Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PBC 63493
PBC 63493
CrossMark
View Export
Online Citation
Abstract. This paper discusses the identification of disaster risks that occur in Jambi Province based on disaster data and
various types of disasters. The disaster risk index is obtained from the potential hazard, vulnerability, and risk capacity of the
area. From the distribution of the risk index, each region can be linked with supply chain activities so that it can be identified
INTRODUCTION
The investigation related to the topic covers numerous sorts of risks that want to be recognized and mitigated. As
defined in [1],[2], Risk is a critical issue that threatens the sustainability of the supply chain. As defined in [3],
Supply chain risk management encompasses the collaborative and coordinated efforts of all parties involved in a
supply chain to identify, assess, mitigate and monitor risks with the aim to reduce vulnerability and resilience of the
supply chain, ensuring profitability and continuity. In identifying and mitigating disasters, a framework is needed to
provide disaster management so that the supply chain can run correctly. One of the danger elements which are the
primary attention is a disaster [4]. In this paper, the basis for coping with the problem is with makes use of data
mining[5].
The various decisions and actions involved in identifying and mitigating disasters in the supply chain using this
data mining-based framework can be classified into three categories: (1) Risk Identification; (2) Disaster Mitigation;
and (3) Data Mining. The first category includes the identification of risks affecting the supply chain [1] or analysis
of the disaster risk index [2]. The second category is related to disaster mitigation techniques that occur most along
the supply chain [3] and the third category relates to the design of data mining-based frameworks [4].
To mitigate risks for every delivery chain, we need to assess the extent of the impact and the way powerful the
management of alternative failures is. However, such supply chain disruption is an event that can occur at any point
of the delivery chain, which affects the overall performance of one or many supply chain partners and their supply
130003-1
chain flows [5]. Modeling and simulation techniques can be used to assist the risk and disaster management method.
The use of data mining has received little attention in the supply chain, but using the development and statistical
processing requirements quite a lot, encouraging researchers to remember the capacity of information mining
strategies to fix problems associated with hazard identification, prediction, assessment, and reaction [6],[7],[8]. So
that this theoretical framework or concept may be applied to actual troubles [6].
The research hypothesis discussed in this article is using facts mining strategies to provide predictive analysis for
a supply chain that targets to contribute to the untapped ability of statistics mining-based techniques inside the
delivery chain, as identified in [9]. Also, it could be used to expect disaster risk inside the supply chain so that the
proposed framework is then applied and applied to the prevailing issues. In this paper, threat prediction is
accomplished thru classification, then used on data to predict disaster chance alongside the supply chain. The
novelty of the research supplied does the technology that has to be incorporated into the supply chain process in
times of disaster. In particular, the contributions of this text are as follows:
• Disaster identification and Mitigation using experiments for specific case research.
• A facts mining-primarily based disaster chance prediction framework that emphasizes the synergy between
statistics mining and the supply chain, especially the ones associated with disaster events.
The rest of this paper is prepared as follows. Section two gives a precis of the study's attempt that applies data-
pushed data mining for supply chain-related purposes. Section three describes the framework of data mining within
the supply chain while a disaster occurs. Then, Section four calculates a disaster risk index based on hazard
potential, vulnerability, and capacity and classifies the level of risk. Finally, concludes and proposes directions for
future research on data mining and supply chains.
130003-2
Hazard identification framework in Supply Chain
The framework model for supply chain risk was also developed by [10], who made 3 stages, namely (1)
determination of risk factors, (2) development model stages which explain the risk identification model, (3) risk
analysis and risk mitigation as well as the system design stage. To improve supply chain threat prediction, we
suggest a framework that relies on the combination of data mining inside the supply chain risk management
procedure. This framework aims for two way interactivity and synergy among supply chains. Figure 1 describes the
framework flow. The focus is on conventional tasks in supply chain procedures.
The definition of data mining is a business process for exploring large amounts of data to discover meaningful
patterns and rules [11]. Another definition states that data mining is defined as a process of finding patterns in
data[12]. Data Mining are regularly used in Customer Relationship Management (CRM), customer prediction, and
client risk evaluation inside the insurance and banking sectors. [13],[14]. Cluster analysis is any other commonplace
Data Mining method for the risk control field [15]. The Supply Chain network structure can reveal the supply chain
to intrusion and is checked for the spread of these disruptive events. It is validated that Data Mining can be used
correctly for hazard control. Furthermore, a way to convert risk management issues into Data Mining issues to make
strong chance management selections in the supply chain remains a project. Thus, there's a need for holistic and
systematic Data Mining-based supply chain management risk strategies to accommodate most varieties of risk and
data overload developing in the supply chain. One of the techniques in data mining is the classification technique
[16]. In this paper, classification is used to classify disaster risk level classes based on the region and type of
disaster.
