Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Impact of Climate Change On Groundwater Recharge and Runoff in A Humid, Equatorial Catchment: Sensitivity of Projections To Rainfall Intensity
The Impact of Climate Change On Groundwater Recharge and Runoff in A Humid, Equatorial Catchment: Sensitivity of Projections To Rainfall Intensity
Abstract Projected warming in equatorial Africa, accompanied by greater evaporation and more frequent
heavy precipitation events, may have substantial but uncertain impacts on terrestrial hydrology. Quantitative
analyses of climate change impacts on catchment hydrology require high-resolution (<50 km) climate data
provided by regional climate models (RCMs). We apply validated precipitation and temperature data from
the RCM PRECIS (Providing Regional Climates for Impact Studies) to a semi-distributed soil moisture
balance model (SMBM) in order to quantify the impacts of climate change on groundwater recharge and
runoff in a medium-sized catchment (2098 km2) in the humid tropics of southwestern Uganda. The SMBM
explicitly accounts for changes in soil moisture, and partitions effective precipitation into groundwater
recharge and runoff. Under the A2 emissions scenario (2070–2100), climate projections from PRECIS
feature not only rises in catchment precipitation and modelled potential evapotranspiration by 14% and 53%,
respectively, but also increases in rainfall intensity. We show that the common application of the historical
rainfall distribution using delta factors to the SMBM grossly underestimates groundwater recharge (i.e. 55%
decrease relative to the baseline period of 1961–1990). By transforming the rainfall distribution to account
for changes in rainfall intensity, we project increases in recharge and runoff of 53% and 137%, respectively,
relative to the baseline period.
Key words climate change; groundwater; recharge; runoff; precipitation; Africa; Uganda
1 INTRODUCTION
Groundwater is the primary source of freshwater for drinking and irrigation around the world. In
sub-Saharan Africa, groundwater supplies 75% of all safe sources of drinking water (Foster et al.,
2006). The impacts of climate change on groundwater resources remain, however, very poorly
understood (IPCC, 2001, 2007). Analysis of the hydrological impacts of climate change is
especially important in sub-Saharan Africa where significant increases in water demand are
Open for discussion until 1 February 2010 Copyright © 2009 IAHS Press
728 Lucinda Mileham et al.
anticipated from high rates of population growth, currently 2.6% per annum (UN, 2007). At
present, estimates of freshwater resources (e.g. Shiklomanov, 2000) and predictions of freshwater
resources as a result of climate change (e.g. Kamga, 2001; Arnell, 1999a,b, 2003; Legesse et al.,
2003; Vörösmarty et al., 2005; Wit & Stankiewicz, 2006; Messager et al., 2006) are commonly
defined in terms of mean annual river discharge (runoff). Such estimates and predictions disregard
soil water (i.e. water transpired by plants) despite the fact that this sustains almost all agricultural
production in equatorial Africa. Freshwater resources defined in terms of mean annual river
discharge also fail to indicate the proportion of freshwater available ephemerally in drainage
channels as stormflow (i.e. runoff) and that which is more evenly distributed in time and space as
groundwater. A quantitative understanding of the impacts of climate variability and change on
both catchment stores (i.e. soil water, groundwater) and flows (i.e. river discharge) is of critical
importance to the development of climate change adaptation strategies.
In Africa, mean continental surface temperatures increased by approximately 0.7°C over the
20th century and a further warming of 0.2–0.5°C per decade is predicted for 2070–2100 (Hulme et
al., 2001). This rise in surface air temperatures is expected to have significant impacts on
terrestrial hydrology, an integral part of the climate system. Estimated hydrological changes in
equatorial Africa where warming of 1.4°C is predicted by 2050 (IPCC, 2001, 2007), include
increased precipitation (Joubert & Hewitson, 1997), increased evaporative demand (Hulme et al.,
1999), and greater runoff (Arnell, 1999a; Milly et al., 2005). There is, however, substantial
uncertainty and variability in the spatial and temporal distribution of these changes. Several studies
in sub-Saharan Africa (e.g. Kamga, 2001; Legesse et al., 2003; Messager et al., 2006) have
developed hydrological models to assess climate change impacts at the catchment scale. None of
these studies, however, explicitly estimates the impacts of climate change on groundwater.
