People must understand the difference between moral and non-moral standards to identify fundamental ethical values. Moral standards deal with issues that can seriously affect humans, animals, and the environment, whereas matters of personal taste or cultural preference are non-moral. While cultures have different views, we should not force our moral standards on others or judge them based on matters of indifference.
People must understand the difference between moral and non-moral standards to identify fundamental ethical values. Moral standards deal with issues that can seriously affect humans, animals, and the environment, whereas matters of personal taste or cultural preference are non-moral. While cultures have different views, we should not force our moral standards on others or judge them based on matters of indifference.
People must understand the difference between moral and non-moral standards to identify fundamental ethical values. Moral standards deal with issues that can seriously affect humans, animals, and the environment, whereas matters of personal taste or cultural preference are non-moral. While cultures have different views, we should not force our moral standards on others or judge them based on matters of indifference.
difference between moral and non-moral standards, to identify fundamental ethical values that may guide our actions.
! Some values do have moral ! We have NO RIGHT to impose
implications, while others on others. don't. ! Refer to standards by which ! Different cultures have we judge what is good or different moral standards. bad and right or wrong in a : What is a matter of non-moral way. moral indifference, that ! Matters of taste or is, a matter of taste in preference. one culture, maybe be a ! Examples: standards of matter of moral etiquette, the law, standards significance in another. of aesthetics ! FORCE others to act accordingly. 1. Deal with matters we think ! Are norms that individuals or can seriously injure or groups have about the kinds benefit humans, animals, and of actions believed to be the environment. morally right or wrong, as 2. Not established or changed well as the values placed on by the decisions of what we believed to be authoritative individuals or morally good or morally bad. bodies. ! Normally promote “the good”, 3. Overriding, that is, they take that is, the welfare and well- precedence over other being of humans as well as standards and animals and the environment. considerations, especially of self-interest. 4. Based on impartial considerations. 5. Associated with special emotions and vocabulary.