, reports)
Board View is more advanced with
horizontal lanes and beer customizations
Timeline View to create roadmaps is
interactive
🦐 For any complex process Coda
quickly becomes extremely hard to
maintain and it has many workarounds to
make it work
No good way to connect Docs and form
a connected workspace
Charts are very basic and limited

Hierarchical List view to visualize deep Timeline View is very restrictive, Board
hierarchies (Product → Features → Tasks) view is weak and not fully customizable

🔦 Bi-directional links to connect No Whiteboard View to create diagrams

unstructured text information beer
(feedback management, knowledge
accumulation)

Powerful rich edit field to create text inside

entities (specifications, ideation, blog
posts).

Charts are really powerful, you can

visualize any data, calculate metrics on the
fly and share charts outside Fibery

Whiteboard View to create diagrams and

mind-maps and include entities from Fibery
into it

Beer information organization and

navigation for the whole company.