Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Answers Questions Course of Technique and Urban Planning
Answers Questions Course of Technique and Urban Planning
3. Contents of the IP
With the introduction of Regional Law 11/2004 more precisely in Art. 17 tells us what are the contents of
the Plan of interventions. The PI, Plan of Interventions, relates to a multi-year municipal and three-year
budget for public works. It can be implemented through direct and indirect interventions (PUAs). The IP
shall:
- Subdivide the municipal territory into ZTO;
- Identify the areas where interventions are subordinate to PUAs;
- Define the parameters for the identification of variants to PUAs;
- Identify minimum units of intervention and the methods of intervention and transformation on the existing
heritage to be safeguarded.
The IP consists of:
(a) a programme report indicating timetables, operational priorities and the economic framework;
b) graphic drawings with the design indications;
(c) operational technical standards;
d) the handbook for architectural quality and environmental mitigation;
(e) the register of building credits;
f) cognitive framework, i.e. an alphanumeric and vector database.
4. IP formation process
The mayor prepares a document in which the urban transformations, the interventions, the public works
to be carried out and the expected effects are highlighted. The IP is adopted and approved by the
municipal council. Within 8 days of adoption, the plan is deposited available to the public for 30 days at
the municipality, after which anyone can make comments within the next 30 days. The news of the
adoption is given by notice published in the Praetorian Register of the municipality and in at least 2 local
newspapers. Within 60 days of the deadline for commenting, the city council approves the plan. The plan
becomes effective after 15 days from the publication in the Praetorian Register of the municipality. The
approval of the plan entails the forfeiture of the PUAs in force limited to the parts incompatible with it.
6. Safeguard measures
Safeguard measures are measures designed not to jeopardise the territory in the period between the
date of adoption of the plan and its actual entry into force. After approval, the old one is abolished, but
during the transit phase from one floor to another, the municipality is required to suspend any intervention
that is in contrast with the prescriptions and constraints contained in the plans. The maximum period is
five years. You need to know what happens between the two adoption-approval time frames. After the
approval of the new plan, the old one is no longer in force. The period in between is a transitional period
where both plans apply in order not to have regulatory holes. If the two plans provide for different things,
the administration checks the plans and decides that you can do the things that are foreseen in both the
old and the new plan, that is, those that are in common between the two. It cannot adopt something that
is only in the new plan because that part may not have entered into force.
7. Cognitive framework
The cognitive framework is the system of information and data necessary for understanding the issues
carried out by territorial and urban planning tools. The information bases contain data aimed at the
knowledge of the physical and socio-economic aspects of the territory, territorial planning and regional
and local programming. The cognitive framework must be presented to the competent office of the region,
it is evaluated according to a number (Cognitive Quality Index) from 1 to 10, it needs to obtain at least 6
for approval. Until the QC is validated, the region/province does not consider any other paper.
8. The SEA
The SEA, strategic environmental assessment was introduced with Law 11/2004 to align with a European
directive. In order to promote sustainable and sustainable development and to ensure a high level of
environmental protection, municipalities, provinces and the region, in the formation of spatial planning
instruments, shall carry out a strategic environmental assessment of the effects deriving from their
implementation. The regional government defines the criteria and methods of application of the SEA. All
floors are subject to VAS. The SEA highlights the adequacy of the choices of planning tools with respect
to sustainability objectives. It is an active procedure, it must intervene directly in the design of the plan
and is presented to the competent office of the region.
9. Program Agreement
Article 7 (11/2004) Municipalities, provinces and regions may conclude agreements with private entities
to take proposals for projects of public interest. The programme agreement shall be signed by
representatives of the administrations and public entities participating in the agreement. The program
agreement is not made if there is a plan forecast already consolidated, but when you need to intervene
outside the choices of the plan. Otherwise, it would be necessary to propose a variation to the plan, which
has a long and complex approval procedure. In this case, to simplify the procedure, it is possible to use
the program agreement: the municipality calls together all the public subjects (possibly private)
concerned, during the conference of services. They must intervene and give their assessment, in the end
unanimity must be obtained. Once the services conference is closed positively, the project is
automatically variant to the master plan. If the program agreement involves a change to the PAT, the
adhesion of the province is required and is approved by the president of the province, if the agreement
involves variant to the PI, it is approved by the mayor.