METHODS
The proposed framework is developed after an assessment of the literature. This systematic model provides a
complete evaluation of various data mining based threat management together: hazard indicator identity, hazard
statistics, building a chance-orientated data warehouse, danger analysis assets and management team, conversion of
supply chain issues to Data Mining.
The goals of this research are to expand a Data Mining-primarily based supply chain framework via integrating
numerous activities consisting of figuring out risk signs, identification and mitigating disasters, translating chance
control issues into Data Mining. First, the supply chain, Data Mining, data warehousing, and information
management structures literature were reviewed to develop a conceptual version.
130003-3
To expand the holistic records-based supply chain risk management framework, the main standards of data
mining, data warehousing, and hazard control are finished methodology integrated. The step-by way of-step
technique for the development of a data mining-based supply chain framework. The proposed version is i) threat
identity indicators, ii) improvement of a risk data warehouse to collect and keep threat data, and iii) incorporates
data mining modules covering conversion of danger control issues into data mining troubles and interpretation of
analysis effects for risk management measures [17].
• Profile Data: Risk management fashions must be advanced considering crucial records related to institutional
profiles.
• Map the Supply Chain community: The supply chain map presents a larger image.
• Hazard policies: The risk mindset and degree of tolerance of the enterprise affect risk identification, evaluation
and perception, and the choice of hazard mitigation [18].
• Evaluating the extent of resilience to chance: Obtain statistics about the extent of resilience inside the context of
supply chain danger.
Various descriptive and processing Data Mining tasks may be used for analyzing risk data inclusive of
classification, prediction, regression, association evaluation, clustering, anomaly detection, etc. [17],[12]. Hit upon
troubles, expect risks and their results, discover relationships among risks and other elements (e.G., triggering
factors), pick out the root reasons of risks, cluster volatile items, etc. [19],[4]. Prediction equipment may be
implemented to expect risk elements and future hazard information developments.
The Data Mining module aims to convert risk data into risk information / knowledge in decision making for
supply chain risk management. Risk data is meaningless until it is subject to data processing. Risk data is collected
so that it becomes a data mart generated from the Risk Data Warehouse for analysis. In the supply chain risk
management model the data mart is called the risk data mart. Datamart risk (database problem risk) is part of the
Risk Data Warehouse and is created from this data warehouse by changing, summarizing, and sharing data
according to the needs of the Data Mining application.
In this section, we discuss the results presented in relation to the disaster risk index assessment. The first part
discusses the level of danger, level of vulnerability and level of capacity for disaster risk. Then the second part
summarizes the disaster risk level assessment. The data mining model that is decided upon must be evaluated and
Regarding the disaster that occurred, we took the example of a disaster in Jambi Province. Jambi Province is
one of the provinces on the island of Sumatra which is one of the areas prone to disasters, such as floods, drought,
extreme weather, forest and land fires, epidemics and disease outbreaks, landslides, earthquakes, flash floods and
extreme waves and abrasion. The various types of disasters in Jambi Province are reinforced by data on disaster
events that have been recorded in the 2016-2020 Jambi Province disaster risk assessment document [2]. From this
data combined with indicators and methodology for disaster risk assessment, a disaster risk assessment in Jambi
Province is generated. A disaster risk assessment is carried out to identify the hazards and vulnerabilities of an area
which then analyzes and estimates the likelihood of potential disaster threats and compares it with the area's capacity
to deal with disasters, as shown in the following equation[2]:
(1)
Information:
R = Risk
H = Hazard
V = Vulnerability
C = Capacity
130003-4
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
A top-down approach is used to assess potential hazards, levels of vulnerability, and capacity. Table 1 shows the
level of potential hazards. Table 2 also provides an overview of the level of vulnerability and Table 3 potential
Disaster Losses in Jambi Province, table 4 also provides the level of capacity to obtain a disaster risk index and table
5 Jambi province disaster risk level.
The hazard index was compiled based on data and records of events that have occurred in an area. The
hazard index analysis was obtained based on the type of potential disaster that occurs. From the potential for existing
disasters, it can be estimated that the potential magnitude of the hazard affected by the disaster can be estimated.
Details of hazard classes, as well as the extent of areas exposed to potential disasters in Jambi Province, can be
obtained as seen in table 1.
