Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ODCM Term Paper
ODCM Term Paper
Submitted to:
Farhana Ferdousi Aziz
Assistant Professor
Department of Management Studies
Submitted by:
Name Roll
MD. Rakib Hoaasin (L) 2024161012
Nusrat Jahan Pranti 2024161052
Farhana Omi Hafsa 2024161070
Sk Marzia Zafor 2024161092
Md Shakil Khan 2024161100
Faria Fatima Roza 2024161108
Section: B
Session: 2019-2020
Page: 1
● Defining Impact: Change activities should include an assessment of the impact of the
proposed change on stakeholders, including employees, customers, vendors, and other
parties. This helps ensure all necessary steps are taken to minimize disruption and
ensure the change is successful.
● Establishing Support Structures: Change activities should include establishing the
necessary support structures to ensure the change is implemented correctly and the
stakeholders are informed and engaged. This may include training, communication
plans, policies, and procedures to ensure success.
Page: 2
Motivating Change
Organizations resist changing it in the face of uncertain future benefits. Consequently, a key
issue in planning for action is motivating commitment to organizational change. This requires
attention to two related tasks:
1. Creating Readiness for Change: People’s readiness for change depends on creating a felt
need for change. This involves making people so dissatisfied that they are motivated to try
new work processes, technologies, or ways of behaving. The following three methods can
help generate sufficient dissatisfaction to produce change:
Page: 3
also can be taught about the benefits of positive expectations and be encouraged to set
credible positive expectations for the change program.
2. Overcoming Resistance to Change: Change can generate deep resistance in people and
organizations, thus making it difficult, if not impossible, to implement organizational
improvements. At a personal level, change can arouse considerable anxiety about letting go
of the known and moving to an uncertain future. People may need clarification on whether
their existing skills and contributions will be valued in the future or may have significant
questions about whether they can learn to function effectively and achieve benefits in the new
situation.
At the organizational level, resistance to change can come from three sources.
1. Empathy and support: A first step in overcoming resistance is learning how people are
experiencing change. This strategy can identify people having trouble accepting the
changes, the nature of their resistance, and possible ways to overcome it. Still, it
requires a great deal of empathy and support. It demands a willingness to suspend
judgment and to see the situation from another’s perspective, a process called active
listening.
2. Communication: People resist change when they are uncertain about its
consequences. Lack of adequate information fuels rumors and gossip and adds to the
anxiety generally associated with change. Effective communication about changes
and their likely results can reduce this speculation and allay unfounded fears. It can
help members realistically prepare for change. However, communication is also one
of the most frustrating aspects of managing change. Organization members constantly
receive data about current operations and plans and informal rumors about people,
changes, and politics.
3. Participation and involvement: One of the oldest and most effective strategies for
overcoming resistance is to involve organization members directly in planning and
implementing change. Participation can lead both to the design of high-quality
changes and to overcome resistance to implementing them.18 Members can provide
diverse information and ideas, contributing to making the innovations effective and
appropriate to the situation. They also can identify pitfalls and barriers to
implementation.
Page: 4
Creating A Vision
● Leading and Managing Change.
● Core values and purpose that guide the organization.
● Energize commitment by forming common Goals.
● Leadership Frameworks.
● Envisioned future with the desired future state.
For example, in 1990 Wal-Mart Stores made a statement of intent “to become a $125
billion company by the year 2000.” (Net sales in 1999 exceeded $137.6 billion.)
Following the downsizing of the U.S. military budget, Rockwell proposed the
following bold outcome for its change efforts: “Transform this company from a
defense contractor into the best diversified high-technology company in the world.”
2. Desired future state: This element of the envisioned future is a detailed and
passionate statement describing what the organization should look like to achieve
valued outcomes. It is intended to engage and inspire organization members and draw
them into the future vision. The organizational features described in the statement
help define a desired future state toward which change activities should move. This
aspect of the visioning process is exciting and compelling. It seeks to create a world
picture that empowers and motivates members to change.
Page: 5