Article 6 (11/2004), The administration when drawing up a new plan has the advantage of initiating
possible agreements. "The municipalities, provinces and the Region within the limits of the competences
referred to in this law may conclude agreements with private subjects to take proposals for projects and
initiatives of significant public interest in the planning". In the IP, in reality, the public interest is broadened,
because, especially in the preliminary phase of the IP, the administration tries to find agreements
between public and private subjects that try to solve problems, trying to direct certain decisions that will
then be formalized.
Procedure
Within 75 days from the date of submission of the application for approval of the PUA, the City Council
adopts the Plan or returns it if it does not comply with the rules and urban planning instruments in force.
If within 15 days from the date of submission the preliminary check of the Offices reveals irregularities in
the documentation, the interruption of the procedure will be communicated and the 75 days will be
counted again from the date of submission of the regular and complete documentation. Following the
adoption, the Plan is deposited with the secretariat of the Municipality for 10 days and the filing is given
notice by means of a published notice. In the following 20 days, property owners can lodge an objection
while anyone can submit comments. After the deadline for submitting comments or oppositions, within
75 days, the City Council approves the Plan, deciding on the observations and oppositions presented. If
the plan is approved, it is deposited with the secretariat of the Municipality and the deposit is notified
within 15 days to the owners opposed. The PUA comes into force 10 days after publication.
30. The main innovations of the LR Veneto 11/2004 compared to the LR Veneto 61/1985
The introductions in terms of content are essentially 7:
- Division of the PRG into two parts: a first part the PAT more synthetic and technical, of general definition,
and a second the PI of an executive nature.
- Introduction of SEA on environmental protection. It is done to comply with a European directive. If there
is no SEA the plan cannot be approved
- Introduction of the QC: a procedure is given to be followed in the preparation of the analyzes and a
homogenized and standardized database in which to enter the data.
- Transfer of urban planning competence from region to province.
- Obligation of CTR;
- Introduction of building credit, divided into urban equalization, environmental redevelopment and building
credit and urban compensation.
- Land consumption.
31. Values and use of the standard urban volume per theoretical settleable inhabitant
Knowledge of the urban volume for residential areas is necessary when sizing a plan, in particular with
regard to ZTO-F. As far as the actual calculation is concerned, we consider:
- For residences, gross floor area x 3
- For office and residential activities, gross floor area x 3.5
The minimum value translates into 150 cubic meters, but it can be shown that the real situation is different
from that shown by the calculation. The concept of urban volume plays an important role in the calculation
of the theoretical inhabitants settled, which is done simply by dividing the building volume by the minimum
endowment or the urban load, which is configured in the 150 cubic meters / inhabitant mentioned above.
34. The main "urban" laws of the late nineteenth century in Europe
points, attempts to enunciate and establish the fundamental principles of the contemporary city and
proposed as fundamental points:
- the house independent of the street
- the formation of business centers
- the portal distinction between residential and office buildings
- the circulation of car traffic distinct from pedestrian routes
- the equipment of gardens, playgrounds, cultural institutions
It supports the theory of zoning, i.e. the division of neighborhoods and the diversification of buildings
according to the functions that people perform within the city, and which are reduced to four: living,
working, having fun, moving.
One of the most important exponents of this period was Le Corbusier, of whom we remember in particular
the Plan Voisin for Paris, the ville Radieuse and the plan for Algiers.
44. The main criticisms of the Modern Movement and the International style.
The Modern Movement had reworked the culture of architecture and building both in Europe and in
America, creating an International Style.
The main criticisms against MM are made above all against the presumed universality of its principles
and the loss of any sentimental and occasional bond with the original social, economic and productive
structure. What was deeply criticized, however, was in particular the lack of attention that the
movement paid to local instances and the characteristics of each territory. The same five points of
architecture promoted by Le Corbusier are an emblem of this lack of consideration towards individual
regional realities, all this translates into the possibility of designing a building potentially suitable for
each region but at the same time unable to conform to the context. In urban matters the same
happens, his Ville Radieuse is nothing more than a utopian project, which aims to be realized in every
part of the world, regardless of the context, whether of an anthropic or natural nature.
It is important to refer to a current that is formed around the English journal "Architectural Review"
which poses the problem of deepening the Modern Movement and trying to verify its results, criticizing
it. Since the nineteenth century there had been an attempt to create an orderly and hygienically
appropriate system within the cities, and the teachings of the Bauhaus had contributed to this in the
first part of the twentieth century. At the threshold of the late 50s we begin to question this way of
proceeding, not the validity of the teachings but their limitations. The criticism lies in the fixity and
rigidity: man feels the link with the genius loci (study of the environment, interaction of place and
identity) but is forced to live in a city without architectural quality. We take it for granted that the
quantitative problem has been solved, so it is necessary to worry about the qualitative aspect: the
Modern Movement focuses a lot on standardization and industrialization, losing the link with the place.