130003-5
TABLE 2. Potential Population Exposed to Disasters in Jambi Province
The vulnerability index consists of the exposed population index and the loss index. Index the exposed population
derives from the socio-cultural component. While the loss index is obtained from physical, economic, and
environmental components. The socio-cultural component is determined based on parameters population density and
population of vulnerable groups (sex ratio, vulnerable age group, poor population, and disabled population). Forest
and land fire disasters do not have a social and physical component, because forest and land fire disaster, the danger
Potential Environment
Potential Disaster Losses (Rp. Billion)
Damage (Ha)
Kind of Disaster
Physical Economic Total
Class Large Class
Losses Losses Losses
Flood 9743,6 7592,4 17336,0 High 264 Medium
Flash Floods 1052,3 214,1 1266,4 High 7523 High
Extreme Weather 15653,8 17676,1 33329,9 High - -
Epidemics and disease outbreaks - - - - - -
Extreme Wave and Abrasion
Wave 8,0 6,5 14,6 Medium 1228 High
Earthquake 3462,9 3496,6 1959,4 High - -
Forest and Land Fires - 17481,5 17481,5 Medium 548682 High
Drought - 17750,3 17750,3 Medium 740860 High
Kerinci Volcano Eruption - 0,0 0,0 High 1679 High
Landslide 425,1 502,6 927,8 High 552678 High
130003-6
Table 4 shows the dominant class with potential for physical and economic losses is high and the dominant class
for potential environmental damage is high.
The level of risk for all potential disasters in Jambi Province is obtained from the combination of hazard levels,
level of vulnerability, and level of capacity. The following is a summary result in producing the level of risk for all
potential disasters in Jambi Province as shown in table 5.
In this study, there are four attributes used, level of hazard, level of vulnerability, level of capacity, and
attributes of level of risk used as a class attribute. The classification process in this study used WEKA Software to
evaluate the model. WEKA is a software that contains machine learning algorithms used in completing tasks or
analyzing data mining. From the results of the study of the level of disaster risk in Jambi Province, then a data
mining analysis was carried out using a classification technique using the J48 tree classification, for a high risk
level, there are 8 (80%), namely floods, flash floods, extreme weather, earthquake, forest and land fires, drought,
detailed volcano eruptions, you landslide, while epidemics and disease outbreaks and extreme wave and abrasion
waves enter the medium level (20 %). As seen in Figures 2.
130003-7
FIGURE 2. Classifier tree all Class Level of Risk
In applying the Data Mining-driven supply chain framework, the following observations were made.
• Implementation of a data mining-based supply chain risk management framework requires continuous
monitoring for changes in risk factors.
• Description of risk management problems into Data Mining problems is one of the crucial.
• It is not possible to analyze all types of risk at once. Therefore, each problematic Data Mining must focus on
a particular risk category.
• Framework should be integrated with information systems and data warehouses to automate the selection and
application of Data Mining analysis.
Furthermore, it can be explained how to convert risk management into data mining, in supply chain risk
problems there are several things that are encountered such as how to determine risk factors that can be included in
the stage of identifying risk sources, then how can we create models to predict the value of risk, besides that we can
also predict the level of risk in each particular area, characterizing different items, etc. all of them can be converted
into data mining processing with several techniques such as classification, prediction, time series analysis,
association analysis, clustering, summarization and anomaly detection with decision tree, neural techniques.
networks, support vector machines, K-means clustering and sequence mining.
130003-8
CONCLUSION
Supply chains that use statistics mining strategies and depend on collaboration and interactivity between data
mining and the supply chain. This framework is established through the case supply chain in instances of
catastrophe. The results of the evaluation done on the case studies suggest that the technique data mining used to
process risk disaster. Future research directions on the software of data mining within the supply chain consist of: (a)
exploring more function-wealthy statistics sets and larger units of statistics mining techniques; (b) extract
understanding thru an aggregate of facts mining and data mining-based techniques and use it to benefit managerial
insights and affect supply chain decision-making techniques; and (c) investigating whether a comparable approach
can be applied in other phases of the supply chain process, which includes catastrophe chance assessment and
prediction in agro-industry supply chains.
This report contributes to the literature in the area of data mining-based framework for Supply chain risk
management. The primary focus on danger control and Data Mining are combined to expand a roadmap to acquire
an effective and smart control method for an adaptive supply chain in the event of a catastrophe.
The data mining-based supply chain framework within the occasion of a catastrophe, especially within the
supply chain in agro-industry, is precise and has by no means been discussed before. The proposed data mining-
based risk management model is anticipated to make corporations smarter and provide a higher knowledge of supply
chain dangers. Proactive and reactive mitigation techniques may be advanced primarily based on an evaluation of
threat data. This research can offer an initial foundation for similar studies and improvement of a data-driven
framework for supply chain risk control. Future research can discover a number of the restrictions captured on this
take a look at. Future studies can focus on the awareness of the benefit of records mining, primarily on supply chain
risk management frameworks, so they can be extensively applied.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author would like to thank the Education Fund Management Institute (LPDP) of the Ministry of Finance and
REFERENCES
[1] Aqlan F and Lam S S, 2016 Supply chain optimization under risk and uncertainty: A case study for high-end
server manufacturing Comput. Ind. Eng. 93 p. 78–87.