Most river catchments are similar or smaller than the grid dimensions (300 km) of current
general circulation models (GCMs). Downscaling of GCM output is required and generally
follows one of two methodologies: (a) statistical downscaling using a pre-defined statistical
relationship (or weather generator), or (b) dynamical downscaling using a regional climate model
(RCM) nested in GCM output. The PRECIS (Providing Regional Climates for Impact Studies)
RCM is a high resolution (<50 km) coupled ocean–atmosphere model designed by the UK Met
Office (Jones et al., 2004) specifically for use by non-climate scientists to produce detailed climate
scenarios for impact assessment studies. Furthermore, PRECIS is freely available to less
economically developed nations, making it the model of choice for many impact assessors in these
data-sparse regions. The PRECIS model has been validated extensively at both the regional
(2 660 000 km2) and the catchment (<2500 km2) scale in Uganda, and represents well the mean
climate (Mileham, 2008). The PRECIS RCM predicts an increase in mean annual catchment
precipitation of 14% and a mean annual temperature increase of 3–4°C by 2070–2100, relative to
the baseline climate (1960–1990), under the A2 SRES emissions scenario. An increased intensi-
fication of precipitation events, and a change in the onset and length of the rainy seasons, are also
predicted (Mileham, 2008). These changes in precipitation and potential evapotranspiration will be
used to force the catchment SMBM which is calibrated to historical gridded gauge precipitation
(1965–1970).
Soil-moisture balance models (SMBMs) have a demonstrated efficacy in simulating the
terrestrial water balance in the humid tropics of Africa (e.g. Taylor & Howard, 1999a,b; Rushton
et al., 2006, Mileham et al., 2008). SMBMs use widely available hydrometeorological obser-
vations (e.g. precipitation, evaporation, soil and vegetation types) and enable quantitative assess-
ment of the impacts of climate change and variability on basin stores (e.g. soil water, groundwater
recharge) and fluxes in data-sparse regions. In this study, we examine how projected (2070–2100)
changes in precipitation and evaporative regimes impact on simulated groundwater recharge and
runoff in a medium-sized catchment in an equatorial region of southwestern Uganda (River
Mitano) using dynamically downscaled climatological data derived from PRECIS to force a semi-
distributed SMBM.
(a) (c)
(b)
Fig. 1 (a) Location map of the Mitano catchment; (b) detailed map of the catchment drainage system;
and (c) the location of the basin relative to the weathered land surfaces of Uganda (adapted from Taylor
& Howard, 1999a).
larger than the variation (2°C) in mean monthly maximum and minimum temperature. Discharge
records (1965–1979) for the River Mitano reflect the bi-modal precipitation but lag peak
precipitation by approximately 2 to 6 weeks. Mean daily river discharge during SON (35 m3 s-1)
exceeds MAM (20 m3 s-1) (Fig. 2(b)).
Fig. 2 (a) Mean monthly Mbarara pan evaporation (1967–1974) and mean monthly precipitation
derived from 20 rainfall stations within and around the River Mitano catchment for the period 1965–
1974; and (b) mean daily catchment precipitation derived from 20 rainfall stations within and around
the River Mitano catchment and mean daily discharge from the River Mitano gauge, for the period
1965–1974.
observed parameter values. Over the model validation period (1971–1974), simulated mean annual
recharge (82 mm) and runoff (134 mm) compare very favourably (<10% difference) with mean
annual baseflow (90 mm) and runoff (129 mm) derived from graphical partitioning. In addition,
simulated recharge events, following a time lag of 2 weeks, correspond well to observed recharge
events deduced from recent (2001–2005) water-level monitoring records (Mileham, 2008).
Weighting of the Thornthwaite equation towards maximum temperature is required in the tropics
as the equation has been criticised for seriously underestimating evaporative demand and seasonal
variations in temperature (Dupriez, 1959; Dagg & Blackie, 1965; Ward, 1971). Future changes in
both PET and precipitation were applied to the historical precipitation and potential evapotrans-
piration regime using mean monthly delta factors for each of the six PRECIS (0.25º × 0.25º) grid
cells that occupy the catchment (Mileham, 2008).