In the sixties an attempt was made to overcome the international architectural order often seen as
inhuman and alienating, in an attempt to provide new stimuli for an architecture closer to the
psychological, emotional and memory needs of people, especially in its application to urban themes.
50. Main differences between Owen's New Harmony and Fourier's phalanstery
Owen's New Harmony consists of a large quadrilateral building unit, designed for a settlement of
between 500 and 1500 people and had to be as autonomous as possible. The principle on which New
Harmony is based is the firm belief that people are the product of their environment and that improving
the environment improves people and their productivity.
On the perimeter there were adult accommodation, dormitories for boys, guesthouse and infirmary; At
the center there would be services and public buildings: church, school, leisure spaces, kitchen and
refectory; and outside the square in an area close to the houses there were giordini and vegetable
gardens, and at a safe distance there would have been laboratories and industries.
From Owen's model, Howard's theories and the Garden City model are born.
Fourier's theory, on the other hand, criticizes competition between social classes and theorizes a
reform of society capable of guaranteeing the free satisfaction of individual tendencies, while
respecting the rights of others. He argues that we should not be interested in the territory, because
man is at the center.
Fourier proposes for a community of 1000-1700 the "Falansterio" or "Familìsterio", a building unit in
which people had to live in the form of a community, which contained within it residential and
productive functions, public and private. The idea is to create a machine for living, a real city within the
building.
The positioning of these communities took into account road and rail transport networks.
Inside the building we would find public activities in the center of the building: dining rooms, the library,
the temple, the observatory, the greenhouse and the main structures of the community; In the two
wings were located the activities that should not interfere with domestic activities: in one wing noisy
workshops, carpentry, boys, while in the other ballroom and public relations room. In the rest of the
space there are housing and other collective places. Looking at the building in section on the ground
floor there are places for production and driveways; In the mezzanine there are dormitories for children
and the elderly, on the first floor public spaces, on floors 2 and 3 the lodgings and finally in the attic the
guesthouse and water tanks. Finally, an innovative and important element is the covered gallery that
from the first floor connects the various points of the building and is triple height.
The Falansterio project is accompanied by a meticulous financial plan that divides the investment in
shares among the different members of the community.
From Fourier takes inspiration Le Corbusier for his Unité d'Habitation and one of his pupils, Godin who
founds the Falansterio, an industrial village built in France in Guise. Today, unfortunately, it has been
demolished.
- Rationalist Fourier: no interest in the environment; Owen naturalist: environment must be built at the
service of man.
- Fourier all in one building: recreational, productive, daily life while Owen separates them.
52. The main elements of the expansion plan of Ferrara of Ercole I and Biagio Rossetti.
GIS (Geographical Information System) are the IT component of the SIT. They are the containers of
territorial information that lead to the creation of thematic maps relating to the many aspects of the
territory: cadastral maps, geo-environmental maps, regional technical maps.
66. The main differences between Building Permit, Building Permit and Building Permit
At first there was the building permit which consisted of a simple authorization that the municipality
gave to the private individual to be able to build on the land owned by him.
With the law 10 of 1977 (the Bucalossi) the building permit was replaced by the building permit which,
unlike the first, was for consideration as the municipality guaranteed the citizen the primary urbanization
works that therefore involve a certain cost. The charges are divided into primary urbanization works,
secondary urbanization works and construction cost tax.
Subsequently, with the consolidated text in 2001, the concession was replaced by the building permit,
also for consideration, but only necessary for certain categories of interventions such as new
construction, urban restructuring or restructuring interventions in type A areas with variation of volumes
or change of intended use.
Extraordinary maintenance interventions are those intended for the realization of works and modifications
to renew or replace structural parts of existing buildings and the construction and integration of sanitary
and technological services.
Building renovation: set of interventions aimed at transforming building organisms through a set of works
that can lead to a building organism in whole or in part different from the previous one.
The restoration and conservative rehabilitation interventions aim to preserve and recover the building
organism respecting its typological, formal, structural, architectural and artistic elements.
"New construction" includes any building intervention that produces an effective impact on the territory
and therefore works of any kind, "in the soil" and "on the ground", suitable for modifying the state of the
places determining a significant transformation.
Urban renovation interventions, i.e. those aimed at replacing the existing urban-building fabric with
another different, through a systematic set of building interventions, also with the modification of the
design of the lots, blocks and road network.