VALIDATION SHEET FOR QUESTIONNAIRE

Name of Evaluator:
______________________________________________________________
Educational Qualification: ________________________________________________________
Years of Service: _______________________________________________________________

Scale: 5-Very High 4- High 3- Moderate 2- Poor 1- Very Poor

Indicators 5 4 3 2 1
Face/Format
1. The data gathering tool is neatly prepared. It is capable to elicit
interest among target people to become respondents once they get a
copy.
Comprehensiveness/Completeness
2. The gathering tool is complete in terms of its necessary parts. No
missed item.
Consistency
3. The questions agree with the over-all objectives/thrust of the study.
Purpose
4. The questions have coherent objective. The questions, once taken
together, bring out a holistic assessment of the context.
5. The questions are structured that they can aid later on in the overall
interpretation of the data.
Flow/Coherence
6. Questions are arranged and organized. Each category has questions
that support it. The questions agree with one another, which d no
create confusions on the part of the respondents.
Sentence Structure
7. Questions are free from any error on syntax.
8. The words used are appropriate for the respondent’s level of
understanding.
Direction
9. The tool gives clear instructions.
Sensitivity
10. The questions are not bothersome, hurtful and/or shaming.
Recommendations:
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Thank you!
 RESULT OF THE VALIDITY OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE

Indicators V1 V2 V3 MEAN DR
Face/Format 5 4 5 4.67 VHV
1. The data gathering tool is neatly prepared. It is
capable to elicit interest among target people to
become respondents once they get a copy.
Comprehensiveness/Completeness 5 4 4 4.33 VHV
2. The gathering tool is complete in terms of its
necessary parts. No missed item.
Consistency 5 4 4 4.33 VHV
3. The indicators agree with the over-all
objectives/thrust of the study.
Purpose 5 4 5 4.67 VHV
4. The indicators have coherent objective. The
indicators, once taken together, bring out a holistic
assessment of the context.
5. The indicators are structured that they can aid later on 5 4 4 4.33 VHV
in the overall interpretation of the data.
Flow/Coherence 5 5 5 5.0 VHV
6. Indicators are arranged and organized. Each category
has questions that support it. The indicators agree
with one another, which d no create confusions on
the part of the respondents.
Sentence Structure 5 5 4 4.67 VHV
7. Indicators are free from any error on syntax.
8. The words used are appropriate for the respondent’s 5 5 5 5.0 VHV
level of understanding.
Direction 5 4 5 4.67 VHV
9. The tool gives clear instructions.
Sensitivity 5 5 5 5.0 VHV
10. The indicators are not bothersome, hurtful and/or
shaming.
Over-All Mean 4.65 VHV
*VHV- Very High Validity
RESULT OF THE RELIABILITY TEST