Delta factors derive proportional or absolute changes in baseline (1960–1990) and future
(2070–2100) data sets and are often applied to historical records, for impact assessments (e.g.
Arnell & Reynard, 1996; Arnell, 1999a,b, 2003; Pilling & Jones, 1999). Such methods have been
used to examine the potential impacts of future climate change on flooding (Gleick, 1986; Crooks
et al., 1996; Schreider et al., 2000; Reynard et al., 2001; Prudhomme et al., 2002). Mean monthly
delta factors are a favoured approach for impact studies due to their ease and speed of application.
However, this approach is limited, as the scaled and baseline scenarios differ only in terms of their
respective means, maxima and minima; all other properties of the data such as the range and
variability are assumed to remain constant. The procedure thus fails to account for changes in
either the number of rain days or the spatial distribution of precipitation. Considerable uncertainty
surrounds the physical response of hydrological systems to changes in the temporal distribution of
precipitation. Recent projections of substantial (70%) declines in groundwater recharge in
northeast Brazil and southwest Africa (Döll & Flörke, 2005), cited in the IPCC Fourth Assessment
Report, did not consider changes in the distribution of daily precipitation (Kundzewicz et al.,
2007, 2008). However, previous research in the humid tropics (Taylor & Howard, 1996) shows a
strong, positive relationship between the number of heavy rainfall events (>10 mm d-1) and the
magnitude of groundwater recharge.
In this study, we assess the errors attributed to the estimation of groundwater recharge and
runoff using delta factors relative to a transformation method which can account for changes in
precipitation distribution. A transformation of the distribution of historical gridded station data to
represent the distribution of PRECIS-A2 future precipitation can be applied to all precipitation
events to address changes in rainfall intensity under future climatic scenarios. The gridded station
and both the PRECIS baseline and future data sets conform to the standard lognormal distribution
with sufficient accuracy to prevent significant underestimation of precipitation variability. If the
historical (baseline) PRECIS precipitation (Yt) was completely accurate (i.e. had an identical
distribution to gridded River Mitano station precipitation), the required transformation
(equation (1)) could be calculated simply from gridded station precipitation (Xt) and future
PRECIS-A2 precipitation, where Rt is the historical precipitation with a distribution equivalent of
future PRECIS-A2; μ3 is the mean of PRECIS-A2 future precipitation; and δ3 is the standard
deviation in PRECIS-A2 future precipitation; since log(Xt) has a normal distribution with mean
(μ1) and standard deviation (δ1):
⎡
Rt = μ 3 + ⎢δ 3 ⋅
(log(Xt ) − μ1)⎤ (1)
δ1 ⎥
⎣ ⎦
However, the distribution of baseline PRECIS precipitation (Yt) differs from that of the observed
gridded River Mitano precipitation. Conversion of Yt to the baseline PRECIS precipitation with a
probability distribution equivalent to the historical distribution of observed gridded River Mitano
precipitation (Zt) was achieved using equation (2) where μ1 is the mean of historical gridded
station precipitation; δ1 is the standard deviation of historical gridded station precipitation; Yt is
the historical PRECIS precipitation; μ2 is the mean of historical PRECIS precipitation; and δ2 is
the standard deviation of historical PRECIS precipitation:
⎡
Zt = μ1 + ⎢δ 1 ⋅
(log(Yt ) − μ 2)⎤ (2)
δ2 ⎥
⎣ ⎦
On the assumption that this relationship between historical PRECIS and gridded River Mitano
station precipitation holds true for future climates, it is possible to transform Rt to represent the
-1
Precipitation (mm d )
Fig. 3 Frequency distribution of precipitation events in the River Mitano catchment for: (a) historical
gridded station precipitation (1965–1974); and (b) transformed historical precipitation.
precipitation distribution of future precipitation using equation (2) by replacing log(Yt) with Rt
(Fig. 3). This procedure accounts for the bias in both the mean and variance of the PRECIS output
on the log scale. To convert back to a rainfall sequence, an antilog is required. This method
accounts for both changes in the intensity of precipitation and biases resulting from PRECIS
model error. However, the transformation and delta factor approaches are both limited by their
inability to represent changes in rainfall occurrence, which is demonstrated to decrease by 8%
under future climatic conditions (Mileham, 2008). Changes in PET were addressed using the delta
factor approach as only monthly data are available.
