You are on page 1of 3

RECREATIONAL WATERS (9213)/Membrane Filter Technique for Pseudomonas aeruginosa

5. CABELLI, V.J., H. KENNEDY & M.A. LEVIN. 1976. Pseudomonas 10. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. 1986. Ambient Water
aeruginosa and fresh recreational waters. J. Water Pollut. Control Quality Criteria for Bacteria—1986; EPA-440/5-84-002. U.S. En-
Fed. 48:367. vironmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
6. SHERRY, J.P., S.R. KUCHMA & B.J. DUTKA. 1979. The occurrence of 11. CHAROENCA, N. & R. FUJIOKA. 1993. Assessment of Staphylococcus
Candida albicans in Lake Ontario bathing beaches. Can. J. Micro- bacteria in Hawaii’s marine recreational waters. Water Sci. Technol.
biol. 25:1036. 27:283.
7. STEVENS, A.R., R.L. TYNDALL, C.C. COUTANT & E. WILLAERT. 1977.
Isolation of the etiological agent of primary amoebic meningoen-
10. Bibliography
cephalitis from artificially heated waters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
34:701.
8. WELLINGS, F.M., P.T. AMUSO, S.L. CHANG & A.L. LEWIS. 1977. OLIVIERI, V.P., C.W. DRUSE & K. KAWATA. 1977. Microorganisms in
Isolation and identification of pathogenic Naegleria from Florida Urban Stormwater; EPA-600/2-77-087. U.S. Environmental Pro-
lakes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 34:661. tection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.
9. N’DIAYE, A., P. GEORGES, A. N’GO & B. FESTY. 1985. Soil amoebas RICE, E.W., T.C. COVERT, D.K. WILD, D. BERMAN, S.A. JOHNSON & C.H.
as biological markers to estimate the quality of swimming pool JOHNSON. 1993. Comparative resistance of Escherichia coli and
waters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49:1072. Enterococci to chlorination. J. Environ. Health A28:89.

9213 E. Membrane Filter Technique for Pseudomonas aeruginosa

1. Laboratory Apparatus Agar .................................................................................... 15.0 g


Reagent-grade water......................................................... 500 mL
See Section 9222B.1. Separately prepare and sterilize Mixtures A and B; cool rap-
idly to 55°C; aseptically combine mixtures and dispense 20 to
2. Culture Media 25 mL per Petri dish.

a. M-PA agar: This agar may not be available in dehydrated


form and may require preparation from the basic ingredients. 3. Procedure
L-Lysine HCl ......................................................................... 5.0 g
Sodium chloride (NaCl) ........................................................ 5.0 g
a. Presumptive tests: Filter 200 mL or less of natural waters or
Yeast extract .......................................................................... 2.0 g up to 500 mL of swimming pool waters through sterile mem-
Xylose .....................................................................................2.5 g brane filters. Place each membrane on a poured plate of modified
Sucrose................................................................................... 1.25 g M-PA agar so there is no air space between the membrane and
Lactose ................................................................................... 1.25 g the agar surface.
Phenol red.............................................................................. 0.08 g
Invert plates and incubate at 41.5 ⫾ 0.5°C for 72 h.
Ferric ammonium citrate ....................................................... 0.8 g
Sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3) .............................................. 6.8 g Typically, P. aeruginosa colonies are 0.8 to 2.2 mm in diam-
Agar ..................................................................................... 15.0 g eter and appear flat with light outer rims and brownish to
Reagent-grade water.............................................................. 1 L greenish-black centers. Count typical colonies, preferably from
filters containing 20 to 80 colonies. Use a 10- to 15-power
Adjust pH to 6.5 ⫾ 0.1 and sterilize via autoclaving. Cool to magnifier as an aid in colony counting.
55 to 60°C; readjust pH to 7.1 ⫾ 0.2 and add the following dry A two-plate method also may be used; this method will help
antibiotics per liter of agar base: sulfapyridine,* 176 mg; kana- recover chlorine-stressed P. aeruginosa (e.g., from swimming
mycin,* 8.5 mg; nalidixic acid,* 37.0 mg; and cycloheximide,* pools and whirlpools). Use membrane filter technique to prepare
150 mg. After mixing, dispense in 3-mL quantities in 50 ⫻ 12 mm samples. Place membrane filters on R2A agar (Section
Petri plates. Store poured plates at 2 to 8°C. Discard unused 9215A.6c) and incubate at 37 ⫾ 0.5°C for 24 h. Aseptically
medium after 1 month. transfer the membranes to M-PA agar and incubate at 35 ⫾
b. Modified M-PA agar† 0.5°C for another 24 h. Random and atypical colonies can be
c. Milk agar (Brown and Scott Foster Modification): verified using confirmation tests.
1) Mixture A: b. Confirmation tests: Use milk agar to confirm a number of
Instant nonfat milk‡ .......................................................... 100 g typical and atypical colonies. Make a single streak (2 to 4 cm
Reagent-grade water ........................................................... 500 mL long) from an isolated colony on a milk agar plate and incubate
at 35 ⫾ 1.0°C for 24 h. P. aeruginosa hydrolyzes casein and
2) Mixture B:
produces a yellowish to green diffusible pigment.
Nutrient broth .................................................................... 12.5 g
Sodium chloride (NaCl) ...................................................... 2.5 g
4. Interpretation and Calculation of Density

* Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, or equivalent. Confirmation is not routinely required. In the absence of
† Commercially available as M-PA-C agar. Contains magnesium, sulfate, kana-
mycin, and nalidixic acid. confirmation, report results as the number of presumptive
‡ Carnation, or equivalent. P. aeruginosa/100 mL.

https://doi.org/10.2105/SMWW.2882.187 7
RECREATIONAL WATERS (9213)/Multiple-Tube Technique for Pseudomonas aeruginosa

5. Bibliography DUTKA, B.J. & K.K. KWAN. 1977. Confirmation of the single-
step membrane filter procedure for estimating Pseudomonas
DRAKE, C.H. 1966. Evaluation of culture media for the isolation and
aeruginosa densities in water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Health Lab. Sci. 3:10.
33:240.
BROWN, M.R.W. & J.H. SCOTT FOSTER. 1970. A simple diagnostic milk
medium for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Clin. Pathol. 23:172. BRODSKY, M.H. & B.W. CIEBIN. 1978. Improved medium for recovery
LEVIN, M.A. & V.J. CABELLI. 1972. Membrane filter technique for and enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from water using
enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl. Microbiol. 24:864. membrane filters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 36:26.

9213 F. Multiple-Tube Technique for Pseudomonas aeruginosa

1. Laboratory Apparatus within 1 year. Adjust pH to between 7.1 and 7.3 before
sterilization. Final pH should be 7.0 ⫾ 0.2. Prepare acetamide
See Section 9221. broth as described above. If agar slants are preferred, prepare
as described above but add 15 g agar/L, heat to dissolve agar,
2. Culture Media and dispense 8-mL quantities in 16-mm tubes. After autoclav-
ing, incline tubes while cooling to provide a large slant
a. Asparagine broth: This medium may not be available in surface.
dehydrated form and may require preparation from the basic
ingredients. 3. Procedure
Asparagine, DL ......................................................................... 3.0 g
Anhydrous dipotassium hydrogen phosphate (K2HPO4) ....... 1.0 g a. Presumptive test: Perform a five-tube test. Use 10 mL
Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4 䡠 7H2O) ...................................... 0.5 g single-strength asparagine broth for inocula of 1 mL or less and
Reagent-grade water ................................................................ 1 L 10 mL double-strength asparagine broth for 10-mL inocula.
Higher dilutions may be necessary for swimming pools. Incubate
Adjust pH to between 6.9 and 7.2 before sterilization.
inoculated tubes at 35 to 37°C. After 24 h and again after 48 h
b. Acetamide broth: This medium may not be available in
of incubation, examine tubes under long-wave ultraviolet light
dehydrated form and may require preparation from the basic
(black light) in a darkened room. Production of a green fluores-
ingredients.
cent pigment constitutes a positive presumptive test.
Acetamide ............................................................................ 10.0 g b. Confirmed test: Confirm positive tubes by inoculating
Sodium chloride (NaCl) ........................................................ 5.0 g 0.1 mL of culture into acetamide broth or onto the surface of
Anhydrous dipotassium hydrogen phosphate (K2HPO4) ..... 1.39 g acetamide agar slants. Development of purple color (alkaline
Anhydrous potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4) ..... 0.73 g
pH) within 24 to 36 h of incubation at 35 to 37°C is a positive
Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4 䡠 7H2O).................................... 0.5 g
confirmed test for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Dissolve 1.2 g phenol red in 100 mL 0.01N NaOH and add c. Computing and reporting results: Refer to Table 9221:V
1 mL/L of acetamide broth. Use phenol red stock solution and Section 9221C.