[2] Brusset X and Teller C, 2017 Supply chain capabilities, risks, and resilience Int. J. Prod. Econ. 184,
September p. 59–68.
[3] Baryannis G Validi S Dani S and Antoniou G, 2019 Supply chain risk management and artificial
intelligence: state of the art and future research directions Int. J. Prod. Res. 57, 7 p. 2179–2202.
[4] Rajagopal V Prasanna Venkatesan S and Goh M, 2017 Decision-making models for supply chain risk
mitigation: A review Comput. Ind. Eng. 113, September p. 646–682.
[5] Er Kara M Oktay Fırat S Ü and Ghadge A, 2020 A data mining-based framework for supply chain risk
management Comput. Ind. Eng. 139, December.
[6] Simchi-Levi D et al., 2015 Identifying risks and mitigating disruptions in the automotive supply chain-
Interfaces (Providence). October.
[7] Amri M R et al., 2018 RBI (Risiko Bencana Indonesia) Bnpb Direktorat Pengurangan Risiko Bencana 9, 3
p. 1–218.
[8] Ghadge A Dani S Ojha R and Caldwell N, 2017 Using risk sharing contracts for supply chain risk
mitigation: A buyer-supplier power and dependence perspective Comput. Ind. Eng. 103, January p. 262–
270.
[9] Kang S Kim E Shim J Cho S Chang W and Kim J, 2017 Mining the relationship between production and
customer service data for failure analysis of industrial products Comput. Ind. Eng. 106 p. 137–146.
[10] Blos M F Da Silva R M and Miyagi P E, 2015 Application of an agent-based supply chain to mitigate
supply chain disruptions IFAC-PapersOnLine 28, 3 p. 640–645.
130003-9
[11] Thun J H and Hoenig D, 2011 An empirical analysis of supply chain risk management in the German
automotive industry Int. J. Prod. Econ. 131, 1 p. 242–249.
[12] Baryannis G Dani S and Antoniou G, 2019 Predicting supply chain risks using machine learning: The trade-
off between performance and interpretability Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst.
[13] Zage D Glass K and Colbaugh R, 2013 Improving supply chain security using big data IEEE ISI 2013 -
2013 IEEE Int. Conf. Intell. Secur. Informatics Big Data, Emergent Threat. Decis. Secur. Informatics June
2013 p. 254–259.
[14] Ye S J Xiao Z and Zhu G, 2015 Identification of supply chain disruptions with economic performance of
firms using multi-category support vector machines Int. J. Prod. Res. 53, 10 p. 3086–3103.
[15] Norrman A and Jansson U, 2004 Ericsson’s proactive supply chain risk management approach after a
serious sub-supplier accident Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 34, 5 p. 434–456.
[16] Chen P S and Wu M T, 2013 A modified failure mode and effects analysis method for supplier selection
problems in the supply chain risk environment: A case study Comput. Ind. Eng. 66, 4 p. 634–642.
[17] Guertler B and Spinler S, 2015 Supply risk interrelationships and the derivation of key supply risk indicators
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 92 p. 224–236.
[18] Mani V Delgado C Hazen B T and Patel P, 2017 Mitigating supply chain risk via sustainability using big
data analytics: evidence from the manufacturing supply chain Sustainability.
[19] Ghadge A Dani S and Kalawsky R, 2012, Supply chain risk management: present and future scope, …
journal of logistics management. emerald.com.
[20] Wu D D Chen S H and Olson D L, 2014 Business intelligence in risk management: Some recent progresses
Inf. Sci. (Ny). 256, January p. 1–7.
[21] Le H Q Arch-Int S Nguyen H X and Arch-Int N, 2013 Association rule hiding in risk management for retail
supply chain collaboration Comput. Ind. 64, 7 p. 776–784.
[22] Blackhurst J Rungtusanatham M J Scheibe K and Ambulkar S, 2018 Supply chain vulnerability assessment:
A network based visualization and clustering analysis approach J. Purch. Supply Manag. 24, 1 p. 21–30.
[23] Tobback E Bellotti T Moeyersoms J Stankova M and Martens D, 2017 Bankruptcy prediction for SMEs
using relational data Decis. Support Syst. 102, March p. 69–81.
[24] Septiani W Marimin Herdiyeni Y and Haditjaroko L, 2014 Framework model of sustainable supply chain
130003-10