Table 1 Mean monthly modelled recharge and runoff using delta factor altered gridded River Mitano station
precipitation and delta factor forced Mbarara PET, mean monthly graphically partitioned baseflow and
stormflow and the percentage difference (% diff.) between observed and modelled recharge and runoff
outputs for the period 1965–1974. All fluxes are rounded to the nearest mm d-1.
Recharge Baseflow % diff. Runoff Stormflow % diff.
January 0 8 –99 4 5 –16
February 0 9 –99 13 4 +197
March 1 9 –87 30 12 +151
April 10 8 +24 35 16 +121
May 5 8 –40 23 18 +29
June 1 7 –93 11 5 +124
July 1 7 –82 7 3 +183
August 0 6 –100 15 2 +596
September 0 7 –96 31 10 +214
October 2 7 –79 24 12 +101
November 14 8 +70 34 25 +39
December 8 9 –2 14 17 –18
Annual 42 93 –55 240 129 +88
Fig. 4 Mean annual modelled recharge (mm d-1) using delta factor forced gridded River Mitano station
precipitation and delta factor forced Mbarara PET for the River Mitano catchment for the period
1965–1974.
under the A2 emissions scenario. These results are an overestimate of projected changes in
recharge and runoff as dry days are underestimated by 6% in the transformed precipitation data
set. The transformation approach results in 238% greater recharge and 28% greater runoff than
those derived using monthly delta factors. This difference results solely from the representation of
projected changes in rainfall intensity. Substantial (>70%) increases in recharge are projected
during the second rainy season (Fig. 5). In contrast to recharge estimates using the delta factor
approach (Table 1, Fig. 4), very little recharge is projected for the remainder of the year with
reductions in all other months, relative to mean monthly baseflow, ranging between 40 and 100%
(Table 2). Runoff is projected to increase in all months except May (Fig. 5). The greatest increases
occur between July and September due to the earlier onset of the rains (Table 2). Increases in
runoff during the first rains and the two dry seasons are smaller.
The use of mean monthly delta factors remains a standard approach to assessing climate
change impacts on basin hydrology (e.g. Arnell, 1999a,b; Guo et al., 2002; Tate et al., 2004;
Leander & Buishand, 2007; Linderink et al., 2007; Herrera-Pantoja & Hiscock, 2008) yet our
results show that this approach can substantially underestimate groundwater recharge. The
assumption of a constant relationship between modelled and historical precipitation under future
climatic conditions is, however, a source of uncertainty with the transformation approach. It must
Table 2 Mean monthly modelled recharge and runoff using transformed gridded station precipitation and
delta factor forced Mbarara PET, and mean monthly graphically partitioned baseflow and stormflow for the
period 1965–1974. All fluxes are rounded to the nearest mm d-1.
Recharge Baseflow % diff. Runoff Stormflow % diff.
January 0 8 –97 8 5 +62
February 0 9 –100 7 4 +64
March 0 9 –100 22 12 +86
April 2 8 –80 27 16 +69
May 1 8 –89 16 18 –9
June 0 7 –100 10 5 +100
July 2 7 –73 20 3 +715
August 4 6 –40 42 2 +1851
September 22 7 +229 58 10 +472
October 14 7 +84 31 12 +161
November 64 8 +698 40 25 +63
December 34 9 +300 25 17 +45
Annual 142 93 +52 306 129 +139
Fig. 5 Mean annual modelled recharge and runoff (mm d-1) using transformed gridded River Mitano
station precipitation and delta factor forced Mbarara PET for the River Mitano catchment for the period
2070–2100 relative to historical gridded River Mitano station precipitation derived recharge for the
period 1965–1974.
be noted that substantial uncertainties are associated with presented quantitative projections of
hydrological change. Our use of a single emission scenario (A2) and RCM (single, dynamically
downscaled GCM) makes this only one of a wide range of projections. To quantify the range of
uncertainty in hydrological projections requires the application of multiple scenarios and
models.