https://doi.org/10.2105/SMWW.2882.187 8
9215 HETEROTROPHIC PLATE COUNT*

9215 A. Introduction

1. Applications produces no heat shock. Comparable to the pour plate method,


this method† uses a medium in which substrates are hydrolyzed
The heterotrophic plate count (HPC), formerly known as the by multiple microbial enzymes, causing the release of 4-meth-
standard plate count, is a procedure for estimating the number of ylumbelliferone after 48 h of incubation at 35 ⫾ 5°C. The
live, culturable heterotrophic bacteria in water and for measuring 4-methylumbelliferone fluoresces when exposed to long-wave-
changes in swimming pools or during water treatment and dis- length (365–366 nm) ultraviolet (UV) light, and the number of
tribution. Colonies may arise from pairs, chains, clusters, or blue fluorescing wells corresponds to a most probable number
single cells—all of which are included in the term colony- (MPN) of bacteria in the sample. Unfortunately, individual col-
forming units (CFU). The final count also depends on interaction onies cannot be directly recovered for subsequent analysis
among developing colonies. Choose the procedure and medium
that best suit how the resulting information will be used. Only 3. Work Area
compare data generated using the same procedure and medium.
Four methods and five media are described. Provide a level table or bench top with ample area in a clean,
draft-free, well-lighted room or within a horizontal-flow laminar
2. Selection of Method hood. Use tables or bench tops with nonporous surfaces, and
disinfect before any analysis is made (Sections 9020B.3c and e).
a. Pour plate method: The pour plate method (9215B) is
simple to perform and can accommodate sample or diluted- 4. Samples
sample volumes ranging from 0.1 to 2.0 mL. It produces sub-
surface colonies that are relatively small, compact, and less apt Collect water as directed in Section 9060A. Initiate analysis as
to encroach on each other than surface colonies do. However, soon as possible after collection to minimize changes in bacterial
submerged colonies often are slower growing and difficult to populations, and do not exceed a holding time of 24 h (or, if the
transfer. A thermostatically controlled water bath is essential for sample was collected for regulatory purposes, the maximum
tempering the agar. holding time specified by the regulation). If the sample cannot be
b. Spread plate method: The spread plate method (9215C) tested within 30 min after collection, maintain it at ⬍10°C but do
causes no heat shock. All colonies are on the agar surface, where not allow it to freeze during transit.
analysts typically can easily distinguish them from particles and
bubbles, and discern different colony morphologies. If not, they 5. Sample Preparation
can transfer colonies quickly and easily discern colony morphol-
ogy via comparisons to published descriptions. However, the Mark each plate with sample number, dilution, date, and any
agar in this method can only absorb a small volume of sample or other necessary information before examination. For pour- or
diluted sample (0.1 to 0.5 mL, depending on the degree to which spread-plate methods, use sterile glass (65 cm2) or presterilized
prepoured plates have been dried). Also, spreading colonies disposable plastic (57 cm2) Petri dishes. For pour-plate, spread-
could be interferences. To use this procedure, maintain a supply plate, or membrane-filtration methods, prepare at least two rep-
of suitable pre-dried, absorbent agar plates (see 9215C.4). licate plates for each volume of sample or dilution examined for
c. Membrane filter method: The membrane filter method compliance testing. Duplicates also are recommended for non-
(9215D) can be used to analyze large volumes of low-turbidity compliance testing.
water and is the method of choice for waters with low numbers Thoroughly mix all samples or dilutions by shaking vigor-
of heterotrophic organisms (⬍1 to 10 CFU/mL). It produces no ously for 7 s by hand (approximately 25 times with a 1-ft
heat shock. However, there is the expense of the membrane filter, movement) or via a mechanical shaker for 15 s at low speed.
the smaller area for colony development, possible damage to Analytical results depend on adequate sample mixing; if the
cells by excessive filtration pressures, possible variations in sample is not adequately shaken before aliquots are removed, the
membrane-filter quality (see Section 9020B.5i), and the need to actual bacterial density could be underestimated.
detect colonies via reflected light against a white background if
colored filters or contrast stains are not used. 6. Media
d. Enzyme substrate method: The enzyme substrate method,
SimPlate® (9215E), can be used to analyze drinking- and source-
Users should ensure that the formulations of purchased media
water samples with a wide range of bacterial concentrations. It
match those described below. Compare new lots of media with
current lot in use according to Sections 9020B.5j and 9b.
* Approved by Standard Methods Committee, 2016.
Joint Task Group: Gil Dichter (co-chair), Mark W. LeChevallier (co-chair),
Jennifer Best, Eric Duderstadt, Dennis Hill, Kimberly Phillips. † SimPlate威 for HPC, Idexx Laboratories, Westbrook, ME.

https://doi.org/10.2105/SMWW.2882.188 1

You might also like