Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1998 - Heavy Metals in Soils of Argentina
1998 - Heavy Metals in Soils of Argentina
Toulouse ]
On: 14 February 2013, At: 01:39
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number:
1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street,
London W1T 3JH, UK
Communications in Soil
Science and Plant Analysis
Publication details, including instructions for
authors and subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lcss20
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study
purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution,
reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any
form to anyone is expressly forbidden.
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make
any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or
up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses
should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher
shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or
costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or
indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
Downloaded by [Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse ] at 01:39 14 February 2013
COMMUN. SOIL SCI. PLANT ANAL., 29(11-14), 1913-1917 (1998)
INTRODUCTION
Trace metals, including heavy metals, concentration are related to several factors
in non-contaminated soils. Among those factors are biogeochemical cycling, parent
material, particle-size distribution, soil age, mineralogy, organic matter content, and
drainage (Frink, 1993; Lee et al., 1997; Ma et al., 1997). Holmgren et al. (1993)
have indicated that concentrations generally follow the degree of weathering. Over
those natural processes, man's activities tend to increase the concentration of heavy
metals and other trace elements in soils (Dudka, 1992; Dudka, et al. 1995). Those
elements can be harmful to the biota, including human beings. This fact leads to the
necessity of studying the accumulation of those elements in soils. The extent of soil
contamination is generally determined by a comparison with total elemental concen-
tration of soil at an assumed non-contaminated nearby site (Frink, 1996).
1913
FIGURE 1. Average concentration and standard error of Pb, Cd, Cu, and Zn.
• Cr
DCo
• Ni
FIGURE 2. Average concentration and standard deviation of Cr, Co, and Ni.
from urban to rural soils. There was a high variability in metal concentrations,
particularly in the last three soils. This cannot be to attributed to either soil inherent
variability or to localized recent contamination.
The average concentrations of Cd and Pb in the soils of Buenos Aires City
exceeded both the maximum tolerable soil limits (Commision of European Com-
munity, 1982) and the maximum level in the range of variation of non-contaminated
soils of the World (Frink, 1996). In industrial areas of Buenos Aires City, Llosa et
al. (1990) found higher concentrations of Pb but similar Cd levels as we did. The
concentrations of both elements in the agricultural soils are around the average world
concentrations (Frink, 1996) and the known local values (Camilión et al., 1996).
The concentrations of Cu and Zn are below the maximum tolerable thresholds
(Kloke, 1983) and do not reach the maximum level in the range of variation of
non-contaminated soils of the world (Frink, 1996). However, our Cu level data
exceeded those values previously determined in non-contaminated soils of Buenos
Aires City (Llosa et al., 1990), and values from other non-contaminated areas
elsewhere (Berrow and Reaves, 1984). The concentrations of Zn, however, are
lower than those from other local data (Llosa, 1990). There are not previous local
data for the elements Co, Cr, and Ni. Our data are shown in Figure 2. Average
concentrations of Cr and Ni were below most world data, but those for Co were
above (Frink, 19%).
Several authors (Frink, 1996; Lee et al., 1997; Ma et al., 1997) have obtained
correlations between the concentrations of different heavy metals with particle size
fractions. In our case, clay content (data no shown) was only significantly related to
the concentrations of Cd, Cr, Ni. Pb, and Zn (Table 1). These correlations coincided
with those found in nearby soils (Camilión et al., 1995). There was no relationship
between the studied metals and soil pH and the organic matter content. The lack of
influence of the latter can be attributed to the large clay content of the soils selected
(Lee et al., 1997).
In summary, the metal concentration in the studied soils was variable and two
factors affected their distribution pattern: the distance from the city and probably to a
lesser degree, the one soil characteristic, clay content. For some of the elements,
mainly Cd and Pb, their concentrations fell sharply with a distance of 50 km or more
from the City of Buenos Aires. With our limited data, it could be hypothetized that
HEAVY METALS IN ARGENTINIAN SOILS 1917
cars are the main source of contamination for these metals in the urban residential
soils. Their total concentrations, particularly those from rural areas, can be taken as a
basis to establish the background levels for those soils.
REFERENCES:
Berrow, M.L. and G. A. Reaves. 1984. Background levels of trace elements, pp.
Downloaded by [Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse ] at 01:39 14 February 2013