4 CONCLUSIONS
Through the application of a dynamically downscaled projection of climate change to a soil-
moisture balance model (SMBM), we highlight the critical importance of considering changes in
the distribution of daily precipitation in estimating the impacts of climate change on groundwater
recharge and runoff. Dynamical downscaling of climate change projections from the HadCM3
GCM under the A2 emissions scenario for a humid, equatorial catchment in southwestern Uganda
for the period 2070–2100, relative to 1960–1990, indicates not only increases in precipitation
(14%) and modelled potential evapotranspiration (53%), but also substantial increases in rainfall
intensity. Application of mean monthly delta factors of climate change with the same daily rainfall
distribution as historical (baseline) conditions to the SMBM projects a 55% decrease in ground-
water recharge and an 86% rise in runoff. Transformation of the daily rainfall distribution to
account for projected changes in rainfall intensity substantially alters hydrological projections and
gives rise to increases in recharge (53%) and runoff (137%). Although our analysis is based on a
single emissions scenario for one dynamically downscaled GCM, we show that the common
approach of assessing climate change impacts on catchment hydrology using mean monthly delta
factors can seriously misrepresent the projected changes in hydrological fluxes. Explicit con-
sideration of changes in the daily distribution of precipitation in simulating climate change impacts
on hydrology is particularly important in the tropics where changes in rainfall intensities as a result
of global warming are expected to be especially pronounced.
REFERENCES
Arnell, N. W. (1999a) Climate change and global water resources. Global Environ. Change 9, S31–S49.
Arnell, N. W. (1999b) The effect of climate change on hydrological regimes in Europe a continental perspective. Global
Environ. Change 9, 5–23.
Arnell, N. W. (2003) Relative effects of multi decadal climate variability and changes in the mean and variability of climate due
to global warming: future streamflows in Britain. J. Hydrol. 270, 192–213.
Arnell, N. W. & Reynard, N. S. (1996) The effects of climate change due to global warming on river flows in Great Britain.
J. Hydrol. 183, 397–424.
Carmargo, A. P., Marin, F. R., Sentelhas, P. C. & Picini, A. G. (1999) Adjustment of Thornthwaite’s method to estimate the
potential evapotranspiration for arid and superhumid climates, based on daily temperature amplitude. Rev. Bras.
Agrometerol. 7, 251–257.
Crooks, S. M., Naden, P. S., Broadhurst, P. & Gannon, B. (1996) Modelling the flood response of large catchments, initial
estimates of the impacts of climate and landuse change. CEH Report to Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food,
Project FD 412. CEH Wallingford, UK.
Dagg, M. & Blackie, J. R. (1965) Studies of the effects of changes in land use on the hydrological cycle in East Africa by
means of experimental catchment areas. Bull. IASH X(4), 63–75 (available at: http://iahs.info/hsj/104/104011.pdf).
Döll, P. & Flörke, M. (2005) Global-scale estimation of diffuse groundwater recharge. Frankfurt Hydrology Paper 03, Institute
of Physical Geography, Frankfurt University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Dupriez, G. L. (1959) La cuve lysimétrique de Thornthwaite, comme instrument de mesure de l’évapotranspiration en régions
equatorials. In: Symposium of Hannoversch-Münden (8–14 September 1959), vol. II. Lysimeters, 84–98. IAHS Publ. 49.
IAHS Press, Wallingford, UK (available at: http://www.iahs.info/redbooks/049.htm).
Foster, S., Tuinhof, A. & Garduno, H. (2006) Groundwater development in sub-Saharan Africa. A strategic overview of key
issues and major needs. Sustainable groundwater management, lessons from practice, Case profile collection number 15.
World Bank, Washingto DC, USA.
Gleick, P. H. (1986) Methods for evaluating the regional hydrological impacts of global climatic changes. J. Hydrol. 88,
97–116.
Grindley, J. (1967) The estimation of soil moisture deficits. Meteorol. Mag. 96, 97–108.
Guo, N., Zhang, J. & Liang, Y. (2003) Climate change indicated by the recent change of inland lakes in Northwest China.
J. Glaciol. Geocryol. 25, 211–214.
Herrera-Pantoja, M. & Hiscock, K. M. (2008) The effects of climate change on potential groundwater recharge in Great Britain.
Hydrol. Processes 22, 73–86.
Howard, K. W. F. & Lloyd, J. W. (1979) The sensitivity of parameters in the Penman evaporation equations and direct recharge
balance. J. Hydrol. 41, 329–344.
Hulme, M., Doherty, R., Ngara, T., New, M. & Lister, D. (2001) African climate change: 1990–2100. Climate Res. 17,
145–168.
Hulme, M., Mitchel, J. F. B., Jenkins, J., Gregory, B. M., New, M. & Viner, D. (1999) Global climate scenarios for fast track
impact studies. Global Environ. Change 9, S3–S19.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2001) Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability.
Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(ed. by J. J. McCarthy, O. F. Canziani, N. A. Leary, D. J. Dokken & K. S. White). Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, UK.
IPCC (2007a) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment
Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ed. by S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen,
M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor & H. L. Miller). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Jones, R. G., Noguer, M., Hassell, D. C., Hudson, D., Wilson, S. S., Jenkins, G. J. & Mitchell, J. F. B. (2004) Generating high
resolution climate change scenarios using PRECIS. Met Office Halley Centre, Exeter, UK.
Joubert, P. D. & Hewitson, B. C. (1997) Simulating present and future climates of southern Africa using general circulation
models. Progr. Phys. Geogr. 21, 51–78.
Kamga, F. M. (2001) Impact of greenhouse gas induced climate change on the runoff of the upper Benue river (Cameroon).
J. Hydrol. 252, 145–156.
Kundzewicz, Z. W., Mata, L. J., Arnell, N., Döll, P., Kabat, P., Jiménez, B., Miller, K., Oki, T., Şen, Z. & Shiklomanov, I.
(2007) Freshwater resources and their management. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability.
Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(ed. by M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, C. E. Hanson & P. J. van der Linden). Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, UK.
Kundzewicz, Z. W., Mata, L. J., Arnell, N., Döll, P., Jiménez, B., Miller, K., Oki, T., Şen, Z. & Shiklomanov,I. (2008) The
implications of projected climate change for freshwater resources and their management. Hydrol. Sci. J. 53(1), 3–10.
Leander, R. & Buishand, T. A. (2007) Resampling of regional climate model output for the simulation of extreme rover flows.
J. Hydrol. 332, 487–496.
Legesse, D., Vallet-Coulomb, C. & Gasse, F. (2003) Hydrological response of a catchment to climate and land use changes in
tropical Africa: case study South Central Ethiopia. J. Hydrol. 275, 67–85.
Lerner, D. N., Issar, A. S. & Simmers, I. (1990) Groundwater Recharge, a Guide to Understanding and Estimating Natural
Recharge, 345. International Contributions to Hydrogeology, Heinz Heise Verlag, Germany.
Linderink, G., Buishand, T. A. & Van Deursen, W. (2007) Estimates of future discharges of the River Rhine using two scenario
methodologies: duet version delta approach. Hydrology Earth System Sci. 11, 1145–1159.
Messager, C., Gallée, H., Brasseur, O., Cappelaere, B., Peugeot, C., Séguis, L., Vauclin, M., Ramel, R., Grasseau, G., Léger, L.
& Girou, D. (2006) Influence of observed and RCM-simulated precipitation on the water discharge over the Sirba basin,
Burkina Faso/Niger. Clim. Dynam. 27(2-3), 199–214.
Mileham, L. J. (2008) The impact of climate change on a humid equatorial catchment in Uganda. Unpublished PhD Thesis,
University College London, London, UK.
Mileham, L. J., Taylor, R. G., Thompson, J., Todd, M. & Tindimugaya, C. (2008) Impact of rainfall distribution on the
parameterisation of a soil-moisture balance model of groundwater recharge in equatorial Africa. J. Hydrol. 359, 46–58.
Milly, P. C. D., Dunne, K. A. & Vecchia, A. V. (2005) Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a
changing climate. Nature 438(7066), 347–350.
MWLE (Ministry of Water, Lands and Environment, Uganda) (1996) Land-use/Vegetation Maps, Scale of 1:50 000.
MWLE (Ministry of Water, Lands and Environment, Uganda) (2006) Water Authorities Division Annual Inspection Report.
Unpublished Report, Directorate of Water Development, Uganda.
Penman, H. L. (1950) The water balance of the Stour catchment area. J. Inst. Water Engrs 4, 457–469.
Pereira, H. C. & Pruitt, W. O. (2004) Adaptation of the Thornthwaite scheme for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration.
Agric. Water Manage. 66, 251–257.
Pilling, C. & Jones, J. A. A. (1999) High resolution equilibrium and transient climate change scenario implications for British
runoff. Hydrol. Processes 13, 2877–2895.
Prudhomme, C., Reynard, N. & Crooks, S. (2002) Downscaling of global climate models for flood frequency analysis; where
are we now? Hydrol. Processes 16, 1137–1150.
Reynard, N. S., Prudhomme, C. & Crooks, S. M. (2001) The flood characteristics of large UK rivers: potential effects of
changing climate and land use. Climatic Change 48, 343–359.
Rushton, K. R., Eilers, V. H. M. & Carter, R. C. (2006) Improved soil moisture balance methodology for recharge estimation.
J. Hydrol. 318, 379–399.
Schreider, S. Y, Smith, D. I. & Jakerman, A. J. (2000) Climatic change impacts on urban flooding. Climatic Change 47,
91–115.
Shiklomanov, I. (2000) World water resources and water use, present assessment and outlook for 2025. In: World Water
Scenarios Analyses (ed. by F. R. Rijkeman), 160–203. Earthscan Publications, London, UK.
Tate, E., Sutcliffe, J. V., Conway, D. & Farquharson, F. (2004) Water balance of Lake Victoria: update to 2000 and climate
change modelling to 2100. Hydro.l Sci. J. 49(4), 563–574.
Taylor, R. G. & Howard, K. W. F. (1996) Groundwater recharge in the Victoria Nile basin of east Africa: support for the soil
moisture balance approach using stable isotope tracers and flow modelling. J. Hydrol. 180, 31–53.
Taylor, R. G. & Howard, K. W. F. (1998) Post Paleozoic evolution of weathered landscapes in Uganda by tectonically
controlled cycles of deep weathering and stripping. Geomorphology 25, 173–192.
Taylor, R. G. & Howard, K. W. F. (1999a) The influence of tectonic setting on the hydrological characteristics of deeply
weathered terrains: evidence from Uganda. J. Hydrol. 218, 44-71.
Taylor, R. G. & Howard, K. W. F. (1999b) Lithological evidence for the evolution of weathered mantles in Uganda by
tectonically controlled cycles of deep weathering and stripping. Catena 35, 65–94.
Taylor, R. G. & Howard, K. W. F. (2000) A techno-geomorphic setting in the hydrological characteristics of deeply weathered
crystalline rock from Uganda. Hydrogeol. J. 8, 279–294.
UN (United Nations) (2002) World Population Prospects: The 2002 Revision. United Nations, New York, USA.
Veevers, J. J. (1977) Rifted arch-basins and post-breakup rim basin on passive continental margins. Tectonophys. 41, T1–T5.
Vörösmarty, C. J., Douglas, E. M., Green, P. A. & Revenga, C. (2005) Geospatial indicators of emerging water stress: an
application to Africa. Ambio 34, 230–236.
Ward, R. C. (1971) Measuring evapotranspiration, a review. J. Hydrol. 13, 1–21.
Wit, M. & Stankiewicz, J. (2006) Changes in surface water across Africa with predicted climate change. Science 311,
1917–1921.